Stefanik, Elise M. [R-NY-21]
Republican · NY · 22 bills sponsored
LCBP Enhancements Act of 2026
# LCBP Enhancements Act of 2026 - Summary Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill's specific provisions because the congressional database information provided does not include the bill's actual text or a description of its contents—only metadata showing it's sponsored by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and currently in committee. To give you accurate information about what this bill would do, I would need access to the bill's full text or official summary. I'd recommend checking **Congress.gov** (the official source for all federal legislation) where you can search "HR 7560" to find: - The complete bill text - A summary of its specific provisions - Current status and any amendments - Voting records if it advances **Current Status:** The bill is in the committee stage, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for you.
Strengthening America’s Turning Point Act
# Strengthening America's Turning Point Act (HR 1550) - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill simply renames Saratoga National Historical Park in Stillwater, New York to "Saratoga National Battlefield Park." The change reflects the site's significance as a Revolutionary War battlefield rather than a broader historical park. **Who it affects and key details:** The bill primarily affects the National Park Service management of this New York location and visitors to the site. Saratoga was the location of a crucial 1777 Revolutionary War battle where American forces defeated the British, often considered a turning point in the war. The renamed designation emphasizes this military heritage specifically. The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is awaiting further action in Congress.
Ernest Peltz Accrued Veterans Benefits Act
# Ernest Peltz Accrued Veterans Benefits Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill creates a clear process for distributing military pension payments that were approved but not yet paid out when a veteran dies. Instead of the money potentially going unclaimed or reverting to the state, it goes to the veteran's family members in a specific order: first to a surviving spouse, then to children, then to dependent parents, and finally to the veteran's estate. Family members have one year after the veteran's death to apply for these accrued benefits. **Who It Affects:** Veterans' families and dependents who may be entitled to pension payments that were approved before a veteran's death but processed afterward. This primarily impacts surviving spouses, children, and dependent parents who might otherwise lose access to these funds. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is named after Ernest Peltz, suggesting it was created in response to a specific situation. It now awaits action in the Senate.
Keep Violent Criminals Off Our Streets Act
# Keep Violent Criminals Off Our Streets Act (HR 5213) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, sponsored by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY), aims to address violent crime by imposing stricter penalties on individuals convicted of violent offenses. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on measures such as mandatory minimum sentences, bail restrictions for violent offenders, or enhanced penalties for repeat violent criminals. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect individuals convicted of violent crimes, the criminal justice system, law enforcement, and potentially crime victims and communities. It could also impact courts and correctional facilities that would implement any new sentencing requirements. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5213 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process. To understand the specific provisions and their potential impact, you would need to review the full bill text, which is available through Congress.gov.
To authorize, ratify, and confirm the Agreement of Settlement and Compromise to Resolve the Akwesasne Mohawk Land Claim in the State of New York, and for other purposes.
# HR 2916: Akwesasne Mohawk Land Claim Settlement This bill would legally recognize and finalize a settlement agreement for a longstanding land dispute involving the Akwesasne Mohawk territory, which spans parts of northern New York, Ontario, and Quebec. The agreement was negotiated between the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, New York State, two counties, two towns, and the New York Power Authority. By passing this bill, Congress would officially authorize and confirm this compromise resolution to the land claim. The settlement includes several key provisions: it restores certain land rights and provides land access to the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe; it offers tuition assistance for tribal members attending select colleges and universities; and it requires the New York Power Authority to make annual payments to the tribe. The bill also authorizes the transfer of specific lands, rights-of-way, and easements that were the subject of ongoing court cases, and designates certain areas as Indian country. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House and is awaiting Senate action. It was sponsored by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY).
District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act of 2025
# District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill aims to change how the bail system works in Washington, D.C. by making it harder for judges to release defendants without requiring them to pay bail, particularly in cases involving violent crimes or repeat offenses. The legislation would require that certain defendants—especially those accused of serious crimes—be held without bail or required to post cash bail as a condition of release, rather than being released on their own recognizance (a promise to return to court). **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects defendants in D.C.'s criminal justice system and crime victims. It would restrict judges' discretion in bail decisions for individuals accused of violent crimes or those with prior criminal records. The bill also addresses property crimes and appears designed to increase detention of defendants considered high-risk, with the goal of reducing crime in the district. Supporters argue it improves public safety, while critics of such measures typically argue they could impact lower-income defendants disproportionately. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and would need Senate approval to become law. As a measure affecting D.C.'s local criminal justice system, it represents federal legislative involvement in local governance, which has been a longstanding point of debate regarding D.C.'s autonomy.
Servicemember Credit Monitoring Enhancement Act
# Servicemember Credit Monitoring Enhancement Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Servicemember Credit Monitoring Enhancement Act (HR 5923) would improve credit monitoring protections for active-duty military members and veterans. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title and focus suggest it aims to enhance existing credit monitoring services or expand access to them for servicemembers who may be at higher risk of identity theft and fraud. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily benefit active-duty servicemembers, veterans, and their families. Military personnel are considered vulnerable to identity theft and financial fraud due to factors like frequent relocations, overseas deployments, and access to personal information by multiple military institutions. Enhanced credit monitoring could help this population detect and respond to fraudulent activity more quickly. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5923 remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The bill was introduced by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. For the most current status and specific provisions, you can check Congress.gov.
PASS Act of 2025
# PASS Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** The PASS Act would ban citizens and companies from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea from buying or investing in U.S. agricultural land and agricultural businesses. The bill would also add the Secretary of Agriculture to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a government body that reviews certain foreign investments. CFIUS would be required to scrutinize investments by these foreign entities in the U.S. agricultural sector. The President could grant case-by-case exceptions if deemed necessary for national security. **Who it affects:** The bill directly restricts foreign investors and entities from these four countries. It indirectly affects U.S. farmers, agricultural companies, and landowners who might otherwise sell to or partner with foreign investors from these nations. It also expands the role of the Department of Agriculture in reviewing foreign investments. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
INFANT Act of 2025
# INFANT Act of 2025 - Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a substantive summary of this bill. While the bill information shows it's titled the "INFANT Act of 2025" (HR 5759), currently in committee, the congressional record provided doesn't include the bill's actual text, detailed provisions, or subject classifications—which are necessary to explain what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search "HR 5759" for the full bill text, summary, and sponsor details - **House committees**: Check the relevant committee page for hearing information - **Summary from official sources**: Congressional Research Service summaries provide plain-language overviews If you have access to the bill text or a more detailed summary, I'd be happy to help break it down into plain language for a general audience.
Consistent Egg Labels Act of 2025
# Consistent Egg Labels Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Consistent Egg Labels Act of 2025 would establish uniform federal standards for how eggs are labeled and marketed across the United States. Currently, egg labeling can vary significantly by state, creating confusion for consumers and compliance challenges for producers and sellers. This bill aims to create consistent labeling requirements nationwide, likely addressing terms like "cage-free," "free-range," and other production method descriptions that appear on egg packaging. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact egg producers, distributors, retailers, and consumers. Egg producers would need to comply with standardized labeling requirements rather than navigating different state regulations. Consumers shopping for eggs would benefit from clearer, consistent information about how eggs are produced, making it easier to compare products across different stores and states. **Current Status** HR 5659 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a bill in early stages, it has not yet become law. The specific provisions and details of the labeling standards would be determined as the bill moves through the legislative process.
Sovereign Enforcement Integrity Act of 2025
# Sovereign Enforcement Integrity Act of 2025 - Summary I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: the bill details you've provided don't include the actual legislative text or provisions. The summary information shows only basic metadata—the bill number (HR 5411), sponsor, and status—but not what the bill actually proposes to do. To give you an accurate, factual summary in plain language, I would need access to the bill's actual text, which typically includes sections describing its specific provisions, affected parties, and implementation details. Without this information, I cannot responsibly tell you what the bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. **What I can tell you:** This is a House bill currently in committee review (meaning it's being studied but hasn't been voted on yet) and was introduced by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY). If you'd like a summary, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov, where you can find the full bill text, or letting me know if you have additional details about its provisions.
Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act
# Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act (HR 5121) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to reform how colleges and universities are accredited—the process that determines whether institutions meet quality standards. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, its title suggests it would address concerns about fairness in the accreditation system. Accreditation is important because it affects student financial aid eligibility, institutional reputation, and enrollment. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact colleges and universities, their students (particularly those relying on federal financial aid), and accrediting agencies—the organizations that evaluate educational institutions. Students and families choosing schools, as well as employers evaluating credentials, would also be indirectly affected. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5121 remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. This means it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and may not advance further unless committee members vote to move it forward. **Note:** For specific details about what changes the bill proposes, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov, as the core provisions are not outlined in the summary information available.
WWII Nurses Congressional Gold Medal Act
# WWII Nurses Congressional Gold Medal Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would authorize Congress to award the Congressional Gold Medal to nurses who served during World War II. The Congressional Gold Medal is one of the highest civilian honors the U.S. government can bestow, typically given to individuals or groups for outstanding contributions to American history and culture. If passed, this medal would recognize the service and sacrifices of military and civilian nurses who provided medical care during WWII. **Who It Affects:** The bill recognizes WWII-era nurses, including those who served in the U.S. Army Nurse Corps, Navy Nurse Corps, and civilian medical personnel. Most of these individuals are now elderly or deceased, so the medal would primarily serve as a historical recognition of their contributions, with any living recipients or their families receiving the honor. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in either chamber of Congress. No further action has been taken at this time.
American Investment Accountability Act
# American Investment Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The American Investment Accountability Act (HR 4617) is currently in committee and has not been publicly detailed with specific legislative language available. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to establish accountability measures related to American investments, though the exact provisions remain unclear without access to the full text. **Current Status:** This bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and is currently in committee review. At this stage, it has not advanced to a floor vote and its specific details have not been widely publicized. **Note:** To provide you with accurate information about key provisions and who specifically would be affected, I would need access to the actual bill text. I'd recommend checking Congress.gov or your representative's website for the full legislative language once it becomes publicly available, as the summary information currently accessible is limited.
Trusted Foreign Auditing Act of 2025
# Trusted Foreign Auditing Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Trusted Foreign Auditing Act of 2025 would establish new requirements for foreign audit firms that conduct financial audits of U.S. companies. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to address concerns about the quality and reliability of audits performed by foreign-based accounting firms on American businesses. The legislation would likely set standards or restrictions for how foreign auditors operate in the U.S. market. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact foreign audit firms conducting business in the United States, as well as U.S. companies that use foreign auditors. It could also affect investors and regulators who rely on audit quality to ensure financial transparency and protect the markets. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 4616) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. The detailed provisions of the bill are not yet publicly available in summary form, so its specific requirements and scope remain unclear at this stage.
Advancing Skills-Based Hiring Act of 2025
# Advancing Skills-Based Hiring Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Advancing Skills-Based Hiring Act of 2025 aims to promote hiring practices based on job-related skills and abilities rather than formal educational credentials like college degrees. If passed, the bill would encourage employers to evaluate candidates primarily on whether they can actually do the job, rather than requiring a specific diploma or degree as a prerequisite for employment. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect job seekers (especially those without traditional four-year degrees), employers across all industries, and potentially educational institutions. It could open career pathways for workers who have gained skills through alternative routes—such as vocational training, apprenticeships, military service, or work experience—but lack formal degrees that many employers currently require. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4050 is in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY). Without additional information about specific provisions, this summary reflects the bill's general purpose based on its title and intent.
Employer-Directed Skills Act
# Employer-Directed Skills Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Employer-Directed Skills Act (HR 4049) would allow employers to play a more direct role in shaping workforce training and skills development programs. While specific details are limited in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on giving businesses greater input into what skills are taught in vocational training, community college programs, or apprenticeships—rather than having these decisions made primarily by government or educational institutions alone. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect workers seeking job training, employers looking to hire skilled workers, community colleges and vocational schools, and the workforce development system overall. The changes could influence what training programs are available and how they're designed. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill may be revised, debated, or could potentially stall in committee.
Drones for First Responders Act
# Drones for First Responders Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Drones for First Responders Act would establish or expand programs to provide unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to emergency response teams, including fire departments, police departments, and rescue services. The bill aims to help these first responders use drone technology for missions like search and rescue operations, disaster assessment, and emergency scene investigation. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily benefit local and state emergency services and first responder agencies. It could also affect communities that receive improved emergency response capabilities through enhanced drone technology. The bill may involve federal funding or support to help departments acquire and operate these systems. **Current Status** The bill (HR 3786) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: Specific provisions, funding amounts, and implementation details were not provided in the available information. For complete details, the full bill text would need to be reviewed.*
Stamp Out Invasive Species Act
# Stamp Out Invasive Species Act (HR 3024) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Stamp Out Invasive Species Act aims to address the problem of invasive plant and animal species that damage ecosystems and cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars annually. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, legislation with this title typically focuses on prevention, detection, and removal of non-native species that outcompete or harm native wildlife and agriculture. **Who It Affects** This legislation would likely impact farmers, environmental agencies, state wildlife departments, property owners, and businesses in industries affected by invasive species (such as forestry and fishing). It could also affect anyone using public lands or waterways. **Current Status** HR 3024 was introduced by Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. To provide more specific details about key provisions, the actual bill text would need to be reviewed on Congress.gov or the House Clerk's website.
Border Airport Fairness Act of 2025
# Border Airport Fairness Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the President to designate certain major airports located near the U.S. border as official ports of entry for customs processing. More importantly, it would eliminate user fees that airports currently charge for customs and border protection services. Currently, airports pay fees to the federal government to cover customs operations; this bill would remove that financial requirement. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects airports situated near U.S. borders, their operators, and potentially travelers passing through these airports. It could also impact federal customs operations and how border security services are funded. The changes would theoretically benefit airports by reducing their operating costs, though it could shift expenses elsewhere in the federal budget. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (HR 2962, introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-NY), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
TRACKS Act
# TRACKS Act Summary I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of HR 2917 (the TRACKS Act) because the bill information available doesn't include the actual text or legislative details—only that it's sponsored by Rep. Elise Stefanik and is currently in committee. To give you an accurate, plain-language explanation of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the bill's full text or summary. **I'd recommend checking:** - **Congress.gov** (search "HR 2917") for the official bill text and summary - **Rep. Stefanik's official website** for her explanation of the bill's purpose - Legislative tracking sites like **Ballotpedia** or **LegiScan** for nonpartisan summaries If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to break it down in plain language for you.
Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area Enhancement Act
# Summary of HR 2895 **What the Bill Does** This bill would enhance the existing Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area, a region in New York that preserves the cultural, historical, and natural significance of the Hudson River Valley. The bill is named after Maurice D. Hinchey, a former U.S. Representative from New York who was a longtime advocate for environmental protection and preservation of the Hudson Valley. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect communities, businesses, and residents in the Hudson River Valley region of New York. It could also impact local tourism, historic preservation efforts, and environmental conservation initiatives in the area. Heritage Areas typically support local economic development through increased tourism while helping to protect important historical sites and landscapes. **Current Status** As of now, HR 2895 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No further details about specific provisions or amendments are available at this stage. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY).