Lee, Mike [R-UT]
Republican · UT · 97 bills sponsored
A bill to clarify the classification of service provider payees as employees or independent contractors in Federal law.
# Summary of S. 4010: Service Provider Classification Bill **What It Would Do:** This bill would clarify how federal law determines whether workers who provide services—such as drivers, cleaners, or other gig economy workers—should be classified as employees or independent contractors. Currently, different federal agencies and courts sometimes use different standards to make this determination, creating confusion for workers and businesses. This bill aims to establish clearer, consistent rules across federal law for making that classification. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact millions of workers in the gig economy and service industries, as well as the companies that hire them. It would also affect federal agencies responsible for enforcing labor laws, tax regulations, and workplace protections. The classification matters significantly because employees typically receive benefits like minimum wage guarantees and unemployment insurance, while independent contractors do not. **Current Status:** S. 4010 was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced to the next stage in the legislative process.
A bill to establish a regulatory sandbox program under which agencies may provide waivers of agency rules and guidance, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 3998: Regulatory Sandbox Program Bill **What the Bill Would Do** S. 3998 would create a "regulatory sandbox" program that allows federal agencies to temporarily waive or suspend certain rules and regulations. A regulatory sandbox is a controlled testing environment where companies or organizations can operate under modified regulations to test new business models, technologies, or services without full compliance with existing rules. If passed, this bill would establish a formal framework for how agencies can grant these waivers and under what conditions. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect businesses, startups, and entrepreneurs looking to innovate in regulated industries (such as fintech, transportation, healthcare, or energy). Federal agencies would gain authority to provide temporary relief from their rules for approved participants. The specific details about how long waivers would last, which agencies participate, and what safeguards exist aren't available in this summary, but regulatory sandbox programs typically include consumer protections and limits on the number of participants. **Current Status** S. 3998 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
A bill to enforce the rights protected by the Second and Fourteenth Amendments against the States.
# Summary of S. 4013 **What the Bill Would Do:** S. 4013 aims to enforce Second Amendment (gun rights) and Fourteenth Amendment protections against state governments. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, bills with this title typically seek to override or limit state and local gun regulations by asserting that the Second Amendment applies uniformly across all states. Such legislation would likely prevent states from enforcing their own stricter gun control laws. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact gun owners, state governments, and anyone subject to state firearm regulations. States with stricter gun laws—particularly on issues like background checks, permit requirements, or restrictions on certain weapons—would be most affected, as the bill could invalidate those laws. It would also affect public safety officials and organizations focused on gun regulation. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken at this stage.
Upper Price River Watershed Project Act of 2025
# Upper Price River Watershed Project Act of 2025 Summary **What the bill would do:** This legislation authorizes a water management project focused on the Upper Price River watershed area in Utah. Based on its subjects, the bill would likely involve transferring or managing federal land, improving water storage capabilities, and collecting geographic and hydrological information about the region. The exact details of the project—such as specific infrastructure plans, costs, or water allocation methods—would be contained in the full bill text. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts Utah residents and communities that depend on the Upper Price River for water supply or rely on the watershed for agriculture, recreation, or other purposes. It may also affect federal agencies responsible for managing public lands and water resources in the region. **Current status:** As of now, the bill (S 3004) remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) in the 119th Congress. Until it moves out of committee, the proposal has not been formally debated or voted on by the broader Senate.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
# Summary of SJRES 109 **What the Bill Would Do** This resolution allows Congress to disapprove a new management plan for the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). If passed, it would reject the BLM's resource management plan for how the monument should be operated and protected. This would use a congressional tool called the "Congressional Review Act," which allows Congress to overturn federal agency rules with a simple majority vote. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects management of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah, which impacts outdoor recreation, conservation, energy development, and local communities in the region. The resolution was introduced by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah. The specific details of what the BLM's plan includes—and why the sponsor opposes it—are not provided in this bill summary, though disputes over the monument typically involve disagreements between conservation groups and those favoring energy exploration or local economic development. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Congress, meaning it remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
A bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to reauthorize and reform certain authorities and to provide greater transparency and oversight.
# Plain Language Summary: S 3893 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would update and extend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a law that governs how U.S. intelligence agencies conduct surveillance for national security purposes. The bill aims to reauthorize certain surveillance authorities that are set to expire while also adding new reforms to increase transparency and congressional oversight of these intelligence activities. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact intelligence agencies (like the FBI and NSA), Congress, and ultimately American citizens whose communications might be monitored. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, the stated goals of "reform" and "greater transparency and oversight" suggest the bill would likely include measures to limit certain surveillance powers, require more public reporting about how these powers are used, or increase congressional review of surveillance programs. Exactly which surveillance authorities would be reauthorized and what specific reforms would be included aren't clear from this summary. **Current Status** As of now, S 3893 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). For more detailed information about specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text, as this summary doesn't specify which FISA authorities are being reauthorized or what reforms are proposed.
Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act
# Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Outdoor Americans with Disabilities Act would improve access to outdoor recreational areas and forests for people with disabilities. The bill aims to ensure that national forests, public lands, and outdoor recreation facilities are more accessible to individuals with mobility challenges and other disabilities. It addresses barriers that currently prevent people with disabilities from enjoying hiking trails, camping areas, scenic viewpoints, and other outdoor spaces. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects people with disabilities who want to participate in outdoor recreation, as well as federal land management agencies (like the Forest Service) that oversee national forests and public lands. State and local governments may also be involved in implementing accessibility improvements on public lands they manage or maintain. **Key Provisions and Current Status:** While specific provisions aren't detailed in this summary, bills of this type typically include requirements for agencies to assess accessibility barriers, create plans to improve access (such as paved trails or accessible parking), and provide information about accommodations available at outdoor sites. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet debated or voted on by the full Senate. It would need to pass committee review and a Senate vote before moving forward.
Count the Crimes to Cut Act
I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a summary of this bill because the information provided doesn't include the actual text or details about what the legislation would do. The listing you've shared only shows basic metadata—the bill number, sponsor, and status—but not the substantive provisions. To give you an accurate summary in plain language, I would need access to: - The bill's stated purpose and objectives - Specific provisions or actions it would authorize - Which agencies or populations it affects - Any budget impacts or implementation details I'd recommend checking **Congress.gov** (search "S 3868") to find the full bill text, summary, and sponsors' statements. This will give you the most reliable, up-to-date information about what this bill actually proposes.
Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025
# Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would align two government lists of important minerals and materials. Currently, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Department of Energy (DOE) maintain separate lists of "critical minerals" and "critical materials" that are important for the nation's economy and security. This bill would require the USGS to automatically update its list within 45 days whenever DOE adds something to its list, ensuring the two lists stay in sync. More importantly, it would make materials on DOE's list eligible for the same government financial support and tax benefits that are currently only available to items on the USGS list. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects mining companies, manufacturers, and energy producers who depend on critical minerals and materials for their operations. It also impacts industries relying on clean energy technologies. By expanding access to government financing and tax incentives to include DOE's materials list, the bill could increase funding opportunities for companies working with a broader range of essential materials—particularly those needed for energy production and storage. **Current Status** The bill (S. 714) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
University of Utah Research Park Act
# University of Utah Research Park Act - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would officially authorize the University of Utah to use approximately 593 acres of land in Salt Lake City for a research park and related educational purposes. The land in question is nonfederal property (meaning it's not owned by the federal government), and the bill would legally confirm that using this land for the university's research park, student housing, and transit hub is a valid public purpose under Utah law. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects the University of Utah and potentially Salt Lake City residents who might benefit from the development. By formally recognizing these uses as a valid public purpose, the bill could help remove any legal obstacles the university might face in developing the property. The 593 acres would be dedicated to research activities, student housing, and a transit hub—projects that could generate economic activity and improve campus infrastructure. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken on it yet.
Balance the Highway Trust Fund Act
# Balance the Highway Trust Fund Act (S 3786) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to address funding shortfalls in the Highway Trust Fund, which pays for highway and bridge construction and maintenance across the United States. The fund has faced financial challenges because fuel tax revenue (the primary funding source) hasn't kept pace with spending demands. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically propose solutions to balance the fund's budget, which could involve adjusting fuel taxes, reducing spending, or reallocating funds. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact transportation infrastructure projects nationwide, state and local governments that manage roads and bridges, and potentially drivers (if it involves fuel tax changes). Construction workers and businesses involved in highway projects would also be affected by any changes to funding levels. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) in the 119th Congress. *Note: For detailed provisions and the bill's specific proposals, you'd want to check Congress.gov or the bill's official text, as the summary provided doesn't include those specifics.*
Historic Roadways Protection Act
# Historic Roadways Protection Act – Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would prevent the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from closing old historical roads on federal public lands in Utah until courts finish deciding legal cases about whether those roads should stay open. The disputes stem from an 1866 law that gave states and counties the right to build roads across public lands to encourage western settlement. Utah and 22 counties have filed lawsuits claiming they still have rights to keep certain historical roads open, even though the federal government stopped granting new road rights in 1976. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts Utah state and local governments, residents who use these historical roads, and the BLM. It also affects land management decisions on federal property in Utah, which could influence public access to recreation and other activities on those lands. **Current status:** The bill (S. 90) is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) in the 119th Congress.
SAVE America Act
# SAVE America Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The SAVE America Act would require voters to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship (such as a passport or REAL ID-compliant identification) when registering to vote in federal elections. It would also mandate that voters show photo identification at the polls. Currently, federal law allows states to accept voter registration applications without citizenship documentation, though states can verify citizenship through other means. This bill would standardize citizenship verification requirements across all states for federal elections. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects voters registering for federal elections and states administering elections. It would impact anyone without current photo identification or citizenship documentation, potentially creating barriers for certain groups, including elderly citizens, low-income individuals, and some minorities—though supporters argue it strengthens election security while critics contend it could suppress voter participation. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (S 3752, 119th Congress), sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). It has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill reflects ongoing partisan debate over voting access versus election security, with Republicans generally supporting stricter voter ID requirements and Democrats generally opposing them as unnecessary barriers to voting.
A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a feasibility study on a selective water withdrawal system at Glen Canyon Dam, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3743: Glen Canyon Dam Water Withdrawal Study **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Secretary of the Interior to study whether a "selective water withdrawal system" could be installed at Glen Canyon Dam in Arizona. Such a system would allow water to be drawn from different depths of the reservoir, potentially improving water quality and environmental conditions downstream. The bill directs the government to investigate the technical feasibility, costs, and benefits of implementing this technology. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects water users in the Southwest, including states that rely on the Colorado River (Arizona, Nevada, California, and others), tribal nations, hydroelectric power generation, and environmental groups concerned about downstream ecosystems. Glen Canyon Dam plays a major role in managing water distribution across the region and maintaining Lake Powell, so any changes could impact millions of people and various industries. **Current Status** S 3743 is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), reflecting regional interest in exploring new management approaches for the dam.
Terminate Unaccountable Spending, Abuse, Deception, and Fraud Act
# Summary of S. 3748: Terminate Unaccountable Spending, Abuse, Deception, and Fraud Act **What the Bill Would Do** While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it's designed to address wasteful government spending, fraud, and accountability issues within federal agencies. The exact mechanisms and which programs or departments would be affected cannot be determined from the information provided. **Current Status and Impact** S. 3748 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). At this stage, the bill has not become law and would need to pass out of committee, receive a Senate vote, pass the House, and be signed by the President before taking effect. **Note:** For a complete understanding of this bill's specific provisions, impact on taxpayers and government agencies, and exact details about what spending or practices it targets, you would need to review the full legislative text, which is not included in this summary.
Immediate Access for the Terminally Ill Act
# Immediate Access for the Terminally Ill Act (S 3648) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow terminally ill patients to access experimental drugs and medical treatments that haven't yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Currently, patients with terminal illnesses can apply for access to unapproved treatments through existing FDA "Right to Try" programs, but this bill appears designed to expand or streamline that access. The legislation would potentially make it easier for dying patients to obtain experimental medications without waiting for full FDA approval, giving them more treatment options when conventional medicine has exhausted possibilities. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill directly impacts terminally ill patients seeking experimental treatments, pharmaceutical companies developing new drugs, and the FDA. Patients with incurable conditions would gain faster pathways to try new therapies. The specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, but such bills typically focus on reducing bureaucratic barriers while potentially including safeguards around patient consent and data collection. This touches on the ongoing debate between expanding patient choice at the end of life versus ensuring drugs meet safety standards. **Current Status** As of now, S 3648 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote in the Senate.
Cartel Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act of 2025
# Cartel Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would authorize the federal government to issue "letters of marque and reprisal" against drug cartels and criminal organizations. Historically, letters of marque allowed governments to commission private parties to attack enemy ships and seize their property. If passed, this law would modernize that concept to permit private entities (likely security contractors or armed groups) to conduct operations against cartel targets, potentially including seizure of their assets. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect major drug trafficking organizations and cartels, along with private military/security companies that might be hired to conduct these operations. It could also impact border communities, law enforcement agencies, and international relations—particularly with Mexico and other neighboring countries where cartels operate. The general public could be affected depending on how such operations are regulated and conducted. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 3567, 119th Congress), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). The bill remains largely undefined in publicly available details, with no specific implementation mechanisms listed. *Note: This proposal is highly controversial, raising significant legal and constitutional questions about delegating military authority to private entities.*
Brian Head Town Land Conveyance Act
# Brian Head Town Land Conveyance Act Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would transfer about 24 acres of federal land from the Dixie National Forest to the town of Brian Head, Utah, at no cost. The land includes any buildings or improvements already on it. Once transferred, the town would have full control over how to use the property, whether for public facilities or other purposes the town deems necessary. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects Brian Head Town and the U.S. Forest Service. It would reduce the amount of federally managed forest land in Utah while giving a small Utah municipality control over a specific parcel for local development or public use. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) in the 119th Congress.
A bill to authorize the use of off-highway vehicles in certain areas of the Capitol Reef National Park, Utah.
# Capitol Reef National Park Off-Highway Vehicle Bill Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow off-highway vehicles (like ATVs and dirt bikes) to be used in certain areas of Capitol Reef National Park in Utah. Currently, such vehicles are generally prohibited in national parks. If passed, the bill would create exceptions to this rule for specific zones within the park, giving visitors more recreational options in those designated areas. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects off-highway vehicle enthusiasts who want to recreate in Capitol Reef National Park, as well as the park itself and local Utah communities. It could also impact other park visitors, wildlife, and natural resources, depending on which areas are opened to vehicles and how much use occurs. **Current Status & Key Details** The bill is sponsored by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The specific areas where vehicles would be allowed are not detailed in this basic bill description, so those details would likely be determined through the committee process or included in amendments.
D.C. Shield Law Repeal Act
# D.C. Shield Law Repeal Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would repeal the D.C. Shield Law, a Washington, D.C. regulation that protects the identities of certain individuals involved in sensitive situations. If passed, it would eliminate these privacy protections, making information that is currently shielded available to the public and law enforcement. The exact scope of which records would be affected is not detailed in the basic bill information available. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact people in Washington, D.C. whose identities are currently protected under the Shield Law, as well as D.C. residents and the local government. The specific groups protected by the current law (such as crime victims, confidential informants, or others) would lose those privacy safeguards if the repeal passes. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3327) has been introduced in the Senate but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). No further action has been taken at this time.
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 50 East 100 North in Moab, Utah, as the "2nd Lieutenant Mitch Williams Post Office".
# S 3331 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would rename the U.S. Postal Service facility in Moab, Utah to the "2nd Lieutenant Mitch Williams Post Office." The building is currently located at 50 East 100 North in Moab. This is a commemorative naming that honors 2nd Lieutenant Mitch Williams. **Who It Affects** The change would primarily affect the postal facility in Moab and its operations, though the practical impact would be minimal—mainly affecting signage, official documents, and mail processing at that location. The naming honors an individual (likely a military service member based on the rank), though the bill summary doesn't provide details about who 2nd Lieutenant Williams was or why he's being honored. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Bills that name federal facilities are generally considered routine procedural matters and often pass with broad support, though this one has not yet advanced.
UNtaxed Act
# UNtaxed Act (S 3276) Summary The UNtaxed Act is a bill introduced in the Senate that aims to eliminate federal taxes on certain income or transactions, though specific details about which taxes would be affected are not provided in the available information. The bill was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and currently remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill would primarily affect American taxpayers and the federal government's revenue. However, without access to the bill's specific language and provisions, it's unclear exactly which tax provisions would be changed, who would benefit most, or how much revenue would be lost. The lack of detailed information suggests this may be an early-stage proposal or the full text may not yet be publicly available in standard summaries. To understand the bill's full impact and implications, interested parties would need to review the actual legislative text on Congress.gov or contact Senator Lee's office for more detailed information about the proposed tax changes.
Flight Risk Reduction Act
# Flight Risk Reduction Act (S 3197) Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the specific details of this bill beyond the basic metadata you've provided. The bill is currently in committee and hasn't been publicly summarized in standard legislative databases I can reference. To give you an accurate, factual summary of what it would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the actual bill text. **What I'd recommend:** - Visit **Congress.gov** and search for "S 3197" to read the full bill text and official summary - Check Senator Mike Lee's official website for his statement on the bill's purpose - Look for any news coverage from legislative tracking sources for additional context I want to make sure any summary I provide is accurate rather than speculating about the bill's contents. Would you like to share the bill text or summary, or would you prefer guidance on how to find this information?
Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025
# Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025 would require the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive audit of the nation's gold reserves and make the results publicly available. Currently, the U.S. Treasury holds significant gold reserves, but the bill seeks to increase public disclosure about exactly how much gold the government possesses and where it's stored. The legislation aims to provide transparency about these valuable national assets that haven't been fully audited in many decades. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** This bill would primarily affect the U.S. Treasury Department and Federal Reserve, which manage the nation's gold reserves. The general public would benefit from increased transparency about government assets. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, such bills typically call for independent audits of gold storage facilities and public reporting of findings. The measure reflects broader interest in government accountability and verification of assets that underpin confidence in U.S. financial institutions. **Current Status:** As of now, S 3218 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). No further action has been taken at this stage.