Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]
Republican · SD · 32 bills sponsored
To allow members of federally recognized Tribes to use their Tribal government identification documents in obtaining a firearm from a federally licensed firearms dealer.
# HR 7698 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7698 would allow Native Americans who are members of federally recognized tribes to use their tribal government ID cards as acceptable identification when purchasing firearms from licensed gun dealers. Currently, federal law requires firearms purchasers to provide specific forms of identification—typically a state-issued driver's license or passport. This bill would expand the accepted forms of identification to include tribal government IDs, making it easier for tribal members in areas where obtaining state identification may be difficult or inconvenient. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects members of federally recognized Native American tribes who wish to purchase firearms legally. It would apply to transactions with federally licensed firearms dealers across the country. The legislation doesn't change who can or cannot buy guns—it only modifies the acceptable identification documents for an existing legal process. Gun dealers would still be required to conduct the same background checks and follow all other federal firearms regulations. **Current Status** HR 7698 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dusty Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota.
To ensure that Federal laws that enable Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies to access firearms apply equally to Tribal law enforcement agencies.
# HR 7699 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would ensure that Tribal law enforcement agencies have the same access to firearms through federal programs as Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies currently do. Essentially, it aims to remove any gaps or inconsistencies in federal firearms access laws so that Tribal police departments aren't left out of existing federal programs that help other law enforcement groups obtain weapons and equipment. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Tribal law enforcement agencies (police departments serving Native American reservations and tribal territories) and the communities they serve. It also relates to the federal government's management of firearms distribution programs. **Current Status** HR 7699 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-South Dakota).
Tribal Trust Land Homeownership Act of 2025
# Tribal Trust Land Homeownership Act of 2025 (HR 2130) — Summary ## What the Bill Does This bill aims to speed up the process for obtaining mortgages and leases on tribal trust lands (land held in trust by the federal government for Native American tribes and their members). Currently, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) can take a long time to approve or deny mortgage and lease applications. The bill would require the BIA to set strict deadlines: reviewing applications within 10 days of receipt and making final approval or denial decisions within 20-30 days, depending on the application type. It also requires the BIA to notify lenders when documents are received and to inform applicants if there are delays. ## Who It Affects This bill primarily affects Native Americans and tribal members who want to buy or lease homes or start businesses on tribal trust lands, as well as banks and lenders considering these mortgages. Tribes themselves would gain access to certain BIA records systems to better track land transactions. The bill also directs the Government Accountability Office to study how the BIA could better digitize its records. ## Current Status The bill was introduced in the House by Republican Representative Dusty Johnson of South Dakota and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
Kamisha’s Law
# Kamisha's Law Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7364 (Kamisha's Law) needed to provide you with an accurate summary of what the bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. Congressional bills often have limited publicly available information until they're formally introduced with detailed text. **To get this information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "HR 7364" for the full bill text and details - Checking Rep. Dusty Johnson's official website for a summary from his office - Looking at news coverage if the bill has received media attention If you can share the bill's text or provide more details about its purpose, I'd be happy to help summarize it in plain language!
Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act
# Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would authorize the federal government to conduct a feasibility study for a water supply project along the main channel of the Dakota rivers (likely the Missouri River mainstem in South Dakota). If passed, it would fund and direct relevant federal agencies to examine whether a large-scale water infrastructure project is technically and economically viable for the region. The study would assess engineering requirements, costs, environmental impacts, and benefits before any actual construction could move forward. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects South Dakota residents and communities, particularly those in rural areas that may face water supply challenges. It could also impact downstream states along the Missouri River and any stakeholders concerned with river management. Agricultural interests, municipalities needing water resources, and environmental groups monitoring river impacts would all have a stake in the project's outcome. **Current Status and Key Provisions** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not been enacted. The legislation simply authorizes a study rather than approving construction or committing substantial funding upfront. This is a preliminary step that would gather information to inform future policy decisions about regional water infrastructure needs.
Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act
# Lewis and Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act (HR 7287) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would authorize a feasibility study for expanding the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System, a water infrastructure project that currently serves parts of South Dakota, Iowa, and Minnesota. If passed, the bill would direct the government to examine whether and how the system could be expanded to serve additional communities in the region, likely focusing on areas currently lacking reliable access to clean water or experiencing water supply challenges. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects communities in South Dakota, Iowa, and Minnesota that either currently receive water from the Lewis and Clark system or could potentially benefit from expansion. Residents in rural or underserved areas would be the main beneficiaries, as improved water infrastructure typically increases access to reliable municipal water supplies. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-SD) in the 119th Congress. No further action has been taken on the bill at this time.
Western South Dakota Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act
# Western South Dakota Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 7288 would authorize a feasibility study for a water supply project in western South Dakota. If passed, the bill would direct the federal government to examine whether and how a new water infrastructure project could be developed to provide reliable water supplies to the region. Rather than building the project itself, this bill focuses on the planning stage—determining technical requirements, costs, environmental impacts, and engineering solutions. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects residents and communities in western South Dakota, where water availability is often limited. It could impact agriculture, ranching, municipal water systems, and local economies dependent on water access. The study would involve federal agencies and potentially state and local officials working together to assess the region's water needs. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7288 remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Dusty Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota.
Shutdown Fairness Act
# Shutdown Fairness Act (HR 7137) - Summary **What It Would Do** This bill, introduced by Representative Dusty Johnson of South Dakota, aims to address the financial impact of federal government shutdowns on federal employees. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided, bills with this title typically propose measures to ensure federal workers receive back pay or maintain benefits during shutdown periods—situations where Congress fails to pass funding legislation and government agencies temporarily close. **Who It Affects** The primary beneficiaries would be federal employees who lose pay or face financial hardship when shutdowns occur. Secondarily, it could affect government operations and budgeting procedures more broadly. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. No further action has been taken at this time. To get more detailed information about the specific provisions proposed, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act
# Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This law directs the federal government to transfer approximately 40 acres of land in South Dakota to the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. The land will be placed in "restricted fee" status, meaning the tribes own it but cannot sell or lease it without federal approval. The site will be preserved as a memorial and sacred place commemorating the Wounded Knee Massacre, a historical tragedy that occurred in 1890. Commercial development and gambling operations are prohibited on the land. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiaries are the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, who gain ownership and control of the land for memorial and spiritual purposes. The bill honors Native American history and provides these tribes with a sacred site to preserve their cultural heritage. **Current Status:** The bill has been signed into law, meaning it is now official legislation. It was sponsored by Representative Dusty Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota, and received bipartisan support.
Federal Maritime Commission Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Federal Maritime Commission Reauthorization Act of 2025 Summary **What the bill does:** This legislation extends funding and authority for the Federal Maritime Commission (the federal agency that oversees ocean shipping) through 2029. It also gives the agency new powers to crack down on unfair competition in international shipping. Specifically, it expands which shipping companies the government can more closely monitor—now including carriers connected to non-market economy countries (like China) or countries flagged by U.S. trade officials. The bill also requires the Commission to investigate complaints about anticompetitive practices by shipping platforms (digital services that help businesses book cargo transport). **Who it affects:** This primarily impacts shipping companies, international cargo carriers, and U.S. businesses that import and export goods overseas. By increasing oversight of carriers linked to certain foreign countries, the bill could influence shipping costs and availability for American importers and exporters. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and now heads to the Senate for consideration. No partisan opposition was noted in the sponsorship.
ePermit Act
# ePermit Act Summary **What it does:** The ePermit Act would modernize how the federal government handles environmental reviews by digitizing the process. It requires the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to create standardized digital formats for collecting environmental data and build tools to streamline reviews. Federal agencies would then be required to adopt these standards and share data electronically with each other, rather than using separate paper-based or disconnected systems. **Who it affects:** This primarily impacts federal agencies that conduct environmental reviews (like the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, and others), project developers seeking environmental permits, and potentially the general public by potentially speeding up the permit process. Businesses applying for permits for infrastructure, energy, or construction projects could see faster approval timelines. **Key provisions:** The bill mandates data standardization across agencies, creation of prototype review tools, publication of guidance for implementation, and development of a unified digital system where agencies can automatically share relevant data. It also includes requirements for computer security and identity protection as agencies handle sensitive environmental information online. **Status:** The bill passed the House and is awaiting Senate action.
Securing Infrastructure from Adversaries Act of 2025
# Securing Infrastructure from Adversaries Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Securing Infrastructure from Adversaries Act of 2025 (HR 4802) aims to protect U.S. infrastructure from threats posed by foreign adversaries. Based on its title, the bill would likely establish or strengthen safeguards to prevent hostile foreign entities from compromising critical infrastructure systems—such as power grids, water systems, telecommunications networks, or transportation systems. However, specific details about the bill's exact provisions are not publicly available yet. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would impact infrastructure operators and owners (both public and private entities), federal agencies responsible for infrastructure security, and potentially technology companies involved in infrastructure systems. Businesses that manage critical infrastructure may face new compliance requirements, while the general public could benefit from enhanced security protections. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote in the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-SD). Since specific legislative language or details aren't yet available in public summaries, the exact provisions remain unclear.
Agricultural Cooperative Energy Savings Act of 2025
# Agricultural Cooperative Energy Savings Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Agricultural Cooperative Energy Savings Act of 2025 aims to help agricultural cooperatives—organizations owned and controlled by farmers—reduce their energy costs. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it would create mechanisms or incentives for these cooperatives to achieve energy savings, likely through improved efficiency, renewable energy adoption, or reduced utility expenses. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be agricultural cooperatives and their farmer-members across the country. These cooperatives pool resources to purchase supplies, equipment, and services. Lower energy costs for cooperatives could translate to reduced operating expenses and potentially lower costs for member farmers. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee review (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Sponsor Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) introduced the legislation, which focuses on the agricultural sector in his home state of South Dakota. *Note: Complete legislative details weren't available, so this summary is based on the bill's title and basic information. For specific provisions, consult Congress.gov or official legislative summaries.*
Beef Origin Labeling Accountability Act
# Beef Origin Labeling Accountability Act – Summary **What It Does:** This bill would direct the U.S. Trade Representative's office to find a way to bring back mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) for beef sold in American stores. COOL requires grocery stores and supermarkets to tell customers where their beef comes from. The bill also asks the Trade Representative to work with Canada and Mexico to resolve previous trade disputes over beef labeling rules. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects U.S. beef producers, retailers (grocery stores and warehouses), and consumers. Domestic beef producers generally support country-of-origin labeling because it helps distinguish American beef from imported beef. Canada and Mexico have opposed similar labeling requirements in the past, arguing they violate free trade agreements. **Key Details:** The Trade Representative must submit a report to Congress explaining what progress has been made and recommending any new laws needed. The government must ensure any new labeling system complies with World Trade Organization rules—the previous COOL law was challenged internationally and ultimately repealed in 2015 due to trade concerns. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not been voted on by Congress.
Shutdown Fairness Act
# Shutdown Fairness Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Shutdown Fairness Act would require the federal government to pay certain employees during a government shutdown. Currently, federal employees deemed "essential" or "excepted"—those required to work when the government shuts down—are not paid until the shutdown ends. This bill would change that by providing immediate funding to pay these workers their regular salaries, benefits, and allowances during any shutdown period. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects federal employees who must continue working during shutdowns (like air traffic controllers, border patrol agents, and federal law enforcement). It also extends to certain contractors who support federal operations and active-duty military members during shutdowns. Federal agencies would use the appropriated funds to pay these workers without waiting for Congress to resolve the budget dispute that caused the shutdown. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-South Dakota) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been brought to a floor vote. The bill aims to address a longstanding issue where essential workers face financial hardship during shutdowns despite being required to work.
Eliminate Shutdowns Act
# Eliminate Shutdowns Act (HR 5552) – Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does** The Eliminate Shutdowns Act would automatically prevent government shutdowns by creating a "safety net" funding mechanism. If Congress fails to pass regular budget bills before the new fiscal year begins, this bill would allow federal agencies and programs to continue operating at the same spending level as the previous year. Instead of shutting down when funding lapses, the government would keep running on autopilot using last year's budget until Congress passes new appropriations bills. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would affect all federal agencies, employees, and programs that depend on annual budget appropriations. By removing the possibility of a shutdown, it could protect federal workers from furloughs and ensure that funded programs continue without interruption. The main provision is straightforward: continue operations at the prior year's funding level if new appropriations aren't ready on time. This approach assumes that last year's spending levels are appropriate until Congress acts on new budgets. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-SD).
Balanced Agricultural Support and Efficiency Act
# Balanced Agricultural Support and Efficiency Act (HR 5551) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** Unfortunately, the bill summary provided contains limited details about the specific provisions of HR 5551. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to address agricultural support programs and improve their efficiency, but the exact proposals are not included in the information available. To understand what changes it would actually make to farm policy, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov. **Who It Affects & Current Status:** This bill would primarily affect U.S. farmers and agricultural programs, though the precise impact depends on its specific provisions. The bill was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-South Dakota) and is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. At this stage, it's still in the early legislative process. **To Learn More:** For detailed information about the bill's specific provisions, amendments, and language, visit Congress.gov and search for HR 5551. This will provide the full text and track any updates as the bill moves through the legislative process.
FASTER Act
# FASTER Act (HR 4679) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill beyond what you've provided. To give you an accurate plain-language summary, I would need information about what the bill actually proposes—such as its stated purpose, key provisions, and which agencies or groups it would affect. **What I can tell you:** - **Status:** The bill is currently in committee (hasn't been voted on by the full House yet) - **Sponsor:** Rep. Dusty Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota - **Congress:** 119th (current Congress as of 2025) **To get a complete summary, I'd recommend:** 1. Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 4679" for the full bill text and official summary 2. Checking Rep. Johnson's official website for his statement on the bill's purpose 3. Looking at news coverage from South Dakota or national outlets covering this bill If you can share the bill's stated purpose or key provisions, I'd be happy to explain them in plain language.
To encourage States to participate with the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council's online dashboard for certain covered projects.
# HR 4135 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 4135 would encourage states to participate in an online dashboard system managed by the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council. This dashboard tracks and manages permits for major infrastructure projects that require federal approval—such as energy facilities, transportation projects, and other large developments. The bill aims to improve coordination between federal and state governments by getting states to voluntarily use this shared tracking system. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects state governments and developers working on large infrastructure projects. By encouraging states to join the dashboard system, the goal would be to streamline the permitting process, reduce delays, and improve communication between state and federal agencies. The specific mechanisms for "encouragement" aren't detailed in this summary, but such bills typically use incentives rather than mandates to promote participation. **Current Status** HR 4135 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Highway Funding Flexibility Act of 2025
# Highway Funding Flexibility Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Highway Funding Flexibility Act of 2025 (HR 3972) would modify how states can use federal highway funding. Rather than restricting transportation money to specific road projects, the bill would give states greater flexibility in deciding how to spend their federal highway allocations. This allows states to potentially redirect funds toward different transportation priorities based on their local needs. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects state transportation departments, local governments, and communities that rely on federal highway funding. It could also impact federal infrastructure planning by shifting more decision-making authority from the federal government to individual states. The changes would influence which transportation projects get built or funded across the country. **Current Status:** HR 3972 was introduced by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-SD) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced to a vote at this stage of the legislative process. *Note: Specific funding amounts, detailed provisions, and implementation mechanisms were not available in the basic bill information provided.*
To prohibit the participation of males in athletic programs or activities at the military service academies that are designated for women or girls.
# HR 3917 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3917 would prohibit male students from participating in athletic programs and activities designated for women and girls at the military service academies (including West Point, Annapolis, and the Air Force Academy). The bill aims to restrict athletic participation to females only in women's sports at these institutions. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects current and future cadets and midshipmen at the U.S. military service academies. It also impacts the athletic departments and leadership at these institutions who oversee sports programs. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) in the 119th Congress. No further action has been taken at this time.
Interactive Federal Review Act
# Interactive Federal Review Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill would modernize how the government reviews environmental impacts of highway projects that receive federal funding. It directs the Department of Transportation to encourage the use of digital tools—specifically interactive online platforms and 3D digital models (called "digital twins")—to help analyze environmental effects and get community input on highway projects. The DOT would also need to test these digital tools on at least 10 highway projects and create guidelines for other communities to follow. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects state and local governments that build highways with federal money, as well as the communities where these projects are planned. By making environmental reviews more visual and interactive through digital platforms, the bill could make it easier for the public to understand and provide feedback on proposed highway projects. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 3634) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dusty Johnson (R-South Dakota) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
TEENS Act
# TEENS Act (HR 3545) - Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of this bill in my current knowledge base. To provide you with an accurate summary of what the TEENS Act would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the bill's full text or legislative details. **What I can tell you:** - The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a floor vote yet - It was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-South Dakota) - It's in the 119th Congress **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 3545" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill's summary section for legislative intent - Reading the sponsor's official statement about the bill's purpose If you can share the bill's actual text or provisions with me, I'd be happy to summarize it in plain language for you.
Healthy Dog Importation Act
# Healthy Dog Importation Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Healthy Dog Importation Act (HR 3349) would establish new federal regulations governing the importation of dogs into the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to set health and safety standards for imported dogs, including requirements for vaccinations, disease testing, and veterinary certificates to prevent the introduction of rabies and other diseases into the U.S. dog population. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact dog breeders and sellers who import dogs from other countries, as well as American consumers who purchase imported dogs. It could also affect the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Customs and Border Protection, which would enforce the new requirements. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-SD) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. For more specific details about the bill's exact provisions, you would need to consult the full text on Congress.gov.