Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
Democrat · NY · 24 bills sponsored
Terminating the national emergency declared to impose global tariffs.
# Summary of HJRES 150 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would cancel a national emergency declaration made by President Trump on April 2, 2025, that imposed a 10% tariff (tax) on most imported goods coming into the United States, plus additional tariffs on certain trading partners. If passed, the bill would eliminate these tariffs and end the emergency declaration that authorized them. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact businesses that import goods, consumers who buy imported products, and trading partner countries. It would also affect any U.S. industries that benefit from tariff protections. The measure directly challenges a presidential action, so it reflects disagreement between Congress and the administration over trade policy. **Current Status and Key Details** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York. Joint resolutions like this one require approval from both the House and Senate and cannot be vetoed by the President, making it a direct congressional check on executive power—though passing both chambers typically requires significant bipartisan support.
Relating to a national emergency by the President on February 1, 2025.
# Summary of HJRES 72 **What the Bill Does:** This is a congressional resolution that addresses a national emergency declaration made by the President on February 1, 2025. The bill gives Congress the ability to review, debate, and potentially terminate that emergency declaration. Under federal law, when a president declares a national emergency, Congress has the power to vote to end it—and this resolution is the formal mechanism to do that. **Who It Affects:** This resolution affects anyone impacted by the emergency declaration itself. Depending on what the declaration covers (whether it relates to military actions, natural disasters, public health, border security, or other crises), it could impact different groups of Americans. The resolution is primarily a tool for Congress to exercise its constitutional oversight power over presidential emergency declarations. **Key Provisions and Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and has passed the House. As a congressional resolution addressing presidential powers and emergency authorities, it falls under the War Powers Act framework, which requires Congress to have a say in how long national emergencies can last. The bill's specific provisions regarding which emergency declaration it targets and what outcome it seeks would be detailed in the full legislative text.
Terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil.
# Summary of HJRES 147 **What the Bill Would Do** This resolution would terminate a national emergency declaration that was used to impose tariffs (special taxes) on imports from Brazil. If passed, it would end the legal basis for these tariffs, effectively removing or reducing the additional taxes currently placed on Brazilian goods entering the United States. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact U.S. businesses and consumers who buy Brazilian products (such as steel, agricultural goods, and other imports), as well as American companies that export to Brazil. It could affect prices for consumers and competitiveness for U.S. industries that rely on or compete with Brazilian imports. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY).
RESTRICT Act
# RESTRICT Act Summary The RESTRICT Act (HR 6879) is a bill sponsored by Representative Gregory Meeks that would regulate foreign investment and control of certain U.S. technologies and infrastructure. While specific details aren't provided in the information available, bills with this title typically aim to prevent foreign adversaries—particularly countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—from acquiring controlling interests in American companies or technologies deemed critical to national security, such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, telecommunications, and energy systems. The bill would primarily affect U.S. companies in sensitive technology sectors, foreign investors seeking to acquire American assets, and potentially regulators who would implement these new restrictions. It could impact business transactions, merger and acquisition deals, and how foreign capital flows into the U.S. economy in strategic industries. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Many bills introduced in Congress do not advance beyond the committee stage.
Stop Illegal Fishing Act
# Stop Illegal Fishing Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Stop Illegal Fishing Act (HR 6338) aims to combat illegal fishing operations, particularly those that occur in international waters or involve trafficking of illegally caught seafood. The bill would strengthen enforcement mechanisms and penalties against vessels and companies engaged in unlawful fishing practices that harm marine ecosystems and undercut legitimate fishing industries. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact commercial fishing operations, seafood importers, and enforcement agencies. It could affect consumers by potentially influencing seafood supply chains and prices, while also protecting legitimate fishermen who operate within legal boundaries. International fishing vessels and foreign companies involved in illegal operations would face stricter consequences. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) in the 119th Congress. Without additional action, the bill could still be debated, amended, or voted on during the current congressional session, though no movement has been reported yet.
Mortgage Insurance Freedom Act
# Mortgage Insurance Freedom Act (HR 5508) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to give homeowners more flexibility in managing private mortgage insurance (PMI). Currently, when homeowners put down less than 20% on a home purchase, they're required to pay PMI—an extra monthly fee that protects lenders if the borrower defaults. The bill would allow homeowners to remove this insurance requirement more easily once they've built up enough equity in their home, rather than waiting for automatic removal at a set point. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily benefit homeowners who couldn't afford a large down payment when buying their home. It would affect millions of Americans with mortgages, as well as mortgage lenders and insurance companies. First-time homebuyers and those with limited savings would likely see the most impact, as PMI can add hundreds of dollars monthly to mortgage payments. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. No action has been taken since its introduction, so its chances of passage remain uncertain.
Relating to a national emergency by the President on July 30, 2025.
# Summary of HJRES 117 **What the Bill Would Do** This resolution addresses a national emergency declaration made by the President on July 30, 2025. Based on its classification as a joint resolution concerning presidential emergency powers, it likely either approves, disapproves, or modifies the President's emergency declaration. Joint resolutions of this type are typically used by Congress to exercise its constitutional authority over emergency powers—meaning Congress can review and potentially override or limit how the President uses emergency authorities. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This resolution would affect the President's ability to exercise emergency powers and any actions taken under the July 30, 2025 declaration. It would also impact whatever situation prompted the emergency declaration (whether related to security, natural disaster, economic crisis, or another issue—the specifics aren't provided in this summary). All Americans could potentially be affected depending on the nature of the emergency and the powers being invoked. **Current Status** As of now, HJRES 117 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY). *Note: The specific details of the July 30, 2025 emergency declaration are not included in this bill summary, so the exact nature and scope of the emergency cannot be determined from this information alone.*
Regional China Officer Authorization Act
# Regional China Officer Authorization Act (HR 5329) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would authorize the creation of regional China officer positions within the U.S. government. These officers would focus on diplomatic and policy matters related to China across different geographic regions. The legislation essentially gives official approval and funding authority for establishing specialized roles dedicated to managing U.S.-China relations on a regional basis, rather than handling all China-related issues from a single central office. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects the State Department and other federal agencies involved in foreign policy, as it would require them to staff and operate these new regional positions. Indirectly, it could affect U.S. relations with countries in Asia and other regions where China has significant influence, since these officers would coordinate diplomatic strategy in their assigned areas. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY).
Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025
# Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 - Summary **What it does:** This bill directs the President to identify and punish foreign individuals and organizations that work with Haiti's criminal gangs. The State Department would create reports listing major gang leaders and any Haitian political or business elites (government officials, executives, board members) who have direct connections to these gangs. The President would then impose sanctions—blocking visas and freezing property—against those identified individuals and organizations. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily targets foreign entities and individuals supporting Haiti's gangs, as well as Haitian political and economic leaders accused of gang connections. It could also indirectly affect Haiti's economy and governance if key business or political figures are sanctioned. **Current status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting consideration in the Senate. The bill aims to increase transparency about corruption and gang involvement in Haiti's leadership while giving the U.S. government tools to pressure individuals suspected of supporting organized crime.
Enhancing Multi-Class Share Disclosures Act
# Enhancing Multi-Class Share Disclosures Act (HR 3357) — Summary **What the bill does:** This bill requires companies with multi-class share structures to provide clearer information to investors about who owns what and how much voting power they have. Multi-class shares occur when a company issues different types of stock with unequal voting rights—for example, founders might own shares with 10 votes each while regular investors own shares with only 1 vote each. The bill requires companies to disclose the share ownership and voting power of directors, executive officers, and major shareholders (those owning 5% or more of voting power) whenever they seek shareholder approval on matters. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects publicly traded companies with multi-class share structures (common among tech and media companies) and their investors. Investors would benefit from more transparent information about who controls the company and how voting power is distributed. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and awaits action in the Senate.
Burma GAP Act
# Burma GAP Act Summary **What the bill would do:** The Burma GAP Act aims to increase U.S. oversight and accountability regarding the situation in Myanmar (Burma). Based on its subjects, the bill would likely establish congressional oversight mechanisms, impose restrictions on U.S. foreign aid to Myanmar, and create reporting requirements for the State Department on issues including human rights abuses, potential war crimes, and the treatment of ethnic minorities and refugees. The bill also appears to address Internet access and sanctions-related matters. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts U.S. foreign policy toward Myanmar and would affect Myanmar's government, military, and citizens fleeing the country. It could also influence international partners, NGOs working on human rights issues in the region, and U.S. diplomatic efforts in Southeast Asia and South Asia more broadly. **Current status:** As of now, the bill is in committee and has not been passed. It was introduced by Representative Gregory W. Meeks (D-NY) in the 119th Congress. Bills in committee status have not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Saving Lives and Taxpayer Dollars Act
# Saving Lives and Taxpayer Dollars Act (HR 4516) - Summary I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: the bill information provided doesn't include the actual legislative text or details about what the bill would do. The summary you've shared only shows basic metadata (bill number, sponsor, and committee status) without describing the specific provisions or policy changes the bill proposes. To give you an accurate, factual summary as requested, I would need access to: - The bill's actual text or a detailed summary of its provisions - What specific programs or policies it targets - Estimated costs or savings claims - Which populations would be affected **What I can tell you:** HR 4516 is currently in committee (meaning it hasn't advanced to a full vote yet) and was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York. The title suggests it aims to improve government efficiency and reduce costs, but I cannot responsibly speculate about the specific mechanisms without the actual bill language. If you can provide the bill's text or a more detailed summary, I'd be happy to break it down into clear, non-partisan language for a general audience.
SAK PASE in Haiti Act of 2025
# SAK PASE in Haiti Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The SAK PASE in Haiti Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently under review in Congress. "SAK PASE" is Haitian Creole for "what's happening" or "how are you"—suggesting the bill focuses on Haiti-related matters. However, specific details about the bill's provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided, so the exact measures it would implement cannot be detailed here. **Current Status and Who It Affects** The bill was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. If passed, it would likely affect U.S. foreign policy toward Haiti, potentially impacting aid, trade, or diplomatic relations. It could also affect Haitian citizens and Haitian-Americans, though the specific population impacts depend on the bill's detailed provisions. **Next Steps** To learn exactly what this bill proposes, interested parties should check Congress.gov or the House Foreign Affairs Committee (which likely oversees it given the sponsor and subject matter) for the full text once it becomes available for public review.
Strengthening the Quad Act
# Strengthening the Quad Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Strengthening the Quad Act directs the U.S. State Department to work more closely with Japan, Australia, and India—a partnership known as the Quad—on shared interests and goals. The bill requires the State Department to develop and report to Congress a comprehensive strategy outlining how the U.S. can strengthen cooperation with these three countries in areas like economic growth, technology, energy innovation, and supply chain resilience. The report must also identify what new authorities and resources the government needs to expand and improve these partnerships. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects U.S. foreign policy and diplomatic efforts in the Indo-Pacific region. It focuses on deepening relationships with key allies to address shared challenges, including climate change, energy security, and technology development. The legislation requires the State Department to assess current and past Quad initiatives and recommend to Congress specific ways to remove obstacles to cooperation and expand these efforts. The bill essentially asks the State Department to take stock of the partnership and create a roadmap for the future. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is a bipartisan effort to increase U.S. engagement in the Indo-Pacific through strengthened partnerships with Japan, Australia, and India.
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services.
# Summary of HJRES 97 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would block a planned military equipment and services sale to the United Arab Emirates. If passed, it would prevent the U.S. government from delivering defense articles (weapons, military hardware) and related services that have been proposed for sale to the UAE. The bill uses the congressional disapproval process, which allows Congress to formally reject an arms sale that the executive branch has already approved. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects U.S.-UAE military relations and defense contractors involved in the proposed sale. It would also impact the UAE's military capabilities. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives, meaning it remains in the early legislative stage. Sponsor Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) introduced the measure, though the specific details about which defense articles are involved are not included in this summary. **Key Context** Congress has the authority to review and reject foreign military sales, though such disapprovals are relatively uncommon. This mechanism allows lawmakers to weigh in on U.S. defense relationships with foreign governments on a case-by-case basis.
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services.
# Summary of HJRES 96 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would block a proposed military sale of weapons and defense services to the United Arab Emirates. If passed, it would prevent the U.S. government from completing this specific arms deal with the UAE. **Who It Affects** The bill would directly affect U.S.-UAE military relations and trade. It would also impact U.S. defense contractors involved in the proposed sale, as well as broader Middle Eastern geopolitical dynamics given the UAE's strategic importance in the region. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House. Without additional details in the official summary, the specific weapons systems involved and the stated reasons for the proposed disapproval are not specified in this congressional record.
Suspending Transfer of Property for Improper Trump Use Act
# Summary of HR 3405 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3405, titled the "Suspending Transfer of Property for Improper Trump Use Act," would restrict the transfer of federal property to former President Donald Trump or entities associated with him. While the bill's specific language and detailed provisions are not provided in the available information, the title suggests it aims to prevent what the sponsor views as improper uses of federal property by Trump or Trump-related organizations. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect the former president and any organizations connected to him that might seek to acquire federal property. It was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) in the 119th Congress. As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives and has not advanced in the legislative process. **Note:** Limited details are available about the specific provisions and mechanisms of this bill. For complete information about what property transfers would be prohibited and under what circumstances, you would need to review the full text of the legislation on Congress.gov or similar official sources.
Ukraine Support Act
# Ukraine Support Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Ukraine Support Act (HR 2913) is a proposed law aimed at strengthening U.S. support for Ukraine. While specific details aren't provided in this summary, bills with this title typically authorize military aid, financial assistance, humanitarian support, or diplomatic measures to help Ukraine. The bill would need to be approved by the House of Representatives and Senate before becoming law. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and Russia, U.S. defense and budget priorities, and potentially American military personnel or contractors involved in aid efforts. It could also indirectly affect Ukrainian civilians and officials receiving assistance. **Current Status:** As of this information, HR 2913 is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. It has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY). To learn more about specific provisions—such as the exact amount of aid or what types of support it includes—you would need to review the full bill text through Congress.gov.
Relating to a national emergency by the President on April 2, 2025.
# Summary of HJRES 91 **What the Bill Does:** This joint resolution addresses a national emergency declared by the President on April 2, 2025. Based on its title alone, the bill appears to be a response measure to that emergency declaration, though the specific details of what actions it would authorize or require are not provided in this summary. Joint resolutions of this type typically either affirm, modify, or terminate emergency powers granted to the President. **Who It Affects:** The bill would potentially affect federal agencies, government spending and powers, and possibly the general public—depending on the nature of the emergency declared and what the resolution proposes. Without knowing the specifics of the April 2 declaration, it's difficult to identify precise impacts. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (as of the information provided), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks, a Democrat from New York. **Note:** To provide more detailed information about key provisions and effects, the actual text of the bill would be needed, as the summary provided here contains limited detail.
U.S. Engagement in Sudanese Peace Act
# U.S. Engagement in Sudanese Peace Act (HR 1939) — Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would direct the U.S. government to increase its diplomatic involvement in achieving peace in Sudan, a country experiencing ongoing conflict. If passed, it would require the State Department and other U.S. agencies to develop and implement strategies aimed at supporting peace negotiations, humanitarian assistance, and diplomatic engagement with parties involved in Sudan's conflict. The bill would essentially make Sudan peace efforts a more formal priority in U.S. foreign policy. **Who It Affects & Key Provisions** The bill would affect U.S. foreign policy operations and could impact Sudan and neighboring countries experiencing spillover effects from the conflict. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills of this type typically include requirements for the administration to coordinate with international partners, support peace talks, and potentially allocate resources toward humanitarian relief. Sudanese civilians experiencing the conflict, as well as U.S. diplomatic agencies, would be directly involved. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1939 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and is still in the early legislative process.
Relating to a national emergency by the President on February 1, 2025.
# HJRES 73 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This resolution would block or challenge a national emergency declaration made by the President on February 1, 2025. Under the National Emergencies Act, Congress has the power to terminate a presidential emergency declaration, and this resolution appears to be an attempt to exercise that authority. If passed, it would effectively end the emergency declaration and any special powers or actions taken under it. **Who It Affects:** This resolution could impact federal agencies, businesses, and the public depending on what actions were taken under the emergency declaration. The specific effects would depend on what emergency was declared and what measures the President implemented as a result. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further. Sponsor Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) introduced it, indicating Democratic opposition to the emergency declaration. For the resolution to pass, it would need committee approval, a House floor vote, and Senate approval. *Note: The bill's subjects are not specified in the available information, so the exact nature of the emergency being challenged is unclear from these records alone.*
To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.
# HR 1488 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 1488 would repeal the congressional authorizations that have allowed the U.S. military to conduct operations in Iraq. Specifically, it targets the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iraq, which originally gave the president legal authority to invade Iraq and has remained on the books for over two decades. Repealing these authorizations would remove the legal basis the executive branch has used to justify military actions in Iraq, requiring Congress to pass new authorizations if the military wanted to conduct future operations there. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects the military's operational authority in Iraq and could impact current U.S. military personnel and activities there. It would also affect the executive branch's ability to act militarily without seeking new congressional approval. The bill is straightforward in scope—its main provision is simply to cancel the old authorization rather than to create new restrictions or requirements. **Current Status** HR 1488 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet moved forward for a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and reflects ongoing congressional debate about war powers and whether decades-old authorizations remain appropriate for current military needs.
No Russian Tunnel to Crimea Act
# No Russian Tunnel to Crimea Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the President to impose sanctions against foreign individuals and companies that help build, maintain, or repair a tunnel or bridge connecting Russia to Crimea. The sanctions would include blocking visas (preventing travel to the U.S.) and freezing property assets in the United States. The bill aims to discourage infrastructure projects that strengthen Russia's control over Crimea, the Ukrainian peninsula that Russia annexed in 2014. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill primarily targets foreign companies, contractors, and individuals involved in such construction projects—not American citizens. It includes some flexibility, allowing the President to make exceptions for humanitarian assistance or international obligations, and permits the President to waive sanctions if they conflict with U.S. national security interests. The measure reflects ongoing U.S. opposition to Russia's presence in Crimea and efforts to isolate Russia internationally. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Gregory Meeks (D-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Sanction Russian Nuclear Safety Violators Act of 2025
# Sanction Russian Nuclear Safety Violators Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would require the U.S. President to impose sanctions against foreign individuals or entities that endanger the safety of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine or prevent Ukraine from controlling it. Sanctions would include blocking visa access to the United States and freezing any U.S. property or assets these individuals or entities own. The bill includes exceptions for international obligations, humanitarian aid, and efforts to restore Ukrainian control of the plant. **Who it affects:** The sanctions would primarily target Russian officials, military personnel, and other foreign nationals involved in threatening the nuclear facility's safety or Ukrainian control of operations. Indirectly, it may affect broader U.S.-Russia relations and international trade in nuclear or related sectors. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It requires additional review and debate before moving forward in the legislative process.