Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI]
Democrat · MI · 18 bills sponsored
Paving the Way for American Industry Act
# Paving the Way for American Industry Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Paving the Way for American Industry Act (S 3819) aims to support American manufacturing and industrial development, though specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in the current summary. The bill's title suggests it focuses on removing obstacles or creating conditions that help U.S. industries grow and compete, but the exact provisions would need to be reviewed in the full legislative text. **Who It Affects:** Based on its title and sponsorship, the bill would likely affect American manufacturers, industrial companies, and potentially their workers. It may also impact consumers and the broader economy depending on what specific policies it contains. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill may be debated, modified, or could remain in committee without further action. --- *Note: A more detailed summary would require access to the bill's full text or official summary. If you need specific information about particular provisions, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov for the complete legislative language.*
Make Congress Drive Union Made Act
# Make Congress Drive Union Made Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require members of Congress and congressional staff to drive American-made vehicles, specifically those manufactured by unionized workers. If passed, it would essentially mandate that official congressional vehicles meet these production standards. The bill is a show of support for domestic manufacturing and union labor practices. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects Congress members and their staff who use official vehicles for work. Indirectly, it could influence vehicle procurement policies for the legislative branch and send a symbolic message about support for American manufacturing and unionized jobs. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full vote in either the Senate or House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process and would need committee approval and sponsorship support from both parties to progress further.
National Housing Emergency Act of 2026
# National Housing Emergency Act of 2026 Summary **What It Would Do** The National Housing Emergency Act of 2026 would address housing affordability and availability challenges across the United States by declaring a national housing emergency. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically propose federal funding, tax incentives, or regulatory changes to increase housing supply, reduce costs, or help people afford homes. The exact mechanisms would be outlined in the full bill text. **Who It Affects** This legislation would potentially impact renters and homebuyers struggling with housing costs, developers and builders, state and local governments responsible for zoning and housing policy, and taxpayers who would fund any new federal programs. The bill's effects would likely reach communities across the country facing affordable housing shortages. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full floor vote. Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan) is the sponsor. To learn the specific provisions and any recent developments, you would need to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov or monitor the committee's progress.
PRIMED Act
# PRIMED Act Summary The PRIMED Act (specific full title not provided in the information available) is a bill introduced by Senator Elissa Slotkin in the 119th Congress that focuses on streamlining environmental and regulatory processes related to mining and metal production, particularly as they affect Department of Defense operations and supply chains. The bill appears designed to balance environmental protections with the need to secure domestic sources of critical minerals and metals that are essential for national defense and military manufacturing. The bill would likely affect mining companies, the Department of Defense, environmental agencies, and communities near mining operations. Key provisions appear to involve modifying environmental assessment and monitoring procedures for mining activities, though the exact details of these changes are not fully specified in the available summary. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. **Current Status:** The bill remains in the committee stage and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. --- *Note: For complete details on specific provisions and impact, the full bill text should be reviewed, as this summary is based on limited information.*
Enhancing Arctic Readiness Act of 2025
# Enhancing Arctic Readiness Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Enhancing Arctic Readiness Act of 2025 aims to strengthen the United States' military and operational capabilities in the Arctic region. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on improving infrastructure, equipment, personnel training, and coordination among military branches to address Arctic security challenges and maintain U.S. presence in a strategically important region. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect the U.S. military and Department of Defense, which would need to implement new Arctic-focused strategies and operations. It could also impact communities in Alaska and other Arctic regions, as well as federal agencies involved in Arctic operations. Potentially, it could influence U.S. foreign relations with Arctic nations like Russia and Canada. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 3203) is in committee, meaning it has been referred for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI). Further action would require committee approval before advancing to a broader Senate vote.
A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to seek to engage appropriate officials of Taiwan in a joint program with Taiwan to enable the fielding of uncrewed systems and counter-uncrewed systems capabilities.
# Summary of S. 3163 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the U.S. Secretary of Defense to work with Taiwan's officials to develop a joint military program focused on unmanned systems (like drones) and technologies to defend against them. Essentially, it directs the Pentagon to pursue cooperative efforts with Taiwan to strengthen its capabilities in drone technology and counter-drone defenses. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the Department of Defense and Taiwan's military leadership. It could have broader implications for U.S.-Taiwan military relations and regional security in the Indo-Pacific, though it doesn't directly impact American civilians or domestic policy. **Current Status** S. 3163 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
A bill to provide for interagency tabletop exercises to assess the impacts of Department of Defense decisions during crises and evaluate United States Government tools available to augment Department of Defense capabilities in competition, crisis, and conflict, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3160 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Department of Defense (DoD) to conduct "tabletop exercises"—simulated scenarios where government officials discuss how they would respond to crises without actually deploying resources. These exercises would test how DoD decisions affect other parts of government and identify what tools and resources from other federal agencies could support the military during times of competition, crisis, or conflict. Essentially, it's designed to improve coordination and planning between the Pentagon and the rest of the federal government. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill directly affects the Department of Defense and other federal agencies that would participate in these planning exercises. By requiring these simulations, the legislation aims to ensure that the U.S. government can better coordinate its response to national security challenges by drawing on capabilities beyond just the military. This could include resources from intelligence agencies, State Department, FEMA, and other departments. **Current Status** S 3160 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not yet advanced further in the legislative process.
A bill to require a briefing on increasing procurement of strategic and critical materials from sources in the United States.
# S 3164 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** S 3164 would require the federal government to provide a briefing on ways to increase the purchase of strategic and critical materials from U.S. sources rather than relying on imports. Strategic and critical materials are raw materials essential for national defense, technology, and infrastructure—such as rare earth elements, lithium, and cobalt used in batteries, electronics, and military equipment. The bill essentially mandates that relevant government agencies analyze and report on how the U.S. could strengthen domestic supplies of these materials. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects federal procurement agencies and would ultimately impact U.S. supply chains across defense, energy, and manufacturing sectors. The main provision requires a briefing on strategies to increase domestic sourcing, meaning the government would need to study and propose ways to buy more of these critical materials from American suppliers instead of foreign ones. This could potentially affect mining companies, manufacturers, and other businesses involved in producing or processing these materials domestically. **Current Status** S 3164 is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant congressional committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI).
No Troops in Our Streets Act of 2025
# No Troops in Our Streets Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would restrict the federal government's ability to deploy active-duty military troops domestically within the United States. Specifically, it would place limits on when and how the Posse Comitatus Act—an existing 1878 law that already restricts military use in domestic law enforcement—can be waived or suspended. The bill aims to make it harder for the federal government to invoke exceptions that currently allow military deployment during emergencies or insurrections. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact federal policymakers, military leadership, and potentially state and local authorities who might otherwise coordinate with federal troops during crises. It could affect emergency response procedures during natural disasters, civil unrest, or national security emergencies where military assistance might currently be available. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan). The bill would need to pass committee review, Senate debate, House approval, and presidential signature to become law.
A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary shall develop and implement a comprehensive wastewater surveillance system at certain installations of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
# S 3162 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the Secretary of Defense to create and test a wastewater surveillance system at selected military installations. Wastewater surveillance involves testing sewage and wastewater to detect the presence of diseases and pathogens in a population—a public health monitoring technique that has become more common since the COVID-19 pandemic. The bill establishes this as a pilot program, meaning it would be tested at certain bases before potentially being expanded. **Who It Affects:** The primary organizations affected would be the Department of Defense and military installations across the country. Secondarily, it could impact military personnel and civilian employees at those bases by providing an additional disease monitoring tool. The system could help detect disease outbreaks early among base populations. **Current Status:** The bill (S 3162) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced to a vote as of now.
Protecting DOD Data Act of 2025
# Protecting DOD Data Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Protecting DOD Data Act of 2025 aims to strengthen security and protections for data held by the Department of Defense. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on safeguarding sensitive military information, research data, and personnel records from unauthorized access, theft, or misuse. The legislation would establish or enhance requirements for how the DOD handles, stores, and protects classified and sensitive information. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact the Department of Defense and its various agencies and contractors who handle defense data. It could also affect military personnel and federal employees whose information is stored in DOD systems, as well as defense contractors and technology companies that work with the department. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3161) is in committee review in the Senate, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) introduced the legislation. The bill would need to pass through committee, receive a Senate vote, pass the House, and be signed by the President to become law.
Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025
# Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Fairness for Fruits and Vegetables Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently being reviewed in the Senate. While specific details aren't available from the basic bill information provided, the title suggests it would address fairness issues related to fruits and vegetables—likely involving pricing, market practices, labeling, trade, or regulations affecting these agricultural products. To understand the exact provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov. **Who It Affects** Based on the title, this bill would likely impact farmers who grow fruits and vegetables, agricultural businesses, grocers and food retailers, and potentially consumers who purchase these products. The bill may also affect related industries like food processing or distribution. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 3112) is in committee, meaning it's being reviewed and debated by Senate committees before it can move forward for a full Senate vote. It was introduced by Senator Elissa Slotkin, a Democrat from Michigan. The bill has not yet passed or become law. *To learn the specific details of what this bill proposes, visit Congress.gov and search for "S 3112" to view the full legislative text.*
Federal Firefighter Cancer Detection and Prevention Act of 2025
# Federal Firefighter Cancer Detection and Prevention Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to address cancer risks among federal firefighters by establishing programs for early detection and prevention. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically create screening programs, provide funding for cancer research related to firefighter health, and establish protocols to help identify and treat cancer in federal firefighters at earlier stages. **Who It Affects** The legislation would primarily affect firefighters employed by federal agencies, as well as potentially their families and the federal agencies that employ them. Firefighters face elevated cancer risks due to occupational exposure to hazardous materials and smoke, making them a distinct group with specific health needs. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 2745) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) in the 119th Congress. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process and would need to move through committee review and debate before any vote could occur.
Biomanufacturing and Jobs Act of 2025
# Biomanufacturing and Jobs Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Biomanufacturing and Jobs Act of 2025 is a proposed law aimed at strengthening the U.S. biomanufacturing industry. Based on its title and sponsorship, the bill likely focuses on supporting the domestic production of biological products—such as vaccines, medications, and biotech materials—while creating manufacturing jobs in this sector. The bill would probably include provisions for federal investment, tax incentives, workforce training, or regulatory support to help American companies compete in this growing industry. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact biomanufacturing companies, workers seeking jobs in biotech fields, and potentially consumers who rely on domestically-produced medicines and vaccines. It may also affect states like Michigan (the sponsor's home state) that have significant biotechnology operations. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 2654) remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill would need committee approval before advancing further. *Note: Specific provisions are not publicly detailed in available summaries, so this summary reflects typical objectives of biomanufacturing legislation.*
Protecting Military Bases from Connected Vehicles of Concern Act of 2025
# Protecting Military Bases from Connected Vehicles of Concern Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to restrict the use of certain connected vehicles—cars and trucks equipped with internet connectivity and data collection capabilities—on military bases in the United States. The legislation would authorize the Department of Defense to establish rules preventing vehicles from foreign companies of concern from accessing or operating on military installations. The primary concern appears to be vehicles made by or connected to companies from countries that could pose national security risks, particularly regarding data collection and surveillance capabilities. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would directly impact military personnel, civilian employees, and contractors working at U.S. military bases who drive connected vehicles. It would also affect automakers and vehicle manufacturers if their products are restricted from military properties. The specific vehicles or manufacturers targeted aren't detailed in this bill summary, but the legislation gives the Department of Defense authority to define which vehicles qualify as concerning based on foreign ownership or control. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Future of Defense Manufacturing Act of 2025
# Future of Defense Manufacturing Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Future of Defense Manufacturing Act of 2025 would address how the United States manufactures military equipment and defense-related products. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on modernizing defense production capabilities, strengthening domestic manufacturing, and ensuring the U.S. can meet military equipment needs. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact defense contractors, manufacturing workers, military readiness, and potentially supply chain operations related to military equipment production. It could also affect communities that depend on defense manufacturing jobs. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan) during the 119th Congress and is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, the bill is still in the early legislative process. *Note: The full text of this bill would provide specific details about which manufacturing sectors are targeted, what changes are proposed, and what resources would be allocated.*
Connected Vehicle National Security Review Act
# Connected Vehicle National Security Review Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require a national security review of connected vehicles—cars and trucks that communicate wirelessly with other vehicles, infrastructure, or networks. The legislation aims to assess potential cybersecurity and national security risks posed by these connected vehicle technologies before they become widespread on American roads. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact vehicle manufacturers, technology companies developing connected vehicle systems, and potentially consumers who own or purchase connected vehicles. It could also affect government agencies responsible for transportation and national security. **Key Provisions:** While specific details weren't provided, bills of this type typically establish a review process to examine how connected vehicles handle data, their vulnerability to hacking, foreign ownership or control of related companies, and whether these technologies pose risks to critical infrastructure or national security. The review would likely inform future regulations or standards for the industry. **Current Status:** As of now, S 2040 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It has not advanced to become law.
Information and Communications Technology and Services National Security Review Act
# Information and Communications Technology and Services National Security Review Act (S 2041) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a new government review process for information and communications technology (ICT) companies and services that could affect U.S. national security. It would establish procedures for examining foreign ownership, control, or influence over technology companies—particularly those providing critical services like telecommunications, data storage, or internet infrastructure. The bill aims to give the federal government tools to identify and address potential security risks before they become problems. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect technology and telecommunications companies, especially those with foreign investors or ties to other countries. It would create a formal review mechanism (likely similar to existing Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States processes) to assess whether foreign entities could pose security threats through their stakes in U.S. tech firms. This could impact companies' ability to receive foreign investment and may require companies to disclose information about their ownership and operations. **Current Status** As of now, S 2041 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced to the next stage of consideration.