Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]
Republican · TX · 41 bills sponsored
To modify a provision relating to adjustments of certain State apportionments for Federal highway programs, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7776 **What the Bill Does:** HR 7776 would change how federal highway funding is distributed among states. Specifically, it would modify rules governing "apportionments"—the process by which the federal government allocates highway construction and maintenance money to individual states. The bill's exact changes aren't detailed in the available information, but it focuses on adjusting how these allocations are calculated or distributed. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact states and their transportation departments, which rely on federal highway funds to build and repair roads. It could also affect construction companies, commuters, and communities depending on how the funding changes are distributed. Drivers nationwide could potentially see impacts on road quality or construction projects in their areas. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7776 remains "In Committee," meaning it hasn't advanced beyond the initial review stage in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas) but has not yet been voted on by the full House. **Note:** The bill's summary language is general, and the specific details of what changes it proposes aren't publicly available in standard sources, so the exact impacts of these modifications cannot be determined without reviewing the full legislative text.
SAVE America Act
# SAVE America Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The SAVE America Act would require people to show official documents proving U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, and would require photo identification at the polls. Acceptable documents would include IDs that comply with the REAL ID Act (like certain driver's licenses). States would also need to create an alternative process for voters to demonstrate citizenship if they don't have standard documentation. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would affect all voters in federal elections and require states to change their voter registration procedures. It's currently in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. Sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), the bill reflects ongoing debate over voting access and election security—supporters argue citizenship verification strengthens election integrity, while critics contend it could create barriers for eligible voters without certain documents.
Count the Crimes to Cut Act
# Count the Crimes to Cut Act - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Department of Justice and other federal agencies to create and maintain public databases listing all federal criminal offenses—both those created by Congress (statutory offenses) and those created by regulatory agencies (regulatory offenses). The goal is to make information about federal crimes publicly accessible and transparent. The bill also requires these agencies to report on their criminal offenses to Congress. **Who It Affects and Why It Matters** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies and the Department of Justice, which would need to compile and publish this information. The general public would benefit by having easier access to information about what federal crimes exist. The bill's supporters argue this promotes government transparency and helps citizens understand what conduct is actually illegal under federal law. Some proponents suggest having a clear, public count of offenses could also help identify regulatory overreach. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It now awaits action in the Senate, where it would need to pass before going to the President for consideration.
PAUSE Act of 2025
# PAUSE Act of 2025 - Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the specific details of HR 6225 (PAUSE Act of 2025) in my training data, so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search for "HR 6225" for the full text, summary, and latest status - **Representative Roy's official website**: Often includes bill summaries and sponsorship details - **Nonpartisan sources**: Organizations like the Congressional Research Service or fact-checking sites that analyze legislation If you can share the bill's text or a summary from Congress.gov, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
No Tax Exemptions For Terror Act
# No Tax Exemptions For Terror Act (HR 5890) – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prohibit organizations designated as terrorist entities by the U.S. government from receiving tax-exempt status. Currently, some organizations may retain their tax exemptions even after being labeled as terrorist groups by federal authorities. The bill aims to close this potential gap by automatically revoking or denying tax-exempt benefits to any organization on the government's official terrorist designation list. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect organizations that the U.S. State Department or Treasury Department has formally designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) or Specially Designated Terrorist Entities. Tax-exempt organizations—typically nonprofits, charities, and religious groups—would face automatic loss of their tax benefits if they receive such a designation. This could impact donors who claim charitable deductions and the organizations themselves by eliminating their exemption from federal income taxes. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5890 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas) in the current congressional session.
Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act
# Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act (HR 5722) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), aims to prohibit the application of religious law—specifically Sharia law—in U.S. courts and legal proceedings. The bill would establish that American courts must apply only U.S. constitutional and statutory law when making judicial decisions, and would prevent foreign or religious legal systems from being recognized or enforced in the American legal system. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill would apply to all U.S. courts and potentially affect any cases where religious law might be referenced. Proponents argue it protects constitutional principles of secular law and equal treatment, while critics contend that federal courts already operate under U.S. law exclusively and that the bill may be unnecessary or target religious minorities. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5722 remains in committee and has not advanced for a full House vote. The bill has limited cosponsors and no companion legislation in the Senate, suggesting it faces an uncertain path to passage.
Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act of 2025
# Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish federal penalties for state and local governments that adopt "sanctuary" policies—rules that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agencies. If passed, it would penalize jurisdictions that restrict their police or officials from assisting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or sharing immigration-related information with federal authorities. **Who It Affects:** The bill would directly impact sanctuary cities, counties, and states that have chosen to limit immigration enforcement activities. It would also affect immigrants, law enforcement agencies in those jurisdictions, and potentially federal agencies like ICE. Supporters argue it protects public safety, while critics contend it could affect police-community relations and target vulnerable populations. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 5005, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Chip Roy (R-TX). No provisions or specific penalty details are publicly documented at this stage. *Note: This summary reflects the bill's basic framework as introduced. Specific details about proposed penalties or enforcement mechanisms are not yet publicly available.*
TPS Reform Act of 2025
# TPS Reform Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The TPS Reform Act of 2025 (HR 4201) would modify the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program, which currently allows foreign nationals from designated countries experiencing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or other crises to live and work temporarily in the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, TPS reform bills typically address how long people can stay, eligibility requirements, renewal processes, or the criteria for which countries qualify for the program. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact the roughly 600,000 individuals currently holding TPS designations, as well as citizens from countries that may be added or removed from the program in the future. It would also affect employers who rely on TPS workers and immigration agencies responsible for administering the program. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4201 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To understand the specific changes being proposed, you would need to review the bill's text directly through Congress.gov.
End DED Act
# End DED Act (HR 4200) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The End DED Act aims to eliminate the Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) program, which currently allows certain foreign nationals to legally live and work in the United States on a temporary basis. DED is a humanitarian protection status typically granted to people from countries experiencing ongoing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or other extraordinary conditions. If passed, this bill would end the ability to grant new DED status and would likely phase out protections for those currently holding it. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact foreign nationals currently protected under DED status, as well as future applicants from countries that might otherwise qualify for such protection. It would also affect employers who hire workers with DED authorization. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. This means it is still in the early stages of the legislative process and may not move forward, be modified, or require further discussion before any action is taken.
FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 589: FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would repeal portions of the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a 1994 law that currently makes it illegal to use force, threats, or property damage to intimidate or interfere with people obtaining or providing reproductive health services. The bill would also repeal protections for people exercising religious freedom at places of worship. If passed, these federal criminal prohibitions would no longer apply to such conduct. **Who It Affects** The bill would affect abortion clinics and reproductive health providers, patients seeking these services, and religious institutions and their congregants. It would also impact federal law enforcement agencies that currently investigate violations of these protections. The change would shift enforcement responsibility entirely to state and local authorities. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress (2025) by Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No companion bill has been introduced in the Senate at this time.
Make DOGE Permanent Act
# Make DOGE Permanent Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as a permanent federal agency. Currently, DOGE operates as a temporary initiative. If passed, the bill would convert it into an official, permanent department within the federal government structure. **Who It Affects:** The bill would affect federal government operations and structure. It would impact how efficiency and cost-reduction efforts are organized within the executive branch, potentially affecting multiple federal agencies and their operations. **Key Provisions & Current Status:** Specific details about provisions are limited in available records, but the bill's core purpose is to make DOGE a permanent fixture rather than a temporary commission. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet advanced further in the legislative process. --- *Note: This bill is in early stages. For current details on provisions and any updates to its status, check Congress.gov, the official legislative tracking website.*
State Border Security Assistance Act
# State Border Security Assistance Act (HR 3464) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The State Border Security Assistance Act would provide federal funding and support to states to help them enhance security along their borders. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills of this type typically aim to assist states—particularly those bordering Mexico or Canada—with resources like technology, personnel, or infrastructure for border monitoring and enforcement. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect border states and their law enforcement agencies, as well as federal agencies involved in border security. It could also impact immigration enforcement efforts and, potentially, immigration-related policies at the state level. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (HR 3464, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. Committee review is an early stage in the legislative process where bills are debated and revised before moving forward. *Note: Detailed policy provisions aren't publicly available in the source provided. For comprehensive information about specific measures and funding amounts, you may want to check Congress.gov.*
Ending Medicaid Discrimination Against the Most Vulnerable Act
# Ending Medicaid Discrimination Against the Most Vulnerable Act (HR 3321) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), addresses what its supporters view as discriminatory practices within Medicaid—the federal-state health insurance program for low-income individuals. While specific provisions aren't detailed in available summaries, bills with this title typically aim to change Medicaid eligibility rules or coverage requirements that the sponsor believes unfairly disadvantage certain vulnerable populations. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would potentially impact Medicaid beneficiaries and the structure of state Medicaid programs. Currently, HR 3321 is in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full House vote and remains in the early legislative process. Without additional details on the specific provisions, it's unclear which populations are targeted as "vulnerable" or what exact changes are proposed, making it difficult to assess the full scope of who would be affected. **Next Steps** To understand the bill's specific intent and implications, interested readers should consult the full legislative text on Congress.gov, where detailed provisions and the bill's purpose statement would be available.
SAVE Act
# SAVE Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) requires people registering to vote in federal elections to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. The bill specifies which documents are acceptable—such as IDs that comply with the REAL ID Act—and requires states to set up an alternative process for applicants who may not have traditional documentation but can provide other evidence of citizenship. **Who It Affects** This bill affects anyone registering to vote in federal elections and the states that administer voter registration. It applies nationwide and would change current registration practices in states that don't already require citizenship verification at registration. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX). It now awaits action in the Senate.
Bring Entrepreneurial Advancements To Consumers Here In North America Act
# Bill Summary: Bring Entrepreneurial Advancements To Consumers Here In North America Act (HR 2652) **What We Know:** This bill, sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), is currently in committee and has not yet advanced to a vote. Unfortunately, the bill's specific provisions are not publicly detailed in the available information, so the exact details of what it would do cannot be confirmed at this time. **Next Steps:** Since the bill remains in committee, it would need to pass committee review and then be voted on by the full House of Representatives before moving to the Senate. Given the limited public information available, interested parties can track its progress through Congress.gov for updates on any amendments or actions taken. --- **Note:** For a more complete summary, you may want to check Congress.gov directly, where the full bill text and current status updates are maintained.
To remove certain species from the lists of threatened species and endangered species published pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
# Summary of HR 2608 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would remove certain animal and plant species from the federal lists of threatened and endangered species that are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. By removing species from these lists, they would no longer receive the legal protections that prevent their hunting, harm, or habitat destruction. The specific species to be delisted are not detailed in the bill title provided, so the exact animals or plants affected would depend on the full bill text. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects wildlife and environmental groups that advocate for species protection, as well as industries (such as logging, development, or hunting interests) that may face fewer restrictions on lands where these species live. It also impacts the federal agencies responsible for enforcing wildlife protection rules. Additionally, the public has a stake, as the Endangered Species Act reflects national policy on conservation. **Current Status** HR 2608 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Chip Roy (R-TX). Without seeing the complete text, it's unclear which specific species would be affected or the bill's chances of advancing further in Congress.
CRT Act
# Summary of HR 2276 - CRT Act **What the bill would do:** This bill would prevent schools and colleges from receiving federal funding if they teach or require students and teachers to accept certain race-based theories. The bill targets what supporters call "critical race theory" and related concepts, aiming to stop schools from allegedly promoting ideas that discriminate based on race, color, or national origin. If passed, schools would risk losing federal money if they violate these restrictions. **Who it affects:** The bill would impact elementary schools, high schools, and colleges that receive any federal funding, as well as the students and teachers in those institutions. It could also affect the federal government's ability to distribute education funding. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is an early stage in the legislative process.
SCHOOL Act of 2025
# SCHOOL Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** The SCHOOL Act would change how federal education funding works by allowing money to "follow the student" rather than going directly to school districts. Instead of funding being tied to public schools, the federal dollars would go with students to whatever school they choose—public, private, or homeschool—whether they're learning in person or online. Students could use these funds for tuition, educational materials, tutoring, and extracurricular activities. **Who it affects:** This bill would primarily affect K-12 students and their families, as well as public school districts (which could lose funding if students leave), private schools, and homeschooling families. It could also impact teachers and school programs funded by federal dollars. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill represents a significant shift in education policy philosophy, moving from district-based funding to student-based funding, sometimes called "education savings accounts" or "school choice" funding models.
Deportation Compliance Act
# Summary of HR 1953: Deportation Compliance Act Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill because the specific legislative text and provisions are not included in the information you've provided. The database entry shows only basic metadata: the bill number, sponsor, status, and title. To give you an accurate, factual summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and key provisions, I would need access to the actual bill text or a substantive description of its contents. **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee (meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House yet) and was introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX). To find the complete bill details, you can search for "HR 1953" on Congress.gov, which provides full legislative text and analysis. If you can share the bill's specific provisions or text, I'd be happy to summarize it in plain language for a general audience.
Defending Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights Act
# Defending Veterans' Second Amendment Rights Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would prevent the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from automatically reporting veterans' personal information to the national background check system used for firearm purchases simply because they have a service-connected disability. Currently, VA regulations can lead to veterans being flagged in the background check system if they're deemed unable to manage their finances due to disability, which can result in them being denied the ability to purchase firearms. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects veterans with service-connected disabilities, their families, and gun dealers. It would also impact the VA's current reporting procedures. **Key Provision:** The central provision prohibits using disability status alone as the basis for reporting veterans to the background check system. This means having a service-connected disability would not automatically disqualify someone from purchasing a firearm—though other disqualifying factors (like felony convictions or certain mental health adjudications) would remain in place. **Current Status:** The bill has been introduced in the House and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House or Senate. No action has been taken on it yet during this congressional session.
Veterans Access to Direct Primary Care Act
# Veterans Access to Direct Primary Care Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs to run a five-year test program allowing enrolled veterans to choose receiving primary care from private (non-VA) doctors instead of VA facilities. Veterans could pay for these services using a "veteran health savings account"—a dedicated fund for their medical expenses. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts veterans enrolled in the VA health care system, giving them an alternative option rather than using VA clinics and hospitals. It could also affect private healthcare providers who might gain new veteran patients, and the VA itself, which would need to establish and manage the new program. **Key Points:** The legislation essentially creates a pilot program to test whether veterans benefit from having a choice between VA and private primary care doctors. It includes oversight mechanisms and focuses on fraud prevention and cost management. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
Move the ICC Out of NYC Act of 2025
# Move the ICC Out of NYC Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the International Criminal Court (ICC) to relocate its offices out of New York City. Currently, the ICC maintains a presence in Manhattan. The proposed legislation would effectively remove this international organization's operations from U.S. soil. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect the ICC and its staff members working in New York, as well as diplomats and international officials who conduct business at the NYC location. It could also impact countries that work with the ICC and rely on its U.S. presence for coordination and meetings. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No additional legislative action has occurred at this time.
Higher Education Reform and Opportunity Act
# Summary of HR 1739: Higher Education Reform and Opportunity Act **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would significantly restructure federal student lending and higher education accreditation. It would consolidate multiple federal student loan programs into a single loan program and eliminate loan forgiveness programs for borrowers. The bill would also expand federal student aid eligibility to include alternative education and training programs—such as apprenticeships and vocational courses—if they're accredited through state-level agreements with the Department of Education, not just traditional colleges and universities. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill primarily affects college students and recent graduates, as well as institutions offering postsecondary education. It requires colleges and universities to publicly report data on how many former financial aid recipients find employment after graduation and how much federal student loan debt graduates accumulate. These transparency measures are designed to help students make informed decisions about their education choices. The bill shifts some accreditation authority to state governments rather than relying solely on federal oversight. **Current Status:** HR 1739 is currently in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) in the 119th Congress.
Reciprocity Ensures Streamlined Use of Lifesaving Treatments Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 1632: Reciprocity Ensures Streamlined Use of Lifesaving Treatments Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a faster approval pathway for drugs, biologics, and medical devices that haven't been approved by the FDA but have already been approved in other countries. Instead of going through the FDA's full approval process, manufacturers could seek "reciprocal approval" if their product is already approved in a qualifying country (such as Canada, the UK, or Australia) and addresses an unmet medical need in the U.S. The FDA could still reject products it considers unsafe or ineffective, and could require additional studies after approval. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect patients with serious conditions where no FDA-approved treatments exist, as well as pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers. To qualify, a product must: (1) be approved in a specified foreign country, (2) not have been withdrawn from any of those countries due to safety or effectiveness concerns, and (3) address an unmet medical need. The FDA retains authority to deny approval or impose conditions, such as requiring post-market monitoring studies to ensure safety. **Current Status** HR 1632 is currently in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Chip Roy (R-TX).