Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA]
Democrat · MA · 40 bills sponsored
A bill to reinforce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 by establishing a limitations period of 10 years for antibribery offenses, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 4029 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would strengthen the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), a 1977 law that makes it illegal for American companies and individuals to bribe foreign officials. The main change would establish a 10-year time limit for prosecutors to bring charges against someone for antibribery violations. Currently, there is no specified limitations period, which can create uncertainty about how long someone could potentially face prosecution for these offenses. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect U.S. businesses operating internationally, their executives, and law enforcement agencies responsible for investigating and prosecuting bribery cases. It could also impact American citizens working abroad and foreign officials involved in dealings with U.S. companies. **Current Status:** The bill (S 4029) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced further at this time.
A bill to amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update eligibility for the supplemental security income program, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 4001 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill proposes changes to the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, which provides cash assistance to elderly, blind, and disabled Americans with limited income and resources. The bill aims to update SSI eligibility rules, though specific details about those changes are not available in the basic information provided. The phrase "and for other purposes" suggests it may include additional provisions beyond SSI eligibility. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact current and potential SSI recipients—roughly 7 million Americans including seniors, people with disabilities, and blind individuals who have minimal income and savings. Changes to eligibility could expand or restrict who qualifies for these federal benefits. **Current Status** S. 4001 was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Without the detailed legislative text, specific provisions cannot be confirmed at this time.
A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to restrict the sale and procurement of certain weapons and ammunition by the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 4015 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would restrict the Department of Defense's ability to buy and sell certain types of weapons and ammunition. The specific weapons affected aren't detailed in the available information, but the bill targets what its sponsors view as problematic military procurement practices. If passed, it would change federal law governing how the Defense Department acquires and disposes of weaponry. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact the Department of Defense and its weapons purchasing decisions. It could also affect defense contractors who supply weapons and ammunition to the military, as well as potentially those who purchase surplus military equipment. **Current Status** S. 4015 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in the 119th Congress. Like most bills in committee, it faces an uncertain path forward and would need committee approval and significant Senate support to move toward a vote. *Note: Full details about which specific weapons are targeted were not available in the provided information.*
A joint resolution providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to "Rescission of Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions".
# Bill Summary: Congressional Disapproval of Climate Risk Rule Rescission **What the Bill Does** This joint resolution would overturn a recent decision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)—a federal agency that regulates banks—to eliminate guidelines requiring large financial institutions to assess climate-related risks. If passed, it would restore those climate risk management principles that the OCC had rescinded, forcing banks to once again evaluate how climate change might affect their business operations and financial stability. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects large financial institutions (major banks and financial companies) that would be required to incorporate climate risk assessments into their operations and management practices. It could also indirectly affect customers and the broader economy by potentially influencing how banks manage long-term financial risks. **Current Status and Key Details** Introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), this joint resolution is currently in committee and has not advanced further. Using a special Congressional Review Act process, a joint resolution like this can overturn federal rules with a simple majority vote in both chambers, though it would still require presidential approval to become law. The bill reflects ongoing partisan disagreement about whether financial regulators should require climate risk consideration in banking oversight.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce relating to "One Year Suspension of Expansion of End-User Controls for Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities".
# Plain Language Summary of SJRES 112 **What This Bill Does** This is a resolution that would allow Congress to reject a rule created by the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security. The rule in question suspends (pauses) for one year the expansion of export controls on certain foreign companies and their affiliated businesses. In simpler terms: the Commerce Department temporarily eased restrictions on what U.S. companies can sell to certain foreign entities that were previously on a restricted list. This resolution would reverse that decision and keep the stricter controls in place. **Who It Affects** This primarily affects U.S. businesses that export goods, technology, or services (especially in sensitive sectors like semiconductors or advanced technology) and foreign companies or affiliates that want to purchase those items. The bill was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and reflects concerns that easing these restrictions could harm national security interests. **Current Status** The resolution is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Congress. Under the congressional disapproval process, if the resolution passes both chambers, it would block the Commerce Department's rule from taking effect.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System relating to "Revisions to the Large Financial Institution Rating System and Framework for the Supervision of Insurance Organizations".
# Summary of SJRES 111 **What the Bill Does** This bill would block a recent rule change made by the Federal Reserve regarding how large financial institutions and insurance companies are rated and supervised. If passed, it would use a congressional disapproval process to overturn the Federal Reserve's new rating system and supervision framework for these large organizations. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily impacts large banks and insurance companies that are regulated by the Federal Reserve, as well as the Federal Reserve itself. Indirectly, it could affect consumers and investors, depending on how the supervision rules influence financial institution behavior and stability. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House or Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Without more details about the specific changes the Federal Reserve made, the public reasoning behind this disapproval, or the bill's support level, it's unclear whether it will advance further in the legislative process.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to "Regulatory Capital Rule: Modifications to the Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio Standards for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiary Depository Institutions; Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt Requirements for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies".
# Summary of SJRES 110 **What the Bill Would Do:** This resolution would block a Treasury Department rule that modifies capital requirements for the largest U.S. banks. Specifically, it would reject changes to the "Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio" and debt requirements for systemically important banks—those considered so large that their failure could threaten the entire financial system. If passed, the rule would be disapproved and not take effect. **Who It Affects:** The rule primarily affects the nation's largest banks (such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup) and their holding companies. Supporters of the disapproval argue it protects taxpayers and financial stability; opponents argue the modified requirements are still sufficiently strict and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden on major financial institutions. **Current Status:** The bill, sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), is currently in committee and has not yet been brought for a full vote in either chamber of Congress. This type of resolution, known as a "Congressional Review Act" measure, allows Congress to overturn executive agency rules with a simple majority vote if passed.
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to codify the Direct File program.
# S 3948: Direct File Program Bill **What It Would Do** This bill would make the IRS's "Direct File" program a permanent part of federal tax law. Direct File is a free online tool that allows eligible taxpayers to prepare and file their federal income tax returns directly through the IRS, without using commercial tax preparation software or hiring a tax professional. Currently, the program operates as a pilot project; this bill would formally establish it in the tax code, giving it legal backing beyond temporary funding. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily benefits taxpayers with straightforward tax situations who are currently eligible for Direct File—generally those with simple income sources and standard deductions. It could reduce costs for millions of Americans who might otherwise pay tax preparation fees. The IRS would gain permanent authority to operate and expand the program. Major commercial tax preparation companies, which currently dominate the tax filing market, could see reduced demand for their services. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). The bill has not advanced to a floor vote.
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny interest and depreciation deductions for certain taxpayers, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 3904 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change tax rules for certain taxpayers by limiting their ability to deduct interest payments and depreciation expenses from their taxable income. Interest deductions allow businesses and investors to reduce their taxes by deducting money they pay on loans, while depreciation deductions let them deduct the declining value of assets like buildings and equipment. The bill would restrict these deductions for specific types of taxpayers, though the exact details aren't fully specified in the available information. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect businesses and investors who currently use these deductions to lower their tax bills. The bill was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) but is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Without additional legislative action, it remains in the early stages of the congressional process and may not advance further.
Corporate Crimes Against Health Care Act
# Corporate Crimes Against Health Care Act (S 3829) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren, would create new criminal penalties for corporations and corporate executives who commit fraud or illegal activities in the health care industry. The legislation is designed to increase accountability in the health care sector by making it easier to prosecute corporate wrongdoing and imposing stricter consequences on companies that deceive patients, overcharge for services, or engage in other unlawful practices. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact health insurance companies, pharmaceutical firms, hospital networks, and other large health care corporations, as well as their executives and board members. Indirectly, it could affect patients and consumers by potentially reducing health care fraud that increases costs. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process and would need committee approval and broader Congressional support to advance further. *Note: Specific provisions are not detailed in the publicly available summary; the full bill text would contain the exact definitions of crimes and penalties.*
Break Up Big Medicine Act
# Break Up Big Medicine Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Break Up Big Medicine Act would give the federal government new powers to break up large healthcare companies that are considered too dominant in their markets. The bill targets hospital systems, insurance companies, and other healthcare organizations that have grown through mergers and acquisitions. If passed, it would allow the government to force these large companies to sell off parts of their business to increase competition in the healthcare industry. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact large healthcare corporations and insurance companies, potentially forcing them to divest (sell) divisions or subsidiaries. Consumers and patients could be affected if the increased competition leads to lower healthcare costs or different service availability. Healthcare workers and communities served by large hospital systems might also see changes. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant Senate committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). *Note: Since detailed provisions weren't available in the source data, this summary covers the general intent based on the bill's title and subject matter.*
Schedules That Work Act
# Schedules That Work Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Schedules That Work Act is proposed legislation sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren that aims to improve working conditions related to employee scheduling. While specific details aren't available in the summary provided, bills with this title typically focus on giving workers more predictable and stable work schedules—such as requiring employers to provide advance notice of shift schedules, limiting last-minute schedule changes, and potentially guaranteeing minimum hours for workers. These types of reforms are designed to help workers better manage childcare, education, and other personal responsibilities. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect hourly and part-time workers in retail, food service, hospitality, and similar industries where unpredictable scheduling is common. It could also impact employers in these sectors. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. To learn the specific provisions—such as which employers it applies to, what penalties exist for violations, or what notice periods are required—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
United States Cadet Nurse Corps Service Recognition Act of 2025
# United States Cadet Nurse Corps Service Recognition Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would provide official recognition and benefits to members of the United States Cadet Nurse Corps, a federal nursing program that operated during World War II. The bill aims to acknowledge the service of these nurses, who trained and worked during the war effort, though specific benefits or recognition measures aren't detailed in the available summary. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would primarily affect surviving members of the World War II-era Cadet Nurse Corps and potentially their families or descendants. These were young women who enrolled in an accelerated federal nursing training program between 1943 and 1948 to address severe nursing shortages during and after the war. **Current Status:** The bill (S 3329) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and is currently in committee. This means it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. No further action has been taken at this time.
EXPERTS Act of 2025
# EXPERTS Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The EXPERTS Act of 2025 is a bill currently under consideration in the Senate that would establish new requirements for federal agencies to consult with independent experts and specialists when developing policies and regulations. While the bill's full details are limited in available public records, bills with this type of title typically aim to improve decision-making by ensuring that government agencies rely on evidence-based expertise from outside sources rather than relying solely on internal staff. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies and the regulatory process, potentially impacting businesses, organizations, and the public who are subject to new government regulations. By requiring agencies to seek expert input, the bill could slow down some regulatory processes but aims to produce better-informed policies. The specific areas of expertise or which agencies would be covered depend on the bill's actual language, which hasn't been widely detailed yet. **Current Status** As of now, S 3210 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in the 119th Congress, but it has not yet been scheduled for debate or a floor vote.
Stop Ballroom Bribery Act
# Stop Ballroom Bribery Act Summary I appreciate the request, but I'm unable to provide a meaningful summary of this bill. The information available shows only basic details—that it's Senator Elizabeth Warren's bill currently in committee—without access to the actual text, purpose, or provisions. The "Subjects: N/A" notation suggests limited documentation is publicly available yet. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "S 3191" to read the full text - Checking Senator Warren's official website for her statement on the bill's purpose - Reviewing any committee hearing records if they're available If you can provide the bill's text or summary from Congress.gov, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for you.
Social Security Emergency Inflation Relief Act
# Social Security Emergency Inflation Relief Act (S 3078) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren, would provide emergency relief payments to Social Security beneficiaries to help them cope with inflation. While the specific details aren't fully outlined in the available information, the bill's title and purpose suggest it aims to give additional funds to Social Security recipients whose fixed monthly benefits have lost purchasing power due to rising prices. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit Social Security recipients—including retirees, disabled individuals, and surviving family members who receive Social Security payments. These beneficiaries often live on fixed incomes and have been affected by recent inflation that has increased costs for housing, food, healthcare, and other necessities. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate Senate committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill would need to pass through committee, receive Senate approval, pass the House, and be signed by the President to become law. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions and payment amounts, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Innovation Fund Act
# Innovation Fund Act (S 3067) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this particular bill's text, so I cannot provide accurate information about its exact provisions and impacts. To give you a reliable summary, I would need to review the actual bill language. **What I can tell you:** This bill is sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full Senate vote yet. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 3067" to read the official bill text - Checking Senator Warren's official website for her statement on the bill's purpose - Looking at news coverage from major outlets that may have covered it I prefer to acknowledge gaps in my knowledge rather than guess at a bill's contents, since accurate legislative information is important for understanding how government affects you. Would you like help finding these resources instead?
No Argentina Bailout Act
# No Argentina Bailout Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would prohibit the U.S. government from providing financial assistance or bailouts to Argentina. Specifically, it would restrict the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other international financial institutions from using U.S. funds to bail out the Argentine government or its debts. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Argentina's government and economy, as well as U.S. taxpayers whose money funds contributions to international lending organizations. It could also impact American investors with financial interests in Argentina. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No action has been taken on it yet.
Child Care for Every Community Act
# Child Care for Every Community Act Summary This bill, introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren, aims to expand access to child care across the United States. While the full legislative text would detail specific provisions, bills with this title typically focus on increasing the availability and affordability of child care services, particularly in underserved communities. Based on the bill's subject areas, it likely addresses funding for child care facilities, workforce development for child care workers, health and safety standards, and support for families with low to moderate incomes. The bill would primarily affect families seeking child care, child care providers and workers, and communities with limited child care options. It could also impact federal budgets and regulatory agencies responsible for overseeing child care programs. The broad range of subjects listed—from building construction to employee benefits—suggests the bill takes a comprehensive approach, potentially addressing infrastructure, worker training, health standards, and support for vulnerable populations including those experiencing domestic violence or disability. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. For detailed information about specific provisions, timelines, and legislative progress, you can check Congress.gov, which provides the complete bill text and real-time updates on its status.
Reconciliation in Place Names Act
# Reconciliation in Place Names Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Reconciliation in Place Names Act would establish a process for reviewing and potentially changing U.S. geographic names that are considered offensive or historically inaccurate. While the bill's full details aren't specified in the information provided, bills with this title typically aim to address place names containing slurs or terms offensive to Native American tribes and other groups. The bill would likely work through existing federal naming authorities to facilitate these changes. **Who It Affects:** This would impact communities with places bearing such names, Native American tribes and other groups whose histories or identities are tied to place naming issues, local governments that oversee these areas, and potentially the federal government's Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), which officially records U.S. place names. **Current Status:** As of the latest information, the bill (S 2894) is in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in the 119th Congress but remains in the early legislative stage.
Transparency in Contracting Act of 2025
# Transparency in Contracting Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** The Transparency in Contracting Act of 2025 would require federal government agencies to disclose more information about contracts they award to private companies. The goal is to make the contracting process more open and accessible to the public, Congress, and watchdog organizations. While specific details aren't available in the summary provided, transparency bills typically mandate publication of contract terms, costs, timelines, and contractor performance data. **Who it affects:** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies (like the Department of Defense, Health and Human Services, etc.) and the private companies they hire for services and projects. Indirectly, it affects taxpayers and the public, who would gain better visibility into how government spends money. **Current status:** As of now, the bill (S 2809) is in committee, meaning it's still in early stages of review. It was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in the 119th Congress. For the bill to become law, it would need to advance through committee review, pass the full Senate, pass the House, and be signed by the President.
Equal Employment for All Act of 2025
# Equal Employment for All Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Equal Employment for All Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently being reviewed in the Senate. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to address employment discrimination or expand workplace protections, though specific details about its provisions are not available in the information provided. To understand exactly what changes it would make to employment law, you would need to review the full bill text. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** This bill would potentially impact employers and workers across the country if passed. It was introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) and is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. **Next Steps:** For current details on the bill's specific provisions and any updates to its status, you can visit Congress.gov, where you can search for "S 2798" to find the full bill text, sponsor statements, and any committee actions or amendments.
Nationwide Right To Unionize Act
# Nationwide Right To Unionize Act (S 2729) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would make it easier for workers across the United States to form labor unions and engage in collective bargaining. The legislation would streamline the unionization process by removing certain procedural barriers and potentially expanding workers' legal protections when organizing. The bill aims to strengthen workers' rights to collectively negotiate wages, benefits, and working conditions with their employers. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would primarily affect private-sector workers who currently face various obstacles to unionizing, though the specific mechanisms proposed aren't detailed in the basic bill information available. Generally, such legislation impacts both workers seeking to unionize and employers who would face increased unionization efforts. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee (S 2729), meaning it has been introduced but hasn't advanced to a full Senate vote. It was sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in the 119th Congress. The bill has not yet passed either chamber of Congress. --- *Note: For the complete details of specific provisions, the full text of the bill would need to be reviewed, as this summary is based on limited information provided.*
Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2025
# Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Anti-Racism in Public Health Act of 2025 aims to address racial disparities in the U.S. healthcare system. The bill would require the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to examine how racism affects public health outcomes and implement strategies to reduce health inequities. It would establish new advisory bodies, create funding mechanisms, and require data collection to track health disparities across different racial and ethnic groups. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact federal health agencies, healthcare providers, and communities experiencing health disparities. Key areas addressed include discrimination in housing and employment that affects health, law enforcement practices, federal Indian health programs, and criminal justice issues as they relate to public health. The bill would also involve congressional oversight of these efforts and potentially affect how federal agencies allocate resources and structure their operations. **Current Status** As of now, S. 1489 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).