Tiffany, Thomas P. [R-WI-7]
Republican · WI · 14 bills sponsored
ACRES Act
# ACRES Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The ACRES Act requires the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior to better track and report on wildfire prevention work done on federal lands. Specifically, it mandates that these agencies include annual reports in the President's budget showing how many acres received vegetation management activities aimed at reducing wildfire risk. The bill also requires the agencies to establish standardized methods for collecting and reviewing this data to ensure accuracy and timely reporting. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects federal land management agencies and Congress. Indirectly, it impacts wildfire prevention efforts and the public who depends on these lands for recreation and safety. The bill does not cover contract awards for these projects, only the tracking and reporting of the work itself. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now in the legislative process. If signed into law, it would improve transparency and consistency in how the government measures and reports on its wildfire prevention activities across federal lands.
To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from admitting to the United States any national of the People's Republic of China without a valid visa, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7780 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require that all Chinese nationals entering the United States have a valid visa before arrival. Currently, certain travelers may be admitted through other immigration processes without a pre-issued visa. If passed, this legislation would eliminate those alternative pathways specifically for citizens of the People's Republic of China, making a visa a mandatory requirement for entry. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect Chinese citizens seeking to enter the U.S., including tourists, business travelers, students, and workers. It would apply to the Department of Homeland Security's admission procedures. The bill's broad language ("and for other purposes") suggests it may contain additional provisions not detailed in the title, though those specifics aren't provided here. **Current Status** HR 7780 is currently in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Thomas Tiffany (R-Wisconsin) in the 119th Congress. No further action has been taken at this time.
Wabeno Economic Development Act
# Wabeno Economic Development Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would require the U.S. Forest Service to sell approximately 14 acres of federal land in Wisconsin's Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest to a private company called Tony's Wabeno Redi-Mix, LLC. The company would have 180 days to make an offer after the Forest Service appraises the land at market value. If the company purchases it, they would own both the land and the mineral rights (such as stone, sand, and gravel). The bill also requires the Department of the Interior to review and publish information about the federal permitting process for extracting stone, sand, and gravel on federal lands. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly benefits Tony's Wabeno Redi-Mix, LLC, a ready-mix concrete company, by giving it an opportunity to purchase federal land. It may indirectly affect local communities near Wabeno, Wisconsin, potentially through economic development or changes in the forest area. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need to be approved by the Senate and signed by the President to become law.
Apostle Islands National Park and Preserve Act
# Apostle Islands National Park and Preserve Act Summary This bill would redesignate the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (located in Wisconsin) as a National Park and Preserve. Currently, the Apostle Islands is protected as a National Lakeshore, a less restrictive designation. The main change would be upgrading its status to provide greater protection and potentially increase federal funding and resources for the area. The bill would affect visitors, local communities, conservationists, and hunters/fishers in the region. **Key provisions** include the official name change and likely stricter regulations on land use and development. The bill appears designed to enhance conservation of the area's natural and historic resources while potentially allowing for hunting and fishing activities (as indicated by the subjects listed). This affects approximately 69,000 acres of land and water in northern Wisconsin, which includes 22 islands known for their scenic beauty, lighthouses, and recreational opportunities. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. As a proposal to designate federal lands with enhanced protections, it would require approval from both chambers of Congress. The bill was introduced by Representative Thomas Tiffany (R-WI), whose district includes the Apostle Islands region.
OMAR Act
# OMAR Act (HR 7304) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this particular bill (HR 7304) beyond the basic metadata you've provided. To give you an accurate summary of what the OMAR Act would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the bill's full text. **What I can tell you:** This is a House bill sponsored by Representative Thomas Tiffany (R-Wisconsin) that is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full floor vote yet. **To get accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 7304" for the full bill text and summary - Checking the bill sponsor's official website for their description - Looking at nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service summary I want to make sure any summary I provide is factually correct rather than risk giving you incomplete or inaccurate information about what this bill contains.
CARE Act of 2025
# CARE Act of 2025 Summary I don't have access to the specific text or details of HR 6414 (CARE Act of 2025), so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. While I can see it's a House bill sponsored by Rep. Thomas Tiffany (R-WI) currently in committee, the bill's actual contents aren't available to me. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "HR 6414" for the official bill text - Checking the bill's summary section for a plain-language overview - Reading the sponsor's website or press releases about the bill's purpose If you have access to the bill text or a summary, feel free to share it and I'd be happy to explain it in plain language.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 202 South Chestnut Avenue in Marshfield, Wisconsin, as the "Army Corporal Gordon 'Gordy' Richard Schmoll Post Office Building".
# Summary of HR 6119 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would rename the post office located at 202 South Chestnut Avenue in Marshfield, Wisconsin, in honor of Army Corporal Gordon "Gordy" Richard Schmoll. If passed, the building would officially be called the "Army Corporal Gordon 'Gordy' Richard Schmoll Post Office Building." The change is purely ceremonial and would not affect the post office's operations or services. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects residents and businesses in Marshfield, Wisconsin, who use this postal facility. More broadly, it honors an Army service member from the area. These naming bills are typically introduced to commemorate local veterans or notable community members. **Current Status:** HR 6119 was introduced by Representative Thomas P. Tiffany (R-Wisconsin) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
CAP Act of 2025
# CAP Act of 2025 Summary I appreciate the request, but I don't have access to the actual text or details of HR 4743 (the CAP Act of 2025). The information provided shows only basic metadata—the bill number, sponsor, and status—but not what the bill actually proposes to do. To give you an accurate summary, I would need to know: - What "CAP" stands for in the bill's full title - The bill's stated purpose and key provisions - Which groups or industries it affects **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House yet. It was introduced by Rep. Thomas Tiffany (R-Wisconsin). I'd recommend checking **Congress.gov** or your representative's website for the full bill text and a detailed summary, which would allow me to provide the specific information you're looking for.
Federal Interviews Reform Act
# Federal Interviews Reform Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 4468 to provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do. While I can see it's a Republican-sponsored bill currently in committee during the 119th Congress, I cannot verify the actual provisions without reliable source material. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search "HR 4468" for the full text, sponsor details, and latest status - **Official House websites**: Rep. Thomas Tiffany's office may have a summary - **Congressional tracking services**: Sites like Congress.gov or LegiScan provide detailed bill information I apologize I can't be more helpful without being able to confirm the actual content. Would you like help finding these resources instead?
No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act
# Bill Summary: No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act (HR 4207) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the U.S. Senate to approve any pandemic preparedness agreement negotiated with the World Health Organization (WHO) before it can take effect. Currently, the executive branch (the President and their administration) can enter into certain international agreements without full Senate approval. This bill would change that by mandating Senate ratification—meaning a two-thirds majority vote would be needed—for any WHO pandemic treaty or agreement. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill affects the federal government's ability to make pandemic-related commitments to the WHO and would impact future pandemic response coordination between the U.S. and international partners. It essentially gives the Senate, rather than the President alone, final decision-making authority over such agreements. This reflects broader debate over the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches in foreign affairs. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4207 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process with no immediate action scheduled.
Withdrawing approval of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.
# Summary of HJRES 93: WTO Withdrawal Resolution **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would withdraw the United States' congressional approval of the agreement that created the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. If passed, it would formally remove the U.S. from the WTO—the international organization that sets rules for trade between countries and helps resolve trade disputes. This would be a major shift in U.S. trade policy, as the country has been a member for nearly 30 years. **Who It Affects and Key Implications** The bill would affect American businesses, workers, farmers, and consumers. U.S. companies currently rely on WTO rules for market access abroad, while foreign companies do business here under the same framework. Withdrawing could disrupt supply chains, lead to trade disputes with other nations, and potentially increase costs for imported goods. The bill would also impact trade negotiations and international commerce broadly. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Thomas Tiffany (R-Wisconsin) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. No action has been taken to advance it.
FARM Act of 2025
# FARM Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The FARM Act of 2025 (HR 1754) is a bill currently being reviewed in congressional committee. However, the available information does not include specific details about what provisions the bill contains or what it would accomplish. The bill's title and subject matter remain unclear from the available documentation. **Current Status:** This bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Thomas P. Tiffany (R-WI) but has not yet advanced beyond the committee stage. No action has been taken on it at this time. **What We Don't Know:** To provide you with accurate details about who would be affected, what specific provisions it contains, and whether it relates to agriculture, farm policy, or something else entirely, the full text of the bill would need to be reviewed. If you're interested in learning more about this bill, you can find the complete text and current status on Congress.gov by searching for "HR 1754."
Justice for Murder Victims Act
# Justice for Murder Victims Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Justice for Murder Victims Act would remove the time limit (statute of limitations) for federal murder prosecutions. Currently, federal law sets deadlines for when prosecutors must bring charges in homicide cases. This bill would allow the government to prosecute someone for federal murder at any point in the future, no matter how much time has passed since the crime occurred. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact murder victims' families by potentially allowing cases to be prosecuted decades later, and it would affect defendants by removing the protection of a statute of limitations in federal murder cases. It applies only to federal crimes, not state crimes. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Thomas Tiffany (R-Wisconsin) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
FAIR Act of 2025
# FAIR Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does:** The FAIR Act would prohibit the federal government and organizations that receive federal funding from discriminating against or giving preference to people based on race, color, or national origin in contracts, employment, and other activities. The bill defines "preference" broadly to include affirmative action programs, quotas, set-asides, numerical goals, and timetables. Federal agencies would be required to review and change their policies to comply with these restrictions, and individuals who believe they've been harmed could sue in federal court for violations. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact federal agencies, federal contractors, employers receiving federal funds, and any organizations participating in federal programs. It would affect hiring and promotion decisions, as well as contract bidding processes across these entities. Individuals who believe they've been discriminated against under current diversity programs would potentially gain the ability to pursue legal action. **Current Status:** HR 711 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Thomas Tiffany (R-WI) in the 119th Congress. For a bill to become law, it must pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President.