Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]
Republican · WA · 20 bills sponsored
Meeting Demand for Organic Produce Act
# Meeting Demand for Organic Produce Act (HR 7406) - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill, introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA), aims to address the growing market demand for organic produce in the United States. While specific details aren't available in the basic information provided, bills with this title typically focus on removing regulatory barriers, improving certification processes, or providing support to farmers transitioning to or expanding organic farming operations. The goal would be to help increase domestic organic produce supply to meet consumer demand. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact organic farmers and those considering organic farming, as well as consumers interested in purchasing organic products. It may also affect the USDA and organic certification programs that oversee standards and compliance. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7406 is in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. To understand the specific provisions—such as whether it provides grants, streamlines regulations, or offers tax incentives—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or contact Representative Newhouse's office directly.
To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.
# Summary of HR 2072 **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to extend the deadline for companies to start construction on certain hydropower projects. Currently, hydropower developers must begin construction within a set timeframe after receiving a license from FERC or risk losing their permit. This bill would give them additional time to meet this requirement. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects hydropower developers and companies that hold FERC licenses for dam and power generation projects. It could indirectly benefit consumers and communities interested in hydropower development, as extended timelines might make these projects more feasible. The bill would also impact FERC's licensing and project management processes. **Current Status** HR 2072 was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee review stage.
Keeping Public Lands Out of Adversarial Hands Act
# Keeping Public Lands Out of Adversarial Hands Act (HR 7074) – Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would restrict foreign ownership and control of land in the United States, particularly focusing on public lands and lands near sensitive national security areas. While the full legislative text isn't provided here, bills with this title typically aim to prevent foreign entities—particularly those from countries considered adversarial to U.S. interests—from purchasing or leasing American land. The bill would likely establish new regulations and oversight mechanisms for foreign land acquisitions. **Who It Affects:** The primary groups affected would include foreign investors and businesses seeking to buy U.S. land, federal land management agencies responsible for overseeing public property, and potentially American landowners near sensitive areas (who might face new restrictions on selling to foreign buyers). The bill could also impact international trade relations and agricultural/commercial sectors that have foreign investment. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7074 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full congressional vote. This means it's still in the early legislative process and has not yet been formally debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Like many bills introduced in Congress, it may not advance further.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the meaning and eligibility of energy communities for purposes of the increased renewable electricity production and increased clean electricity investment credit rates.
# HR 6474 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 6474 would expand which communities qualify as "energy communities" under federal tax law, making them eligible for higher tax credits when investing in renewable and clean electricity projects. Currently, the tax code limits energy community status to specific areas—primarily those historically dependent on coal mining or coal power plants. This bill would broaden that definition to include additional communities, potentially allowing more areas to access enhanced federal tax incentives for clean energy development. **Who It Affects** The bill would benefit communities seeking to develop renewable energy projects, as well as businesses investing in clean electricity generation in newly eligible areas. It could particularly impact rural and economically transitional communities looking to attract clean energy investment as an economic development strategy. Taxpayers and companies making renewable energy investments would also benefit from the expanded tax credit opportunities. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. As introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA), it remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
SAWMILL Act
# SAWMILL Act Summary I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of HR 6277 because the bill information available is minimal—it only shows the bill number, sponsor, and committee status without the actual legislative text or subject details. To give you accurate information about what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the full bill text. **What I can tell you:** The SAWMILL Act is a Republican-sponsored bill from Washington state representative Dan Newhouse that is currently being reviewed in a House committee (meaning it hasn't advanced to a full chamber vote yet). **To learn more**, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - Search "HR 6277" for the full text and current status - **Representative Newhouse's official website** - Often includes bill summaries - **News articles** - Major outlets covering legislation typically explain bills in accessible language If you can share the bill's actual text or subject description, I'd be happy to provide the summary you're looking for.
MIRACLE Act of 2025
# MIRACLE Act of 2025 (HR 6220) - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's provisions since the detailed subject information isn't available in the data provided. To give you an accurate, factual summary of what the MIRACLE Act would actually do, I would need access to the bill's text or official description. **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee (meaning it's been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House), was sponsored by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA), and is in the 119th Congress. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 6220" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill's summary section, which lists specific provisions - Reading analysis from nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service I want to make sure any summary I provide is factually correct rather than speculating about the bill's contents. Would you like to share the bill's actual provisions, or would you like guidance on where to find them?
Defending our Dams Act
# Defending our Dams Act (HR 2073) – Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would provide federal funding and support specifically for dam maintenance and infrastructure projects in Washington State. The legislation aims to protect and preserve existing dams, which are critical for water supply, flood control, hydroelectric power generation, and irrigation across the state. By directing resources to dam upkeep and repairs, the bill seeks to prevent deterioration of these water infrastructure systems. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Washington State residents and communities that depend on dams for drinking water, electricity, and agricultural water supply. It could also impact broader energy markets, since hydroelectric dams generate significant clean power. Utilities, agricultural users, and municipalities in Washington would be the main beneficiaries of improved dam infrastructure funding. **Key Provisions and Current Status:** While specific details aren't fully outlined in available summaries, the bill focuses on water resources funding for dams and canals in Washington. As of now, the bill remains **in committee**, meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House of Representatives yet. It was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-Washington) and would require committee approval and broader congressional support before advancing further.
Parity for Tribal Law Enforcement Act
# Parity for Tribal Law Enforcement Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Parity for Tribal Law Enforcement Act (HR 4712) aims to improve law enforcement services in Native American tribal communities. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, "parity" in this context likely means ensuring tribal law enforcement agencies receive comparable resources, funding, or authority to federal and state law enforcement agencies. This could address disparities in training, equipment, pay, or operational capacity between tribal police departments and other law enforcement organizations. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact Native American tribes and their law enforcement agencies, as well as residents of tribal lands who depend on tribal police for public safety services. It may also affect federal and state law enforcement agencies that work with or support tribal law enforcement efforts. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4712 is in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA). For more detailed information about specific provisions and the bill's current progress, you can check Congress.gov or contact the sponsoring office.
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand the definition of critical access hospital under the Medicare program to include certain hospitals on Indian reservations.
# HR 4345 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change Medicare rules to allow certain hospitals located on Indian reservations to qualify as "critical access hospitals." Critical access hospitals receive special Medicare funding and reduced regulatory requirements because they serve rural or remote areas with limited hospital access. By expanding the definition to include reservation-based hospitals, the bill aims to help these facilities access additional federal funding and operational flexibility. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects hospitals operated on Indian reservations and the Native American communities they serve. It also impacts Medicare (the federal health insurance program for seniors and some disabled individuals) and potentially affects how federal healthcare dollars are distributed to rural and tribal healthcare systems. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-Washington) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has no specific subjects listed in official records, suggesting it may still be in early stages of development.
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand the definition of critical access hospital under the Medicare program to include certain hospitals on Indian reservations.
# HR 4258 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would expand which hospitals qualify as "critical access hospitals" under Medicare (the federal health insurance program for seniors and certain disabled individuals). Specifically, it would allow certain hospitals located on Indian reservations to receive critical access hospital status. Critical access hospitals receive special Medicare funding and payment rules designed to help smaller, rural hospitals stay financially viable. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects hospitals on Indian reservations and their patients, as well as Medicare beneficiaries who use these facilities. It could also impact Indian tribes and the federal government's healthcare spending, since critical access hospital status comes with different reimbursement rates from Medicare. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The specific provisions of what qualifies a reservation hospital for this status are not detailed in the summary provided.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a tax on United States-bound circumvented cargo through Canada or Mexico and entering the United States.
# HR 3363 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would create a new tax on goods that enter the United States through Canada or Mexico in ways designed to avoid existing tariffs or trade restrictions. The tax would apply to cargo deliberately routed through these neighboring countries to circumvent U.S. trade rules. The proposal amends the tax code to establish this enforcement mechanism. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact importers and businesses that ship goods through Canada or Mexico, as well as consumers who buy products subject to tariffs. It's intended to prevent companies from using neighboring countries as transshipment points to dodge U.S. tariffs on certain goods. **Current Status:** HR 3363 was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not advanced to a vote or become law.
United States Postal Service Shipping Equity Act
# United States Postal Service Shipping Equity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3011 aims to address shipping cost disparities within the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically seek to adjust how USPS prices its shipping services to ensure fairer rates across different regions, customer types, or service categories. The legislation would apply to anyone who uses USPS for mailing and shipping packages. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact USPS customers including small businesses, e-commerce sellers, rural communities, and individual mailers who depend on postal services. It could also affect USPS operations and revenue structures depending on what rate adjustments are proposed. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full House vote. It was introduced by Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Washington). Without access to the full text, the specific details of what "shipping equity" provisions are included remain unavailable, but interested parties can track its progress through Congress.gov.
POWER Act
# POWER Act Summary The POWER Act (HR 2074) is a bill sponsored by Representative Dan Newhouse that focuses on hydroelectric power and energy management in the Western United States. While the specific details aren't provided in the available information, the bill's subject areas suggest it addresses how dams and hydroelectric systems operate, particularly in Western states like Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. The bill likely examines how these systems can be optimized for electricity generation while balancing other concerns related to water management and renewable energy. The legislation would primarily affect Western states that rely on hydroelectric dams for power generation, as well as utility companies and energy consumers in those regions. It may also influence federal agencies that oversee water and energy management. The bill includes provisions for government studies and investigations, suggesting it would require research into current practices and potential improvements. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant House committee for review but has not yet been voted on by the full House. Many bills at this stage do not advance further in the legislative process.
Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act of 2025
# Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a new joint task force within the federal government dedicated to combating the production, trafficking, and distribution of illicit synthetic narcotics—primarily drugs like fentanyl and other opioids made in laboratories rather than derived from plants. The task force would coordinate efforts across multiple federal agencies to improve intelligence gathering, law enforcement operations, and international cooperation in stopping these drugs from reaching American communities. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects federal law enforcement agencies (such as the DEA, FBI, and Homeland Security), international drug trafficking victims, and communities struggling with opioid addiction. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, such task forces typically focus on sharing information between agencies, targeting major drug trafficking organizations, and working with international partners to disrupt supply chains. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. It has not advanced to become law.
Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act of 2025
# Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would allow the Department of Defense to sell surplus military aircraft and aircraft parts to be used for fighting wildfires. Currently, this authority exists but expires soon; this bill would extend it for a 10-year period (October 2025 through October 2035). The bill also expands what these aircraft can do—they could now drop water on fires in addition to fire retardant, and the aircraft could be used to help suppress wildfires in other countries, not just the United States. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects wildfire suppression agencies and organizations that purchase firefighting aircraft. It could benefit states and communities dealing with wildfires by providing access to additional aerial firefighting resources. The Defense Department would benefit by having an authorized way to dispose of excess military equipment rather than storing or scrapping it. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Protecting American Agriculture from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2025
# Plain Language Summary: Protecting American Agriculture from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2025 **What the bill does:** This bill would strengthen oversight of foreign purchases of American agricultural land by requiring the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—a government agency that reviews foreign investments for national security concerns—to review agricultural land sales referred by the Department of Agriculture. Currently, CFIUS has authority to review certain foreign investments, but this bill would specifically require them to determine whether agricultural land purchases by foreign buyers pose a national security risk before allowing the transactions to proceed. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects foreign investors or companies seeking to purchase agricultural land in the United States, as well as American farmers and agricultural businesses considering selling land to foreign buyers. The bill appears to target concerns about adversarial countries (mentioned in the bill's subjects include China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea) acquiring U.S. farmland. **Current status:** The bill (HR 1576) was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House.
No American Land for Communist China Act
# No American Land for Communist China Act (HR 1575) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to restrict Chinese government and Communist Party entities from purchasing agricultural land and other real property in the United States. If passed, it would prevent individuals and organizations with ties to China's government or Communist Party from acquiring American land, likely through new federal regulations or prohibitions on such transactions. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact Chinese government officials, state-owned enterprises, and Communist Party-affiliated organizations seeking to buy U.S. property. It could also affect American landowners in rural or agricultural areas by limiting their potential buyer pool. Agricultural communities and policymakers concerned about foreign ownership of American farmland would be the focus of this legislation. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1575 is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The bill has not yet received a vote in the House of Representatives. To become law, it would need to pass committee review, House approval, Senate approval, and presidential signature.
Agriculture Export Promotion Act of 2025
# Agriculture Export Promotion Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would extend two federal programs that help U.S. farmers and agricultural businesses sell their products overseas through 2029 and increase their funding. The Market Access Program (MAP) provides matching funds to help agricultural organizations, cooperatives, and small businesses pay for marketing and promotion activities in foreign countries. The Foreign Market Development (FMD) Program similarly funds overseas marketing, but focuses on promoting generic U.S. agricultural commodities (like "American wheat") rather than specific branded products. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly benefits U.S. agricultural exporters, including nonprofit trade organizations, state agricultural groups, farming cooperatives, state agencies, and small agricultural businesses. Indirectly, it affects American farmers who rely on export markets to sell their products and rural economies dependent on agricultural trade. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No specific provisions regarding funding amounts are detailed in the official summary.
Northwest Energy Security Act
# Northwest Energy Security Act Summary **What it does:** This bill would require federal agencies managing the Columbia and Snake River dam system (spanning Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Idaho) to follow a 2020 environmental plan focused on dam operations and power generation, rather than newer initiatives aimed at restoring wild salmon populations. Specifically, it locks in operations based on a 2020 decision and prevents the agencies from following a 2023 fish restoration plan or a proposed 2024 update. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts the Pacific Northwest region's power supply, water management, and fishing communities. It affects the Bureau of Reclamation, Bonneville Power Administration, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—the three federal agencies that operate the dam system. Indirectly, it influences hydroelectric power rates for consumers in the region and the fate of endangered salmon species. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 626, sponsored by Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-WA) and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The measure reflects an ongoing regional debate between those prioritizing hydroelectric power production and those advocating for ecological restoration of salmon runs.
Federal Employee Return to Work Act
# Federal Employee Return to Work Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prevent federal employees who work from home at least one day per week from receiving certain annual pay raises. Currently, all federal employees receive yearly pay adjustments through two mechanisms: a general raise based on private sector wage trends, and an additional "locality pay" increase if there's a significant gap between federal and private sector salaries in their area (like the higher pay rates in Washington, DC). The bill would block teleworking employees from getting these increases, effectively freezing their pay while office-based colleagues continue to receive raises. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill targets federal employees across all executive agencies who telework at least one day weekly (or 20% of their time on alternative schedules). This could impact hundreds of thousands of federal workers, from administrative staff to engineers. The bill would take effect the first fiscal year after it becomes law. For example, a teleworking employee in a high-cost area like DC would no longer receive locality pay increases, potentially creating significant pay gaps between similar workers doing the same job—one remote, one in-office. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet passed either chamber of Congress. It was introduced by Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) in the 119th Congress.