Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2]
Republican · UT · 19 bills sponsored
GEO Act
# GEO Act Summary **What It Does:** The Geothermal Energy Opportunity Act would speed up the federal permitting process for geothermal energy projects. Currently, companies applying for drilling permits on existing geothermal leases can face long delays. This bill would require the Department of Interior to approve or deny these applications within 60 days after completing all required environmental reviews and legal checks (such as endangered species assessments and historic site preservation reviews). **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects energy companies seeking to develop geothermal resources on federal lands, as well as states like Utah that have geothermal potential. It could also indirectly affect communities near geothermal projects and people interested in expanding renewable energy sources. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in either chamber of Congress. The bill doesn't eliminate environmental or legal protections—those reviews must still be completed before the 60-day clock starts.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
# Summary of HJRES 151 **What This Bill Would Do** This bill would use a Congressional Review Act (CRA) procedure to reject a rule created by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding how the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah should be managed. If passed, it would block the BLM's management plan for this monument from taking effect. The CRA is a fast-track congressional tool that allows Congress to overturn federal agency rules with a simple majority vote. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This bill directly affects how the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument—a large protected area in southern Utah—will be managed. It could impact land users including energy companies, ranchers, outdoor recreationists, and environmental groups with interests in the monument. The bill was introduced by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT), reflecting regional disagreement over the BLM's management approach. The specific details of what the BLM rule contains are not provided in this summary, though such disputes typically involve balancing resource extraction, conservation, and public access. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide overtime compensation exceptions to employers of emergency medical technicians and paramedics in rural areas.
# HR 7739 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would modify federal overtime pay rules for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics working in rural areas. Specifically, it would create an exception allowing employers in these areas to avoid paying overtime compensation in certain circumstances—something that would normally be required under the Fair Labor Standards Act. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects EMTs and paramedics employed by ambulance services, fire departments, or hospitals in rural communities, as well as their employers. Rural emergency medical services often struggle with staffing and budget constraints, which is likely the reason for this proposed exemption. **Current Status** HR 7739 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Sponsored by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT), the bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process. The specific details about which circumstances would qualify for the overtime exception are not provided in the available information.
Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act
# Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would transfer legal authority from federal courts to Utah state courts for certain civil lawsuits involving the Shivwits Band of Paiutes, a Native American tribe in southwestern Utah. It would also allow the tribe to lease its trust lands (property held by the federal government for the tribe's benefit). Currently, disputes arising on tribal lands typically fall under federal or tribal jurisdiction; this bill would shift civil cases to state courts instead. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects the Shivwits Band of Paiutes and anyone (individuals or businesses) involved in civil disputes with the tribe or contracts affecting tribal lands. This could include disputes over leases, property agreements, or other civil matters. The change would make it easier to resolve contract disputes in state court rather than navigating federal or tribal systems. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend title 38, United States Code, to include eyeglass lens fittings in the category of medical services authorized to be furnished to veterans under the Veterans Community Care Program, and for other purposes.
# HR 5593 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would expand the Veterans Community Care Program to cover eyeglass lens fittings as a medical service. Currently, the program allows the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to refer veterans to community healthcare providers for certain medical services when VA facilities cannot provide timely care. This bill would add eyeglass lens fittings to the list of services veterans could receive through community providers rather than only at VA facilities. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects veterans who need eyeglass prescriptions filled and fitted. It could allow veterans who face long wait times at VA eye care clinics or live far from VA facilities to receive this service from private optometrists or eyeglass retailers more quickly and conveniently. **Current Status** HR 5593 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) in the 119th Congress. No additional details about the bill's progress or specific provisions are publicly available at this time.
Geothermal Tax Parity Act
# Geothermal Tax Parity Act (HR 6873) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Geothermal Tax Parity Act aims to provide tax incentives for geothermal energy development that match those already available for other renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Specifically, the bill would extend or equalize tax credits and deductions for companies and individuals investing in geothermal energy projects, making the financial benefits comparable to what renewable energy competitors currently receive. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit geothermal energy companies, developers, and investors by improving the financial returns on geothermal projects. It could also indirectly benefit consumers and communities in areas where geothermal energy is developed, potentially leading to more affordable renewable energy options and job creation in those regions. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6873 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT), reflecting Utah's significant geothermal energy potential. No additional action has been taken since its introduction.
CLEAR Act of 2025
# CLEAR Act of 2025 Summary I apologize, but I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information available is limited. The congressional record shows only basic metadata: it's a House bill (HR 6802) from 2025 sponsored by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT), and it's currently in committee review. The actual text, provisions, and stated purpose of the bill are not included in the information provided. **What I can tell you:** To give you an accurate, factual summary, I would need access to the bill's actual text and legislative summary. These are typically available on Congress.gov or the House Clerk's website. I'd recommend checking those sources directly to learn what the bill would do, who it affects, and its specific provisions. If you can share the bill's text or a legislative summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for a general audience.
STARS Act
# STARS Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The STARS Act (Semiquincentennial Tourism and Access to Recreation Sites Act) would make September 17, 2026, a free entrance day at America's federal parks and recreation sites to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the United States. On that single day, the National Park Service would waive all entrance fees, and other federal agencies managing public lands—including the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Reclamation—would waive their standard recreation fees. **Who It Affects** This bill directly benefits any American who visits a federal park or recreation site on September 17, 2026. It could encourage tourism and increase park visitation on that specific date. Federal agencies that manage these sites would experience a one-day loss in fee revenue, though the fiscal impact would likely be modest given it's limited to a single day. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and awaits action in the Senate. It is a relatively straightforward commemorative measure with bipartisan potential, as it creates a one-time celebration of American history without major ongoing costs or controversial policy changes.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 35 South Main Street in Glendale, Utah, as the "Deputy Sheriff Brian Harris Post Office".
# Summary of HR 6459 **What the bill does:** This bill would officially rename the U.S. Postal Service facility located at 35 South Main Street in Glendale, Utah, to the "Deputy Sheriff Brian Harris Post Office." The renaming would honor Deputy Sheriff Brian Harris, though the bill text itself does not provide details about who he was or why he is being commemorated. **Who it affects:** The primary effect would be symbolic—the change would apply only to the specific postal facility in Glendale, Utah. Local residents and postal employees would be the most directly affected by the name change on building signage and official documents. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT-2). Bills that designate federal buildings or facilities are often considered non-controversial and may pass with limited debate, though this one has not yet advanced beyond the committee stage.
Water Rights Protection Act
# Water Rights Protection Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Water Rights Protection Act would restrict the federal government's ability to require water rights transfers as a condition for issuing or renewing permits and leases on federal lands. Specifically, it would prohibit the Departments of Interior and Agriculture from demanding that water users—including tribes, ranchers, farmers, and other stakeholders—transfer their water rights to the federal government in order to obtain or maintain land use agreements. The bill would also prevent these departments from imposing additional restrictions on how, when, where, or how much water users can divert or pump beyond what state water laws already require. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily impacts water users in western states who hold permits or leases on federal land, including farmers, ranchers, Native American tribes, and other businesses. It also affects the federal agencies (Interior and Agriculture) that manage these agreements, and states that oversee their own water rights systems. Water conservation advocates might be concerned about its implications, while agricultural and property rights groups would likely support it. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
FREE Act
# FREE Act (HR 689) Summary **What It Would Do:** The FREE Act is a regulatory reform bill that would modify how federal agencies create and enforce rules. Based on its subject matter, the bill appears to focus on reducing regulatory burdens by addressing procedures for issuing regulations, oversight mechanisms, and the costs associated with compliance and legal challenges. The specific provisions related to "accounting and auditing" and "licensing and registrations" suggest it may affect how businesses comply with federal requirements and how agencies conduct oversight. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact businesses and individuals subject to federal regulations, as well as federal agencies responsible for enforcing them. It could also affect people seeking professional licenses or permits at the federal level, and potentially those involved in legal disputes with agencies over regulatory matters. **Current Status:** HR 689 is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote. The bill was introduced by Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT). **Note:** The bill's full text would be needed to provide specifics on exact provisions and their impact.
To amend section 5545 of title 5, United States Code, to provide hazard pay for carrying out prescribed burns, and for other purposes.
# HR 5091 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would amend federal law to provide hazard pay for federal employees who carry out prescribed burns—controlled fires intentionally set by land management agencies to reduce wildfire risk, clear dead vegetation, and maintain healthy forests. The bill seeks to recognize the dangerous nature of this work by offering additional compensation to workers who perform these duties. **Who It Affects** The legislation primarily affects federal employees working for agencies like the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management who conduct prescribed burn operations. It could also influence budget allocations for these agencies and potentially affect the overall compensation structure for federal workers in hazardous positions. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote. No timeline has been set for further action. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT), representing Utah's 2nd congressional district.
Public Land Search and Rescue Act
# Public Land Search and Rescue Act (HR 3777) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Public Land Search and Rescue Act would establish or improve procedures for handling search and rescue operations on public lands managed by the federal government. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to clarify which agencies are responsible for rescue operations, how they coordinate with each other and local authorities, and potentially how costs are managed when people need to be rescued on federal lands like national forests or Bureau of Land Management areas. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would impact outdoor recreationists (hikers, hunters, campers), the federal agencies that manage public lands (National Park Service, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management), state and local emergency responders, and potentially taxpayers who fund rescue operations. It could also affect private search and rescue organizations that volunteer in these areas. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress and has not yet advanced to a full vote. This means it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and may require modifications before it can move forward.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles".
# Summary of HJRES 60: Glen Canyon Motor Vehicle Rule Disapproval **What the Bill Does** This bill cancels a National Park Service rule that was issued in January 2025 regarding motor vehicle use at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, a large park straddling the Arizona-Utah border. The original rule had restricted where visitors could use off-road vehicles like ATVs and similar recreational vehicles in certain parts of the recreation area. By passing this resolution, Congress rejected that restriction and effectively allowed broader motor vehicle access to continue in those areas. **Who It Affects** The bill impacts outdoor recreation enthusiasts who use off-road vehicles, local communities in Arizona and Utah near the recreation area, and the National Park Service's management of the land. Conservation groups and visitors who prefer quieter or protected areas would also be affected, as would local economies that depend on recreation-related tourism and activities. **Current Status** The bill has already been signed into law, meaning it is now in effect. This was a "disapproval resolution," a congressional procedure that allows lawmakers to overturn federal agency rules they oppose, rather than creating new legislation from scratch.
To nullify the Henry Mountains and Fremont Gorge Travel Management Plan.
# HR 2376 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 2376 would cancel a travel management plan for the Henry Mountains and Fremont Gorge areas. Travel management plans are rules created by federal land agencies (like the Bureau of Land Management) that designate which roads, trails, and areas are open to vehicles, hiking, or other uses. If passed, this bill would eliminate whatever restrictions or designations were established in the Henry Mountains and Fremont Gorge plan. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects people who use these areas in Utah—including off-road vehicle enthusiasts, hikers, hunters, and outdoor recreationalists—as well as local communities and the federal agencies managing the land. Supporters likely argue that the travel plan is overly restrictive, while opponents may contend it protects environmental resources or manages conflicts between different user groups. The bill contains no detailed provisions listed in the summary provided. **Current Status** HR 2376 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT).
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture relating to "Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions".
# Summary of HJRES 36 **What the Bill Would Do:** This resolution is a "disapproval resolution" that would reject a Forest Service rule about law enforcement and criminal prohibitions. If passed, it would overturn the rule using a fast-track congressional process that prevents lengthy debate and filibustering. The resolution doesn't specify the exact details of what the Forest Service rule contains, but it targets regulations the agency created regarding how law enforcement operates on national forests and what activities are criminalized there. **Who It Affects:** The rule would primarily affect people who use national forests—including visitors, outdoor recreationists, hunters, and campers—as well as Forest Service employees responsible for enforcing the law on federal forest lands. The specifics of how the rule impacts these groups depend on what criminal prohibitions and enforcement procedures it establishes. **Current Status:** The resolution was introduced by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a floor vote. Without more information about the rule's specific contents, it's unclear what concerns prompted the disapproval resolution or what opposition to the rule exists.
WEST Act of 2025
# WEST Act of 2025 Summary The WEST Act of 2025 (HR 1206) is a bill currently under review in the House of Representatives that focuses on how the Department of the Interior manages environmental regulations related to land use, conservation, and wildlife protection. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, its subject matter suggests it would modify current environmental regulatory procedures and potentially affect federal land management policies. This bill would primarily impact federal land management agencies, environmental organizations, and communities that depend on federal lands for activities like ranching, mining, recreation, or conservation. It could also affect wildlife habitats and conservation programs overseen by the Department of the Interior. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives, so it remains in the early legislative stage. For current details on the specific provisions being proposed, interested parties should check Congress.gov or the bill sponsor's official website, as the exact language and impacts would be outlined in the full bill text.
Ending Presidential Overreach on Public Lands Act
# Ending Presidential Overreach on Public Lands Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change who has the power to create or expand national monuments. Currently, U.S. presidents can designate new national monuments or make existing ones larger under the Antiquities Act of 1906. If passed, HR 521 would remove this presidential authority and require Congress to vote on any new monument designations instead. Essentially, it shifts decision-making power from the executive branch (the president) to the legislative branch (Congress). **Who It Affects and Key Implications** This bill would affect conservation efforts, land management, Native American tribes (who often advocate for monument protections), states with public lands, and environmental and recreational interests. Western states like Utah have been particularly involved in this debate, as much of their land is federally managed. The change would make monument designations more difficult, since they would require Congressional approval rather than presidential action alone—a process that typically requires more consensus but takes longer. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Celeste Maloy, a Republican from Utah.
Daylight Act
# Daylight Act Summary **What It Does:** The Daylight Act would allow U.S. states to keep daylight saving time (DST) in effect throughout the entire year, rather than switching between daylight saving time and standard time twice annually. Currently, states can opt out of DST and observe standard time year-round, but they cannot do the reverse—staying on DST permanently. This bill would change that rule. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would impact all Americans, as it would give states the flexibility to determine their own time observance year-round. The change would primarily affect business operations, transportation, school schedules, and daily routines that depend on sunrise/sunset times. Some states may choose to implement permanent DST if this bill passes, while others would likely maintain their current practices. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 300) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Celeste Maloy (R-UT) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.