Sullivan, Dan [R-AK]
Republican · AK · 47 bills sponsored
FISH Act of 2025
# FISH Act of 2025 – Summary The FISH Act of 2025 is a Senate bill currently under review in committee that addresses fisheries management and related maritime issues. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, its broad subject areas indicate it covers marine resources, fisheries management, international fishing cooperation, seafood trade, and coastal conservation. The bill also appears to touch on government oversight of these areas and may include provisions related to technology use in fisheries and international trade negotiations. The legislation would primarily affect the fishing industry, seafood producers, coastal communities, and the Department of Commerce. It may also impact international trade relationships related to fish and seafood products, as well as how the U.S. coordinates with other nations on ocean resource management. **Current Status:** The bill is still in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Since it's in the early stages of the legislative process, it remains unclear what specific changes, if any, it will ultimately contain before any potential floor vote. --- *Note: A more detailed summary would require access to the bill's full text, which typically becomes available on Congress.gov.*
RURAL Rate Act
# RURAL Rate Act (S 3688) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The RURAL Rate Act is a bill introduced in the Senate that aims to address rates and costs affecting rural areas. However, specific details about the bill's provisions are not available in the information provided. Without access to the full text, the precise nature of what it would change—whether related to telecommunications, utilities, taxes, or other services—cannot be confirmed. **Who It Affects:** Based on the title, this bill is intended to benefit rural communities and residents who may face higher costs or unfavorable rate structures compared to urban areas. This could include farmers, small business owners, and residents of remote or sparsely populated regions. **Current Status:** As of the information provided, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. To learn more about specific provisions, next steps, or to voice support or opposition, you can check Congress.gov for the full bill text and current legislative updates.
Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act
# Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act Summary **What the bill does:** This law extends and updates programs that address marine debris—trash and pollution in the ocean—through 2029. It reauthorizes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Marine Debris Program and the Marine Debris Foundation, which work to identify, prevent, and clean up ocean debris that harms marine life, fishing, and navigation. The bill gives NOAA more flexibility in how it partners with other organizations and funds cleanup projects. **Who it affects:** The law benefits environmental organizations, fishing communities, coastal states, and indigenous groups working on ocean conservation. It also affects NOAA and partner organizations that receive funding or work with the government on marine debris initiatives. **Current status:** This bill has already been signed into law and is in effect.
Bycatch Reduction and Research Act of 2025
# Bycatch Reduction and Research Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would establish new requirements and funding for research and programs aimed at reducing "bycatch"—the unintended capture of non-target fish and marine animals in commercial fishing operations. The legislation would likely direct federal resources toward developing and implementing technologies and practices that help fishing vessels avoid catching unwanted species, which is a significant problem in commercial fisheries. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact commercial fishing industries, marine conservation efforts, and federal fisheries management agencies like NOAA. Environmental groups and coastal communities dependent on fishing would also be affected, as bycatch reduction can influence fishing practices and regulations. **Current Status** As of now, S. 3579 is in committee review (119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet moved forward for a full vote in the Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK), reflecting Alaska's significant fishing industry interests. --- *Note: Specific provisions and funding amounts were not available in the information provided. For detailed language, consult Congress.gov.*
ADS for Mental Health Services Act
# ADS for Mental Health Services Act (S 414) **What the Bill Does** The ADS for Mental Health Services Act would require digital platforms and social media companies to display mental health resources and support information in their advertising systems. Specifically, the bill aims to integrate mental health awareness materials into the digital advertising ecosystem, making it easier for people using these platforms to access information about mental health services and crisis resources. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects social media platforms, digital advertisers, and internet companies that serve ads to users. It would establish requirements for how mental health information is presented alongside or within digital advertisements. The legislation is designed to increase public awareness of mental health services and crisis hotlines by leveraging the advertising space where millions of people spend time online. Individuals struggling with mental health issues would potentially benefit from easier access to support resources. **Current Status** S 414 has passed the Senate as of the 119th Congress. The bill would need to pass the House of Representatives and receive the President's signature to become law.
LINC VA Act
# LINC VA Act Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of S 3303 (LINC VA Act) in my current knowledge base. To provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the full bill text. **What I can tell you:** - It's a Senate bill (S 3303) from the 119th Congress - Sponsored by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK) - Currently in committee (meaning it hasn't advanced to a floor vote yet) **To get accurate details, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "S 3303" for the full bill text and summary - Checking Senator Sullivan's official website for his description of the bill's purpose - Looking at committee records if it's assigned to a specific committee If you can share the bill's purpose or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in plain language.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision".
# Summary of SJRES 80 **What It Does** This bill cancels a 2022 management plan for Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve (a 23-million-acre area on Alaska's North Slope) and replaces it with an older 2020 plan. The 2022 plan had closed about 48% of the reserve to oil and gas drilling to protect wildlife and allow Alaska Native communities to continue traditional subsistence activities. By passing this resolution, Congress reversed those environmental protections and opened more of the reserve back up for potential oil and gas leasing. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Alaska's oil and gas industry (which gains access to previously protected lands), Alaska Native communities that rely on hunting and fishing in the region, and environmental groups concerned about wildlife protection. It also reflects a broader policy disagreement between Congress and the federal government over how to balance energy development with environmental conservation on public lands. **Current Status** The bill has already been signed into law, meaning it is now in effect. It was sponsored by Senator Dan Sullivan, a Republican from Alaska, and represents the use of congressional "disapproval" procedures that allow lawmakers to overturn federal agency regulations without going through the normal rulemaking process.
A bill to amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to provide that Alexander Creek, Incorporated, is recognized as a Village Corporation under that Act, and for other purposes.
# S 1468 Summary: Alexander Creek Village Corporation Recognition **What the Bill Does** This bill would officially recognize Alexander Creek, Incorporated as an Alaska Native village corporation under federal law. Currently, it operates as a group corporation. The bill requires the company to modify its state charter to become a village corporation and to negotiate a settlement agreement with the U.S. Department of the Interior regarding land claims and other claims against the federal government. The settlement must be completed within 13 months of the bill becoming law. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Alexander Creek, Incorporated and its members—Alaska Native shareholders who currently receive individual benefits as at-large shareholders of Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated. If passed, these shareholders would lose their individual benefits from the larger Cook Inlet corporation and would instead receive all future resource payments directly from Alexander Creek. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (S 1468, 119th Congress) and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK).
Measuring Availability of Providers (MAP) for Veterans Act
# Measuring Availability of Providers (MAP) for Veterans Act Summary **What the bill would do:** The MAP for Veterans Act would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to establish better systems for measuring and reporting the availability of healthcare providers in the VA network. Currently, the VA tracks provider availability, but this bill would standardize how that data is collected and made public, making it easier for veterans and policymakers to see where healthcare access gaps exist. **Who it affects:** This bill primarily affects veterans seeking healthcare through the VA system, VA administrators and staff, and policymakers involved in veterans' healthcare. By improving transparency about provider availability, the bill could help identify which regions have shortages of doctors, specialists, and other healthcare professionals. **Key provisions:** While specific details aren't provided, bills of this type typically require the VA to establish consistent metrics for measuring provider availability across different locations and specialties, report this information publicly, and potentially use the data to address gaps in care. This is part of broader efforts to improve the transparency and quality of veterans' healthcare services. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate.
Save Our Seas 2.0 Marine Debris Infrastructure Programs Reauthorization Act
# Save Our Seas 2.0 Marine Debris Infrastructure Programs Reauthorization Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill reauthorizes and expands federal programs designed to reduce marine debris—trash and pollution in oceans, rivers, and coastal areas. It extends funding and authority for existing initiatives that help remove garbage from waterways and prevent future pollution. The bill also supports infrastructure projects that help states and local communities clean up and manage marine debris more effectively. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily impacts coastal communities, state and local governments, environmental organizations, and fishing/shipping industries that deal with marine pollution. Key provisions likely include renewed funding for debris removal programs, grants to states for cleanup infrastructure, research initiatives to reduce ocean pollution, and coordination between federal agencies and local authorities. The bill addresses both the immediate cleanup of existing marine debris and longer-term prevention strategies. **Current Status** The bill has passed the Senate (S 3022 in the 119th Congress) and is sponsored by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK). It now moves to the House of Representatives for consideration before it could be sent to the President for signature into law.
VISIT USA Act
# VISIT USA Act Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed legislative text or provisions of S 3220 (VISIT USA Act) from the 119th Congress needed to provide you with an accurate summary. While I can see it's a Senate bill sponsored by Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska currently in committee, the document stub provided doesn't include the actual bill language, specific provisions, or policy details. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 3220" to view the full bill text and summary - Checking Senator Sullivan's official website for a bill description - Reviewing any press releases from the bill's sponsor If you can share the actual bill text or a more complete summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for a general audience.
Cold Weather Diesel Reliability Act of 2025
# Cold Weather Diesel Reliability Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Cold Weather Diesel Reliability Act of 2025 aims to address diesel fuel performance in extremely cold climates. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on establishing standards or regulations to ensure diesel fuel remains usable and reliable in frigid temperatures, where it can thicken and become unusable in engines. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact people and businesses in cold-weather states and regions—particularly Alaska, where the sponsor is from. This includes truckers, construction companies, farmers, the military, and residents who rely on diesel fuel for heating and transportation in winter months. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3135) is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced in the 119th Congress and remains under review. *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would require access to the full bill text, which wasn't provided here.*
Pay Our Military Act of 2025
# Pay Our Military Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill ensures that military members and Defense Department civilians continue receiving paychecks if the federal government shuts down in 2026. Specifically, it provides funding for active-duty military pay, reserve component pay, and salaries for civilian Defense Department employees and contractors who support military operations. The emergency funding would last until either Congress passes a full budget or January 1, 2027, whichever comes first. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts active-duty service members across all military branches, military reservists, National Guard members, and civilian Department of Defense employees. It also covers Coast Guard personnel and their supporting civilians (since the Coast Guard operates under the Department of Homeland Security during peacetime). **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) in the 119th Congress.
DOE and NASA Interagency Research Coordination Act
# DOE and NASA Interagency Research Coordination Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish a formal coordination mechanism between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to improve how these two agencies work together on research projects. Rather than operating independently, the agencies would be required to share information, align research priorities, and collaborate on areas where their work overlaps—potentially reducing duplication and making government research more efficient. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts federal researchers at DOE and NASA facilities, as well as universities and private companies that receive government research contracts from these agencies. Ultimately, American taxpayers benefit if the coordination reduces wasteful spending and accelerates scientific discoveries in areas like energy, space exploration, and advanced technology. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote. No hearing date or further action has been scheduled at this time.
Pay Our Military Act of 2025
# Pay Our Military Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill ensures that active-duty military members and certain Defense Department civilians continue receiving their paychecks during a government shutdown. It would provide funding for military salaries, allowances, and specific benefits—such as housing stipends, food allowances, clothing, and relocation costs—if Congress fails to pass a full budget for fiscal year 2026. The bill also covers benefits for surviving family members of military personnel and includes payments to Defense Department contractors supporting military operations. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects active-duty service members across all branches of the military (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Space Force, and Coast Guard), as well as reserve components. It also covers Department of Defense civilian employees and Coast Guard personnel who support military operations, plus military contractors and surviving spouses receiving benefits. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK) in the 119th Congress and is currently in the early stages—it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on or passed. This type of legislation is typically considered during budget negotiations when there is a risk of government shutdown.
Judicial Efficiency Improvement Act
# Judicial Efficiency Improvement Act (S 3020) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Judicial Efficiency Improvement Act aims to improve how the federal court system operates by streamlining procedures and processes. However, the specific details of what changes it proposes are not publicly available in the summary provided, as the bill's subject matter details have not been disclosed in standard legislative databases. **Who It Affects** If passed, this bill would impact the federal court system, potentially affecting judges, court staff, attorneys, and anyone involved in federal litigation. The changes could influence how quickly cases move through the courts and how efficiently judicial resources are used. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK). For specific details about what provisions the bill contains, you would need to consult the full text on Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office, as those details are not available in this summary.
Young Fishermen’s Development Extension Act
# Young Fishermen's Development Extension Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Young Fishermen's Development Extension Act (S 2357) would extend and support programs designed to help young people enter and succeed in the commercial fishing industry. The bill focuses on education, training, and workforce development opportunities for beginning fishermen, likely including apprenticeships, technical education, and other skill-building initiatives to help new generations learn fishing practices and business operations. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects young people interested in commercial fishing careers, fishing communities, and organizations that provide fishing education and training. By supporting vocational and technical education in the fishing sector, it aims to address workforce shortages in coastal fishing industries and help preserve fishing traditions and livelihoods. The specific provisions would extend existing programs—though the full details aren't specified in the available information. **Current Status** As of now, S 2357 remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), a state heavily dependent on fishing industries.
North Pacific Research Board Enhancement Act
# North Pacific Research Board Enhancement Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This legislation would make changes to the North Pacific Research Board, an organization that funds and oversees research on fisheries and marine ecosystems in waters around Alaska. The bill would add one new board seat specifically for an Alaska Native representative with experience in subsistence practices (using local resources for food and materials). It would also limit board members representing fishing interests and Alaska Natives to three-year terms, though they could be reappointed for one additional term. The bill also appears to adjust funding rules for the board's administrative expenses, though the summary is incomplete on those details. **Who It Affects:** The changes primarily affect Alaska—particularly Alaska Native communities and commercial fishing interests. The board's research influences how marine resources are managed in Alaskan waters, so these groups have a direct stake in its composition and decisions. **Current Status:** The bill (S. 190) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
ARTIST Act
# ARTIST Act Summary **What the bill does:** The ARTIST Act would prevent states from banning the sale and trade of marine mammal products—such as ivory, bone, and baleen—when these materials are legally harvested and crafted by Alaska Natives into traditional handicrafts and clothing. Currently, some states have broad restrictions on these products that can block Alaska Native artisans from selling their traditional goods across state lines. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily benefits Alaska Native communities and artisans who have historically harvested marine mammals like whales and walruses as part of their cultural traditions. It also affects consumers in other states who wish to purchase authentic Alaska Native crafts. Wildlife conservation groups have expressed concerns about the potential impact on marine mammal populations. **Current status:** The bill passed the Senate and is now pending consideration in the House. It represents a tension between protecting Alaska Native cultural practices and traditional harvesting rights versus enforcing wildlife protection laws that exist in other states.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
# Summary of SJRES 63 **What This Bill Does** This joint resolution would use a congressional disapproval process to reject a resource management plan created by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for central Yukon, Alaska. If passed, it would overturn the BLM's "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan." Congress can use this type of resolution to cancel federal agency rules under a process called the Congressional Review Act. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects land management and uses in Alaska's central Yukon region. The resolution targets how the BLM plans to manage federal lands in that area, which could influence activities like mining, oil and gas development, hunting, and conservation. As a Republican-sponsored measure from Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan, it suggests disagreement with how the BLM developed or implemented its resource management plan for the region. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. To become law, it would need to pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President (or Congress would need to override a presidential veto).
Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act of 2025
# Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act of 2025 – Summary **What the bill does:** This legislation extends federal funding and programs through 2030 to address harmful algal blooms (toxic algae buildup) and hypoxia (low oxygen conditions) in American waters—oceans, estuaries, and freshwater systems like lakes and rivers. These blooms can harm human health, kill fish and wildlife, damage the fishing industry, and make water unsafe. The bill requires the government to develop a comprehensive strategy every five years to prevent and manage these problems, and adds the Department of Energy to the federal task force overseeing these efforts. **Who it affects:** The bill impacts coastal communities, fishing industries, states with freshwater systems (particularly the Great Lakes region), and the general public who rely on safe water for recreation and food. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) will handle most of the day-to-day work monitoring and predicting blooms. **Current status:** The bill has already passed the Senate and is moving through the legislative process. It's a bipartisan effort focused on environmental monitoring and research rather than imposing new regulations on businesses or individuals.
PRO Veterans Act of 2025
# PRO Veterans Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** The PRO Veterans Act (S 423) has been signed into law. It makes two main changes to how the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates: First, it requires the VA to give Congress detailed budget updates every three months, including information about any money shortfalls and plans to fix them. Second, it prevents the VA from giving performance bonuses (called "critical skill incentives") to top-level employees at VA headquarters, even if those employees have rare or hard-to-find skills that would normally qualify them for such bonuses. **Who It Affects** This law primarily impacts the VA and Congress. Veterans and the general public are indirectly affected since it influences how VA resources are managed and how taxpayer money is spent on the agency. Senior executives at the VA's central office will no longer be eligible for certain bonus programs, potentially affecting recruitment and retention of high-level staff. **Current Status** The bill has already been signed into law, so it is now in effect. The law emphasizes congressional oversight of VA finances and aims to control executive compensation at the agency's highest levels.
REP VA Act
# REP VA Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Representing VA with Accuracy (REP VA) Act would require the Department of Veterans Affairs to standardize how it contacts veterans by phone. Specifically, all VA calls to veterans about benefits or services would need to come from a single, recognizable phone number with caller ID clearly identifying it as from the VA. Additionally, the bill mandates that the Veterans Health Administration maintain at least one call center in each U.S. time zone to handle questions about medical appointments and healthcare referrals. **Who It Affects and Why It Matters** This bill directly affects veterans who receive VA healthcare and benefits, as well as the VA itself. The goal is to reduce confusion and potential scams targeting veterans—a concern that arises because veterans may receive calls from multiple VA numbers, making it difficult to distinguish legitimate VA calls from fraudulent ones. By centralizing the phone number and ensuring adequate call center coverage across all time zones, the bill aims to improve access to VA services and protect veterans from phone fraud. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (S. 831, 119th Congress) and has not yet been voted on or passed.
Uyghur Genocide Accountability and Sanctions Act of 2025
# Uyghur Genocide Accountability and Sanctions Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would impose financial sanctions and other penalties on individuals and entities the U.S. government determines are responsible for human rights abuses against Uyghurs in China's Xinjiang region. If passed, the legislation would authorize the freezing of assets, travel bans, and trade restrictions against those deemed accountable. The bill aims to hold individuals and organizations financially liable for what supporters characterize as genocide or crimes against humanity. **Who It Affects** The primary targets would be Chinese government officials, security personnel, and companies involved in Xinjiang operations. Secondarily, it could affect U.S. and international businesses that conduct transactions with sanctioned entities. The bill could influence U.S.-China relations and trade policies. Uyghurs and human rights advocates view such measures as accountability mechanisms. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. It was introduced by Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK) in the 119th Congress. The bill has not yet become law.