Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]
Republican · NC · 23 bills sponsored
STORM Act
# STORM Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 6539 (the STORM Act) from the 119th Congress needed to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, and its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 6539" to see the full text, summary, and status - **Your representative's website** - Often includes bills they sponsor with explanations - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or nonpartisan policy organizations If you can share the bill's text or official summary, I'd be happy to help translate it into plain language for you.
Atlantic Coast Shipping Safety Act
# Atlantic Coast Shipping Safety Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Atlantic Coast Shipping Safety Act (HR 6410) is a proposed law designed to improve maritime safety standards for ships operating along the U.S. Atlantic Coast. While specific details aren't available in the basic filing information, bills with this title typically focus on regulations governing vessel operations, safety equipment requirements, crew training standards, or environmental protections in Atlantic shipping lanes. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact shipping companies and maritime operators conducting business along the Atlantic Coast, as well as coastal communities and ports in the region. It could also affect consumers through potential changes to shipping costs or product availability, depending on the specific safety requirements included. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6410 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) but has not advanced further in the legislative process. For more detailed information about the specific provisions, you would need to consult Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office directly.
Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act
# Non-Domiciled CDL Integrity Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill (HR 5688) would establish new rules for Commercial Driver's License (CDL) holders who don't live in the state where they obtained their license—known as "non-domiciled" drivers. The bill aims to improve oversight and accountability for these drivers by requiring stricter standards for obtaining and maintaining CDLs across state lines. This is intended to address concerns about driver safety and compliance with federal trucking regulations. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts long-haul truck drivers and commercial drivers who work across multiple states, as well as trucking companies that employ them. It would also affect state motor vehicle departments responsible for issuing and tracking CDLs. Indirectly, it may affect the broader trucking industry's operations and compliance costs. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) but has not advanced further in the legislative process. Additional details about specific provisions are limited in the available information.
Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025
# Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025 (HR 5721) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** Based on the available information, HR 5721 is titled the "Protect Our Judiciary Act of 2025," suggesting it is designed to address security, conduct, or operational matters related to the federal court system. However, specific details about the bill's provisions are not available in the summary provided. The bill would likely affect federal judges, court operations, or court security if passed, but without access to the full text, the exact nature of these protections or reforms cannot be detailed. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee review. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To understand the specific provisions and impacts of this legislation, interested parties would need to review the complete bill text, which is typically available through Congress.gov. **Next Steps:** For detailed information about what this bill actually proposes, readers are encouraged to visit Congress.gov and search for HR 5721 to access the full legislative text and any committee documentation.
Healthy H2O Act
# Healthy H2O Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed text or specific provisions of HR 4721 (the Healthy H2O Act) in my current information. While I can see it's a bill sponsored by Rep. David Rouzer from North Carolina that's currently in committee, I cannot provide accurate details about what it would specifically do without access to its actual language. To get a reliable summary of this bill's contents, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** (official source with full bill text and summaries) - **Your representative's official website** - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or government tracking sites This ensures you get accurate information about the bill's actual provisions and who it would affect.
Safe and Open Streets Act
# Safe and Open Streets Act (HR 4015) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safe and Open Streets Act is a proposed bill that aims to address street safety and accessibility issues, though specific details about its provisions are not publicly available in the information provided. To understand exactly what changes this bill would make, you would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov. **Who It Affects:** Based on the bill's title, it would likely impact pedestrians, drivers, urban planning, and possibly local governments responsible for street management and public safety. However, without the specific provisions, it's difficult to determine the exact scope of who would be affected. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. Bills in committee are under review before they can move forward in the legislative process. **Next Steps:** To learn more about this bill's specific provisions and purposes, visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 4015" to access the full text and any supporting documents.
Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2025
# Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2025 (HR 3824) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2025 is a Republican-sponsored bill aimed at reducing the number of regulations and red tape that businesses and individuals must follow. While the bill's specific details aren't fully detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically seek to streamline government rules, reduce compliance costs, and give agencies less authority to create new regulations. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact businesses of all sizes, which would face fewer regulatory requirements. It could also affect workers and consumers, depending on which regulations are targeted for elimination or modification. Government agencies responsible for implementing rules would also be affected by any changes to their regulatory authority. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3824 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Rep. David Rouzer (R-NC). To get a complete understanding of the specific regulations targeted and detailed provisions, you would need to review the full text of the bill through Congress.gov.
Improving Water Quality Certifications and American Energy Infrastructure Act
# Improving Water Quality Certifications and American Energy Infrastructure Act (HR 3928) **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modify the process for obtaining water quality certifications for energy infrastructure projects. Currently, states must certify that proposed energy projects (like pipelines, power plants, and transmission lines) won't violate water quality standards before federal permits are issued. The bill would streamline this certification process, likely by setting time limits for state reviews and establishing procedures for projects to move forward if states don't respond within specified timeframes. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect energy companies seeking to build or expand infrastructure projects, as well as states responsible for water quality oversight. Environmental groups and communities concerned about water protection would also have a stake in the outcome, since changes to certification requirements could affect how thoroughly water impacts are evaluated. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3928 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a floor vote in the House. The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC). Until it moves out of committee, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Nationwide Permitting Improvement Act
# Nationwide Permitting Improvement Act Summary The Nationwide Permitting Improvement Act (HR 3927) aims to streamline the federal permitting process for various projects. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't available in the information provided, bills with this title typically focus on reducing bureaucratic delays and simplifying how companies and organizations obtain federal permits for infrastructure, energy, environmental, and development projects. The goal is generally to make it faster and easier to get approval for projects that require multiple federal agencies' sign-off. This bill would primarily affect businesses, developers, and project owners who need federal permits—including those in energy, construction, transportation, and environmental sectors. It could also indirectly impact communities where such projects are proposed. Currently, the bill is in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To learn about the specific changes being proposed, you would need to review the detailed bill text, as the current summary doesn't include those details.
Maritime Supply Chain Security Act
# Maritime Supply Chain Security Act (HR 2390) - Plain Language Summary **What the bill does:** This bill allows the federal Maritime Administration to award competitive grants to U.S. ports for removing or replacing equipment made or controlled by China—specifically port cranes and their parts. The grants can cover both physical equipment replacements and software/hardware upgrades. The money comes from an existing federal program called the Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP), which funds projects that improve port safety, efficiency, and reliability. **Who it affects:** U.S. ports and port operators would be the primary beneficiaries, as they could apply for federal funding to replace Chinese-controlled infrastructure. The bill is designed to reduce potential security vulnerabilities in American maritime operations, though it could indirectly affect shipping costs and operations if ports must upgrade equipment. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need Senate approval and a presidential signature to become law. The underlying concern is national security—specifically ensuring that critical U.S. port infrastructure isn't dependent on equipment or systems that could be controlled by or vulnerable through China.
State-Managed Disaster Relief Act
# State-Managed Disaster Relief Act (HR 2342) - Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would shift how federal disaster relief is managed by giving states greater control over relief efforts following natural disasters. Rather than having the federal government (primarily through FEMA) directly manage disaster response and recovery, the proposal would allow states to take the lead in administering relief programs and distributing federal disaster funds. The exact details of how this power-sharing would work aren't specified in the basic bill information available. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact disaster survivors, state governments, and federal agencies like FEMA. Depending on the specific provisions, it could affect how quickly people receive aid after hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, and other disasters, and would change which level of government handles the coordination and distribution of relief resources. **Current Status:** HR 2342 is currently in committee, meaning it's still in early stages and hasn't advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) in the 119th Congress. Without additional detail on the bill's specific provisions, it's unclear what the exact mechanisms of state management would be or how federal oversight would be maintained.
Duplications of Benefits Victims Relief Act
# Duplications of Benefits Victims Relief Act (HR 2341) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Duplications of Benefits Victims Relief Act would address situations where individuals receive duplicate benefits from multiple government programs simultaneously. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, such legislation typically aims to either prevent people from collecting overlapping benefits they're not entitled to, or to provide relief and compensation to those who were wrongly denied benefits or forced to repay duplicate payments they had received in error. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact individuals who have received or may receive benefits from federal programs—potentially including Social Security, unemployment insurance, disability payments, or other assistance programs. It could also affect the government agencies that administer these programs and their budgets. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 2341 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) but has not yet been scheduled for floor debate or voting. Without more detailed legislative text available, the specific relief mechanisms and exact scope of the bill cannot be fully determined.
Securing Strictly Needy Americans’ Pivotal (SNAP) Benefits Act of 2025
# SNAP Benefits Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would add new restrictions to the SNAP program (food stamps). It would require states to suspend benefits for any household whose EBT card is used only out-of-state for more than 60 consecutive days. The household would need to prove they still live in their home state to restore benefits. Additionally, the bill would prohibit SNAP recipients from using their benefits at stores or wholesale businesses they own themselves. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects SNAP recipients (about 42 million Americans currently receive these benefits). It would most directly impact households that relocate or travel extensively, as well as SNAP recipients who own food retail businesses. **Current status:** HR 1398 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) and remains in committee as of now, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
CONTAINER Act
# CONTAINER Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The CONTAINER Act would allow states bordering Canada and Mexico to place temporary, movable structures on federal lands near the borders without obtaining special permits. These structures—such as barriers or other installations—could remain for up to one year initially, with the possibility of 90-day extensions if U.S. Customs and Border Protection determines the border hasn't been fully secured. The bill streamlines the approval process by removing the typical authorization requirements that currently apply to federal lands. **Who It Affects** The bill directly impacts border states (those adjacent to the U.S.-Canada or U.S.-Mexico borders) and gives them more control over border security operations on federal property. It also affects the Department of the Interior and Forest Service, which would need to approve placements rather than require states to apply through normal permitting channels. Generally, it relates to border security and immigration enforcement efforts. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Act
# Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Act – Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would require states to test or screen welfare applicants for drug use before they can receive benefits. Specifically, it applies to three major assistance programs: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), food stamps (SNAP), and public housing assistance. Applicants with a drug-related arrest in the past five years would be required to take a drug test and pass it to receive benefits. Those without such an arrest history would be screened through interviews or questionnaires to assess drug abuse risk—and those flagged as high-risk would also have to test negative to qualify. **Who it affects:** The bill targets adult applicants seeking welfare, food assistance, or public housing support. It would primarily impact low-income individuals and families relying on government aid programs. **Current status:** The bill (HR 372) was introduced by Republican Representative David Rouzer of North Carolina in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. Similar drug-testing proposals have been debated for years, with supporters arguing they prevent substance abuse among aid recipients and critics raising concerns about costs, privacy, and whether it actually improves outcomes.
Disaster Assistance Fairness Act
# Disaster Assistance Fairness Act (HR 834) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Disaster Assistance Fairness Act, introduced by Rep. David Rouzer (R-NC), aims to reform how federal disaster assistance is distributed to communities affected by natural disasters. While specific details about the bill's provisions are limited in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on ensuring that disaster aid is allocated fairly across different regions and communities, and may address concerns about consistency in how FEMA and other federal agencies process disaster relief claims. **Current Status and Impact** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It has not advanced to the next legislative stage. The bill would primarily affect disaster victims and local governments seeking federal assistance after hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, and other disasters. **Note:** More detailed information about specific provisions—such as which programs it targets or what fairness standards it would establish—would require accessing the full bill text, which was not provided here. To learn more, you can visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 834."
Asylum Accountability Act
# Asylum Accountability Act - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** The Asylum Accountability Act would make it permanently illegal for immigrants to receive certain types of immigration relief if they fail to show up for a removal hearing, unless they have an exceptional reason for missing it. Currently, this penalty lasts 10 years; this bill would make it lifetime. The relief affected includes cancellation of removal (which can lead to permanent residency), voluntary departure, and switching visa categories. **Who it affects and key details:** This bill would primarily affect non-U.S. citizens in removal proceedings—people facing deportation who skip their court dates. Under current law, missing a hearing results in a 10-year ban from seeking relief; this bill extends that to a permanent ban. The bill does allow for exceptions if someone can prove "exceptional circumstances" prevented them from attending. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Lumbee Fairness Act
# Lumbee Fairness Act Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would grant federal recognition to the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, a Native American tribe that currently lacks this official status. Once recognized, Lumbee Tribe members would become eligible for federal services and benefits that are already available to members of other federally recognized tribes, such as healthcare, education, and housing assistance. The bill also allows the Department of the Interior to hold land in trust (own land on behalf of) the tribe. **Who it affects:** The legislation primarily affects approximately 55,000+ members of the Lumbee Tribe, with a focus on those living in four North Carolina counties (Robeson, Cumberland, Hoke, and Scotland). It also impacts federal agencies like the Interior Department and Health and Human Services, which would need to assess and provide services to the newly recognized tribe. North Carolina state government would also be involved in jurisdictional matters over the tribe's lands. **Current status:** The bill (HR 474) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Federal recognition of Native American tribes is historically a complex process that has taken years or decades for other groups to achieve.
Amtrak Executive Bonus Disclosure Act
# Amtrak Executive Bonus Disclosure Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill requires Amtrak (the national passenger railroad company) to publicly disclose how much its top executives are paid, including their base salaries and any bonus compensation. The bill also requires Amtrak to explain the specific criteria and metrics used to decide whether executives receive bonuses. This information must be included in Amtrak's annual report to Congress and posted on Amtrak's public website so taxpayers can see it. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects Amtrak's executive leadership team and Amtrak as a federal corporation. More broadly, it impacts taxpayers and members of Congress, since Amtrak receives federal funding and Congress has oversight responsibility. The goal is to increase government transparency and accountability. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) and would need Senate approval to become law.
States’ Education Reclamation Act of 2025
# Summary of States' Education Reclamation Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would eliminate the federal Department of Education entirely and transfer its responsibilities to other agencies or directly to the states. Instead of the federal government administering education programs, the Treasury would send grants directly to states for K-12 and higher education for the next nine years (2025-2033). The amount of funding would be based on what was provided in 2025, minus money for programs being moved to other departments. Special education programs would go to the Department of Health and Human Services, while job training programs would go to the Department of Labor. **Who It Affects and Key Requirements** This change would affect students, teachers, school districts, colleges, and parents across the country, as well as federal employees working at the Department of Education. States would gain more control over how education money is spent but would also need to follow new rules—including hiring independent auditors each year to track how they spend the federal grants. This represents a significant shift of power from the federal government to individual states in determining education policy and spending priorities. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the House by Rep. David Rouzer (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House.
Voluntary School Prayer Protection Act of 2025
# Voluntary School Prayer Protection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would restrict the Department of Education's ability to fund public schools that limit student-led, voluntary prayer. Under the proposed law, schools could lose federal education funding if they have policies that prevent students from voluntarily praying in school, as long as that prayer is constitutionally protected (meaning student-initiated rather than school-sponsored). Essentially, it uses federal funding as leverage to ensure schools allow voluntary prayer. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill affects public school districts and states that receive federal education funding, as well as students who wish to pray voluntarily at school. Current constitutional law already protects student-initiated prayer in schools—students can pray voluntarily on their own time. This bill would penalize schools financially if they're perceived as restricting such activity. The bill only applies to constitutionally protected prayer, meaning it doesn't require schools to allow prayer that's school-sponsored or that infringes on other students' rights. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken as of now.
No Hires for the Delinquent IRS Act
# No Hires for the Delinquent IRS Act - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would freeze new IRS hiring until the Treasury Department certifies in writing that no IRS employees have seriously delinquent tax debts. A "seriously delinquent tax debt" is defined as unpaid taxes with a public lien filed against the person, though it excludes people who are actively paying through installment plans, have pending appeals, or received hardship relief. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects the IRS and potential job applicants. It also indirectly impacts taxpayers, as it could limit the IRS's ability to hire new staff for customer service, audits, and other operations. The bill's premise is that IRS employees should comply with tax obligations themselves before the agency can expand its workforce. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative David Rouzer (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Natural Disaster Recovery Program Act of 2025
# Natural Disaster Recovery Program Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This legislation would create new federal funding mechanisms to help communities recover from major disasters. It would establish a "National Disaster Recovery Reserve Fund" that allows FEMA to provide grants directly to states and tribal governments for disaster-related expenses that aren't fully covered by existing aid programs. The bill expands what types of assistance FEMA can offer, specifically focusing on housing repair, home rebuilding, and economic recovery support for disaster victims. **Who It Affects:** State and local governments, Native American tribal nations, and individuals affected by federally declared disasters would benefit from expanded recovery assistance. The bill also affects FEMA's operations and budget allocation decisions. **Key Provisions & Current Status:** The bill would require FEMA to consider broader recovery needs when recommending whether the President should declare an emergency or disaster, potentially making it easier for affected areas to access federal aid. It's currently in committee (the early legislative stage) and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Rouzer (R-NC) in the 119th Congress.