Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]
Republican · WV · 19 bills sponsored
National Strategy for School Security Act of 2025
# National Strategy for School Security Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This proposed legislation would direct the federal government to develop and implement a comprehensive national strategy focused on improving security measures in schools across the United States. Rather than imposing specific requirements, the bill would establish a coordinated federal approach to school safety that could include recommendations, guidelines, and resources for states and local school districts to implement. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect public and private K-12 schools, school administrators, and state/local education officials who would use the strategy to guide their security planning. It could also impact families with school-age children and security professionals working in educational settings. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3472) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) during the 119th Congress. Since it remains in the early stages of the legislative process, significant changes could still be made before any vote occurs.
STEWARD Act of 2025
# STEWARD Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary The STEWARD Act (Strategies To Eliminate Waste and Accelerate Recycling Development Act) aims to improve recycling and composting across the United States. If passed, the bill would direct the EPA to create a grant program that gives money to states, local governments, tribal nations, and public-private partnerships to expand recycling access—with special focus on underserved communities that currently have limited recycling options. The bill also requires the EPA to systematically collect data about recycling and composting infrastructure nationwide, create an inventory of recycling facilities every three to four years, and develop a measurement system to track how much recyclable material ends up in regular trash. **Who it affects:** Primarily state and local governments, Indian tribes, recycling facilities, and communities—especially rural and underserved areas that may lack adequate recycling infrastructure. The bill also impacts the EPA, which takes on new administrative and data-collection responsibilities. **Current status:** The bill has passed the Senate and is now awaiting consideration in the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and represents a bipartisan focus on environmental infrastructure and waste reduction.
NOPAIN for Veterans Act
# NOPAIN for Veterans Act Summary The NOPAIN for Veterans Act (S. 3209) is a bill currently under consideration in the Senate that aims to improve pain management options for veterans. While specific details about the bill's provisions are limited in the available information, the bill's title suggests it focuses on expanding or improving pain treatment access for military veterans—a significant population that often deals with chronic pain from service-related injuries and conditions. The bill primarily affects veterans and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which provides healthcare to this population. If passed, it would likely modify VA policies or funding related to pain management treatments and therapies. The bill was sponsored by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. For more detailed information about specific provisions—such as which pain management treatments it would authorize or fund—you would need to review the full bill text from Congress.gov or other official legislative sources.
A joint resolution requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period beginning on December 31, 2025, and ending on January 5, 2026.
# Summary of SJRES 96 **What the Bill Would Do** This joint resolution asks the Secretary of the Interior to allow special, temporary displays on the National Mall and around the Washington Monument between December 31, 2025, and January 5, 2026. The bill is requesting a one-time exception to normal rules governing these federally protected spaces to permit displays during this specific week-long period. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect whoever plans to use the National Mall and Washington Monument area during New Year's week 2025-2026, as well as the Department of the Interior, which manages these iconic public spaces. The resolution is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV). **Key Point** While the bill's exact purpose isn't specified in the available details, joint resolutions of this type typically address specific events or commemorations. Without additional information, the precise nature of the proposed displays is unclear, though the timing suggests it could be related to New Year's celebrations or a specific commemoration planned for that period.
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
# Summary of S 2587: Labor, Health, and Education Appropriations Bill **What It Does:** This bill would allocate federal funding for fiscal year 2026 to three major departments: Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and Education, plus related agencies. It's a routine annual spending bill that determines how much money these departments receive to operate their various programs and services. **Who It Affects:** This bill impacts millions of Americans, including workers, job seekers, students, patients, and people receiving benefits. It funds agencies that handle everything from workplace safety inspections and unemployment benefits to disease prevention, medical research, and public education funding. **Key Provisions:** The bill provides funding for numerous programs under these departments, including the Department of Labor's divisions handling job training, veterans' employment, workplace safety (OSHA), wage enforcement, and worker compensation; HHS programs like disease prevention and health resources; and Education Department initiatives. The specific funding amounts for each agency aren't detailed in the available summary. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. These appropriations bills are standard annual legislation, though their passage timelines can vary depending on Congressional schedules and negotiations.
A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for State-based maternal mortality review committees, to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to disseminate best practices on maternal mortality prevention to hospitals, State-based professional societies, and perinatal quality collaboratives, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 2621: Maternal Mortality Review Committees Bill **What the Bill Does** This bill would renew federal funding and support for state-based committees that review and investigate maternal deaths. It would also direct the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to collect and share best practices for preventing maternal deaths with hospitals, medical societies, and quality improvement organizations. The goal is to help reduce the number of pregnant women and new mothers who die from pregnancy-related complications. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects pregnant women and new mothers, along with healthcare providers, hospitals, and state health departments. By establishing these review committees and sharing proven prevention strategies, the legislation aims to identify what causes maternal deaths and help medical facilities implement effective safety measures. The bill focuses on learning from past cases to prevent future tragedies. **Current Status** Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) introduced this bill in the 119th Congress. As of now, it remains in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill is still in the early stages of the legislative process.
Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025
# Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill does:** This legislation requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create a formal vetting process for organizations applying for federal broadband funding. Before receiving money to build internet infrastructure in underserved areas, applicants would need to prove they have the technical skills, financial resources, and operational experience to complete projects. They would also need to submit a realistic business plan and demonstrate compliance with previous government broadband funding programs. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts rural communities and high-cost areas seeking broadband access, as well as the telecommunications companies, cooperatives, and other organizations that apply for federal funding to build these networks. It also affects the FCC, which would need to establish and oversee the new vetting standards. **Current status:** The bill passed the Senate and is under consideration in the House of Representatives. The intent appears to be ensuring that federal broadband funding goes to capable, reliable organizations that can successfully deliver internet service to rural Americans, though supporters and critics may differ on whether the vetting requirements will help or hinder broadband expansion efforts.
PEAKS Act
# PEAKS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of S. 1960 (the PEAKS Act) from the 119th Congress in my current information. To provide you with an accurate, factual summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the actual bill text. **I'd recommend checking these reliable sources:** - Congress.gov (congress.gov) - Search for "S 1960" to view the full bill text, sponsor information, and amendments - Your representative's or Senator Capito's official website for a statement on the bill's purpose - The bill's summary section on Congress.gov, which provides plain-language overviews If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in accessible language for a general audience.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration relating to "Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Fuel System Integrity of Hydrogen Vehicles; Compressed Hydrogen Storage System Integrity; Incorporation by Reference".
# Congressional Bill Summary: SJRES 55 **What the Bill Does** This joint resolution would overturn a safety rule created by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) regarding hydrogen-powered vehicles. Specifically, it targets regulations about fuel system integrity and compressed hydrogen storage systems in these vehicles. If passed, the rule would be canceled, meaning the safety standards for hydrogen vehicle fuel systems would not go into effect as written by the agency. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill primarily affects automobile manufacturers developing hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and potentially consumers who would drive them. The resolution has already passed the Senate and is a form of "congressional disapproval," which is a legislative tool that allows Congress to reject federal agency rules. The bill's sponsor is Senator Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican from West Virginia. **Key Context** The measure uses a special congressional process (called the Congressional Review Act) that allows lawmakers to overturn regulatory decisions made by executive agencies. Supporters of the disapproval argue the regulations are problematic or unnecessary, while opponents would likely contend the safety standards are important as hydrogen vehicle technology develops. The bill's fate now depends on House action and the President's position.
Second Chance Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Second Chance Reauthorization Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Does** The Second Chance Reauthorization Act of 2025 is a proposed law that would reauthorize and update the Second Chance Act, a federal program created to help formerly incarcerated individuals successfully reenter society. The bill would extend funding and potentially modify provisions for programs that provide job training, housing assistance, mentoring, and other support services to people released from prison or jail. By reauthorizing the program, Congress would continue federal support for these reentry initiatives for an additional period. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects formerly incarcerated individuals seeking to rebuild their lives after release, as well as nonprofit organizations, community groups, and state agencies that provide reentry services. It also affects taxpayers, as it would allocate federal funding to support these programs. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 1843 in the Senate), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican from West Virginia. For the bill to become law, it would need to pass out of committee, receive approval from the full Senate, pass the House, and be signed by the President.
A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for certain cognitive impairment detection in the Medicare annual wellness visit and initial preventative physical examination.
# Bill Summary: S 1799 – Cognitive Impairment Detection in Medicare **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modify Medicare's annual wellness visits and initial preventative physical exams to include screening for cognitive impairment (memory loss and mental decline). Essentially, it would make cognitive assessment a standard part of these routine check-ups for Medicare beneficiaries, potentially helping detect early signs of conditions like Alzheimer's disease or dementia. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Medicare beneficiaries (generally people 65 and older), their healthcare providers, and Medicare itself. It could influence how primary care doctors conduct preventative visits and may lead to earlier detection of cognitive issues in older adults. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No further action has been taken at this time.
Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2025
# Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow Medicare and Medicaid to cover and pay for prescription digital therapeutics—software applications designed to help prevent, manage, or treat medical conditions. Currently, these digital health tools may not be consistently covered by these government insurance programs. The bill requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to create a payment system for manufacturers, taking into account factors like how long patients use the software. Manufacturers would also have to report information about coverage from private insurance companies, with financial penalties for non-compliance. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries who could gain access to digital therapy tools, manufacturers of these applications, and potentially private insurance companies. Patients with chronic conditions or mental health issues could benefit if their digital treatments become covered by government insurance. Manufacturers would need to navigate new reporting requirements and payment structures. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the Senate and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by either chamber of Congress. It would need to pass both the Senate and House before being sent to the President for approval.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
# Summary of SJRES 45 **What It Would Do:** This resolution would cancel an EPA decision from January 2025 that allowed California to set its own vehicle emission standards under the "Advanced Clean Cars II" program. Essentially, it would undo the EPA's approval of California's request for a waiver that permits the state to enforce stricter pollution controls on cars and trucks than federal standards allow. If passed, California would no longer be able to implement these stricter emissions rules. **Who It Affects:** The resolution primarily affects California, which would lose the ability to enforce its stricter vehicle emission standards. It also impacts automakers, who would face different regulations if California can't enforce ACC II rules, and consumers in California, since vehicle emissions policies influence available car options and pricing. The resolution reflects a broader disagreement over whether states like California should be allowed to set environmental rules stricter than federal minimums. **Key Details:** The bill uses a congressional tool called the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to overturn federal regulations with a joint resolution. California's Advanced Clean Cars II program includes requirements for electric vehicles and emissions reductions. The resolution was introduced by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and is currently in committee. The outcome depends on support in both the House and Senate, plus the President's approval or veto.
Credit for Caring Act of 2025
# Credit for Caring Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Credit for Caring Act of 2025 would create a new tax credit for individuals who provide unpaid care to family members or loved ones. While specific details aren't publicly available yet, bills with this title typically aim to offer financial relief (through reduced taxes) to people who take on caregiving responsibilities—such as caring for aging parents, disabled relatives, or chronically ill family members—without receiving payment for that work. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily benefit unpaid caregivers across the United States, potentially helping offset some of their financial burden. It was introduced by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not yet become law.
Increasing Access to Quality Cardiac Rehabilitation Care Act of 2025
# Summary: Increasing Access to Quality Cardiac Rehabilitation Care Act of 2025 **What the bill would do:** This legislation would expand Medicare coverage for cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation programs by allowing more types of healthcare providers to deliver these services. Currently, these rehabilitation programs may be limited in where and by whom they can be provided. The bill would permit physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and clinical nurse specialists to run these programs in their own offices, create treatment plans, and prescribe exercise routines for patients—roles traditionally restricted to physicians. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts Medicare beneficiaries (people 65 and older, plus some younger disabled individuals) who need heart or lung rehabilitation after cardiac events or procedures. It also affects these healthcare providers by expanding their scope of practice, and potentially healthcare facilities that offer rehabilitation services. The broader goal is to make rehabilitation programs more accessible, especially in areas where cardiologists or specialized rehabilitation centers may be scarce. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Shelley Moore Capito, a West Virginia Republican.
Rural Historic Tax Credit Improvement Act
# Rural Historic Tax Credit Improvement Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Rural Historic Tax Credit Improvement Act would modify the federal tax credit system that currently helps property owners restore and preserve historic buildings. Specifically, it aims to make this existing tax credit more accessible and beneficial for rural communities. Tax credits are dollar-for-dollar reductions in what people owe in federal taxes, so improving this credit would give property owners greater financial incentives to rehabilitate old historic structures in rural areas. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily benefit rural property owners, developers, and preservation organizations working on historic building restoration projects outside urban centers. It could also indirectly support rural economies by encouraging investment in older buildings and supporting related construction jobs and local businesses. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 631) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the Senate but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV). No additional details about specific provisions are currently available in the bill summary.
AIMM Act
# AIMM Act (S. 559) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of the AIMM Act (S. 559) from the 119th Congress in my training data. To provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need additional information about its actual content. **To get reliable information about this bill, I recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "S. 559" to read the full text and official summary - Checking Senator Shelley Moore Capito's official website for her description of the legislation - Looking at recent news coverage that may explain the bill's purpose and provisions If you can share the bill's title expansion or key provisions, I'd be happy to help you understand and summarize it in plain language.
Brownfields Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Brownfields Reauthorization Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would extend and update the federal Brownfields Program through 2030. Brownfields are abandoned or underused properties contaminated with hazardous substances. The EPA currently provides grants and technical help to clean up these sites so they can be redeveloped. The bill would make several changes to this program: it expands eligibility to include nonprofit organizations like chambers of commerce; increases the maximum grant per site from an unspecified amount to $1 million; removes a 5% cap on administrative costs for grant recipients; and reduces the cost-sharing requirements (meaning recipients would need to contribute less of their own money). **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects states, local communities, Native American tribes, and nonprofit organizations that work on environmental cleanup projects. It also benefits property owners and developers who want to reuse contaminated land, and communities hoping to revitalize abandoned industrial or commercial sites. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill addresses environmental contamination, rural development, and Native American land issues.
Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025
# Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill would block the United States from sending money to the United Nations for aid programs in Afghanistan unless the State Department certifies that U.S. funds aren't being delivered as cash shipments to Afghanistan and that terrorist organizations aren't benefiting from those payments. If the State Department later discovers its certification was wrong, it must revoke it and inform Congress. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts U.S. foreign aid policy toward Afghanistan and UN operations there. It could affect humanitarian assistance programs in Afghanistan, UN staff working in the country, and potentially Afghan civilians who depend on international aid—while aiming to prevent funds from reaching terrorist groups. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken beyond its initial introduction.