Steil, Bryan [R-WI-1]
Republican · WI · 14 bills sponsored
Stop Insider Trading Act
# Stop Insider Trading Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Stop Insider Trading Act (HR 7008) aims to strengthen laws against insider trading—when people use non-public information to buy or sell securities for profit. While specific details aren't available in the current summary, bills with this title typically seek to increase penalties for insider trading violations, close legal loopholes, or expand the definition of who is covered by insider trading laws. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect corporate executives, government officials, financial professionals, and others with access to confidential business information. It could also impact ordinary investors by potentially creating a fairer playing field in financial markets. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was sponsored by Representative Bryan Steil (R-Wisconsin). For more detailed information about the specific provisions, you can check Congress.gov, which maintains the full legislative text once available.
Make Elections Great Again Act
# Make Elections Great Again Act (HR 7300) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill's specific provisions because the information available only shows basic metadata (bill number, sponsor, status) without access to the actual legislative text or summary of its contents. To give you accurate information about what provisions it contains, I would need to see the full bill details. **Current Status & Next Steps:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Bryan Steil (R-WI). **How to Learn More:** For accurate details about what this bill specifically proposes, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (the official congressional database), where you can read the full text, see any amendments, and track its progress through the legislative process.
Expanding WKSI Eligibility Act
# Summary of the Expanding WKSI Eligibility Act (HR 4430) **What the Bill Does** This bill would make it easier for more companies to qualify as "well-known seasoned issuers" (WKSIs)—a special SEC designation that allows companies to raise money from investors more quickly. Currently, only larger companies meet the requirements to become WKSIs. The bill lowers the financial threshold companies need to reach, meaning smaller and mid-sized companies could now qualify. Once qualified, these companies can use a faster process called "automatic shelf registration" to sell stocks or bonds without as much advance paperwork and waiting time. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily benefits smaller to mid-sized companies seeking to raise capital by reducing regulatory barriers and speeding up the approval process for public offerings. Investors may see more diverse companies entering public markets. The specific change reduces the required "aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity shares" companies must have—essentially lowering the size threshold—though the bill text doesn't specify the exact new number. This could help younger or growing companies access public markets more affordably. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and now moves to the Senate for consideration. It remains to be seen whether it will advance further in the legislative process.
Pay Our Capitol Police Act
# Pay Our Capitol Police Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill would ensure that U.S. Capitol Police officers and their support staff continue to receive paychecks and benefits during a government shutdown. Specifically, it would provide funding for salaries, overtime, hazardous duty pay, bonuses, and employee benefits for Capitol Police who are required to work during a shutdown, as well as civilian support staff and contractors who assist them. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts Capitol Police officers who work during shutdowns (who are considered "essential" and must stay on the job), civilian employees supporting them, and contractors providing services to the police force. Indirectly, it affects Capitol operations, since police presence is necessary to maintain building security and safety during shutdowns. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 5924) was introduced by Representative Bryan Steil (R-Wisconsin) and is currently in committee. It has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill addresses a recurring issue: Capitol Police and other essential government workers typically work without pay during shutdowns until Congress eventually passes appropriations bills, creating financial hardship.
Withhold Member Pay During Shutdowns Act
# Withhold Member Pay During Shutdowns Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prevent members of Congress from receiving their paychecks whenever the federal government enters a shutdown. Currently, Congress members continue to be paid during shutdowns, while many federal employees are furloughed without pay. This legislation aims to create financial pressure on lawmakers to reach budget agreements and avoid shutdowns by making their own compensation subject to the same disruption that affects the rest of the federal government. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill directly affects all voting members of Congress (senators and representatives). During any government shutdown, they would not receive their salaries until Congress passes a budget and the government reopens. The measure is designed to align lawmakers' financial interests with the public's interest in preventing shutdowns, which can disrupt federal services and leave hundreds of thousands of federal workers without pay. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. While the concept of withholding congressional pay during shutdowns has bipartisan appeal in theory, the bill has not advanced further in the legislative process.
Protecting Young Minds Online Act
# Protecting Young Minds Online Act (HR 5074) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Protecting Young Minds Online Act aims to restrict children's access to certain online content and regulate how social media platforms operate. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the publicly available information, bills with this title typically focus on limiting minors' exposure to adult material, regulating social media algorithms, and potentially requiring age verification on certain websites. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact children and teenagers, social media companies (like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook), website operators, and parents. Tech companies would face new compliance requirements, while platforms might need to implement stronger age restrictions or content filtering tools. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5074 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process. For detailed information on the specific provisions and any updates, you can check Congress.gov, which provides the bill's full text and current status.
Business of Insurance Regulatory Reform Act of 2025
# Business of Insurance Regulatory Reform Act of 2025 (HR 4735) — Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to reform how insurance is regulated in the United States. While specific details aren't available in the basic information provided, bills with this title typically seek to change federal oversight of the insurance industry, potentially streamlining regulations or shifting regulatory authority between federal and state agencies. Insurance regulation has traditionally been handled primarily at the state level, so reform bills often address the balance of power between state regulators and federal oversight. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact insurance companies, insurance brokers, and potentially consumers who purchase insurance products. Depending on its specific provisions, it could also affect state insurance commissioners and regulators who currently oversee the industry. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee review. Introduced by Representative Bryan Steil (R-Wisconsin), it has not yet been voted on by the full House. To learn the specific provisions and any recent developments, you would need to check Congress.gov or the bill's official text.
American Flags to Honor Our Veterans Act of 2025
# American Flags to Honor Our Veterans Act of 2025 (HR 3999) **What the Bill Does:** This bill would provide American flags to honor deceased veterans. While the full legislative language isn't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically authorize the distribution of flags that have been flown over the U.S. Capitol or other federal buildings to be presented to families of deceased veterans as a tribute to their service. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect families of deceased veterans, who would receive commemorative flags. It may also involve the Capitol Flag Office and potentially military honor guard units or veterans organizations responsible for presenting these flags. **Current Status:** HR 3999 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No further action has been taken as of the information provided. *Note: This summary is based on limited available details. For complete provisions and legislative language, you can view the full bill on Congress.gov.*
Helping Startups Continue To Grow Act
# Helping Startups Continue To Grow Act (HR 3323) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to support early-stage companies and startups by addressing business investment and competition issues. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided, the bill's title and subject areas suggest it likely focuses on making it easier for startups to access capital, grow their operations, and compete in the marketplace. It may include measures related to funding rules, antitrust considerations, or regulatory relief for small businesses. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact startup companies and small business owners seeking to grow. It could also affect venture capital investors, large established companies in competitive markets, and potentially consumers who benefit from increased business competition and innovation. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3323 is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. The bill was introduced by Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wisconsin) and has not yet advanced to a full House vote. For the most current information about specific provisions and any recent developments, you can check Congress.gov.
STABLE Act of 2025
# STABLE Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** The STABLE Act would create new federal rules for "stablecoins"—a type of digital currency designed to maintain a fixed value, typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. Currently, stablecoins operate with minimal regulation. This bill would require that only certain approved entities can issue stablecoins in the U.S., and those issuers would need to maintain dollar-for-dollar reserves backing every stablecoin in circulation. Companies would also have to publicly disclose their redemption policies and submit to regular federal or state oversight. **Who It Affects:** This legislation primarily impacts cryptocurrency companies that issue stablecoins, financial institutions considering entering the stablecoin market, and cryptocurrency users who rely on these digital assets for transactions. Only subsidiaries of banks, federally-approved nonbank payment companies, or state-approved issuers would be permitted to operate—effectively limiting who can participate in this market. Consumers using stablecoins would theoretically gain more consumer protections and transparency. **Current Status:** HR 2392 was introduced by Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced to a vote as of the latest information available.
No Veteran Falls Through the Cracks Act
# No Veteran Falls Through the Cracks Act – Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to actively work to reschedule mental health appointments when veterans cancel them. Currently, if a veteran cancels a mental health appointment, the VA may simply remove them from the schedule without attempting to get them back in for care. This bill aims to change that practice by making it mandatory for the VA to reach out and try to book a new appointment. **Who It Affects and Why It Matters** The bill primarily affects veterans receiving mental health services through the VA system. The intent is to address a potential gap in care—recognizing that veterans who cancel appointments might face barriers to rescheduling themselves or may benefit from follow-up outreach. By requiring the VA to take the initiative, the bill seeks to prevent veterans from falling out of the mental health care system due to missed or canceled appointments. **Current Status** The bill (HR 2229) is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Bryan Steil (R-Wisconsin).
No Sanctions Relief for Terrorists Act
# No Sanctions Relief for Terrorists Act (HR 2468) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would restrict the U.S. government's ability to lift economic sanctions (financial penalties) against countries or groups designated as state sponsors of terrorism or terrorist organizations. If passed, it would require Congress to approve any sanctions relief before the executive branch (the President and administration) could implement it. Currently, the President has significant authority to negotiate and lift sanctions without prior congressional approval. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact foreign policy decisions involving sanctioned nations and terrorist organizations, as well as any American businesses or individuals seeking to conduct trade with sanctioned entities. It would also shift decision-making power from the President to Congress regarding these negotiations. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The specific provisions of the legislation are not publicly detailed in available records, so the exact requirements or exceptions the bill might contain are unclear.
Survivor Benefits Fairness Act
# Survivor Benefits Fairness Act (HR 2228) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Survivor Benefits Fairness Act aims to reform how survivor benefits are distributed, though the specific details of its provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided. Based on the title, the bill likely addresses fairness issues in how benefits are calculated or distributed to surviving family members of deceased individuals, though it's unclear whether this applies to federal employees, military families, Social Security recipients, or another group. **Current Status and Impact** As of now, HR 2228 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full House vote. This early stage suggests the bill is still under review and has not gained sufficient support to move forward in the legislative process. Without access to the bill's full text or detailed provisions, it's difficult to specify exactly which Americans would be affected or what specific changes would be implemented. **Note:** To get a complete understanding of this bill's intent and impact, interested parties should review the full text on Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office for clarification on what "fairness" issues the bill addresses.
CURD Act
# CURD Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The CURD Act (Codifying Useful Regulatory Definitions Act) would create an official legal definition for "natural cheese" at the federal level. Under this bill, natural cheese would be defined as cheese made from animal milk or certain dairy ingredients following established cheese-making standards. Importantly, the definition would exclude processed cheese products like pasteurized process cheese, cheese foods, and cheese spreads. Any food product that doesn't meet this definition would be prohibited from using the label "natural cheese." **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill primarily affects cheese manufacturers, food labeling practices, and potentially consumers looking to purchase natural cheese products. It would give the food industry a clear, standardized definition to follow rather than relying on informal or varying standards. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. Bryan Steil, a Republican from Wisconsin—a state with a significant dairy and cheese industry.