Torres, Ritchie [D-NY-15]
Democrat · NY · 37 bills sponsored
To establish a pilot program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to support local jurisdictions in developing neighborhood-level, publicly accessible health data platforms, to establish a National Neighborhood Health Data Repository, and for other purposes.
# HR 7717 Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would direct the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to create a pilot program helping local communities build publicly accessible health data platforms at the neighborhood level. It would also establish a national database to collect and organize this neighborhood health information. The goal is to make detailed health data more transparent and available to the public, rather than keeping it at only state or national levels. **Who It Affects:** Local governments and health departments would be the primary implementers, using CDC support to develop their data systems. Residents, community organizations, and public health advocates would benefit from easier access to neighborhood-specific health information that could help identify local health problems and track progress on health issues. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No major provisions have been substantially modified, as the bill remains in the early legislative stage.
Army Corps Congressional Engagement Act
# Army Corps Congressional Engagement Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 7519 would require the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to improve communication and coordination with Congress on its projects and activities. The bill aims to ensure that members of Congress are better informed about Corps of Engineers decisions, plans, and operations that affect their districts. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects Congress members and the Army Corps of Engineers. Indirectly, it could impact communities across the country where the Corps operates, since increased congressional oversight might influence decisions about water management, flood control, dam operations, and infrastructure projects. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. As of now, it has not advanced further in the legislative process. Without specific details about the bill's exact provisions being publicly available, the specific requirements for engagement remain unclear, but the general intent is to strengthen the relationship between the Army Corps and Congress.
To prohibit the Commandant of the Coast Guard from issuing guidance that is less restrictive on prohibiting divisive or hate symbols and flags than the memorandum titled "Coast Guard Policy and Lawful Order Prohibiting Divisive or Hate Symbols and Flags", and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 6346 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prevent the Commandant (top leader) of the U.S. Coast Guard from weakening or removing existing rules that ban divisive or hate symbols and flags on Coast Guard property and uniforms. Specifically, it locks in place a 2021 Coast Guard policy that prohibits symbols like the Confederate flag and other hate-related imagery. If passed, the Commandant could not issue new guidance that allows these symbols unless Congress approves the change. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill directly affects Coast Guard personnel and operations. It essentially makes the current hate symbol ban permanent and harder to reverse through administrative action alone. This means Coast Guard members would continue to be prohibited from displaying certain symbols at work, while the policy itself would require congressional action to change rather than just a decision by Coast Guard leadership. **Current Status** HR 6346 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY).
QR Act
# QR Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed text or specific provisions of HR 7233 (the QR Act) from the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do. The information available to me only shows basic metadata: that it's sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and is currently in committee. To get a reliable summary, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - Search for HR 7233 to see the full bill text and summary - **Your representative's website** - For their official explanation - **Reputable news sources** - For analysis of the bill's impact If you can share the bill's actual text or summary, I'd be happy to break it down into plain language for you.
Food Rescue Act
# Food Rescue Act (HR 7144) Summary **What the bill would do:** The Food Rescue Act is designed to reduce food waste and hunger by making it easier for businesses, farms, and organizations to donate food that would otherwise be thrown away. The bill would likely provide incentives (such as tax breaks) and remove legal barriers that currently discourage food donations, making the process simpler and less risky for donors worried about liability if someone gets sick from donated food. **Who it affects:** This bill would primarily benefit grocery stores, restaurants, farms, and food manufacturers that have surplus food; charities and food banks that distribute food to people in need; and low-income individuals and families who rely on food assistance. It could also affect state and local governments that oversee food safety regulations. **Current status:** As of now, HR 7144 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY). For the bill to become law, it would need to pass through committee review, receive a full House vote, pass the Senate, and be signed by the President.
Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026
# Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish federal regulations for "prediction markets"—platforms where people bet on the outcomes of future events, including political elections, policy decisions, and other public matters. The legislation aims to create rules ensuring transparency, preventing fraud, and protecting the integrity of these markets from manipulation. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact prediction market operators (the companies running these platforms), individual traders and bettors, and potentially the broader financial system. It could also affect election integrity by regulating betting on electoral outcomes. **Current Status:** HR 7004 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY). **Note:** Specific provisions of this bill are not publicly detailed in the available information. To learn the exact requirements the bill would impose—such as licensing requirements, reporting obligations, or restrictions on certain types of bets—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Repealing the IMD Exclusion Act
# Summary of HR 6727: Repealing the IMD Exclusion Act **What the bill would do:** This bill would remove federal restrictions that currently limit Medicaid coverage for mental health and substance use disorder treatment in certain facilities. Under current law, Medicaid (the federal-state health insurance program for low-income Americans) generally won't pay for mental health services at larger institutions—specifically those with more than 16 beds treating patients under 65 years old. If passed, this bill would eliminate that bed-size limit and age restriction, allowing Medicaid to pay for mental health treatment at any sized facility that meets nationally recognized standards for mental health or substance abuse care. **Who it affects:** The bill would primarily benefit people on Medicaid who need mental health or substance use disorder treatment. It could also affect mental health facilities and states, as it would expand which institutions can receive federal Medicaid funding for these services. States might gain more flexibility in how they structure mental health care and could potentially expand treatment options. **Current status:** HR 6727 is currently in committee and has not advanced for a vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress.
Professional Degree Access Restoration Act
# Professional Degree Access Restoration Act (HR 6677) Summary This bill, introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres of New York, aims to restore access to professional degree programs, though specific details about which programs or barriers it addresses are not provided in the available information. Professional degree programs typically include fields like law, medicine, dentistry, and other specialized fields requiring advanced credentials. The bill would likely affect students seeking these degrees and possibly the institutions that offer them. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. Without access to the bill's full text or detailed provisions, the specific changes it would make—such as whether it addresses financial aid, admissions requirements, or other barriers—cannot be definitively stated. To understand the exact impact and key provisions, you would need to review the complete bill text, typically available through Congress.gov.
Lung Cancer Screening Expansion Act of 2025
# Lung Cancer Screening Expansion Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Lung Cancer Screening Expansion Act of 2025 aims to broaden access to lung cancer screening services across the United States. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically seek to expand who qualifies for screening, improve insurance coverage for screening procedures, or increase funding for screening programs. The goal would be to catch lung cancer earlier when treatment is most effective. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect people at risk for lung cancer, including current and former smokers. It could also impact healthcare providers, insurance companies, and the medical imaging facilities that perform screenings. Patients with limited access to screening services—particularly in rural or underserved areas—would likely be among those most affected if the bill passes. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6314 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate congressional committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY). Like most bills at this stage, it would need committee approval and House passage before proceeding to the Senate for consideration.
Our Parks Act
# Our Parks Act (HR 6603) - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill beyond what you've provided (bill number, sponsor, and status). To give you an accurate summary of what the Our Parks Act would actually do, I would need to review the bill text itself, which typically includes sections detailing provisions, funding amounts, affected agencies, and implementation details. **What I can tell you:** This bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. The title suggests it relates to park policy, but the actual scope could cover various topics—such as funding for national parks, state parks, urban green spaces, environmental protections, or public land management. **To get accurate details**, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (congress.gov), where you can search by bill number (HR 6603) to read the full text, see co-sponsors, view committee assignments, and track its progress. This will give you the precise information about who it affects and what specific changes it would make. Would you like help finding where to access the full bill text, or do you have the actual bill language you'd like summarized?
Anesthesia for All Act
# Anesthesia for All Act (HR 6545) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Anesthesia for All Act aims to improve access to anesthesia services across the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on expanding anesthesia coverage, ensuring patients can receive necessary pain management during medical procedures, and potentially addressing gaps in insurance coverage or geographic disparities in anesthesia availability. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect patients undergoing surgical and medical procedures who require anesthesia, as well as anesthesia providers (including anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, and other qualified professionals). It may also impact healthcare facilities, insurance companies, and Medicare/Medicaid programs depending on its specific provisions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6545 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress. For detailed information about specific provisions and the bill's current progress, you can check Congress.gov.
CAT Act
# CAT Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 6344 (the "CAT Act") in the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill actually does, who it affects, or its key provisions. **What I can tell you:** This bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it's still in early stages and hasn't been voted on by the full House yet. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 6344" to see the bill's full text, summary, and sponsor description - Checking your representative's official website - Reviewing fact-sheets from reputable legislative tracking organizations If you can share the bill's full title or provide more details about what it addresses, I'd be happy to help explain those specifics in plain language.
Point-Access Housing Guidelines Act of 2025
# Point-Access Housing Guidelines Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Point-Access Housing Guidelines Act of 2025 would establish federal guidelines for "point-access" housing systems. These systems typically use a scoring method to determine housing eligibility and prioritize applicants for affordable housing programs. If passed, the bill would create standardized rules for how states and local governments implement these point-based allocation systems, likely aiming to ensure consistency and fairness across different jurisdictions. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect local and state housing authorities that administer affordable housing programs, as well as individuals and families applying for affordable housing assistance. It could also impact homeless services organizations and nonprofits that help allocate limited housing resources. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6345 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. Limited details about specific provisions are currently available, as the bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
TRUMP Act of 2025
# TRUMP Act of 2025 - Summary I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: the bill information provided doesn't include the actual text or detailed provisions, so I can only tell you what's publicly available. The TRUMP Act of 2025 (HR 5741) is currently in committee and hasn't advanced further in the legislative process. Without access to the bill's full text or official summary, I cannot accurately describe what it would do, who it affects, or its specific provisions. **What I'd recommend:** To get accurate information about this bill's contents, you can: - Visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 5741" to read the full text and summary - Check the bill's official title and purpose statement - Review any committee reports or summaries posted by Congress This approach ensures you get factual, detailed information directly from the source rather than my attempting to infer the bill's purpose from its title alone.
River’s Law
# River's Law (HR 5124) Summary **What the Bill Does:** Unfortunately, the information provided doesn't include the bill's actual text or detailed provisions, so I cannot accurately describe what River's Law would accomplish. The bill title and basic metadata alone aren't sufficient to explain its content or impact. **Current Status:** River's Law is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY-15). **What You Can Do:** To learn what this bill actually proposes, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 5124" for the full bill text - Checking the sponsor's official website for a statement about the bill's purpose - Contacting your representative's office if you want to know their position on it If you can provide the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language.
Epstein Crime Victims Act
# Epstein Crime Victims Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Epstein Crime Victims Act aims to provide support and resources for people who were victims of crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided, legislation of this type typically focuses on compensation, access to services (such as counseling or legal assistance), or establishing funds to help survivors. **Who It Affects:** This bill directly affects individuals who were harmed by Epstein's criminal activities. It may also affect the broader criminal justice system and federal agencies responsible for victim services. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. For the most current information on specific provisions and legislative progress, you can check Congress.gov or official House records. --- *Note: The summary above is limited by the minimal details provided. For a complete understanding of the bill's specific provisions and impact, consulting the full text on Congress.gov would provide additional details.*
CHEFS Act
# CHEFS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 4537 (the CHEFS Act) from the 119th Congress, so I can't provide you with an accurate summary of what this particular bill would do. While I can see it's sponsored by Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and is currently in committee, I don't have reliable information about its contents, key provisions, or who it would affect. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 4537" for the full text and official details - **The sponsor's official website** - Rep. Torres's office would have information about the bill's purpose - **Legislative tracking sites** - Services like LegiStorm or Ballotpedia track bill progress If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in plain language.
Helping More Families Save Act
# Helping More Families Save Act (HR 4385) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Helping More Families Save Act aims to make it easier for American families to save money for retirement and other financial goals. While the bill's specific details aren't publicly available yet, the title and sponsorship suggest it would likely expand access to tax-advantaged savings accounts or retirement plans, potentially removing barriers that prevent lower and middle-income households from participating in existing savings programs. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact American workers and families seeking to save for retirement, with a likely focus on those with lower to moderate incomes who may currently lack access to employer-sponsored retirement plans or other savings options. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No additional legislative action has occurred at this time. *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would require access to the bill's full text, which may be available on Congress.gov.*
Employment Abundance Act
# Employment Abundance Act (HR 4052) - Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's provisions. While I can see it's a House bill sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) currently in committee, the document you've provided doesn't include the actual text or details about what the bill would do. To give you an accurate summary, I would need access to: - The bill's full text or legislative summary - Specific provisions and policy changes it proposes - Which populations or industries it targets - Any fiscal impacts or funding mechanisms **I'd recommend checking these official sources for complete information:** - Congress.gov (search HR 4052) - The sponsor's official website - House committee documents where it's currently being reviewed If you can share the bill's actual text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language!
Employment Abundance Act
# Summary of the Employment Abundance Act (HR 3893) **What the Bill Does:** The Employment Abundance Act is a proposed federal law currently being reviewed in committee. Unfortunately, the information provided doesn't include specific details about what provisions are actually in the bill, so I cannot describe the exact policies it would create or change. To understand what this bill specifically proposes, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or a legislative tracking website. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress and remains "in committee," meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Bills in committee status are under review and may be revised, discussed, or shelved without ever reaching a vote. **What You Can Do:** To learn what this bill actually contains and who it would affect, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 3893" to read the bill text, sponsor summary, or any available committee reports. This will give you the specific details about job creation policies, economic provisions, or other employment-related measures the bill proposes.
SAFE Act
# SAFE Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary because the information provided is minimal. The bill details show only basic metadata: it's HR 3615 from the current Congress, sponsored by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY), and it's currently in committee. However, the "Subjects" field shows "N/A," which means the core information about what the bill actually does isn't included in your submission. **To give you an accurate summary, I would need:** - The bill's official text or description of its provisions - What policy areas it addresses (healthcare, security, finance, etc.) - Which populations or industries it affects If you can provide the bill's summary from Congress.gov or its legislative text, I'd be happy to break it down into plain language for you. Alternatively, you could check Congress.gov directly by searching "HR 3615" to find the full bill summary and status updates.
Stop Presidential Profiteering from Digital Assets Act
# Stop Presidential Profiteering from Digital Assets Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would prohibit sitting and former U.S. presidents from profiting from digital assets, including cryptocurrencies and NFTs (non-fungible tokens). If passed, it would require presidents to divest from or place digital assets into a blind trust before taking office, similar to existing rules for other types of investments. The bill aims to prevent potential conflicts of interest where a president's policy decisions could benefit their personal cryptocurrency or digital asset holdings. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill directly impacts current and former presidents, requiring them to separate themselves from digital asset ownership during their presidency. It establishes rules around what presidents can and cannot own financially while in office, expanding existing ethics and conflict-of-interest laws that already apply to other types of investments. The legislation essentially treats digital assets the same way the government treats other investments when it comes to presidential financial disclosures and restrictions. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress. For the bill to become law, it would need to pass through committee review, survive a full House vote, pass the Senate, and be signed by the president.
Noncontiguous Energy Relief and Access Act of 2025
# Noncontiguous Energy Relief and Access Act of 2025 (HR 3167) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to provide energy relief and improve energy access in noncontiguous U.S. territories—meaning areas not connected to the mainland by land, primarily Hawaii, Alaska, and U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically address the unique energy challenges these regions face, such as higher energy costs, limited infrastructure, and dependence on imported fuel. **Who It Affects:** The bill would directly impact residents and businesses in Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, and other island territories that face significantly higher electricity and heating costs than the mainland. It could also affect energy producers and utilities operating in these regions. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3167 is in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Ritchie Torres (D-NY) in the 119th Congress. To understand the specific provisions and potential impact, the full bill text would need to be reviewed.
Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act
# Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act (HR 973) - Summary **What the bill does:** This legislation directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to create safety rules for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in popular consumer devices like electric bikes and electric scooters. The rules would require manufacturers and sellers of these products to meet safety standards developed by major standards organizations (ANSI, Standards Council of Canada, and UL Solutions). **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts manufacturers and distributors of micromobility devices, as well as consumers who use e-bikes and e-scooters. With the growing popularity of these devices, safety standards could reduce risks of battery fires, explosions, or other hazards associated with defective batteries. **Current status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting action in the Senate. The measure has bipartisan support for improving product safety, though it reflects ongoing efforts to regulate an emerging consumer technology sector where safety standards have been inconsistent across manufacturers.