Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]
Republican · MS · 20 bills sponsored
To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.
# HR 2294 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 2294 would renew and continue the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System (IOOS) Act, a federal program that monitors U.S. coastal and ocean conditions. The bill essentially extends the authority and funding for this existing program, which tracks things like water quality, marine ecosystems, weather patterns, and other environmental data along America's coasts and Great Lakes. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill impacts coastal communities, fishing industries, researchers, environmental agencies, and the general public that relies on ocean and coastal information. IOOS provides data used for everything from weather forecasting and flood warnings to managing fisheries and protecting marine habitats. By reauthorizing the program, Congress would ensure these monitoring systems and the advisory groups that oversee them can continue operating. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 825 Highway 198 in Beaumont, Mississippi, as the "Jeremy Malone Post Office".
# Summary of HR 6995 **What the Bill Does** This bill would rename a U.S. Postal Service facility in Beaumont, Mississippi to the "Jeremy Malone Post Office." The postal facility is located at 825 Highway 198. If passed, the building would officially be designated with this new name honoring Jeremy Malone. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects the local postal facility and residents of Beaumont, Mississippi who use this post office. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No timeline for further action has been announced.
Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act
# Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act (HR 5745) Summary **What the Bill Does** The Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act would establish protections for marine ecosystems and fishing habitats, particularly concerning activities like oil and gas development and pipeline construction in coastal waters. The bill would require environmental assessments and monitoring to protect aquatic ecosystems that support commercial and recreational fisheries. It appears designed to balance resource development with habitat conservation by ensuring that activities in marine areas are properly studied and evaluated before moving forward. **Who It Affects** This legislation would impact fishing communities and the fishing industry, coastal states, oil and gas companies operating in marine environments, and environmental organizations. Recreational and commercial fishermen could benefit from habitat protections, while energy companies would face additional regulatory requirements and assessments for offshore projects. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. No action has been taken since its introduction in the 119th Congress. The bill would require committee review, potential amendments, and approval before it could move to the broader legislative process.
Cormorant Relief Act of 2025
# Cormorant Relief Act of 2025 – Plain Language Summary **What the bill does:** This bill allows the Department of the Interior to reinstate a rule that permits people to capture, kill, or relocate double-crested cormorants (large water birds) without needing special permits. The original rule was canceled by a court in 2016. The bill would expand this permission to cover more states and more types of operations, including fish farms, fish hatcheries, and private pond managers licensed by their states. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects aquaculture (fish farming) businesses, fish hatcheries, and private lake and pond operators in multiple states across the U.S. (including Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, and others). Cormorants, which eat fish, are considered a threat to these operations. The bill also indirectly affects wildlife advocates concerned about cormorant populations and the birds themselves. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and awaits Senate consideration. It was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS).
Mississippi River Basin Fishery Commission Act of 2025
# Mississippi River Basin Fishery Commission Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a new Mississippi River Basin Fishery Commission—a multi-state advisory group designed to coordinate fishing and fish management policies across the Mississippi River and its connected waterways. The commission would bring together representatives from multiple states (including Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Illinois, and others) to work together on shared fishery issues and provide recommendations to the federal government, likely through the Department of the Interior. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect the 15+ states that border or have territory connected to the Mississippi River Basin. It could impact commercial and recreational fishers, state wildlife agencies, and communities that depend on healthy fish populations for food and economic activity. The federal government would also be involved in overseeing or coordinating with the commission. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 1514) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Sponsor Mike Ezell (R-Mississippi) introduced it in the 119th Congress. The bill would need committee approval and then a full House vote before moving to the Senate for consideration.
NFIP Retroactive Renewal and Reauthorization Act
# NFIP Retroactive Renewal and Reauthorization Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), a federal program that provides flood insurance to property owners when private insurers won't cover flood damage. The bill appears designed to retroactively renew the program, likely addressing a lapse in authorization. The NFIP is the primary flood insurance option for most Americans and is especially important in flood-prone areas where private flood insurance is unavailable or unaffordable. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact millions of American homeowners and businesses with NFIP flood insurance policies, as well as the program's operations. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, reauthorization bills typically address program funding, policy terms, and operational requirements. Flood insurance is mandatory for homeowners with mortgages in federally-designated flood zones, making this program essential for lending and property ownership in vulnerable areas. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5848 is in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS), whose district includes flood-prone areas along the Mississippi coast.
MARA Act of 2025
# MARA Act of 2025 Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a substantive summary of this bill. The congressional record information you've provided only includes basic metadata (bill number, sponsor, committee status), but doesn't contain the actual text or legislative details that would explain what the bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To give you an accurate summary, I would need access to: - The bill's full text or detailed summary - The specific provisions it contains - Its stated purpose and objectives **What I can tell you:** HR 5746 is a bill sponsored by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS) currently under review in committee during the 119th Congress. If you can share the bill's text or a more detailed description, I'd be happy to summarize it in plain language for a general audience.
To extend the National Flood Insurance Program through November 21, 2025.
# Summary of HR 5574 **What the Bill Does** HR 5574 would extend the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for an additional period, keeping it operational through November 21, 2025. The NFIP is a federal program that provides flood insurance to property owners, renters, and businesses in communities that participate in the program. Without periodic extensions, the program would expire and coverage would lapse. **Who It Affects** This bill would affect millions of Americans who rely on flood insurance, particularly those in flood-prone areas where private insurance may be unavailable or unaffordable. It also impacts property owners with mortgages in high-risk flood zones, as lenders typically require flood insurance. Communities participating in the NFIP would also be affected, since the program helps manage flood risk at the local level. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5574 is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS). Extensions of the NFIP are routine but necessary pieces of legislation, as Congress must periodically renew the program to keep it functioning.
Fairness and Accountability of Appeals Act of 2025
# Fairness and Accountability of Appeals Act of 2025 (HR 5310) **What the Bill Would Do:** Unfortunately, the details of this bill are not publicly available in the summary provided. The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) in the 119th Congress, but specific provisions, affected groups, and its exact purpose are not included in this record. To understand what this legislation would actually accomplish, you would need to access the full bill text through Congress.gov or other legislative databases. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been assigned to a House committee for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. At this stage, many bills never advance further in the legislative process. **Next Steps:** If you want to learn more about this bill's specific provisions and who it would affect, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 5310" to view the complete bill text and any committee reports.
To unleash America's offshore critical minerals and resources.
# Summary of HR 4018 **What the Bill Does** HR 4018 would expand opportunities for mining critical minerals and resources in U.S. offshore waters (along coastlines and in the ocean). Critical minerals include metals like rare earth elements, cobalt, and lithium—materials essential for batteries, electronics, and renewable energy technology. The bill aims to increase domestic production of these materials rather than relying on imports from other countries. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect mining companies and energy producers seeking to operate offshore, coastal communities and their economies, and U.S. consumers and industries dependent on these minerals (including renewable energy and technology sectors). Environmental groups and fishing industries may also be impacted, though the bill's specific environmental protections aren't detailed in the available summary. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4018 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-Mississippi) and reflects a policy focus on reducing U.S. dependence on foreign sources for critical materials needed in modern technology and clean energy.
Port Crane Tax Credit Act of 2025
# Port Crane Tax Credit Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Port Crane Tax Credit Act of 2025 would create a tax credit for businesses that purchase or use port cranes—specialized equipment used in shipping terminals and ports to load and unload cargo. While the full details of the bill aren't publicly available, tax credits of this type typically allow businesses to reduce their federal taxes owed if they invest in qualifying equipment, effectively lowering the cost of purchasing or upgrading these machines. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily benefit shipping companies, port operators, and other maritime businesses that use cranes in their operations. It was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS) in the 119th Congress. Currently, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives and would need to advance through the legislative process before it could become law. **Note:** Limited details about specific provisions are available at this time. For more comprehensive information about the exact tax credit amount, eligibility requirements, and affected industries, the full bill text would need to be reviewed.
To amend title 46, United States Code, to include the replacement or purchase of additional cargo handling equipment as an eligible purpose for Capital Construction Funds, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 3842 **What the Bill Does** This bill would expand the rules governing Capital Construction Funds (CCFs), which are special savings accounts that allow U.S. maritime companies to set aside money for ship-related investments while getting tax benefits. Currently, these funds can be used for building or improving vessels. The bill would add cargo handling equipment—the machinery and tools used to load and unload cargo from ships—as an eligible use of these funds, allowing maritime companies to replace or purchase new equipment using CCF money. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects U.S. shipping companies and the maritime industry. By making cargo handling equipment eligible for CCF investments, the legislation could help shipping companies modernize their equipment while taking advantage of existing tax incentives designed to strengthen the domestic maritime sector. **Current Status** HR 3842 was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Capacity Building for Business Districts Pilot Program Act of 2025
# Capacity Building for Business Districts Pilot Program Act of 2025 (HR 3585) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish a pilot program to help business districts—organized groups of property owners and merchants in commercial areas—strengthen their operations and effectiveness. The program would likely provide funding, technical assistance, or resources to help these districts improve their management, planning, and ability to serve their communities. However, specific details about program structure, funding amounts, and eligibility requirements are not publicly available in the current summary. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit business district organizations, local merchants, property owners, and the commercial areas they operate in. Indirectly, it could affect city governments and residents in areas with organized business districts seeking revitalization or improved management. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3585 remains in committee (the early review stage), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS). Without the full legislative text available, additional details about specific provisions cannot be determined.
Safer Shrimp Imports Act
# Safer Shrimp Imports Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safer Shrimp Imports Act would establish stricter food safety standards and inspection requirements for shrimp imported into the United States. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this name typically aim to ensure imported shrimp meet the same safety standards as domestically-produced shrimp, potentially including requirements for testing, certification, or traceability of foreign shrimp products. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact shrimp importers and seafood companies that bring shrimp into the U.S. market, as well as American shrimp producers (particularly those in Mississippi, the sponsor's home state). Consumers would potentially benefit through increased food safety assurances, though import requirements could affect shrimp prices. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 3324) is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House yet. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and it hasn't advanced further as of the last available information. For the most current status and specific provisions, you can check Congress.gov.
To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure that cost estimates, acquisition of proper materials, and any other activity related to certain projects under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act are performed by professionals licensed in the relevant State, and for other purposes.
# HR 3177 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require FEMA to ensure that certain disaster relief and emergency assistance projects are handled by professionals who hold valid licenses in their state. Specifically, it targets cost estimates, material procurement, and related project activities conducted under the Stafford Act, which is the main federal law governing disaster relief. The bill essentially adds a licensing requirement to FEMA's disaster recovery work. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects FEMA and disaster recovery contractors. It would also impact states and communities recovering from disasters, as the licensing requirement could influence which professionals and companies are eligible to work on federally-funded recovery projects. Homeowners and businesses receiving disaster assistance could potentially be affected depending on how the requirements are implemented. **Current Status:** HR 3177 was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
BRIDGE Production Act of 2025
# BRIDGE Production Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The BRIDGE Production Act of 2025 (HR 3061) is a proposed law currently under review in Congress. Based on its title, the bill likely aims to support domestic production or manufacturing in some capacity, though specific details about its provisions are not available in the information provided. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell, a Republican from Mississippi's 4th district. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate congressional committee for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill may be modified, rejected, or advanced for further consideration depending on committee discussions. **Note:** Without access to the bill's full text or detailed provisions, a more specific summary of how it would work, who it directly affects, and its key features cannot be provided. To learn more details, you can view the complete bill text on Congress.gov.
Secretary of the Coast Guard Act of 2025
# Secretary of the Coast Guard Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Secretary of the Coast Guard Act of 2025 would establish the U.S. Coast Guard as an independent agency with its own cabinet-level Secretary, rather than keeping it under the Department of Homeland Security where it currently operates. If passed, this would elevate the Coast Guard's leadership position in the federal government and give it a dedicated voice in presidential cabinet meetings. **Who It Affects and Key Impact** This change would primarily affect Coast Guard operations and leadership structure. It could influence how the Coast Guard sets priorities, receives funding, and coordinates with other federal agencies. The Coast Guard currently handles maritime security, search and rescue operations, law enforcement, and coastal protection. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 2546) is in committee and has not advanced to a full House vote. It was introduced by Representative Mike Ezell (R-MS) in the 119th Congress. The bill has not yet been enacted into law.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources".
# Summary of HJRES 62 **What It Would Do:** This bill would overturn a rule created by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) regarding protection of underwater archaeological sites. The rule, finalized in September 2024, requires oil and gas companies operating on the U.S. continental shelf to submit archaeological reports identifying potential underwater artifacts and historical sites before getting approval for exploration or drilling projects. If passed, the bill would eliminate this requirement, meaning companies would only need to submit such reports if a BOEM official specifically suspects archaeological resources are present in their lease area—reverting to the previous standard. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects oil and gas companies operating offshore, as well as the federal agencies that oversee these operations. It also has implications for the protection of underwater cultural heritage, including shipwrecks, submerged settlements, and other historical artifacts on the ocean floor. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act
# Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require federal agencies that provide disaster assistance to publish detailed information about their spending on a public website, updated quarterly. Agencies would have to report how much assistance they've provided, how much has actually been spent versus just promised, and what specific projects or activities the money went toward. The main agencies affected are the Small Business Administration and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, along with any other federal agency involved in disaster relief. **Who It Affects and Why** The bill is designed to help taxpayers and elected officials see how disaster relief money is being used. It would make it easier for the public to track federal spending after hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, and other disasters. Disaster victims and their communities could also use this information to understand what assistance is available and how funds are being distributed. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting consideration in the Senate. It is a relatively straightforward transparency measure focused on government accountability rather than changing how disaster assistance is delivered.
Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act
# Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act Summary **What it does:** This bill asks FEMA to simplify how it collects information from people and organizations applying for disaster assistance, aiming to reduce paperwork and make the process faster and less repetitive. The bill also requires FEMA to create a system for regularly tracking and reporting what federal disaster aid is being given out, and to study whether different agencies are duplicating each other's work when assessing disaster damage. **Who it affects:** Disaster victims and organizations seeking federal assistance would benefit from a simpler application process. The bill also affects FEMA and other federal agencies involved in disaster response, as well as Congress, which will receive reports on the findings. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is moving through the legislative process. It focuses on improving government efficiency rather than changing who gets disaster aid or how much money is available.