Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]
Republican · WI · 21 bills sponsored
CRACKDOWN Act of 2026
# CRACKDOWN Act of 2026 Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7721 (CRACKDOWN Act of 2026), as the bill's full text and provisions aren't included in the information you provided. To give you an accurate summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the actual legislative text. **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a floor vote yet. It was introduced by Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) in the 119th Congress. **To get the information you're looking for**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 7721" for the full text and summary - Checking the bill's status page for any committee reports or amendments - Looking at Rep. Grothman's official website for his statement on the bill's purpose If you can provide the bill's text or a summary, I'd be happy to break it down in plain language for you.
Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025
# Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025 would establish new requirements related to worker wages, employee rights, and labor standards. Based on its title and subject areas, the bill appears to focus on ensuring workers receive proper compensation and creating mechanisms for addressing wage-related disputes. The bill covers accounting, auditing, and record-keeping requirements, as well as administrative processes for handling employment-related complaints. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This legislation would primarily affect workers and employers, with involvement from the Department of Labor. The bill addresses employment discrimination, employee rights, labor-management relations, and personnel record requirements. However, the specific details of the provisions are not available in this summary, as the bill remains in committee and the full legislative text would provide complete information about exact wage requirements, audit procedures, and enforcement mechanisms. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee stage, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was sponsored by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI) in the 119th Congress. For the most current information on this bill's progress, you can visit Congress.gov.
Migrant Child Safety Act
# Migrant Child Safety Act (HR 7538) - Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill, introduced by Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI), aims to address child safety issues related to immigration. While the full legislative text and specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided, bills with this title typically focus on protecting migrant children and ensuring proper care and oversight of unaccompanied minors who enter the country. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect migrant children, particularly unaccompanied minors, as well as the federal agencies responsible for their care and processing (such as the Department of Health and Human Services). It could also impact immigration procedures and border processing operations. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7538 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full vote in the House. The bill is in the early stages of the legislative process. To understand the specific provisions and policy approach, you would need to review the actual bill text, which can be found on Congress.gov. *Note: Without access to the full bill text, this summary is limited. For complete details on specific provisions, costs, and impact, consult the official bill document.*
Form 5500 Filing Simplification Act
# Form 5500 Filing Simplification Act - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Form 5500 Filing Simplification Act aims to reduce paperwork burdens for employers and plan administrators who manage retirement and health benefit plans. Form 5500 is a complex annual filing that employers must submit to the Department of Labor and IRS detailing their employee benefit plans. This bill would simplify that filing process, though specific details about which requirements would be eliminated or streamlined are not provided in the available information. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects employers, especially small and medium-sized businesses, and the administrators who handle their retirement plans (like 401(k)s) and other employee benefit plans. It could indirectly benefit employees by potentially reducing administrative costs that employers pass along. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-Wisconsin).
Safeguarding Benefits for Americans Act of 2026
# Safeguarding Benefits for Americans Act of 2026 (HR 7213) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safeguarding Benefits for Americans Act of 2026 is a proposed law currently under review in Congress. However, specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in the provided information. To understand what this bill would actually do—such as which benefits it would protect, how it would safeguard them, or what changes it would make—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov. **Current Status and Next Steps:** As of now, the bill remains "In Committee," meaning it has been assigned to a congressional committee for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wisconsin) introduced this bill in the 119th Congress. For the bill to become law, it would need to pass committee review, receive a House vote, move through the Senate, and be signed by the President. **To Learn More:** For detailed information about this bill's specific provisions and impacts, I recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 7213" to access the complete legislative text and any available summaries.
Fair and Accountable IRS Reviews Act
# Fair and Accountable IRS Reviews Act — Plain Language Summary **What the bill does:** This bill clarifies and strengthens oversight rules for IRS employees who propose tax penalties against taxpayers. It requires that before the IRS sends any written notice about a penalty to a taxpayer, a supervisor must first approve it in writing. The bill defines "immediate supervisor" as the person the IRS employee directly reports to, rather than allowing the IRS to use broader definitions through its regulations. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects IRS employees and taxpayers who receive penalty notices. It aims to ensure there's a clear chain of command and consistent approval process when penalties are being assessed. Taxpayers could potentially benefit from an additional review layer, while the IRS would need to follow stricter procedural requirements. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It has not yet been voted on by the Senate, so it is not yet law. The stated purpose is to increase accountability and standardize how the IRS handles penalty approvals, though supporters and opponents may differ on whether the changes improve efficiency or add unnecessary bureaucracy.
Randy Susen Visitation Rights Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 5314: Randy Susen Visitation Rights Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does:** This bill, introduced in the House of Representatives, is titled the Randy Susen Visitation Rights Act of 2025. However, based on the information available, the bill's specific provisions and detailed content are not publicly summarized in standard legislative databases yet. The title suggests it relates to visitation rights—likely addressing custody or access issues for a specific individual or establishing precedent for visitation matters—but the exact scope and mechanisms cannot be determined from the available data. **Current Status and Who It Affects:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been assigned to a relevant House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-Wisconsin). Without access to the bill's full text or detailed summary, it's unclear exactly who would be directly affected, though visitation rights legislation typically impacts families involved in custody disputes or separated families. **Next Steps:** To understand this bill's full implications, you would need to review its complete text on Congress.gov, where the actual language and provisions would be detailed.
Dillon’s Law
# Dillon's Law (HR 4564) - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's content, as the information provided only includes basic metadata (sponsor, committee status, and bill number). Without the actual legislative text or summary from Congress, I cannot accurately describe what Dillon's Law would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 4564" for the full text and official summary - Checking the bill's summary on your representative's website - Looking at news coverage from the time of introduction for context on the sponsor's stated intent If you have access to the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Enforce the Caps Act
# Enforce the Caps Act (HR 4178) Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would set annual spending limits on discretionary federal spending for four fiscal years (2026 through 2029). Discretionary spending refers to money Congress must approve each year for various programs and agencies—like defense, education, and infrastructure—as opposed to mandatory spending on programs like Social Security and Medicare that are funded automatically. By establishing caps, the bill aims to control how much the federal government can spend in these categories during this period. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The spending limits would affect all federal agencies and programs funded through annual appropriations bills. This would potentially impact federal employees, contractors, and recipients of federally-funded services across numerous departments. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full House. No further action has been taken at this time.
Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2025
# Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2025 (HR 4101) aims to ensure equal treatment of cancer medications under health insurance plans. While the full legislative text isn't available in your summary, bills with this title typically address disparities in how insurance companies cover different types of cancer drugs—such as ensuring oral cancer medications (pills) are covered the same way as intravenous cancer treatments (injections). The goal is usually to prevent patients from facing higher out-of-pocket costs for certain cancer treatments simply because of how the drug is administered. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact cancer patients, health insurance companies, and employers who offer health plans. It could affect how insurance plans structure their drug coverage and patient cost-sharing requirements going forward. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4101 remains in committee and has not yet advanced for a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI). Further details about specific provisions would require reviewing the actual bill text, which wasn't included in the information provided.
CREATE JOBS Act
# CREATE JOBS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 3967 (CREATE JOBS Act) from the 119th Congress in my training data, so I cannot provide accurate information about what this particular bill would do, its specific provisions, or who it would affect. To get reliable, factual information about this bill, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** – The official source for all federal legislation, where you can read the full bill text, see sponsors, track its progress, and view any amendments - **Your representative's website** – Often includes their perspective on bills they sponsor - **Nonpartisan analysis sources** like the Congressional Research Service or Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget If you'd like, you can share the bill's text or key provisions, and I'd be happy to help explain them in plain language.
Stop the Baseline Bloat Act of 2025
# Stop the Baseline Bloat Act of 2025 — Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change how Congress calculates its budget baseline—essentially the starting point used to measure whether spending is increasing or decreasing. Currently, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) includes emergency spending and supplemental appropriations (extra money approved outside the regular budget process) when projecting future spending levels. This bill would exclude those types of spending from baseline calculations. The idea behind the change is that emergency and supplemental spending are temporary additions that shouldn't automatically become the new "normal" for future budget projections. **Who It Affects and Why It Matters** This change would affect Congress's budget planning and how lawmakers evaluate the cost of new legislation. By excluding emergency and supplemental spending from baseline projections, the bill could make future spending increases appear smaller on paper—potentially making it easier to pass new legislation without triggering budget rules that require offsets for increased spending. Conversely, it could make baseline spending appear lower, which some argue would create a more accurate picture of regular versus one-time spending. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Elimination Act
# Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Elimination Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would eliminate the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), a federal tax incentive program that has been in place since 1986. The LIHTC allows developers and investors to claim tax credits when they build or renovate rental housing for low-income households. If passed, this program would be discontinued, removing a major funding source for affordable housing development across the country. **Who It Affects** The elimination would impact low-income renters seeking affordable housing, developers who build subsidized rental properties, investors who finance affordable housing projects, and state housing agencies that administer the program. Essentially, it would affect millions of Americans who rely on affordable rental housing and the housing industry that serves them. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced to a full congressional vote. As introduced by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI), it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. Supporters argue the program is inefficient, while opponents contend it is a cost-effective tool for addressing housing shortages for low-income Americans.
Student Loan Marriage Penalty Elimination Act of 2025
# Student Loan Marriage Penalty Elimination Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to address a situation some married couples face with federal student loans: their combined income can result in higher loan payments under income-driven repayment plans than if they had remained unmarried. Currently, married borrowers filing taxes jointly may be required to pay more toward their student loans because their household income is calculated as a combined figure. The bill would eliminate this "marriage penalty" by allowing married couples more flexibility in how their income is counted when determining student loan payment amounts. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily benefit married couples with federal student loans who are enrolled in income-driven repayment plans—programs that tie monthly payments to discretionary income. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Republican Glenn Grothman of Wisconsin in the 119th Congress.
No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2025
# No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would eliminate federal tax breaks currently available for the construction and renovation of sports stadiums. Currently, professional sports teams and stadium developers can use tax-exempt bonds and other tax incentives to finance stadium projects, reducing the overall cost to private entities. If passed, this legislation would remove those tax benefits, making stadium financing more expensive for teams and owners who would need to cover costs without federal tax advantages. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect professional sports teams (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL), stadium developers, and local governments that partner with teams on stadium projects. It would also impact investors who currently benefit from tax-exempt bonds used for stadium financing. By restricting these subsidies, the bill aims to prevent federal taxpayers from indirectly funding what proponents argue are privately profitable ventures. **Current Status** As of now, HR 2434 is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it's in the early stages and would require committee approval and a full vote in the House of Representatives before moving forward.
FEHB Protection Act of 2025
# FEHB Protection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The FEHB Protection Act of 2025 addresses the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program, which provides health insurance to millions of federal workers, retirees, and their families. Based on its subjects, the bill appears to focus on how the program is managed, audited, and funded. However, the specific details of what changes it would make are not publicly available in the information provided, as the bill is still in committee. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect federal government employees and retirees who receive health benefits through the FEHB program, along with their dependents. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which administers the program, would also be impacted by any structural or operational changes. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 2193) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill's full text and specific provisions would need to be reviewed for a more detailed understanding of its exact impact.
Air America Act of 2025
# Air America Act of 2025 - Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of HR 2192 (Air America Act of 2025) available in my training data. To provide you with an accurate summary of what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the actual bill text or legislative details. **What I can tell you:** - The bill is currently in committee (meaning it's still in early stages and hasn't been voted on by the full House) - It was introduced by Representative Glenn Grothman, a Republican from Wisconsin - The bill number is HR 2192 in the 119th Congress **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 2192" for the full bill text and details - Checking your representative's website for their position on the bill - Looking at nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service summary I apologize I can't provide more detail without reliable source material. Would you like guidance on where to find this information, or do you have the bill text you'd like me to help analyze?
Employee Business Expense Deduction Reinstatement Act of 2025
# Employee Business Expense Deduction Reinstatement Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would reinstate a tax deduction for employees' unreimbursed business expenses. Before 2017, workers could deduct certain job-related costs (such as uniforms, professional fees, or home office expenses) if they exceeded 2% of their adjusted gross income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated this deduction, and this bill seeks to bring it back, allowing eligible employees to reduce their taxable income based on these work-related expenses. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit employees who incur unreimbursed business expenses that their employers don't reimburse. This could include teachers buying classroom supplies, consultants paying for professional development, or workers maintaining home offices. Self-employed people and business owners already have other deduction options, so this targets traditional W-2 employees specifically. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No further action has been taken at this time.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to Rules for Supervisory Approval of Penalties.
# Summary of HJRES 65 **What the bill would do:** This bill would overturn an IRS rule issued in December 2024 regarding how the agency approves tax penalties. Specifically, it would cancel the rule that sets requirements for when IRS supervisors must approve certain penalties before they're assessed to taxpayers. The bill uses a congressional process called the "Congressional Review Act" that allows Congress to reject federal regulations within a limited timeframe. **Who it affects and key details:** The rule primarily affects the IRS's internal procedures for administering tax penalties. Depending on what the overturned rule required, it could potentially impact how quickly or under what circumstances the IRS can impose penalties on individual taxpayers or businesses. The bill was introduced by Republican Representative Glenn Grothman from Wisconsin. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process. The bill's passage would require approval from both the House and Senate, plus the President's signature (or a veto override if the President opposes it).
No IRIS Act of 2025
# No IRIS Act of 2025 (HR 1415) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The No IRIS Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently being reviewed in Congress. However, based on publicly available information, specific details about this bill's provisions are limited at this time. The bill was introduced by Representative Glenn Grothman (R-WI) but has not yet been formally debated or voted on by the full House. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process. Before it can be voted on by the House, it must be reviewed and potentially amended by the relevant congressional committee. Many bills introduced in Congress never advance beyond the committee stage. **What You Should Know** To understand the specific impact of this bill and who it would affect, you would need to review the full text of HR 1415 on Congress.gov or similar legislative tracking websites. These resources provide detailed summaries, sponsor statements, and any amendments proposed to the legislation. If you're interested in this bill's status, checking Congress.gov directly is the best way to get current, detailed information.
Protecting Taxpayers from Student Loan Bailouts Act
# Protecting Taxpayers from Student Loan Bailouts Act – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would restrict the Department of Education's ability to create new rules or take executive actions related to federal student loan programs if those actions would cost taxpayers money or have significant economic effects. Specifically, the Department could not implement policies that are considered "economically significant" (affecting the economy by $100 million or more annually or materially impacting jobs, competition, or other sectors) if they would increase government spending on student aid. The bill is designed to prevent what its sponsor views as costly student loan forgiveness programs or debt relief initiatives without congressional approval. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect student loan borrowers, the Department of Education, and taxpayers. Borrowers could see limitations on potential loan forgiveness or relief programs that the administration might otherwise implement. The bill essentially requires Congress to vote on any major student aid changes rather than allowing the Department to act independently through executive action. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.