Risch, James E. [R-ID]
Republican · ID · 38 bills sponsored
SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026
# SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026 would authorize new sanctions against vessels involved in circumventing existing international sanctions, particularly those used to transport oil and other sanctioned goods. "Shadow fleets" refer to networks of aging or obscure ships that countries like Russia and Iran use to evade international trade restrictions and move prohibited goods around the world. If passed, this bill would give the U.S. government expanded authority to identify, track, and penalize these vessels and the companies operating them. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily target shipping companies, vessel owners, and financial institutions involved in shadow fleet operations. It would affect sanctions-evading countries and entities trying to circumvent existing restrictions. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, sanctions-related bills typically include tools like asset freezes, travel bans, and restrictions on doing business with the U.S. economy. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (S 2904 in the Senate) and was introduced by Republican Senator James Risch of Idaho. It has not yet been voted on by the full Senate.
ARC Act of 2026
I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information provided is incomplete. The summary you've shared only includes basic metadata—the bill number, sponsor, status, and title—but doesn't include the actual text or legislative language that describes what the bill would do. To give you an accurate, factual summary suitable for a general audience, I would need access to: - The bill's actual text or a detailed description of its provisions - What "ARC" stands for and the bill's purpose - Which groups or industries it affects - Specific policy changes it proposes **What I can tell you:** This is a Senate bill (S 3814) sponsored by Senator James Risch (R-ID) from Idaho that is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. If you have access to the full bill text or a more detailed summary, I'd be happy to break it down into plain language for you. You can typically find complete bill information on Congress.gov.
A bill to amend the Public Lands Corps Act of 1993 to modify the cost-sharing requirement for conservation projects carried out by a qualified youth or conservation corps, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 1228 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would modify the Public Lands Corps Act of 1993, which oversees youth and conservation corps programs that employ young people and adults to work on public lands projects. The main change involves adjusting "cost-sharing" requirements—the amount of money that local organizations or states must contribute when federal funds support conservation work. By reducing these matching fund requirements, the bill aims to make it easier for youth and conservation corps to carry out environmental projects like trail maintenance, forest management, and habitat restoration on public lands. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily benefit youth and conservation corps organizations, young people seeking employment in conservation work, and public land agencies. It could also affect state and local governments that partner with these programs, as they may have fewer financial obligations to match federal funding. The changes could expand opportunities for young workers to gain employment and training in conservation fields. **Current Status** S 1228 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator James Risch (R-ID) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act of 2025
# Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would require the federal government to keep certain firearm-related operations running even during a government shutdown. Specifically, it would maintain services related to criminal background checks for gun purchases (through the FBI), firearms enforcement activities (through the ATF), and the processing of applications for exporting firearms and firearm-related products (through the Commerce and State Departments). Currently, these services may be suspended or limited when the government shuts down due to budget disagreements. **Who it affects:** The bill would impact gun buyers (who would still be able to have background checks processed), gun sellers and manufacturers, and people in the firearms industry seeking export licenses. It could also affect federal agencies managing these programs. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Senator James Risch (R-ID) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It has not been passed into law.
Deter PRC Aggression Against Taiwan Act
# Deter PRC Aggression Against Taiwan Act (S 2960) – Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to strengthen U.S. support for Taiwan and deter military action by China (the People's Republic of China, or PRC) against the island. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic information available, bills with this title typically authorize military aid, weapons sales, or increased defense cooperation with Taiwan. The legislation signals Congressional support for Taiwan's security in response to concerns about potential Chinese military aggression. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects Taiwan and China's relationship with the U.S., and indirectly impacts Americans through foreign policy implications. It would also affect defense contractors who supply military equipment and personnel involved in U.S.-Taiwan military cooperation. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee (S 2960, 119th Congress), meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator James Risch (R-ID). For more specific details about what provisions it contains, you would need to review the full bill text, as the basic information provided doesn't list the detailed measures included.
FIRE Act
# FIRE Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of S. 2813 (the FIRE Act from the 119th Congress) to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. While I can see it's a Senate bill sponsored by Senator James Risch (R-ID) and is currently in committee, I cannot reliably tell you the bill's actual content without risking providing you with incorrect information. **What you can do:** To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "S 2813" to see the full text, summary, and updates - **Senator Risch's website** - Often includes press releases explaining bills they sponsor - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or major news outlets covering the bill This will give you the most reliable, up-to-date information about what the bill actually proposes.
Urban Canal Modernization Act
# Urban Canal Modernization Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Urban Canal Modernization Act (S 2753) would authorize updates and improvements to canal systems located in urban areas. While specific details aren't available in the summary provided, canal modernization bills typically address aging infrastructure by funding repairs, upgrades to water delivery systems, and improvements to recreational or safety features along canal corridors in cities. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect cities with canal systems, as well as water districts and communities that depend on these canals for water delivery, irrigation, or recreation. It could also impact local governments responsible for maintaining canal infrastructure and residents living near or using these waterways. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee review (S 2753, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been voted on by the full Senate. Senator James Risch (R-ID) sponsors the legislation. To learn more about the specific provisions—such as funding amounts or which canals would be covered—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
International Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2025
# International Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would reauthorize and likely update the International Trafficking Victims Protection Act, a federal law that addresses human trafficking globally. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, reauthorization bills typically extend funding, update agency powers, and may modify programs related to combating human trafficking, protecting victims, and supporting prevention efforts internationally. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact trafficking victims worldwide who may receive U.S.-supported assistance, U.S. government agencies involved in anti-trafficking work (like the State Department), and organizations that receive federal funding to combat human trafficking. It could also influence U.S. foreign policy and aid decisions tied to countries' trafficking prevention efforts. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 2647) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Senator James Risch (R-ID) sponsors the bill. To understand the specific changes being proposed, you would need to review the full bill text, as the summary provided doesn't detail particular provisions being added or modified.
Equal Shot Act of 2025
# Equal Shot Act of 2025 Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the specific details of S. 2562 (Equal Shot Act of 2025) in my current information. While I can see it's a Senate bill sponsored by Senator James Risch (R-ID) that is currently in committee, I cannot provide accurate details about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions without access to the bill's text or congressional documentation. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** (congress.gov) - the official source for all federal legislation - **Your representative's website** - they can explain how it might affect your district - **Nonpartisan analysis sites** like the Congressional Research Service or organizations that track legislation If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy Act of 2025
# Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill proposes implementing "zero-based regulatory budgeting" for energy-related federal regulations. In simple terms, it would require federal agencies to evaluate their existing energy regulations from scratch rather than building on current rules. Agencies would need to justify why each regulation should continue to exist and potentially eliminate or modify rules that don't meet new cost-benefit standards. The bill aims to streamline energy development by reducing regulatory requirements in the energy sector. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The legislation would primarily affect federal energy agencies and the energy industry, including oil, gas, and other energy producers. It would also impact states and consumers who depend on these regulations for environmental and safety protections. The bill requires agencies to prioritize cost-effectiveness when deciding which regulations to keep, modify, or eliminate, potentially favoring energy production efficiency over other considerations. **Current Status** As of now, S. 2427 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to a Senate committee for review but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator James Risch (R-ID) in the 119th Congress.
Say No to Indoctrination Act
# Say No to Indoctrination Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Say No to Indoctrination Act (S 2251) is a proposed federal law sponsored by Senator James Risch of Idaho. While specific legislative details are limited in the available information, bills with this title generally aim to restrict certain educational content or teachings in schools that sponsors view as ideological or partisan in nature. The exact provisions—such as which subjects or materials would be targeted, which grade levels would be affected, or how restrictions would be enforced—are not detailed in the summary provided. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** If passed, this bill would likely impact students, teachers, school districts, and educational institutions nationwide that receive federal funding. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Many bills in committee do not advance further in the legislative process. To understand the specific provisions and potential impacts, you would need to review the full text of S 2251 on Congress.gov, as the available summary does not detail the bill's exact language or requirements.
PARTNER with ASEAN, CERN, and PIF Act
# PARTNER with ASEAN, CERN, and PIF Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would authorize the U.S. government to establish formal partnership agreements with three international organizations: ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), and PIF (Pacific Islands Forum). The legislation aims to strengthen diplomatic and cooperative relationships between the United States and these regional and specialized organizations in Asia-Pacific, Europe, and the Pacific Islands. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact U.S. relations with multiple countries in Southeast Asia (including Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and others), European nations through CERN's scientific work, and Pacific island nations. By formalizing partnerships, the U.S. would likely increase collaboration on shared interests such as scientific research, regional security, economic cooperation, and political coordination. The specific terms of these partnerships would presumably be negotiated after the bill passes. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. It was introduced by Senator James E. Risch (R-Idaho) in the 119th Congress.
Countering Wrongful Detention Act of 2025
# Countering Wrongful Detention Act of 2025 – Summary **What It Would Do** This bill aims to address the problem of Americans being detained abroad by foreign governments without legal justification. If passed, it would establish new government procedures and tools to respond to wrongful detention cases, likely including coordination between agencies, diplomatic efforts to secure releases, and potential sanctions against countries that wrongfully detain U.S. citizens. The bill also appears to create oversight mechanisms and information-sharing requirements so Congress can monitor how these cases are handled. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Americans imprisoned or detained in other countries, though it also impacts U.S. foreign policy and diplomatic relationships with nations accused of wrongful detention. Countries mentioned in the bill's subjects—including China, Iran, Belarus, and others—could potentially face diplomatic pressure or sanctions if they hold Americans without proper legal process. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator James Risch (R-ID) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. This is an early stage in the legislative process.
ETAP Act of 2025
# ETAP Act of 2025 Summary I don't have access to the specific details of the ETAP Act of 2025 (S. 1902) in my training data, so I cannot provide you with accurate information about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get a reliable summary, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search for "S. 1902" to see the full bill text, sponsor details, and any official summaries - **Senator Risch's website**: His office may have a summary of the bill's purpose - **Legislative tracking services**: Sites like govtrack.us or legiscan.com provide plain-language summaries If you can share the bill's text or a summary with me, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Protecting Minors in Federal Health Plans Act
# Protecting Minors in Federal Health Plans Act (S 1774) — Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would restrict coverage of certain gender transition-related medical treatments for minors in federal health plans. Specifically, it would prohibit federal health insurance programs from covering puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries related to gender transition for anyone under 18 years old. The bill would apply to health plans covering federal employees, members of Congress, and members of the military. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The legislation directly affects minors with access to federal health plans—primarily children of federal employees, service members, and their families. It would essentially remove coverage for these specific medical treatments from federal insurance options, though it doesn't prevent individuals from seeking these treatments privately or paying out-of-pocket. The bill takes a restrictive approach to federal healthcare benefits while leaving private insurance and state Medicaid programs outside its scope. **Current Status** As of now, S 1774 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill reflects ongoing national debate about appropriate medical care for transgender youth, with supporters citing medical caution and opponents citing established medical guidelines from major health organizations.
Small Business Disaster Coordination Act
# Small Business Disaster Coordination Act Summary The Small Business Disaster Coordination Act (S 1698) would improve how federal agencies coordinate disaster relief efforts for small businesses. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to streamline the process by which small business owners access federal aid after disasters like hurricanes, floods, or wildfires. This could include coordinating between agencies like the Small Business Administration (SBA), FEMA, and others to reduce confusion and paperwork for business owners seeking recovery assistance. The bill would primarily affect small business owners and entrepreneurs who experience losses from natural disasters or other emergencies. It could also impact the federal agencies responsible for distributing disaster relief. By improving coordination between these agencies, the bill's goal would be to help small businesses recover faster and more efficiently after disasters strike. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the Senate. It was sponsored by Senator James Risch (R-ID).
No Official Palestine Entry Act of 2025
# No Official Palestine Entry Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prohibit the United States from establishing official diplomatic relations with Palestine or recognizing a Palestinian state. If passed, it would prevent the U.S. government from opening an embassy in Palestine, entering into formal treaties with a Palestinian government, or officially acknowledging Palestinian statehood. The bill essentially locks current U.S. policy into law. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East and any future negotiations involving Palestinian statehood. It would affect diplomats and government officials who might otherwise have authority to negotiate or establish relations with Palestinian representatives. The legislation directly affects Palestinians and countries involved in Middle East peace efforts, as it removes the possibility of formal U.S. diplomatic recognition regardless of future circumstances or negotiations. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator James Risch, a Republican from Idaho. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
AUSSOM Funding Restriction Act of 2025
# AUSSOM Funding Restriction Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The AUSSOM Funding Restriction Act of 2025 is currently in committee and has not yet been publicly detailed in available legislative records. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to restrict or control funding related to "AUSSOM," though the specific acronym's meaning and the exact nature of the funding restrictions are not clarified in the basic bill information available. **Current Status:** This bill (S 1583) was introduced in the Senate during the 119th Congress by Senator James E. Risch (R-ID). It remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Without additional legislative details, specifics on who would be affected and what key provisions are included cannot be determined from the information provided. **Note:** For a complete understanding of this bill's implications, you would need to consult the full legislative text on Congress.gov or other official congressional resources, as the basic bill summary does not contain sufficient detail about its purpose or provisions.
Zero Based Regulations Act
# Zero Based Regulations Act (S. 1556) Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would change how federal agencies create and maintain regulations. Under a "zero-based" approach, agencies would need to periodically review all their existing rules and justify keeping them—similar to zero-based budgeting in finance. Rather than regulations automatically staying in place unless repealed, they would need affirmative approval to continue. The bill aims to reduce what sponsors view as outdated or unnecessary regulations accumulating in the federal system. **Who It Affects:** This would impact federal agencies across government, businesses that comply with regulations, and potentially consumers depending on which rules are eliminated or modified. Industries heavily regulated (like environmental, financial, and healthcare sectors) would likely be most affected. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. As with most bills at this stage, its prospects for passage remain uncertain and would depend on committee action and broader legislative priorities. **Note:** Specific details about provisions (review timelines, exemptions, implementation requirements) were not available in the information provided, so the summary reflects the general framework of zero-based regulation approaches.
Stand with Israel Act
# Stand with Israel Act (S 1521) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Stand with Israel Act is currently in committee and has not yet been made available in full text form, so specific provisions cannot be detailed at this time. Based on its title and sponsorship, the bill would likely address U.S. policy toward Israel, though the exact measures remain unclear until the bill text is officially released. **Current Status:** This bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator James Risch (R-ID) but remains in committee review. No further action has been taken, and the bill has not advanced to a floor vote or passed either chamber. **Note for Readers:** To understand what this bill specifically proposes, you can review the full text once it becomes available through Congress.gov or contact your representative's office for more information about its provisions and potential impact.
BUST FENTANYL Act
# BUST FENTANYL Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The BUST FENTANYL Act would require the U.S. President to annually identify foreign opioid traffickers and impose sanctions against them. Sanctions could include freezing assets, blocking loans, and restricting financial transactions. The bill specifically targets foreign individuals and organizations involved in producing or shipping fentanyl and fentanyl-related chemicals—particularly those supplying Mexico or other countries where fentanyl is being produced for U.S. markets. The requirement would remain in effect through 2030. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily targets foreign drug traffickers, their financial networks, and foreign governments' cooperation with trafficking. It places special emphasis on identifying Chinese nationals and entities involved in fentanyl supply chains. The legislation would also strengthen Congressional oversight by requiring detailed annual reports to lawmakers. The bill doesn't directly change laws for U.S. citizens but aims to disrupt international fentanyl trafficking networks through economic pressure and international sanctions. **Current Status** The bill (S 860) is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Republican Senator James Risch of Idaho.
A bill to amend the Aquifer Recharge Flexibility Act to clarify a provision relating to conveyances for aquifer recharge purposes.
# Summary of S 1254 **What the Bill Does** This bill proposes to clarify a specific provision in the Aquifer Recharge Flexibility Act, which deals with how water can be transferred or "conveyed" for the purpose of recharging aquifers (underground water supplies). While the exact details of what needs clarification aren't specified in the available information, the bill aims to make the existing rules clearer or more flexible regarding these water transfers. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect water management agencies, irrigation districts, and agricultural users who rely on aquifer recharge programs—particularly in western states where water is scarce and underground water reserves are crucial for farming and drinking water supplies. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator James Risch (R-Idaho) and is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and hasn't yet been brought to a full Senate vote. No further action has been taken at this time.
A bill to amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to authorize the use of funds for certain additional Carey Act projects, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 1257 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modify the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (the major infrastructure law passed in 2021) to allow federal funding to be used for additional water development projects under the Carey Act. The Carey Act is a century-old law that enables states to develop irrigation and water projects on federal lands. Essentially, the bill would expand what types of water projects can receive federal infrastructure money. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects western states that use Carey Act projects for irrigation and water management, as well as farmers and communities dependent on these water systems. It would also impact how federal infrastructure funds are allocated nationally. Senator James Risch, a Republican from Idaho, sponsors the bill, and Idaho—a state heavily reliant on irrigation—would likely benefit significantly. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full Senate. No specific provisions or details beyond the general scope are available in the public summary provided.
Freedom from Unfair Gun Taxes Act
# Freedom from Unfair Gun Taxes Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, sponsored by Senator James Risch of Idaho, would limit federal excise taxes on firearms and ammunition. Currently, the federal government collects an 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition sales, with revenue directed to wildlife conservation programs. This bill would reduce or eliminate these taxes, which supporters argue makes guns and ammunition more affordable for consumers. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect gun owners and ammunition buyers who would likely pay lower prices at purchase. It would also impact the federal government's revenues—particularly funding for wildlife conservation and habitat restoration programs that currently depend on excise tax money. Hunters and outdoor recreation groups could be affected if conservation funding decreases. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains "In Committee," meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee stage, so its chances of becoming law are uncertain and depend on future legislative action.