Rounds, Mike [R-SD]
Republican · SD · 47 bills sponsored
Small Business Investor Capital Access Act
# Small Business Investor Capital Access Act (S 3880) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Small Business Investor Capital Access Act aims to make it easier for small businesses to access funding from investors. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically work to reduce regulatory barriers or create new mechanisms that help connect small businesses with potential investors, making it simpler for entrepreneurs to raise capital for growth and operations. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily benefit small business owners and entrepreneurs seeking investment funding. It may also affect investment firms, venture capital groups, and the broader small business ecosystem by potentially expanding opportunities for capital formation and business expansion. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) and is currently under review in a Senate committee. It has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. To learn more about the specific provisions and any amendments, you can search for "S 3880" on Congress.gov, which provides official bill text and tracking information.
Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act
# Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would give American Indian and Alaska Native patients more time to notify the Indian Health Service (IHS) about emergency medical care they received at non-IHS hospitals or providers. Currently, patients have 72 hours to report emergency care so the IHS can authorize payment through its Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) program. The bill would extend this deadline to 15 days, making it easier for patients to get their emergency medical bills covered. However, the bill does not change the rules for elderly or disabled patients, who would continue to have 30 days to report emergency care. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill directly affects American Indian and Alaska Native patients who rely on IHS services and sometimes need emergency care at hospitals outside the IHS system. The PRC program reimburses these outside medical providers when IHS facilities aren't available. The bill is currently in committee in the Senate and has not yet been voted on. Sponsor Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) introduced it to address the challenge patients face when dealing with emergencies—situations where a 72-hour notification window may be too tight given the chaos of medical crises and varying notification procedures across providers.
Purchased and Referred Care Improvement Act of 2025
# Purchased and Referred Care Improvement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill aims to improve how the federal government manages healthcare services that are purchased or referred to outside providers, particularly for Native Americans served by the Indian Health Service (IHS). The legislation focuses on reducing healthcare costs and improving access to care by streamlining the process for obtaining medical services from non-IHS providers when those services aren't available through the IHS itself. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily impacts Native American populations who rely on IHS for healthcare, as well as the IHS system itself. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's subjects indicate it addresses healthcare costs, insurance coverage, and access issues. The focus on "purchased and referred care" suggests the legislation may modify rules around how the IHS contracts with private hospitals and clinics or how it authorizes and pays for outside medical services. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 699) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds, a Republican from South Dakota.
Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act
# Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would authorize a feasibility study for the Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project. If passed, the federal government would conduct a comprehensive evaluation of whether a major water infrastructure project along the main stem of the Missouri River in the Dakota region is practical and viable. The study would likely examine engineering, environmental, and economic factors to determine if the project should move forward. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect residents and communities in South Dakota and North Dakota that rely on or could benefit from improved water supplies. It could also impact agricultural operations, Native American tribes, and water management agencies in the region. Broader stakeholders include federal agencies responsible for water infrastructure and environmental protection. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 3736) remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota) in the 119th Congress. The bill is still in the early legislative stage, meaning it has not yet advanced for a floor vote or been passed.
Life at Conception Act of 2026
# Life at Conception Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish a federal law declaring that human life begins at conception. If passed, it would effectively grant legal rights and protections to fertilized eggs from the moment of conception. The legislation aims to create a uniform national standard for when life legally begins, which could have significant implications for abortion policy, certain contraceptives, and fertility treatments across all states. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact women of reproductive age, healthcare providers (doctors, clinics, and hospitals), fertility clinics, and states that currently have their own laws regarding abortion and reproductive rights. It could affect access to certain contraceptive methods and in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures, depending on how courts interpret the law's application. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken on the bill at this time.
Financial Stability Oversight Council Improvement Act of 2025
# Financial Stability Oversight Council Improvement Act of 2025 – Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would modify how the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) operates. The FSOC is a government group that monitors the financial system to prevent another major financial crisis like the 2008 recession. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it aims to improve or change how this council functions. **Who It Affects:** The changes would primarily impact large financial institutions (like banks and investment firms) that the FSOC oversees and monitors. Ultimately, these changes could affect everyday Americans' access to credit, investment options, and financial stability. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) and is currently in committee, meaning it's in an early stage of the legislative process. It has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. To better understand the specific changes being proposed, you would need to review the actual bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary details provided here are limited.
Marcella LeBeau Recognition Act
# Marcella LeBeau Recognition Act — Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would officially rename a federal building in Pierre, South Dakota (located at 225 South Pierre Street) after Marcella LeBeau. It's a commemorative measure that honors someone by giving her name to an existing government building. **Who It Affects:** The change would primarily be symbolic and affect the building's official designation and signage. It would have minimal practical impact on federal operations or the public, though it serves to publicly recognize and honor Marcella LeBeau's legacy in South Dakota. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota).
Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act
# Wounded Knee Massacre Memorial and Sacred Site Act – Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would transfer approximately 40 acres of land in South Dakota to the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe to create a memorial and sacred site at Wounded Knee, the location of a historic 1890 massacre. The land would receive "restricted fee" status, meaning the tribes would own it but couldn't sell it or use it as collateral without federal approval. The bill explicitly prohibits commercial development and gambling operations on the site. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiaries are the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, whose members have ancestral connections to Wounded Knee. The bill also affects the Department of the Interior, which must complete the necessary legal processes to transfer the land. It may have secondary impacts on South Dakota's tax base, since tribal lands typically aren't subject to state taxation. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Keeping Deposits Local Act
# Keeping Deposits Local Act (S. 2757) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota, would address how bank deposits are handled and distributed. While the specific details aren't fully outlined in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to keep customer deposits within local or regional financial institutions rather than having them flow to larger national banks. The intent is usually to support community banks and regional lenders by allowing them to retain deposits locally. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact community banks, regional financial institutions, and their customers. It could also affect larger national banks that currently handle deposits from smaller institutions, as well as depositors who use local banking services. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No further action has been taken at this time. The limited information available suggests the bill is still in early stages of the legislative process. *Note: For more detailed provisions and the bill's current status, you can visit Congress.gov and search for S. 2757.*
Merchant Banking Modernization Act
# Merchant Banking Modernization Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Merchant Banking Modernization Act would update federal regulations governing how banks can handle merchant banking activities—essentially the business of investing in and managing non-financial companies. The bill aims to modernize capital requirements and operational rules for banks engaged in these activities, making it easier for financial institutions to participate in business investments while maintaining safety standards. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects large banks and financial institutions that engage in merchant banking (investing in companies outside the financial sector). It could also indirectly impact businesses seeking capital investment from banks and potentially consumers who use banking services, depending on how the regulatory changes influence the financial sector. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) in the 119th Congress. The bill has not advanced to broader consideration at this stage.
Kamisha's Law
# Kamisha's Law Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of S. 2624 (Kamisha's Law) to provide you with an accurate summary. To give you a factual, non-partisan overview as requested, I would need access to the bill's text, which typically includes sections describing its purpose, specific policies, and affected groups. **What I can tell you:** - The bill is currently in committee (early stage of the legislative process) - It's sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota) - To get accurate details, you can: - Visit **Congress.gov** and search "S 2624" for the full text - Check Senator Rounds' official website for his statement on the bill - Search news sources for coverage if the bill has received media attention If you can provide the bill's text or more details about its focus area, I'd be happy to summarize it for you.
A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to establish the Artificial General Intelligence Steering Committee, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 2604: Artificial General Intelligence Steering Committee **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the U.S. Secretary of Defense to create a new committee called the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Steering Committee. The bill aims to establish a formal structure within the Department of Defense to oversee and coordinate policy related to advanced artificial intelligence systems. "Artificial General Intelligence" refers to AI systems that could potentially perform a wide range of intellectual tasks at or above human level—a capability that doesn't yet exist but is an area of research and concern for national security officials. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect the Department of Defense and its operations, though advanced AI development could have broader implications for national security and technology policy. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota). **Key Note** The bill's summary provided contains minimal details about specific provisions beyond requiring the committee's establishment. To understand exactly what powers the committee would have or what its specific responsibilities would be, the full legislative text would need to be reviewed.
A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to improve recruitment and retention of the cyber workforce of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 2605: DoD Cyber Workforce Bill **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to help the Department of Defense (DoD) recruit and keep skilled cybersecurity workers by making changes to federal military employment laws. While the specific details aren't fully outlined in the available information, such bills typically address issues like competitive pay, benefits, flexible work arrangements, or streamlined hiring processes that make DoD cyber jobs more attractive compared to private sector opportunities. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect people working in or considering careers in cybersecurity at the Pentagon and military agencies. It could also indirectly impact national security, since the DoD relies on strong cybersecurity talent to protect military systems and sensitive information from cyberattacks. **Current Status** S. 2605 is currently in committee, meaning it's still in the early legislative stage and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota). Without the complete text of the bill, specific provisions cannot be detailed, but lawmakers are generally focused on addressing the ongoing challenge of competing with private technology companies for top cybersecurity talent.
A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to designate the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy as principal staff assistant to the Secretary of Defense on matters within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary, and for other purposes.
# Plain Language Summary: S 2603 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would formally designate the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy as the principal staff advisor to the Secretary of Defense on all cyber-related matters. In simpler terms, it would make the cyber policy official the go-to expert on cybersecurity issues within the Department of Defense, clarifying their role and authority in the department's leadership structure. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the Department of Defense and its leadership, particularly those involved in cybersecurity operations and policy. It could also indirectly impact cyber defense strategies that protect military and national security interests. The bill may also influence how cybersecurity decisions are made across federal agencies that work with the Defense Department. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) during the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No specific provisions beyond the title designation were described in the available information.
A bill to improve the planning, programming, and budget coordination for operations of cyber mission force of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 2601 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to improve how the U.S. military plans, budgets for, and operates its cyber warfare units. It would establish better coordination and planning processes for the Armed Forces' cyber mission force—the military units responsible for conducting cyber operations, both defensive (protecting U.S. systems) and offensive (targeting adversary systems). The bill seeks to streamline how money is allocated and how different branches of the military work together on cyber operations. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects the Department of Defense and military personnel involved in cyber operations. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the general intent is to improve organizational efficiency and ensure adequate resources for cyber warfare capabilities. This indirectly affects all Americans by influencing how the military prepares for emerging cyber threats from countries like China and Russia. **Current Status** S. 2601 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD).
A bill to provide for modifications to the State Partnership Program selection analysis.
# Summary of S 2599 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would modify how the State Partnership Program selects which states participate in the program. The State Partnership Program is a Department of Defense initiative that pairs U.S. states with foreign countries to build military relationships and increase security cooperation. Currently, the bill is very limited in publicly available details, but it seeks to change the analysis or criteria used to choose which states get matched with foreign partners. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect state governments, the Department of Defense, and potentially participating foreign nations. States could see changes in which international military partnerships they're eligible for, which could impact defense-related activities, training exchanges, and diplomatic relationships at the state level. **Current Status:** S 2599 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full Senate vote yet. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD). Without the full text available, specific details about what modifications are being proposed remain unclear. The bill would need committee approval and a Senate vote to become law.
A bill to prohibit the availability of funds to modify authorities of the Commander of United States Cyber Command, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 2607 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prevent the federal government from using taxpayer money to change the powers and responsibilities of the Commander of U.S. Cyber Command—the military unit responsible for defending the country's digital infrastructure and conducting cyber operations. In simpler terms, it would freeze the current authority structure for this military leader, preventing any funded efforts to expand, reduce, or modify their official powers. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects the U.S. military's cyber operations and potentially impacts how the government can restructure its cyber defense capabilities. By blocking funding for authority modifications, the bill essentially locks in the current rules governing what the Cyber Command leader can and cannot do. The bill is sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota) and currently sits in a Senate committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. **Current Status** As of now, S. 2607 remains in committee review with no indication of immediate action. The bill's vague language ("and for other purposes") suggests there may be additional provisions not detailed in the basic description, which is typical for congressional bills early in the legislative process.
A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the scope of affirmation of authority for cyber operations to include defense of critical infrastructure of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 2602 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would expand the Department of Defense's legal authority to conduct cyber operations in defense of its critical infrastructure. Currently, the Defense Department's cyber operation authority is limited in scope. The bill aims to broaden these powers to better protect essential defense systems and facilities from cyber attacks. The phrase "and for other purposes" suggests the bill may include additional provisions beyond cyber defense, though the specific details aren't outlined in this summary. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects the Department of Defense and military cyber operations. It could also indirectly impact cybersecurity contractors and companies that work with DoD systems. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and hasn't yet advanced to a full Senate vote. Before any changes take effect, the bill would need to pass both chambers of Congress and be signed by the President.
A bill to require the Commander of United States Cyber Command to complete development of a roadmap for industry collaboration on artificial intelligence-enabled cyber capabilities for cyberspace operations of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
# Plain Language Summary: S 2606 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the head of U.S. Cyber Command to create a detailed plan for how the Department of Defense can work with private companies to develop and use artificial intelligence (AI) in cyber operations. Essentially, it's asking the Pentagon to figure out how to partner with tech companies and defense contractors to build AI tools that could improve the military's cyber defense and offense capabilities. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect the Department of Defense and private technology companies in the defense and cybersecurity sectors. It could also indirectly impact the broader public if improved cyber capabilities help protect government and critical infrastructure systems from attacks. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-South Dakota) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The specific details of what "roadmap" elements would be required are not fully outlined in this summary, so the scope of collaboration and any associated costs remain to be determined through the committee process.
Independent BROKERS TIME Act of 2025
# Independent BROKERS TIME Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Independent BROKERS TIME Act of 2025 (S 2625) is a proposed law currently under review in the Senate. While specific details about the bill's contents are not publicly available in this listing, the title suggests it relates to regulations affecting independent brokers and potentially their operational timeframes or licensing procedures. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) in the 119th Congress. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It has not advanced to a floor vote or passed either chamber of Congress. For detailed information about what this bill specifically proposes, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or contact Senator Rounds' office, as the key provisions are not summarized in the basic legislative data available.
A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.
# S 2600 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Defense Science Board—an independent advisory group that provides expert recommendations to the Department of Defense—to conduct a study examining how the Pentagon should best organize itself to develop and implement digital solutions. Essentially, it's asking for research into the most effective structural and organizational approaches the military should use when handling digital technology projects. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the Department of Defense and its various branches and agencies. It could indirectly impact military personnel, defense contractors who work with the Pentagon, and taxpayers who fund defense operations, depending on what organizational changes might result from the study's recommendations. **Current Status** S 2600 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD). Since it remains in the early stages of the legislative process, passage is uncertain.
Chairman James Mountain Inhofe Recognition Act of 2025
# Chairman James Mountain Inhofe Recognition Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This is a recognition bill introduced in the Senate that would honor former Senator James Mountain Inhofe. Based on its title and type, the bill likely designates something in his name or creates a commemorative honor—though the specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided. Recognition bills typically don't create new programs or laws; instead, they formally acknowledge individuals' contributions or legacy. **Who It Affects:** Recognition bills have minimal direct impact on the general public. This bill primarily serves as a formal acknowledgment of Inhofe's service, likely benefiting his legacy and constituents who valued his work representing Oklahoma in the Senate. **Current Status:** The bill (S 2539) was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Without access to the bill's full text, the exact nature of the recognition cannot be specified.
Unleashing AI Innovation in Financial Services Act
# Unleashing AI Innovation in Financial Services Act (S 2528) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to encourage the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the financial services industry by creating a more flexible regulatory environment for banks, credit unions, and other financial companies to develop and test AI technologies. The legislation would allow financial institutions to experiment with AI tools for tasks like fraud detection, credit decisions, and customer service without facing certain regulatory penalties during the testing phase. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts banks, credit unions, and financial technology companies that want to develop or use AI systems. It also affects consumers who use financial services, as AI changes could influence how they access credit, receive recommendations, and interact with their banks. Financial regulators would need to oversee these new AI activities. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD). The bill represents one of several recent legislative efforts to balance innovation in AI with consumer protection and financial stability concerns.
Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025
# Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025 would establish or strengthen security measures and protocols for protecting physical property and facilities belonging to U.S. intelligence agencies. While specific details aren't available in the basic bill information, legislation with this title typically addresses safeguarding sensitive intelligence agency buildings, equipment, and assets from unauthorized access, theft, or damage. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily impacts the intelligence community—agencies like the CIA, NSA, FBI, and other organizations under the Director of National Intelligence. It could also affect federal employees working at these agencies and potentially private contractors who work on intelligence facilities. Indirectly, it may influence federal security standards and budgets for protecting government property. **Current Status:** As of now, S. 2425 is in the committee review stage, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) in the 119th Congress. Additional details about specific provisions would become clearer as the bill moves through the legislative process.