Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6]
Republican · IN · 12 bills sponsored
Protecting Domestic Mining Act of 2025
# Protecting Domestic Mining Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Protecting Domestic Mining Act of 2025 aims to strengthen and expand domestic mining operations in the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in this summary, the bill's focus on metals and mining infrastructure suggests it would likely streamline permitting processes, provide incentives for mining companies to extract minerals domestically, or reduce regulatory barriers to domestic mineral production. This could affect industries that rely on metals and minerals for manufacturing, such as automotive, construction, and renewable energy sectors. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact mining companies operating in the U.S., workers in mining-related industries, and manufacturers who depend on domestic metal and mineral supplies. It could also affect environmental regulations and communities near mining operations. Supporters argue it would reduce reliance on foreign mineral sources and create domestic jobs, while critics might raise concerns about environmental protections and land use. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1501 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Rep. Jefferson Shreve (R-IN). For more detailed information about specific provisions, you can check Congress.gov, which provides the full text of bills and tracks their progress.
American Assistance Visibility Act
# American Assistance Visibility Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The American Assistance Visibility Act (HR 7633) aims to increase transparency and visibility of U.S. foreign aid and assistance programs. Based on its title and stated purpose, the bill would likely require the government to make information about American aid spending more publicly accessible and easier to track. This could include creating databases, reports, or other systems to show where U.S. taxpayer money goes when the government provides assistance to other countries. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies that distribute foreign aid (such as the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development), as well as the general public and Congress, who would gain better access to aid spending information. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Jefferson Shreve, a Republican from Indiana. **Note:** Detailed provisions are not yet publicly available since the bill remains in early stages. For the most current information, visit Congress.gov.
In Good Standing Adoption Agencies Act of 2026
# In Good Standing Adoption Agencies Act of 2026 (HR 7236) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Representative Jefferson Shreve (R-IN), would establish federal standards or protections related to adoption agencies that meet certain "in good standing" criteria. However, specific details about what those standards are, what benefits agencies would receive, or how the designation would work are not available in the current record. The bill is still in the early legislative stage. **Who It Affects** The legislation would primarily impact adoption agencies, prospective adoptive parents, and children in the adoption system. Depending on its specific provisions, it could also affect state regulatory bodies that oversee adoption services. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. To understand the bill's exact provisions and implications, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or wait for additional legislative action that might provide more details about its intended scope and requirements.
Securing Federal Devices from Chinese Applications Act
# Securing Federal Devices from Chinese Applications Act (HR 7121) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prohibit federal government employees and agencies from using certain Chinese-made applications and software on government-owned devices. The legislation aims to protect sensitive government information and networks from potential security risks by restricting access to apps and programs developed by companies based in China. **Who It Affects** The bill would directly impact federal employees who use government computers, smartphones, and other devices. It would also affect federal agencies responsible for managing technology and cybersecurity. Indirectly, it could influence which technology companies are permitted to operate or do business with the U.S. government. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7121 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House of Representatives but has not yet been voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Representative Jefferson Shreve (R-IN). No further action has been taken at this time.
BIS STRENGTH Act
# BIS STRENGTH Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7003 (BIS STRENGTH Act) in my training data, so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 7003" to see the full text, sponsor information, and legislative history - **House.gov** - Check the bill's status and details on the official House website - **Your representative's office** - They can provide constituent summaries of bills they support or oppose If you can share the bill's text or summary section, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Courthouse Affordability and Space Efficiency Act of 2025
# Courthouse Affordability and Space Efficiency Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill does:** The Courthouse Affordability and Space Efficiency (CASE) Act would require the General Services Administration (GSA), the federal agency that manages government buildings, to implement a courtroom-sharing policy across the country. Instead of building separate courtrooms for each judge, the bill requires judges to share facilities—for example, bankruptcy judges would share one courtroom between every two judges, and senior district judges would follow the same ratio. The bill also prohibits the GSA from constructing any new courthouse unless it complies with these space-sharing requirements. **Who it affects:** This primarily affects the federal court system, including federal judges (district judges, bankruptcy judges, senior judges, and magistrate judges) and the courts' operations. Indirectly, it could affect people who use federal courthouses, including attorneys, litigants, and court staff. The bill also impacts the GSA's budget and construction plans for government facilities. **Key provisions and status:** The bill sets specific ratios for courtroom sharing based on judge type and courthouse size—for instance, courthouses with 10 or more active district judges must provide two courtrooms per three judges. The stated goal is to reduce construction costs and make courthouse operations more efficient. The House has already passed this bill, and it is now awaiting consideration in the Senate.
Mexico Cross-Border Crime Accountability Act
# Mexico Cross-Border Crime Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Mexico Cross-Border Crime Accountability Act (HR 5980) is designed to address criminal activity that originates in Mexico and affects the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on increasing accountability measures, potentially including enhanced reporting requirements, coordination between U.S. and Mexican law enforcement, sanctions against criminal organizations, or stricter consequences for cross-border crimes. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact law enforcement agencies, the Mexican government and its institutions, individuals involved in cross-border criminal activity, and communities along the U.S.-Mexico border affected by such crimes. **Current Status:** HR 5980 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House of Representatives but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Jefferson Shreve (R-Indiana). Without access to the full text, specific details about the bill's provisions and current committee assignments cannot be provided. *For complete details on this bill's specific provisions, consult Congress.gov or the House Judiciary Committee records.*
Dismantle Foreign Scam Syndicates Act
# Dismantle Foreign Scam Syndicates Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Dismantle Foreign Scam Syndicates Act (HR 5490) is designed to combat international scam operations that target Americans. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on giving federal law enforcement agencies enhanced tools and authority to investigate, prosecute, and dismantle organized scam networks operating from outside the United States—such as romance scams, tech support fraud, lottery schemes, and financial fraud targeting U.S. citizens. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect Americans who fall victim to international scams, as well as federal agencies like the FBI and Department of Justice that investigate these crimes. It may also impact telecommunications companies and financial institutions that could face new reporting or compliance requirements. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5490 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full floor vote in the House. The bill was introduced by Representative Jefferson Shreve (R-IN) in the 119th Congress. Without the specific text available, the exact provisions—such as funding levels, penalties, or international coordination mechanisms—cannot be detailed here.
BANNED in Latin America Act
# BANNED in Latin America Act (HR 4531) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The bill's full name is an acronym (BANNED in Latin America Act), but based on the information provided, the specific details about what this legislation would accomplish are not available in the summary data. The bill was introduced by Representative Jefferson Shreve (R-IN) but has not yet been passed out of committee, meaning it remains in the early stages of the legislative process and has not been debated or voted on by the full House. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4531 is in committee, which is the typical first step for a bill. At this stage, the bill could be reviewed, discussed, amended, or potentially dismissed. Without the bill's full text or detailed summary, it's unclear what specific impacts it would have or which groups would be affected. **To Learn More:** If you're interested in understanding what this bill proposes, you could check Congress.gov for the full text, which would provide the complete acronym expansion and detailed provisions.
Water Quality Standards Attainability Act
# Water Quality Standards Attainability Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Water Quality Standards Attainability Act (HR 3934) would modify how the federal government sets and enforces water quality standards. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically aim to change the process for determining whether waterways must meet federal pollution limits, potentially making those standards more flexible or easier for states and industries to meet. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact state environmental agencies, water utilities, industrial facilities (especially manufacturers and power plants), and communities that depend on clean water. Environmental groups and public health advocates would also have an interest in how the standards are implemented. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Jefferson Shreve (R-IN) and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. To better understand the specific provisions and implications, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary provided doesn't include those details.
To require the Secretary of the Treasury to designate certain covered organizations as Foreign Financial Threat Organizations, and for other purposes.
# HR 3523 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3523 would require the U.S. Treasury Secretary to designate certain organizations as "Foreign Financial Threat Organizations." While the bill's full details aren't specified in the provided information, this type of designation typically allows the government to impose financial restrictions on organizations deemed to pose threats to national security or U.S. financial interests—similar to existing sanctions and designations programs already used by the Treasury Department. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect organizations that the Treasury Department determines meet the criteria for foreign financial threats, though the specific criteria aren't detailed in the available information. It could also impact businesses and individuals who conduct financial transactions with designated organizations. As of now, HR 3523 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives.
Build the Wall Act of 2025
# Build the Wall Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would create a dedicated fund specifically for building and maintaining physical barriers (walls) along the U.S.-Mexico border under the Department of Homeland Security. It would redirect unspent money from the COVID-19 pandemic relief funds (the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds) toward this border wall construction project. **Who it affects:** The bill would primarily affect border security operations and potentially states and local governments that were expecting to use remaining pandemic relief funds for other purposes, since those unused funds would be redirected to border construction instead. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Jefferson Shreve (R-IN) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives yet. It remains in the early legislative stage.