Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1]
Republican · AZ · 21 bills sponsored
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure the appropriate availability of personal care services under the Medicaid program.
# HR 7713 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 7713 aims to modify how Medicaid handles personal care services—assistance with daily living activities like bathing, dressing, and meal preparation for people who need help. The bill's stated goal is to ensure these services are appropriately available to eligible Medicaid beneficiaries, though the specific details of how it would change current rules are not publicly detailed in available summaries. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact Medicaid recipients who rely on personal care services, as well as the states that administer Medicaid programs and care providers who deliver these services. Medicaid covers low-income individuals, elderly people, and those with disabilities. **Current Status:** HR 7713 was introduced by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without more detailed legislative language available, the specific provisions and their potential effects cannot be fully determined at this stage.
To direct the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to jointly adopt and use interoperable image-sharing software technology for the purpose of sharing medical images and related data at medical facilities of the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: HR 7558 **What the Bill Does** HR 7558 would require the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to work together to adopt and use compatible software that allows them to share medical images and related health data between their facilities. Currently, these two departments operate separate systems that don't easily communicate with each other, which can create inefficiencies when patients need care from both agencies. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects military service members, veterans, and their families who receive medical care through both the DoD and VA. It would also impact the doctors and staff at military and VA hospitals who currently struggle to access patients' complete medical records across the two systems. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative David Schweikert (R-AZ) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill has no specific subjects or additional provisions listed at this time.
Innovate Less Lethal to De-Escalate Tax Modernization Act
# Summary of HR 4242: Innovate Less Lethal to De-Escalate Tax Modernization Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would modify federal excise tax rules for less-lethal weapons and equipment. Specifically, it appears designed to reduce or eliminate certain tax burdens on the manufacturing and sale of non-lethal law enforcement and self-defense tools—such as stun devices, pepper spray, bean bag rounds, and similar products. The bill's stated purpose is to encourage innovation and wider adoption of alternatives to traditional lethal force. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect manufacturers and sellers of less-lethal weapons and equipment, potentially lowering their production costs. It could also influence law enforcement agencies and private citizens who use or purchase these products, as tax savings might be passed on through lower prices. The changes would apply at the federal tax level. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4242 is in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. This means it remains in the early legislative stage and may not advance further without additional action by lawmakers.
To amend the Colorado River Basin Project Act to provide for the equitable distribution of Colorado River water for the lower basin States, and for other purposes.
# HR 7078 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would modify how Colorado River water is distributed among the three lower basin states—Arizona, Nevada, and California. The Colorado River is a critical water source for millions of people across the Southwest, and this legislation aims to adjust the current water-sharing arrangements to ensure a fairer distribution. The bill amends the Colorado River Basin Project Act, the foundational 1968 law that established the original water allocation system. **Who It Affects:** This bill directly impacts Arizona, Nevada, and California, affecting their water supplies for cities, farms, and industries that depend on the Colorado River. Indirectly, it affects millions of residents and businesses in these states, as well as Native American tribes with water rights in the region. Water agencies and agricultural interests in the lower basin states would also be significantly affected by any changes to allocation. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7078 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona) in the 119th Congress. With minimal details publicly available about specific provisions, the bill's exact proposals for redistribution are not yet clear from this summary alone.
Postal Contracting Financial Accountability Act
# Postal Contracting Financial Accountability Act (HR 5530) Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would require the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to implement stricter financial oversight and accountability measures for contracts. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to ensure the postal service tracks spending more carefully, potentially requiring competitive bidding processes, regular audits, or reporting requirements for large contracts. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect the Postal Service itself and companies that contract with USPS to provide goods or services. It could also indirectly impact mail customers if it changes how USPS operates or spends money. Taxpayers may be affected depending on whether these measures alter postal finances or federal subsidies. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5530 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) in the 119th Congress. No further action has occurred at this time.
Critical Mineral Brine Extraction Research and Development Act
# Critical Mineral Brine Extraction Research and Development Act (HR 5410) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would authorize funding and support for research and development into extracting critical minerals from brine—the salty water found in certain geological formations and industrial processes. Critical minerals are materials essential for modern technology, including batteries, renewable energy systems, electronics, and defense equipment. The bill aims to improve extraction methods, making them more efficient and cost-effective. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit technology manufacturers, renewable energy companies, and defense contractors that rely on critical minerals. It would also affect states with brine deposits (particularly in the Southwest), research institutions conducting mineral extraction studies, and potentially consumers by reducing costs of mineral-dependent products. The U.S. economy broadly would benefit from reducing dependence on foreign sources for these materials. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5410 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona) and has not advanced further in the legislative process.
Scam Farms Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 4988: Scam Farms Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would authorize the use of "marque and reprisal" — a constitutional mechanism that allows the federal government to grant licenses to private individuals or groups to take action against foreign entities that have harmed Americans. In this case, the bill targets "scam farms" — criminal operations (likely based overseas) that conduct fraud schemes, phone scams, and other financial crimes targeting U.S. citizens and businesses. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill would primarily affect victims of international scam operations and potentially authorize private parties to pursue remedies against foreign scam operations. However, the bill's full details are limited in available sources. The concept of marque and reprisal is historically associated with privateering and can involve significant legal and diplomatic complexities. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4988 is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative David Schweikert (R-AZ). No action has been taken on the measure, meaning it remains in early stages and would require committee approval and floor votes before becoming law.
RESTART SUNSET Act of 2025
# RESTART SUNSET Act of 2025 - Summary The RESTART SUNSET Act of 2025 (HR 4770) is a bill currently under consideration in the House of Representatives. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to establish or modify sunset provisions—automatic expiration dates—for government programs or regulations. However, specific details about which programs would be affected or what changes would be made are not provided in the available information. **Current Status:** The bill is in committee, meaning it has been referred to a House committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. Until the bill moves forward or its text becomes publicly available, the specific provisions and affected groups cannot be detailed. Anyone interested in this legislation's particulars should monitor Congress.gov or the House Clerk's website for updates as the bill progresses through the legislative process.
WEAR IT Act
# WEAR IT Act Summary I'd be happy to help summarize this bill, but the information provided is quite limited. Based on what's available, I can tell you that **HR 4203, called the "WEAR IT Act," is currently in committee** in the House of Representatives and was introduced by Rep. David Schweikert (R-Arizona). However, the bill's specific subjects and details aren't included in the data you've shared. To give you an accurate plain-language summary of what the bill would actually do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need additional information such as the bill's full text or a summary of its provisions. The acronym "WEAR IT" might hint at the bill's purpose, but I can't accurately interpret that without official details. **If you can provide the bill summary, full text, or a link to Congress.gov, I'd be glad to give you a clear, non-partisan explanation of its contents and potential impact.**
Medicare Transaction Fraud Prevention Act
# Medicare Transaction Fraud Prevention Act (HR 3996) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to strengthen fraud prevention in Medicare by improving how the program detects and stops fraudulent transactions and claims. While specific details aren't available from the basic information provided, bills with this title typically focus on giving Medicare better tools, technology, or authority to identify suspicious billing patterns, unauthorized claims, and other fraudulent activities before payments are made. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect Medicare beneficiaries (seniors and some disabled individuals), healthcare providers who bill Medicare, and the program's administrators. By reducing fraud, it could help protect seniors' healthcare access and lower costs for the Medicare system overall. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't advanced to a floor vote yet. It was sponsored by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona). For more specific details about the provisions and how they would work, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Forgotten Funds Act
# Forgotten Funds Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Forgotten Funds Act would take unused federal money from previous budgets (specifically from 2021 and earlier) and redirect it to pay down the national deficit. When Congress appropriates funds for government programs, agencies don't always spend every dollar allocated. This bill would reclaim those leftover amounts and apply them solely toward reducing the national debt rather than allowing them to be spent or carried forward to future years. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would affect federal government agencies across all departments, as it targets unspent discretionary funds (money Congress sets aside each year for specific purposes like defense, transportation, and education). The amount of money available could be substantial, depending on how much remains unspent from 2021 and earlier years. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not been voted on by the full House of Representatives, meaning it is still in the early stages of the legislative process.
SMART Act
# SMART Act (HR 3466) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 3466 (the SMART Act) in the 119th Congress to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, and its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search for "HR 3466" to see the full text, summary, and status - **Rep. Schweikert's website**: Often includes legislation summaries - **Tracking sites**: Ballotpedia or LegiStorm provide nonpartisan bill tracking If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to explain them in plain language. This ensures the information is accurate rather than me speculating about what "SMART Act" might stand for or do.
To amend title XVIII to reform the Medicare Advantage program.
# Summary of HR 3467: Medicare Advantage Program Reform **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3467 proposes changes to Medicare Advantage, the private insurance alternative to traditional Medicare that seniors can choose. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, it aims to reform how this program operates. The bill is still in the early stages of the legislative process, currently sitting in committee, so its exact provisions may still be under development or review. **Who It Affects** This legislation would impact the roughly 28 million Medicare beneficiaries currently enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, as well as the insurance companies that offer these plans. It could also affect seniors considering whether to enroll in Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare, depending on what reforms are proposed. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona) in the 119th Congress and remains in committee. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. For more details about specific provisions, the bill text would need to be reviewed once publicly available.
Manifest Modernization Act of 2025
# Manifest Modernization Act of 2025 - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 2653 (Manifest Modernization Act of 2025), as the bill's full text and provisions aren't included in your submission. The information provided shows only that it's a House bill sponsored by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona) currently in committee review, but doesn't specify what it would actually do. To provide you with an accurate summary covering what the bill does, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need additional information such as: - The bill's official summary or full text - Committee reports or hearing documents - Sponsor statements about the bill's purpose If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language. Alternatively, you can find complete bill information on Congress.gov by searching "HR 2653" or "Manifest Modernization Act of 2025."
To suspend the production of the penny and nickel, to require the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a study on pennies and nickels, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 1270: Penny and Nickel Suspension Bill **What the Bill Would Do** HR 1270 would stop the U.S. Mint from making pennies and nickels if passed. The bill would also require the Comptroller General (a government official who oversees federal spending) to conduct a detailed study examining pennies and nickels, likely looking at their costs, uses, and impact on the economy and commerce. **Who It Affects** This bill would affect everyday Americans who use cash, businesses that handle coins, and the U.S. Mint, which currently produces these coins. It could also influence how prices are rounded at checkout and how transactions work in stores that rely heavily on cash payments. **Current Status** HR 1270 was introduced by Representative David Schweikert (R-Arizona) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Many proposals to eliminate or study pennies and nickels have been introduced over the years, citing their production cost and declining use as reasons for the changes.
To amend the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish drug adherence guidelines, and for other purposes.
# HR 1142 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)—the federal agency that runs Medicare—to create new guidelines aimed at helping Medicare patients take their medications as prescribed. The goal is to achieve a 90% "adherence rate," meaning 9 out of 10 patients would take their medications correctly and on schedule. The guidelines would use artificial intelligence and machine learning technology to identify which patients might struggle with taking medications and could recommend more affordable generic drugs and biosimilars (lower-cost versions of complex biological medications) when appropriate. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect Medicare beneficiaries (seniors and some younger people with disabilities) and pharmaceutical companies. By encouraging patients to stick with their medications and promoting cheaper alternatives, it aims to improve health outcomes while potentially reducing costs. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative David Schweikert (R-AZ).
DEBT Act
# DEBT Act Summary **What It Would Do:** The DEBT Act (Debt Explanation Before Taxwriters Act) would require the Treasury Secretary to testify before two key congressional committees—the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee—before the federal government hits its borrowing limit or uses emergency financial measures. The Treasury Secretary would have to explain in detail what extraordinary measures (special financial tactics like delaying certain payments or redirecting investments) the Treasury plans to use, how much these measures cost to implement, and any changes to these plans. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects Congress and the Treasury Department. It increases congressional oversight by ensuring lawmakers get advance notice and detailed explanations about how the Treasury manages the nation's finances when approaching the debt ceiling. Indirectly, it affects all Americans by potentially increasing transparency around how the government handles debt management. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative David Schweikert, a Republican from Arizona.
JFK Act of 2025
# JFK Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** The JFK Act of 2025 would require multiple federal agencies—including the National Archives, CIA, FBI, IRS, Department of Defense, and State Department—to release all documents and information they hold related to President John F. Kennedy's assassination. The bill specifies that these records must be made public in unclassified and unredacted form (meaning without secret classifications or blacked-out sections). Additionally, the Department of Justice would be required to petition courts to release any assassination-related records currently sealed under court orders or grand jury secrecy. **Who it affects and key provisions:** This bill primarily affects government agencies that possess historical records and the general public, as it aims to make Kennedy assassination documents more widely available. It targets information held under seal in court proceedings or protected by grand jury confidentiality rules, requiring the Justice Department to actively work toward their release. The bill doesn't create an exception process—it mandates full, unredacted disclosure of relevant materials. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is the early stage of the legislative process where the bill is being reviewed before any potential advancement.
Healthy Technology Act of 2025
# Healthy Technology Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Healthy Technology Act of 2025 would allow artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning systems to legally prescribe medications. Currently, only licensed healthcare practitioners like doctors and nurse practitioners can write prescriptions. This bill would change that by permitting AI systems to prescribe drugs if they meet two conditions: they are authorized by state law to do so, and they are approved by federal agencies that oversee medical devices and products. **Who It Affects:** This bill would potentially affect patients who receive care, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, and technology developers creating medical AI systems. It could also impact state medical boards that license healthcare professionals, as states would have authority to decide whether to allow AI prescribing within their borders. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (as of early 2025), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative David Schweikert, a Republican from Arizona.
Paws Off Act of 2025
# Paws Off Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Paws Off Act of 2025 would require food products containing xylitol (an artificial sweetener) to display warning labels about the dangers xylitol poses to dogs. Xylitol is toxic to dogs and can cause serious health problems or death if ingested, even in small amounts. Currently, many products containing xylitol—such as sugar-free candies, baked goods, and other foods—don't carry dog-specific warnings on their labels. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects food manufacturers and dog owners. Manufacturers would need to add warning labels to any food product containing xylitol, while dog owners would benefit from clearer information about which household foods could poison their pets. The bill falls under food labeling regulations overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. David Schweikert (R-Arizona) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Maintaining Innovation and Safe Technologies Act
# Summary of HR 193: Maintaining Innovation and Safe Technologies Act **What the Bill Does** This bill would require Medicare (the federal health insurance program for seniors and some disabled people) to create clear payment guidelines for remote monitoring devices that use artificial intelligence—such as smart glucose monitors that send health data directly to doctors. Currently, Medicare lacks specific guidance on how it will pay for these increasingly common AI-enabled medical devices, which creates uncertainty for both patients and manufacturers. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Medicare beneficiaries (roughly 67 million seniors and eligible disabled individuals) who could benefit from using these advanced monitoring devices, as well as medical device manufacturers developing and selling AI-powered health technology. Healthcare providers who use these devices would also be impacted by clearer payment rules. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. David Schweikert (R-Arizona).