Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2]
Republican · KS · 10 bills sponsored
To amend section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, to require emergency disclosure of location information to law enforcement or public safety answering point.
# HR 7752 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require telecommunications companies and technology providers to share customer location information with law enforcement and emergency services (911 centers) during emergencies. Currently, companies can voluntarily share this data but are not legally required to do so. The bill would amend federal law to make location data disclosure mandatory in emergency situations, potentially helping first responders locate people faster during 911 calls and crisis situations. **Who It Affects** The bill impacts phone companies, internet service providers, and tech companies that collect location data, as well as law enforcement agencies and 911 emergency centers that respond to emergencies. It would also affect regular people using cell phones and connected devices, as their location information could be accessed by authorities during emergency calls. **Current Status** HR 7752 was introduced by Representative Derek Schmidt (R-Kansas) in the 119th Congress and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not advanced further at this time.
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the performance of certain Department of Homeland Security counsel functions by State officers and employees, and for other purposes.
# HR 7664 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow state government employees to perform certain legal functions that are currently handled by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Specifically, it would enable states to take on some of the counsel or legal advisory work related to immigration matters that DHS attorneys typically handle. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect state governments, DHS, and individuals involved in immigration proceedings. It could change how immigration cases are processed by shifting some legal responsibilities from federal to state officials. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Derek Schmidt (R-KS) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill's specific provisions and details are not publicly available in standard summaries, so the exact scope of which DHS counsel functions would transfer to states remains unclear from the information provided.
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the eligibility for the rural emergency hospital designation under the Medicare program.
# HR 6596 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 6596 proposes to change the rules for which rural hospitals can qualify for a special Medicare designation called "rural emergency hospital" status. This program allows certain small hospitals in rural areas to operate under different Medicare payment and staffing rules than traditional hospitals. The bill would adjust the eligibility requirements for this designation, though the specific changes aren't detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects rural hospitals and the Medicare program (which provides health insurance for seniors and some disabled individuals). Rural communities that rely on these hospitals for emergency care could also be impacted, depending on whether the eligibility changes make it easier or harder for hospitals to qualify for the designation. **Current Status** HR 6596 was introduced by Rep. Derek Schmidt (R-Kansas) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Additional details about the specific eligibility changes proposed would be available once the bill is officially published with its full text.
Common Repository for Small Businesses Act
# Common Repository for Small Businesses Act (HR 5977) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would create a centralized online repository (a shared database) where small businesses can access federal resources, regulations, and support programs. The goal is to make it easier for small business owners to find information about government assistance, compliance requirements, and other helpful tools all in one place, rather than having to search across multiple federal agencies and websites. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily targets small business owners and entrepreneurs who need to navigate federal requirements and find assistance programs. It could also affect federal agencies that would need to contribute information to and help maintain the repository. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No further action has occurred at this time. Additional details about the specific features, funding, or implementation timeline of the repository are not specified in the available information.
STOP FRAUD in Medicaid Act
# STOP FRAUD in Medicaid Act (HR 5364) — Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The STOP FRAUD in Medicaid Act aims to reduce fraudulent claims and improper payments within the Medicaid program, which provides health coverage to low-income Americans. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this focus typically include measures like enhanced fraud detection systems, stricter verification procedures for eligibility and claims, increased oversight of healthcare providers, and penalties for those who commit fraud. **Who It Affects** This bill would potentially affect Medicaid beneficiaries, healthcare providers (doctors, hospitals, and clinics), state Medicaid agencies, and federal taxpayers. Depending on the specific provisions, it could impact how quickly people enroll in Medicaid, how providers submit claims, and how the program verifies that funds go to legitimate medical services. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Derek Schmidt (R-KS), and further details about its specific provisions would become clearer if it advances through committee discussions.
To amend chapters 4, 10, and 131 of title 5, United States Code, as necessary to keep those chapters current and to correct related technical errors.
# HR 4465 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 4465 is a technical cleanup bill that would update and correct errors in three sections of federal employment law (chapters 4, 10, and 131 of Title 5, U.S. Code). Rather than making major policy changes, the bill aims to modernize existing rules and fix inconsistencies that may have accumulated over time. The specific amendments aren't detailed in the title alone, but the bill touches on federal personnel management, employee benefits, pay, and related administrative procedures across multiple government agencies. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects federal employees and the various government agencies that employ them, including the Department of Defense, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture, and others. It could also impact federal oversight processes and government accounting/auditing procedures. The changes would likely be internal administrative adjustments rather than affecting the general public directly. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Derek Schmidt (R-KS) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Peace Officer Standards and Training Agency Information Access Clarification Act
# Peace Officer Standards and Training Agency Information Access Clarification Act (HR 5211) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill seeks to clarify what information police training agencies must make publicly available. Specifically, it addresses records related to Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) agencies—state and local organizations that certify and oversee police officer training and conduct. The bill would establish or clarify which documents these agencies should be able to share or withhold from the public, though the specific details of what information would be affected aren't fully specified in the available summary. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact POST agencies, law enforcement departments, and members of the public seeking information about police training and officer conduct. It could affect transparency around police certifications, disciplinary records, and training standards depending on what the final language specifies. **Current Status:** HR 5211 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Derek Schmidt (R-KS). *Note: The full text and specific provisions aren't detailed in available sources, so this summary reflects the general intent based on the title and subject matter.*
Congressional Review Reform Act of 2025
# Congressional Review Reform Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Congressional Review Reform Act of 2025 (HR 4112) would modify the Congressional Review Act (CRA), a law that allows Congress to overturn federal agency regulations. Under current rules, Congress has 60 legislative days to disapprove a new regulation before it takes effect. This bill would change those procedures, though the specific details of the proposed changes are not publicly detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies (like the Environmental Protection Agency or Labor Department) and businesses that operate under their regulations. It could also impact the general public, since agency regulations often govern areas like workplace safety, environmental protection, and consumer health. Additionally, it would change how Congress exercises its oversight power over executive branch agencies. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4112 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been brought to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Derek Schmidt (R-Kansas) in the 119th Congress.
Kelsey Smith Act
# Kelsey Smith Act Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of HR 3825, the Kelsey Smith Act, in my current resources. To give you an accurate summary of what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the full bill text. However, I can tell you that the bill is currently in committee (meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House yet) and was introduced by Representative Derek Schmidt, a Republican from Kansas's 2nd district. **To get accurate details, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 3825" to read the official bill text - Checking the bill's summary section, which explains its purpose and provisions in plain language - Looking at the sponsor's website for context on why they introduced it This will ensure you have current and complete information rather than my potentially incomplete summary.
Wrongful Injunction Accountability Act
# Wrongful Injunction Accountability Act (HR 3502) - Summary **What It Would Do** This bill aims to hold judges and courts accountable when they issue injunctions (court orders that stop or require certain actions) that are later found to be improper or wrongful. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, legislation with this title typically would create mechanisms for people or entities to seek remedies—such as damages or other compensation—when they're harmed by injunctions that courts determine were issued in error or without proper legal basis. **Who It Affects** The bill could impact anyone who has been harmed by an injunction later deemed wrongful, as well as the court system itself. This could include businesses blocked from operating under an injunction that was reversed, individuals restricted by court orders that were overturned, and potentially judges and courts facing liability for their decisions. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it's still in the early legislative stage and hasn't advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. Until the bill moves forward, its specific details remain unclear.