Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]
Republican · AL · 9 bills sponsored
$2.50 for America’s 250th Act
# Summary of HR 5616: $2.50 for America's 250th Act This bill would authorize the U.S. Treasury Department to create and release $2.50 coins to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence signing in 2026. The coins would only be minted if Treasury determines it's technically and economically feasible to do so. The bill specifies that the coins' design during the first five years must follow the bill's requirements, but Treasury can change the design afterward to continue celebrating America's founding. Additionally, Treasury could produce special collectible versions made of silver, gold, and other materials for coin collectors. The bill affects anyone who uses U.S. currency, collects commemorative coins, and the Treasury Department, which would manage production and distribution. The measure is relatively modest in scope—it creates a new denomination primarily for commemorative purposes rather than requiring everyday circulation. The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is now in the legislative process.
Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period beginning on December 31, 2025, and ending on January 5, 2026.
# Summary of HJRES 133 **What the Bill Does** This bill, which has been signed into law, grants special permission for unique displays to be set up on the National Mall and around the Washington Monument during New Year's week 2025-2026 (December 31, 2025 through January 5, 2026). Normally, the National Mall has strict rules about what can be displayed there, so this law creates a one-time exception to those standard regulations for this specific period. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill gives the Secretary of the Interior authority to approve these special arrangements. While the bill doesn't specify exactly what displays would be shown, the timing suggests this is related to New Year's celebrations and potentially commemorative events. This affects anyone visiting the National Mall during that week, as well as organizers who want to set up displays in this iconic location. **Current Status** The bill has already been signed into law, meaning it is official and in effect. It was sponsored by Representative Robert Aderholt (R-AL) during the 119th Congress.
ADOPT Act of 2025
# Summary of the ADOPT Act of 2025 I don't have specific details about the contents of HR 6170 (ADOPT Act of 2025) available to provide you with an accurate summary of what the bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. While I can see it's currently in committee and sponsored by Representative Robert Aderholt (R-AL), the actual bill text and its purpose aren't in my information. To get an accurate summary, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 6170" to read the full bill text and summary - **Representative Aderholt's official website** - Often includes bill summaries and rationales - **News reports** on the bill if it's received media coverage This will ensure you have factual, current information about what the bill proposes rather than speculation.
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
# HR 5304 Summary: 2026 Appropriations Bill **What It Does** This bill would allocate federal funding for fiscal year 2026 to three major departments: Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, plus related agencies. Essentially, it determines how much money these departments receive to operate their programs and services for the coming year. **Who It Affects and Key Areas** The bill would impact millions of Americans by funding programs across employment and training, workplace safety, public health, medical research, and education. Specific areas include job training programs, the CDC, the National Institutes of Health, workplace safety inspections (OSHA), Medicare and Medicaid, student aid programs, and veterans' employment services. Individual funding amounts for each agency are not detailed in the available summary. **Current Status** HR 5304 is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) and would need to pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President to become law.
ARMS Act
# ARMS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 4481 (the ARMS Act) from the 119th Congress, so I can't provide you with accurate information about what this particular bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. **To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 4481" to see the full text, summary, and status updates - **Your representative's website** - Often includes their sponsored bills with explanations - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or established news outlets that cover legislation If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in plain language for a general audience.
To authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into arrangements with institutions of higher education to provide dual or concurrent enrollment programs for students enrolled in schools operated by the Department of Defense Education Activity, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 4020 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would allow the Secretary of Defense to partner with colleges and universities to offer dual enrollment and concurrent enrollment programs. These programs let high school students take college courses while still in high school, earning college credits before graduation. The bill specifically targets students who attend schools run by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA), which serves military-connected students at bases around the world and in the U.S. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects military families and their children who attend DoDEA schools. It could also impact colleges and universities that choose to participate in these partnerships, as well as the Department of Defense. Military families would benefit from expanded educational opportunities and a head start on college credits, potentially saving time and money on higher education. **Current Status:** HR 4020 was introduced by Representative Robert Aderholt (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not advanced beyond the committee stage at this time.
Deliver for Democracy Act
# Deliver for Democracy Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: the bill information provided lacks the detailed content needed for an accurate summary. While I can see this is HR 2098 from the 119th Congress, sponsored by Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL), the listing doesn't include the actual bill text, specific provisions, or stated purpose. To give you a proper, factual summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and key provisions, I would need access to: - The official bill text - A summary from Congress.gov or similar official sources - The stated purpose and specific legislative language **I'd recommend checking Congress.gov directly** (congress.gov) where you can search "HR 2098" to find the full bill text, sponsor statements, and any available summaries. This will ensure you get accurate, current information about what this bill actually contains and proposes. If you can share the bill text or a link to it, I'd be happy to provide the clear, non-partisan summary you're looking for.
Designation of English as the Official Language of the United States Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 1772: English as Official Language Act **What the bill would do:** This proposed legislation would officially designate English as the United States' national language and require federal, state, and local government to conduct official business in English. The bill would also incorporate English language testing into the naturalization process for new citizens. However, it includes specific exceptions: government services could still be provided in other languages when necessary to protect public health and safety, ensure crime victims and defendants' rights are protected, or comply with special education requirements under existing federal law. **Who it affects and current status:** The bill would potentially impact immigrants seeking citizenship, non-English speakers accessing government services, and state and local governments that currently provide multilingual services. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. It was introduced by Representative Robert Aderholt (R-AL) in the 119th Congress. The bill represents one approach to language policy; proponents argue it promotes national unity and integration, while critics contend that removing multilingual services could create barriers for vulnerable populations.
Protect Funding for Women’s Health Care Act
# Summary: Protect Funding for Women's Health Care Act (HR 599) **What the Bill Does** This bill would prevent federal government funding from going to Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliated organizations and clinics. It does not eliminate Planned Parenthood itself, but cuts off federal dollars that currently support its operations. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Planned Parenthood's patients and operations. Planned Parenthood receives federal funding (primarily through Medicaid and Title X family planning programs) to provide services including contraception, cancer screenings, STI testing, and abortion services. The organization would lose this federal funding, which could affect the services it provides and how many patients it can serve. It would also affect patients who rely on Planned Parenthood clinics for healthcare. **Current Status and Key Context** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. This type of legislation has been proposed multiple times in previous congressional sessions. The bill is sponsored by a Republican representative. Supporters argue federal funds shouldn't support abortion services, while opponents argue the bill would restrict access to healthcare for low-income women and that federal funds already don't pay for abortion services under existing law (the Hyde Amendment).