Kiley, Kevin [R-CA-3]
Republican · CA · 20 bills sponsored
Modern Worker Empowerment Act
# Modern Worker Empowerment Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Modern Worker Empowerment Act would establish a clearer legal definition for who qualifies as an independent contractor versus an employee under federal labor laws. Currently, courts use different tests to make this determination, which can be confusing. Under this bill, workers would be classified as independent contractors if two conditions are met: (1) they control how they do their work, not just the final result, and (2) they have the typical risks and rewards of running their own business, like professional judgment and discretion. The bill also lists factors that cannot be used to classify someone as an employee. **Who It Affects & Why It Matters:** This bill primarily affects gig economy workers (like rideshare and delivery drivers), freelancers, and other independent contractors—as well as the companies that hire them. The classification matters because employees are entitled to federal protections like minimum wage, overtime pay, and the right to organize unions, while independent contractors are not. Companies generally prefer contractor status (it costs less), while worker advocates worry stricter contractor definitions could deny protections to people who need them. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress and has not yet been voted on. It was introduced by Representative Kevin Kiley, a Republican from California.
Modern Worker Security Act
# Modern Worker Security Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Modern Worker Security Act (HR 1320) would modify federal labor and employee benefit laws, though the specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided. Based on its subject areas, the bill would likely address how employee benefits and pensions are structured or regulated, and could affect labor standards and worker protections in the United States. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact workers, employers, and the pension/benefits industry. Depending on its specific provisions, it could affect how companies offer health insurance, retirement plans, and other employee benefits, as well as workplace standards and protections. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1320 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-California) in the 119th Congress. To learn about the exact provisions and what changes would be made, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
To prohibit a State to impose a retroactive tax on assets of nonresident individuals.
# HR 7619: Prohibition on Retroactive Taxation of Nonresident Assets **What the bill would do:** This bill would prevent states from imposing retroactive taxes on assets owned by people who don't live in that state. In other words, if someone moves out of a state or sells property there, that state couldn't later tax them on those assets for years before the new tax law was passed. The bill aims to protect individuals from surprise tax bills for past transactions that weren't taxable under the rules that existed at the time. **Who it affects and why it matters:** The bill primarily affects nonresident individuals (people who live outside a particular state) and would limit states' ability to collect taxes from former residents or out-of-state property owners. This reflects concerns that some states have attempted to tax people retroactively for asset sales or transfers that occurred before new tax laws were enacted, potentially creating financial liability for people who had no way to anticipate the tax obligation. **Current status:** HR 7619 is currently in committee and has not yet advanced for a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA) in the 119th Congress.
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
# Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act (HR 3495) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would align labor rules and tax treatment for direct sellers (people who sell products like cosmetics or kitchen items directly to consumers) and real estate agents. Currently, these two groups operate under different regulatory frameworks despite having similar business models as independent contractors. The bill aims to create consistent standards across both industries regarding how they're classified, taxed, and regulated by the federal government. **Who It Affects** The legislation would directly impact direct sellers and real estate agents, who number in the millions nationwide. It could also affect the companies that employ or contract with these workers, as well as state and local governments that regulate these professions. Consumers purchasing products or real estate services could be indirectly affected depending on how the rules change. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. No major provisions have been publicly detailed beyond the general harmonization goal, so the specific changes being proposed are not yet clear.
Santini-Burton Modernization Act of 2026
# Santini-Burton Modernization Act of 2026 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modernize the Santini-Burton Act, a 1980 law that governs federal land management and transfers between California and Nevada. The proposed changes would update how the federal government handles land use, conservation, and transfers in these two states, reflecting contemporary land management practices and potentially adjusting the original agreement's terms. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts California and Nevada, affecting federal land management agencies, state governments, local communities in affected regions, and stakeholders involved in land conservation and use. Property owners, conservation organizations, and those dependent on federal lands for resources or recreation could be indirectly affected depending on specific provisions. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full congressional vote. At this stage, it remains under review and discussion within the relevant House committee before any further action could occur. *Note: The full text of HR 7255 would need to be reviewed for specific provisions regarding land transfers, conservation requirements, or other detailed policy changes.*
Housing Choice Voucher Fairness Act of 2025
# Housing Choice Voucher Fairness Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Housing Choice Voucher Fairness Act of 2025 (HR 7139) would modify how the federal Housing Choice Voucher program operates. The Housing Choice Voucher program is a federal assistance initiative that helps low-income families, elderly people, and people with disabilities afford rental housing by providing vouchers that subsidize rent payments. However, the bill's specific provisions are not publicly detailed in the available information, so the exact changes it would make are unclear. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. This early-stage status indicates the bill has not advanced significantly through the legislative process. **What We Don't Know:** Without access to the bill's text or detailed summary, it's unclear who would be affected most significantly—whether it would expand or restrict voucher eligibility, change payment amounts, affect landlords, or modify other program rules. To understand the specific impacts, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or await a detailed committee analysis.
Ensuring Safe and Ethical AI Development Through SAFE AI Research Grants
# Summary of HR 6402: SAFE AI Research Grants **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a federal grant program to fund research into safe and ethical artificial intelligence development. If passed, it would direct government funding toward academic institutions and research organizations studying how to make AI systems more secure, transparent, and aligned with human values. The program aims to support scientific work that helps prevent potential harms from AI while promoting responsible innovation in the field. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily benefit universities, research centers, and scientific organizations that conduct AI safety research. It would create a mechanism for distributing federal funds to projects focused on areas like AI transparency, bias detection, security measures, and ethical guidelines. By supporting this research early, proponents argue it helps ensure that AI development proceeds safely before these technologies become more widespread and powerful. **Current Status** HR 6402 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA) in the 119th Congress. Like most bills in committee, it would need committee approval and floor debate before members could vote on whether to pass it.
Mono Lake Kootzaduka’a Tribe Recognition Act
# Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe Recognition Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would grant federal recognition to the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe, a Native American group from California. Federal recognition is a significant legal status that officially acknowledges a tribe as a sovereign nation and entitles it to certain rights and protections under U.S. law. If passed, the tribe would become eligible for federal services, funding, and programs administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects members of the Mono Lake Kootzaduka'a Tribe and would also impact California state and federal agencies that deal with tribal affairs. Federally recognized tribes have sovereignty rights that can influence land use, resource management, and jurisdiction in their territories, so neighboring communities and local governments could potentially be affected as well. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 5820) is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Kevin Kiley, a Republican from California.
Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act of 2025
# Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act of 2025 (HR 5194) **What the Bill Would Do:** The Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act of 2025 proposes standards or requirements for the aesthetic design and maintenance of federal buildings and civic structures. While specific details aren't available in the summary provided, bills with this title typically aim to improve the visual appearance and architectural quality of government buildings that serve as public landmarks or offices. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect federal agencies responsible for building maintenance and construction, as well as the General Services Administration (GSA), which oversees most federal properties. The changes could indirectly impact the general public who interact with or view federal buildings in their communities. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5194 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't advanced to a full floor vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA). For more detailed information about specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary provided doesn't include those specifics.
To prohibit States from carrying out more than one Congressional redistricting after a decennial census and apportionment.
# Summary of HR 4889 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would prevent states from redrawing congressional district boundaries more than once following the U.S. Census that occurs every 10 years. Currently, some states can redraw districts multiple times between censuses, sometimes due to court orders or legislative changes. If passed, states would be locked into their post-census maps for the entire decade, with only one redistricting allowed after each new census count. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would impact state legislatures responsible for drawing congressional maps, federal courts that sometimes order redistricting, and ultimately voters whose district boundaries would be more fixed. It could affect the ability of parties to gain electoral advantages through mid-decade redistricting and could limit courts' power to correct maps found to be unconstitutional or unfairly drawn. **Current Status:** HR 4889 is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The bill was introduced by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) in the 119th Congress. No action has been taken to move it forward for a vote in the House of Representatives.
No Tax Dollars for Riots
# No Tax Dollars for Riots (HR 4232) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to prevent federal tax dollars from being used to settle legal claims or lawsuits related to riots or civil unrest. While the specific details aren't provided in the summary, the bill's title suggests it would restrict government funding for settlements or damages paid to individuals or organizations involved in riot-related incidents. **Who It Affects:** The bill would potentially affect anyone seeking federal compensation for damages or injuries related to riots, as well as state and local governments that might otherwise receive federal reimbursement for riot-related costs. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4232 remains in committee and has not advanced to a broader vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Kevin Kiley, a Republican from California. Without additional details on the bill's specific provisions, it's unclear whether it would apply to all riot-related incidents, specific types of compensation, or particular time periods.
Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2025
# Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would change the rules for what types of inventions can be patented. Currently, courts use a multi-step test to decide if something qualifies for a patent, which has become complicated and restrictive. The bill would simplify this by clearly stating what *cannot* be patented: naturally occurring things unchanged by humans (like unmodified genes), pure mathematical formulas without practical application, and mental processes done entirely in someone's head. Everything else would be eligible for patent protection, making it easier for inventors to patent software, biotech innovations, and other inventions that current law sometimes rejects. **Who It Affects:** This primarily impacts tech companies, biotech firms, software developers, and individual inventors who have struggled to patent their innovations under current rules. It could also affect patent lawyers, the patent office, and courts that handle patent disputes. Consumers might eventually see changes in innovation and product availability depending on how patent protections shift. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 3152) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Medicare Protection Act of 2025
# Medicare Protection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Medicare Protection Act of 2025 is legislation that has been introduced in the House of Representatives but hasn't yet been voted on. The bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the information available, so the exact changes it would make to Medicare aren't clear from this summary alone. To understand what protections or changes it proposes, you would need to review the full text of HR 3007. **Who It Affects:** If passed, this bill would affect Medicare—the federal health insurance program for people age 65 and older, as well as some younger people with disabilities or end-stage renal disease. Any changes would impact millions of beneficiaries and potentially healthcare providers who serve Medicare patients. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's being reviewed and discussed by House members before any floor vote takes place. At this stage, it has not advanced to a full vote by either chamber of Congress. *Note: For detailed information about the bill's specific proposals, you can review the full text on Congress.gov.*
Free Speech On Campus Act
# Free Speech On Campus Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Free Speech On Campus Act (HR 2634) aims to protect free speech rights at colleges and universities that receive federal funding. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided, bills with this title typically would require or incentivize institutions to maintain policies that safeguard students' and faculty members' rights to express diverse viewpoints without fear of censorship or retaliation. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact students, faculty, and staff at colleges and universities that accept federal funding (which includes most major institutions). It could also affect university administrators who would need to implement or revise free speech policies to comply with the law's requirements. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. As a result, it has not become law. The bill was sponsored by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-California).
To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to establish a conclusive presumption that a State concurs to certain activities, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 1874 **What the bill would do:** This bill would change how federal projects in coastal areas are approved by modifying the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Currently, states can review and approve (or object to) certain federal activities affecting their coastlines. The bill would create an automatic approval system—if a state doesn't respond within a set timeframe, the federal government could assume the state has approved the project and move forward without explicit state consent. **Who it affects:** The bill impacts states with coastal zones, the federal government, and industries conducting marine activities like offshore energy development or fishing. It could affect coastal communities and marine resources depending on which federal projects move forward under this streamlined approval process. **Current status:** HR 1874 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
SAFE HOME Act
# SAFE HOME Act Summary **What It Does:** The SAFE HOME Act would create a tax credit to help homeowners pay for wildfire-resistant improvements to their homes. If passed, homeowners could claim back 25% of the costs they spend on qualifying fire-safety upgrades (up to $25,000 in expenses, meaning a maximum $6,250 credit). The credit would be available through 2032 and would apply to upgrades like fire-resistant roofs, special vents, exterior materials, and defensible space clearing around homes. **Who It Affects:** The tax credit targets homeowners in areas prone to wildfires who want to make their properties more fire-resistant. However, it's limited to individuals earning less than $300,000 per year—those earning more gradually lose eligibility starting at $200,000 in income. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 948, sponsored by Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-CA), meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
National Human Trafficking Database Act
# National Human Trafficking Database Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The National Human Trafficking Database Act would create a centralized online database to collect information about human trafficking cases across the United States. The Department of Justice's Office for Victims of Crime would be responsible for maintaining this database, which would compile trafficking data reported by individual states. The bill would also provide federal grant funding to state law enforcement agencies to help them collect and submit this trafficking data to the national system. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects state and local law enforcement agencies, trafficking victims, and federal authorities working on human trafficking cases. By creating a unified national database, the bill aims to give policymakers and law enforcement better visibility into trafficking patterns and prevalence across different states. The federal grants would help cover the costs for states to participate in the system and ensure consistent data reporting. **Current Status** The bill (HR 863) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Freedom to Cooperate Act
# Freedom to Cooperate Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Freedom to Cooperate Act would require state and local governments to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts. Specifically, it would allow police and other local officials to share immigration status information with federal authorities and would prevent states from passing laws that restrict this cooperation. The bill also expands when federal immigration authorities can issue detainer requests (orders to hold someone) to include anyone arrested for any criminal or motor vehicle offense, not just serious crimes. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects state and local law enforcement agencies, immigration authorities at the federal level, and individuals arrested for crimes or traffic offenses. It would limit the ability of states and cities—particularly those with sanctuary policies—to restrict their employees from participating in federal immigration enforcement. **Key Provisions:** The bill prevents states from prohibiting their personnel from cooperating with immigration enforcement or inquiring about someone's immigration status. It also provides legal protection (immunity) for local officials who temporarily detain someone based on a federal immigration detainer. The expanded detainer authority would apply to any criminal or motor vehicle offense, broadening when federal authorities can request local custody. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House.
No Medicaid for Illegal Immigrants Act of 2025
# No Medicaid for Illegal Immigrants Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prevent state Medicaid programs from paying for healthcare services for undocumented immigrants, with one exception: emergency medical services would still be covered as they are under current law. Currently, states have some flexibility in determining Medicaid eligibility, and some states do provide coverage to undocumented immigrants. This bill would eliminate that option nationwide. **Who It Affects** The legislation would primarily affect undocumented immigrants who rely on Medicaid for non-emergency healthcare, and states that currently cover these populations. Healthcare providers, hospitals, and clinics that serve low-income patients would also be impacted, as would state budgets (since federal Medicaid funds would no longer cover these services in states that currently provide them). **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not been passed. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Kevin Kiley (R-CA). Like most bills, it would need to pass through committee review, floor votes in both the House and Senate, and presidential approval to become law.
To prohibit the use of Federal financial assistance for a certain high-speed rail development project in the State of California, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 213 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 213 would prevent California from receiving any federal funding for its high-speed rail project between Los Angeles and San Francisco. Specifically, it targets the rail corridor project covered under a federal funding agreement from 2010 that the Federal Railroad Administration terminated in 2019. If passed, the state could no longer access federal dollars for this particular project or any substantially similar version of it. **Who It Affects** This bill directly affects California's High-Speed Rail Authority and state residents who might use the proposed train system. It would also impact federal transportation funding decisions. The bill was introduced by Republican Representative Kevin Kiley from California. **Current Status** HR 213 is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The background indicates that the original federal funding agreement was already terminated by federal authorities in 2019, so this bill would formally codify the prohibition into law and prevent any future federal funding for the same project.