Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]
Republican · MT · 48 bills sponsored
A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, and title 10, United States Code, to eliminate those provisions relating to veterans educational assistance that disadvantage eligible individuals who choose to pursue programs of apprenticeship or other on-job training instead of a four-year college degree, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3993 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to change how the federal government provides educational assistance to veterans by removing rules that currently favor four-year college degrees over apprenticeships and on-the-job training programs. The bill would amend veterans' benefits laws to ensure that veterans who choose to learn a trade through apprenticeships receive comparable support to those pursuing traditional college degrees. **Who It Affects** The legislation would primarily impact eligible veterans who are considering career paths in skilled trades—such as electricians, plumbers, and other apprenticeship programs—rather than four-year universities. It could also affect active-duty service members who have access to similar educational benefits. **Current Status** S 3993 is currently pending in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) during the 119th Congress. The specific provisions and exact changes to veteran benefits have not been detailed in available sources.
A bill to establish protections against digital impersonation fraud, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3982: Digital Impersonation Fraud Protection Act **What the Bill Would Do** S 3982 aims to create legal protections against "digital impersonation fraud"—situations where someone uses technology to illegally pretend to be another person online or through digital communications. The bill would establish rules and penalties to combat this type of fraud, though the specific protections and enforcement mechanisms aren't detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect consumers and businesses vulnerable to digital impersonation schemes (such as deepfakes, fake emails, or fraudulent social media accounts), as well as technology platforms that may need to implement new safeguards. Federal law enforcement agencies would likely be responsible for enforcing any new rules established. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and hasn't yet been brought to a full Senate vote. No significant action has been taken, and the full text or specific provisions aren't yet publicly detailed beyond the bill's title.
A bill to amend the Small Business Act to establish a goal for participation by small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans in procurement contracts, and for other purposes.
# S 3964 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would amend the Small Business Act to set a specific goal for how much federal government contracting work should go to small businesses owned and controlled by veterans. Currently, the government has contracting goals for various disadvantaged business groups, and this bill would add or strengthen a target for veteran-owned small businesses to win a portion of federal contracts. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects veterans who own small businesses and want to bid on government contracts, as well as federal agencies that award those contracts. It could also indirectly benefit the broader veteran community by directing more federal spending toward veteran-owned enterprises. **Current Status** S 3964 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) in the 119th Congress. The bill's specific provisions beyond the general goal-setting framework are not detailed in the available information.
A bill to require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to acquire and install certified airborne position reference tools at air traffic control towers, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3929 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to purchase and install specialized equipment called "certified airborne position reference tools" at air traffic control towers across the country. These tools help air traffic controllers track and monitor aircraft positions more accurately. The bill aims to improve safety and operational efficiency at these facilities, though the specific technical details of how these tools would work aren't detailed in the basic bill description. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect the FAA and air traffic control operations nationwide, which in turn impacts commercial airlines, pilots, and the flying public. It was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-Montana) in the 119th Congress. As of now, the bill remains "In Committee," meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate—it's still being reviewed by the relevant committee.
A bill to reauthorize the National Integrated Drought Information System Act of 2006, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 3912: National Integrated Drought Information System Reauthorization **What the Bill Does:** This bill would renew funding and authorization for the National Integrated Drought Information System (NDIS), a federal program that was originally established in 2006. The NDIS provides drought monitoring, forecasting, and information services to help communities, farmers, water managers, and other stakeholders prepare for and respond to droughts. By reauthorizing the program, Congress would continue federal support for these drought-related services. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects farmers, ranchers, water utilities, state and local governments, and communities in drought-prone regions. It also impacts federal agencies involved in water management, agriculture, and emergency response. Essentially, anyone relying on accurate drought information and forecasting would benefit from the program's continuation. **Key Details:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Sponsor Tim Sheehy is a Republican from Montana, a state frequently affected by drought. While the bill title mentions "and for other purposes," the specific additional provisions are not detailed in the available information.
A bill to authorize the transfer by the Secretary of the Navy to the U.S. Space and Rocket Center Commission in Huntsville, Alabama, of certain F-14 Tomcat aircraft.
# Summary of S. 3899 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow the U.S. Navy to give F-14 Tomcat fighter jets to the U.S. Space and Rocket Center Commission in Huntsville, Alabama. The F-14 Tomcat is a retired military aircraft that was used by the Navy for decades. Rather than keeping or scrapping these planes, the bill would transfer them to the museum/educational center in Huntsville so they can be displayed and preserved for public education and historical purposes. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects the Navy (which would transfer the aircraft), the Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville (which would receive them), and the general public who could potentially visit and view these aircraft. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) sponsored the legislation. **Key Point** This is a relatively straightforward bill focused on transferring surplus military equipment to a public educational institution rather than disposing of it through other means.
Revitalizing America’s Offshore Critical Minerals Dominance Act
# Revitalizing America's Offshore Critical Minerals Dominance Act (S 2860) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to expand U.S. mining operations in offshore areas (ocean floors and lakebeds) to extract critical minerals. These minerals are essential for manufacturing electronics, batteries, renewable energy systems, and defense equipment. The legislation would establish a framework allowing private companies to partner with the federal government to explore and extract these resources from U.S. waters, potentially reducing American dependence on foreign mineral imports. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact mining companies, technology manufacturers, and energy producers who need critical minerals. It could also affect coastal communities, environmental organizations, and fishing industries near mining areas. The broader public would theoretically benefit from reduced reliance on foreign mineral supplies and potentially lower costs for tech and renewable energy products. **Key Provisions and Current Status** While specific provisions aren't detailed in this summary, the bill's focus areas include public-private partnerships, ocean mapping, and establishing mining regulations. The legislation addresses national security concerns about U.S. dependence on countries like China for mineral supplies. As of now, S 2860 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. No action has been scheduled.
Carbon Resource Innovation Act
# Carbon Resource Innovation Act (S 3778) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Carbon Resource Innovation Act aims to support research, development, and deployment of carbon management technologies. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on advancing technologies that capture, utilize, or store carbon dioxide—potentially including carbon capture and storage (CCS), carbon utilization methods, or enhanced oil recovery with carbon management components. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect energy companies, research institutions, and technology developers working in carbon management. It could also impact federal energy policy and potentially benefit states with fossil fuel industries or geological formations suitable for carbon storage. **Current Status:** As of now, S 3778 is in committee and has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-Montana). To understand the bill's exact provisions and potential impact, you would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov, as the summary provided here contains limited detail about specific measures or funding mechanisms included.
Long-Distance Corridor Relief Enhancement Act
# Long-Distance Corridor Relief Enhancement Act Summary The Long-Distance Corridor Relief Enhancement Act (S 3728) is a bill currently under consideration in the Senate that aims to provide relief or improvements related to long-distance transportation corridors, though specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in standard legislative databases at this time. The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) in the 119th Congress. **Who It Affects:** The bill would likely impact travelers, trucking companies, and rural communities that depend on or use long-distance transportation routes across the country, though the exact scope depends on the bill's specific provisions. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote in the Senate. This means it is still in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: Because detailed information about this bill's specific provisions isn't readily available, interested parties should check Congress.gov or the Senate's official website for the complete text and any updates on its progress.*
Trade Transparency Unit Strategy Act
# Trade Transparency Unit Strategy Act (S 3608) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a "Trade Transparency Unit" within the federal government to improve how trade information is tracked and shared. While specific details aren't provided in the basic bill information available, the title suggests it would create a strategic plan or framework for making trade data and trade-related activities more transparent and accessible to the public, Congress, and relevant agencies. **Who It Affects** The bill would potentially affect businesses engaged in international trade, government agencies that oversee trade policy (like the U.S. Trade Representative's office and Commerce Department), Congress, and the general public who would have greater access to trade information. **Current Status** As of now, S 3608 remains in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT). Without more detailed legislative language available, the specific provisions and implementation details cannot be fully described at this time.
Law Enforcement Officer and Firefighter Recreation Pass Act
# Law Enforcement Officer and Firefighter Recreation Pass Act (S 3456) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a special recreation pass for law enforcement officers and firefighters, likely providing them with free or discounted access to federal recreational lands and facilities managed by agencies like the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service. The exact benefits aren't specified in the available information, but similar programs typically allow pass holders to visit national parks, national forests, and other public lands at reduced or no cost. **Who It Affects** The bill would directly benefit law enforcement officers (police, sheriffs, federal agents) and firefighters. It indirectly affects federal land management agencies and potentially other recreational pass holders, depending on how the program is structured and funded. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet moved forward for a full vote in the Senate. No additional action has been taken, and there's no indication of when or if it will advance. --- *Note: Limited details are publicly available about the specific provisions of this bill. For more complete information, you can search the bill number (S 3456) on Congress.gov.*
Written Informed Consent Act
# Written Informed Consent Act (S 3314) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require written informed consent for certain medical procedures or treatments. While the specific procedures covered aren't detailed in the available information, "informed consent" generally means patients must receive clear information about a proposed treatment—including its risks, benefits, and alternatives—before agreeing to it. The "written" requirement means this consent would need to be documented on paper or in an electronic format rather than given verbally. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect patients undergoing medical procedures and the healthcare providers administering them, including hospitals, clinics, and individual doctors. It could also impact insurance companies and medical facilities, which might need to update their consent procedures to comply with new written requirements. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in the Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT). Without additional information about the bill's specific provisions, it's unclear which procedures would be covered or what penalties might exist for non-compliance. *Note: For complete details on this bill's specific provisions, visit Congress.gov.*
Wildfire Response and Preparedness Act of 2025
# Wildfire Response and Preparedness Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** The Wildfire Response and Preparedness Act of 2025 aims to improve how the federal government responds to and prepares for wildfires. The bill addresses emergency communications systems, forest management, and support for first responders and emergency personnel. It would also establish congressional oversight mechanisms to monitor wildfire response efforts. **Who it affects:** The bill impacts several groups: federal and local firefighters and emergency responders, communities in wildfire-prone regions (particularly in western states), forest management agencies, and Congress (which would gain oversight responsibilities). Private landowners with forestry interests may also be affected depending on specific provisions. **Current status:** S 902 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full Senate. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill may be modified, debated, or stalled in committee before advancing further. The bill was sponsored by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT), reflecting Montana's significant wildfire concerns.
JAIL Act
# Summary of the JAIL Act (S 3239) I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's text or provisions. While I can see it's a Senate bill (S 3239) from the 119th Congress sponsored by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) with "JAIL Act" as its title, I cannot provide accurate information about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions without access to the actual bill language. To get this information, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** (search "S 3239") for the full text and summary - Checking Senator Sheehy's official website for his description of the bill - Looking at news coverage from nonpartisan sources If you have access to the bill text or a summary, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Improving Veterans Access to Congressional Services Act of 2025
# Improving Veterans Access to Congressional Services Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to make it easier for veterans to get help from their members of Congress. Congressional offices typically assist constituents with federal agencies—like helping someone navigate veterans' benefits claims or resolve issues with the VA (Department of Veterans Affairs). This legislation would likely establish better systems or requirements for Congress members' offices to provide services specifically to veterans, though the bill's exact provisions aren't detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily benefit veterans who need assistance with federal agencies. It could also affect congressional staff, who would need to handle veteran-focused services, and the VA and other federal agencies that work with Congress on constituent matters. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) during the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, the bill could be amended, approved by the committee, or stalled.
Good Government Act of 2025
# Good Government Act of 2025 - Summary Based on the information available, S. 3201, the "Good Government Act of 2025," is a bill currently being reviewed in a Senate committee. However, the specific details about what this bill would actually do are not included in the metadata provided. To give you accurate information about its provisions—such as whether it addresses campaign finance, government transparency, federal spending, ethics rules, or other governance matters—I would need access to the bill's full text and summary. **What we know:** The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-Montana) in the 119th Congress and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. **To get details:** For a complete, factual summary of what this bill would do and who it would affect, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (the official legislative database), which provides the full text, detailed summaries, and any amendments or updates to the bill.
SROS Act
# SROS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of S. 3189 (the SROS Act) from the 119th Congress in my current information. To provide you with an accurate summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, key provisions, and its status, I would need more details about the bill's content. **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee (meaning it hasn't been debated or voted on by the full Senate yet) and was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy, a Republican from Montana. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "S. 3189" to see the full text, summary, and status - Checking Senator Sheehy's official website for details on his legislation - Looking at news coverage if major outlets have reported on the bill If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for you!
Hiring Preference for Veterans and Americans With Disabilities Act
# Hiring Preference for Veterans and Americans With Disabilities Act (S 2996) **What the bill would do:** This bill would establish or expand hiring preferences for two groups in federal government jobs: veterans and Americans with disabilities. Hiring preferences allow these individuals to be considered favorably during the federal job application process, potentially giving them advantages over other candidates. The bill aims to make it easier for these populations to secure employment in federal agencies. **Who it affects:** The bill would primarily benefit veterans (people who have served in the military) and Americans with disabilities seeking federal government employment. It would also affect federal agencies and departments that hire employees, as they would need to implement these preferences in their hiring practices. **Current status:** As of now, S 2996 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) in the 119th Congress but has not progressed further in the legislative process. No additional details about specific provisions or timeline for action are currently available.
Plant Safety Authorities Coordination Act of 2025
# Plant Safety Authorities Coordination Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Plant Safety Authorities Coordination Act of 2025 aims to improve coordination between federal agencies responsible for overseeing industrial plant safety. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't currently available in public records, the title suggests it would establish better communication and cooperation mechanisms among different government agencies that regulate chemical plants, refineries, and other industrial facilities. **Who It Affects** This legislation would impact industrial plant operators and owners, federal regulatory agencies (such as the Environmental Protection Agency and Occupational Safety and Health Administration), and potentially workers and communities near industrial facilities. Improved coordination could affect how plants are inspected, how safety standards are enforced, and how quickly problems are identified and addressed. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) during the 119th Congress and is currently in committee. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. More detailed information about the bill's specific proposals would become available once the committee releases additional documentation or holds hearings on the legislation.
Safety Funding Parity Adjustment Act of 2025
# Safety Funding Parity Adjustment Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safety Funding Parity Adjustment Act of 2025 (S 2917) aims to adjust how federal safety funding is distributed across different regions or programs. While the bill's specific details aren't fully outlined in the available information, "parity adjustment" typically means making funding more equal or fair between different groups or areas that may currently receive disproportionate amounts. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** This bill would likely impact federal agencies responsible for safety programs, as well as communities or organizations that receive safety-related federal funding. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Tim Sheehy, a Republican from Montana. **Note:** To fully understand this bill's specific provisions—such as which safety programs it covers, what the funding adjustments would be, and which regions or groups would be affected—you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or the Senate's official website, as those details aren't available in the summary provided.
Long-Distance Corridor Relief Act
# Long-Distance Corridor Relief Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Long-Distance Corridor Relief Act (S 2916) is a proposed bill currently under consideration in the Senate. Based on its title and sponsor, the bill appears intended to address issues related to long-distance transportation corridors, though specific details about its provisions are not available in the provided information. **Current Status and Impact** The bill was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, the bill has not advanced to a floor vote, so its likelihood of passage and broader impact remain uncertain. Additional information about which constituents would be affected and the bill's specific provisions would require reviewing the full legislative text. **Note:** To learn more about this bill's specific provisions and expected effects, you can visit Congress.gov and search for "S 2916" to access the complete bill text and any committee reports or statements from the sponsor.
CHOICE Act
# CHOICE Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of S. 2875 because the information provided is quite limited. The bill details show it's a Senate bill from the current Congress sponsored by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) and is currently in committee, but the critical information—such as the bill's actual purpose, what it would do, and its key provisions—isn't included in what you've shared. To give you an accurate, factual summary, I would need access to the bill's actual text or more detailed description of its contents. I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** (search "S. 2875") for the full text and summary - The bill's official summary from the Senate - Senator Sheehy's office website for his explanation If you can provide the bill's stated purpose or key provisions, I'd be happy to explain them in plain language for a general audience.
Surface Transportation Weather Safety Gap Analysis Act of 2025
# Surface Transportation Weather Safety Gap Analysis Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the federal government to conduct a comprehensive study analyzing gaps in weather safety information and warning systems for surface transportation (roads, highways, and related infrastructure). If passed, it would direct relevant agencies to identify where current weather monitoring and alert systems fall short in protecting drivers and other road users from dangerous weather conditions. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects the general public who use roads and highways, as well as transportation agencies, weather forecasting services, and emergency management officials. Improved weather safety systems could potentially reduce accidents and fatalities caused by dangerous road conditions from storms, ice, fog, and other weather events. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in either chamber of Congress. No further action has been taken at this time.
Streamlining State Highway Safety Submissions Act
# Streamlining State Highway Safety Submissions Act (S 2911) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would simplify the process by which states submit highway safety plans and reports to the federal government. Currently, states must prepare multiple separate safety documents for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The bill aims to reduce this administrative burden by allowing states to combine these submissions into a single, streamlined document while still meeting federal safety requirements. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be state transportation departments and highway safety offices, which would spend less time and resources preparing redundant paperwork. The changes could indirectly affect drivers and road users by freeing up state resources to focus more directly on safety improvements rather than paperwork compliance. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. It was introduced by Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT) in the current Congress. The bill has not yet been passed or become law.