Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]
Republican · PA · 23 bills sponsored
To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit universal free fare policies on public transportation, and for other purposes.
# HR 7843 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would prevent public transportation systems in the United States from implementing "universal free fare" policies—programs that allow all riders to use buses, trains, and other transit services without paying fares. If passed, it would amend federal transportation law to prohibit such programs nationwide. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact transit agencies (like city bus systems and regional rail networks), commuters who use public transportation, and any communities considering or currently operating free transit programs. It would also affect local and state governments that fund these systems. **Current Status:** HR 7843 was introduced by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has no specified subjects listed and contains additional provisions beyond the main free fare prohibition, though details aren't specified in this summary.
Republic of Georgia Sovereignty Act
# Republic of Georgia Sovereignty Act (HR 7630) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Representative Scott Perry (R-PA), is designed to support the sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Georgia, a country in the South Caucasus region. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this type of title typically express congressional support for Georgia's territorial integrity and independence, particularly in relation to ongoing disputes with Russia over territories like South Ossetia and Abkhazia. **Current Status and Impact** As of now, the bill remains "In Committee," meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill affects U.S. foreign policy toward Georgia and may influence diplomatic relationships with Russia. It would primarily impact policy rather than domestic law, potentially affirming U.S. commitment to Georgian independence and security interests. **Note:** Without access to the full text of HR 7630, this summary is based on the bill's title and context. For complete details on specific provisions, you can view the full bill text on Congress.gov.
CAR Act
# CAR Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7582 (the CAR Act) from the 119th Congress, so I can't provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get this information, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search for "HR 7582" to see the full bill text, sponsors, and committee details - **Representative Perry's website**: Often has summaries of bills their office introduces - **Committee information**: Check the relevant House committee's website for hearing details or analyses If you can share the bill's full title or subject matter, I'd be happy to help explain what it likely addresses in plain language.
To require the Secretary of the Treasury to include any entity identified as a Chinese military company on the Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List.
# HR 7075 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the U.S. Treasury Department to automatically add any entity identified as a Chinese military company to the "Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List." This list is used to track and restrict business dealings with companies believed to be connected to China's military. The bill would make the listing process more automatic rather than discretionary. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects U.S. companies and investors who do business internationally, as it would restrict their ability to trade with or invest in Chinese military-linked companies. It could also impact Chinese companies in the defense sector and potentially some civilian companies with military connections. American consumers might see indirect effects if U.S. companies face new restrictions on their operations. **Current Status:** HR 7075 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) in the 119th Congress.
Stop DC CAMERA Act
# Stop DC CAMERA Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Stop DC CAMERA Act would restrict or eliminate the use of surveillance cameras in Washington, D.C. Based on its title and context, the bill appears to target camera surveillance systems operated by the District of Columbia government. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced for a full vote in the House of Representatives. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect the District of Columbia government and its surveillance infrastructure, as well as residents and visitors to D.C. who are recorded by these camera systems. The bill could impact both public safety operations that rely on surveillance footage and privacy concerns of individuals in the nation's capital. **Current Status:** As of now, the Stop DC CAMERA Act (HR 5525) remains in committee during the 119th Congress. This means the bill has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. Limited details are publicly available about the specific provisions of the bill, so its exact scope and any exceptions it might include are unclear at this stage.
Freedom From Union Violence Act of 2025
# Freedom From Union Violence Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Freedom From Union Violence Act of 2025 would establish federal protections against violence and intimidation related to labor union activities. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it aims to create legal remedies or penalties for violent acts committed during labor disputes or union-related activities. The bill would likely affect the relationship between federal labor law and criminal conduct during labor organizing, strikes, or other union activities. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would potentially impact union members, non-union workers, employers, and labor organizations. Workers who experience or fear violence during labor disputes could be affected, as could unions and their members if the bill creates new legal liabilities or restrictions on union activities. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. At this stage, the bill's specific language and detailed provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided, so the exact scope of its protections and requirements cannot be fully assessed without reviewing the full legislative text.
Republic of Somaliland Independence Act
# Republic of Somaliland Independence Act (HR 3992) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would direct the U.S. government to recognize the Republic of Somaliland as an independent nation. Somaliland is a region in the Horn of Africa that declared independence from Somalia in 1991 but is not currently recognized by the U.S. government or the United Nations. If passed, the bill would change American foreign policy to formally acknowledge Somaliland's sovereignty and establish diplomatic relations with it. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would primarily affect U.S. foreign policy in East Africa and relations with Somalia. It would also impact Somaliland's international status, potentially encouraging other countries to follow suit with recognition. Currently, Somaliland operates as a de facto independent state with its own government and institutions, but lacks international recognition—a status that limits its ability to conduct trade, secure loans, and participate in global organizations. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No timeline has been set for consideration.
No Desire for Streetcars Act
# Summary of HR 3822: No Desire for Streetcars Act **What the Bill Would Do** The specific details of this bill are not publicly available in standard congressional databases, as indicated by the "N/A" subject listing. Based solely on its title, it appears the bill would address streetcar-related policy, though without access to the actual bill text, the precise provisions and intent cannot be accurately described. **Current Status** HR 3822 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA). **To Get More Information** To understand who would be affected and what specific provisions are included, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office directly. This would clarify whether the bill addresses federal funding, local transportation policy, environmental regulations, or another aspect of streetcar development.
Taiwan PLUS Act
# Taiwan PLUS Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Taiwan PLUS Act aims to strengthen U.S. diplomatic and economic relationships with Taiwan. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with similar names typically focus on expanding trade, increasing military cooperation, and enhancing official interactions between the U.S. and Taiwan. The bill would likely elevate Taiwan's status in American foreign policy. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect U.S.-Taiwan relations and trade, potentially benefiting businesses engaged in cross-strait commerce and defense contractors. It could also impact U.S.-China relations, as China views Taiwan as part of its territory and opposes increased U.S. engagement with the island. American consumers and workers in relevant industries could see indirect effects depending on the bill's trade and military provisions. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA). For the most current details on specific provisions, the bill's text would need to be reviewed directly through congressional databases.
Falun Gong Protection Act
# Falun Gong Protection Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Falun Gong Protection Act would require the U.S. President to impose sanctions—specifically visa bans and property freezes—against foreign individuals who knowingly participate in or help with organ harvesting in China. The bill is named after Falun Gong, a spiritual practice whose practitioners have been persecuted in China. The sanctions authority would automatically expire five years after the law takes effect. However, the bill includes exceptions to protect humanitarian aid and certain charitable transactions from sanctions. **Who It Affects** The bill would directly impact foreign individuals and officials accused of involvement in forced organ harvesting. It indirectly affects U.S.-China relations and international human rights policy. The restrictions do not apply to regular trade goods or humanitarian assistance, so ordinary commercial relationships would largely continue unaffected. **Current Status** The bill passed the House of Representatives and is named HR 1540 in the 119th Congress. As of now, it awaits action in the Senate to advance further in the legislative process.
Bertie’s Respect for National Cemeteries Act
# Bertie's Respect for National Cemeteries Act (HR 2078) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, sponsored by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), aims to protect national cemeteries by establishing or strengthening rules about how these sacred spaces are used and managed. While specific details aren't publicly available in the basic bill information, the title suggests it would ensure national cemeteries are treated with appropriate respect and dignity. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would impact national cemeteries, their visitors, and potentially cemetery management practices. It may also affect military families, veterans, and others who use these facilities for burial or remembrance. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 2078 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill would need to advance through the committee process and gain majority support in both chambers of Congress before becoming law. --- *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would be available through Congress.gov or the bill's full text.*
TREAT PTSD Act
# TREAT PTSD Act Summary The TREAT PTSD Act (HR 1947) is a bill currently under consideration in the House of Representatives that aims to expand treatment options for veterans and others suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on improving access to mental health services, potentially including support for emerging therapies or increased funding for PTSD research and treatment programs through the Department of Veterans Affairs and other health systems. The bill would primarily affect veterans with PTSD, though it may also impact civilian populations and the medical community. It is sponsored by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full House. To learn more about the bill's specific provisions—such as which treatments it would authorize, how much funding it allocates, or which agencies would implement it—you would need to review the full bill text, which is available on Congress.gov.
Eliminating the RFS and Its Destructive Outcomes Act
# Eliminating the RFS and Its Destructive Outcomes Act (HR 2460) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would eliminate the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), a federal program that has required oil refineries to blend increasing amounts of renewable fuels—primarily ethanol from corn—into gasoline and diesel fuel since 2005. If passed, the RFS requirements would be completely removed, ending the mandate that refineries use these biofuels. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact several groups: oil refineries (which would no longer face blending requirements), ethanol producers and corn farmers (who benefit from guaranteed fuel demand), vehicle owners and consumers (who could see changes in fuel costs and availability), and environmental advocates (who view renewable fuels as part of climate strategy). The effects would be most significant in corn-producing states like Iowa and the Midwest. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. It was introduced by Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. Elimination of the RFS would be a significant policy reversal, as the program has been a major driver of U.S. biofuel production for nearly two decades.
Protecting Taxpayers’ Wallets Act of 2025
# Protecting Taxpayers' Wallets Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill, currently under review in a House committee, aims to reduce federal spending and protect taxpayer money. Based on its title and listed subjects, it appears designed to address government employee compensation and benefits, establish new oversight mechanisms, and potentially adjust user fees and charges. The specific details of how it would accomplish these goals are not provided in the available information. **Who it affects:** The bill would directly impact federal government employees (through potential changes to pay and benefits) and federal agencies (through new oversight requirements). Indirectly, it affects all taxpayers by potentially reducing federal spending, and the public that uses federal services (which may be subject to new or adjusted fees). **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. To understand the specific provisions and exact impacts, you would need to review the full bill text, which would contain the detailed language of proposed changes.
45Q Repeal Act of 2025
# 45Q Repeal Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would eliminate the Section 45Q tax credit, a federal tax incentive that currently provides financial rewards to companies that capture and store carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere or industrial sources. If passed, businesses would no longer receive tax credits for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, removing a significant financial incentive for this climate-related technology development. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact companies investing in carbon capture technology, including energy producers, industrial manufacturers, and emerging clean-tech firms. It would also indirectly affect workers in these industries and communities where such projects are located. Consumers could potentially see changes in energy costs depending on how companies adjust operations in response. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 10, 2025, by Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) and is currently in committee. It has not yet been voted on or advanced further in the legislative process. No companion bill has been introduced in the Senate at this time.
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act
# Summary of HR 1342: Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would add political affiliation to the list of protected categories in federal disaster relief programs. Currently, FEMA and other organizations distributing disaster assistance are prohibited from discriminating based on race, religion, gender, disability, and several other characteristics. If passed, the bill would make it illegal for them to deny or provide unequal assistance based on a person's political beliefs or party affiliation. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would apply to FEMA and any public or private organizations involved in providing federal disaster aid. It would affect disaster victims seeking federal assistance and the agencies administering relief funds. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken since its introduction in the 119th Congress.
DRILL Now Act
# DRILL Now Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The DRILL Now Act (HR 1341) would expand oil and natural gas drilling opportunities on federal lands and waters in the United States. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to streamline the permitting process for energy companies seeking to extract fossil fuels from publicly-owned territories and to increase the pace and scale of drilling activities on federal property. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would impact energy companies (particularly oil and gas producers), federal land management agencies, environmental groups, and communities living near federal lands and waters. It could also affect energy consumers and taxpayers, as federal lands generate revenue through leasing fees. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee as of the latest information available, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To better understand the specific provisions—such as which lands would be opened for drilling, what permitting changes would be made, or what environmental protections might be affected—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
No Propaganda Act
# No Propaganda Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 1211 would eliminate federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and take back money previously given to the organization. The CPB is a nonprofit created by Congress that financially supports local public television and radio stations across the country, including well-known networks like PBS and NPR. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact public television and radio stations that depend on CPB funding, potentially affecting their ability to produce and broadcast programming. It would also affect viewers and listeners who rely on public broadcasting services, as well as CPB employees and affiliated organizations. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. No action has been taken on it at this time. --- *Note: The bill's title references "propaganda," but the official summary describes it simply as a funding cut. The characterization of CPB's content as propaganda would be a matter of political debate.*
No Kill Switches in Cars Act
# No Kill Switches in Cars Act - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would repeal a requirement for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to create safety standards requiring new passenger vehicles to have technology that detects and prevents drunk driving. The technology in question—called "advanced impaired driving prevention"—would work by either monitoring a driver's behavior to spot signs of impairment or by detecting a driver's blood alcohol level. If the system detects impairment, it would prevent or disable the vehicle from operating. **Who it affects and key details:** This bill would affect vehicle manufacturers and potentially future car owners. However, it's important to note that no such federal requirement currently exists—the bill repeals a *future* mandate that doesn't yet apply. The technology being discussed is still in development. The bill essentially prevents the government from requiring this safety technology to be standard in new cars, allowing manufacturers to decide whether to include it voluntarily. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Restoring Fuel Market Freedom Act of 2025
# Restoring Fuel Market Freedom Act of 2025 (HR 311) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Restoring Fuel Market Freedom Act of 2025 aims to increase consumer choice and competition in the fuel market. While detailed provisions aren't publicly available yet, bills with this title typically seek to remove or modify regulations on fuel blending, distribution, or sales—particularly regarding ethanol requirements and fuel standards. The bill would likely affect gas station operators, fuel blenders, oil refineries, and consumers at the pump. **Current Status** As of now, HR 311 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Scott Perry (R-PA). It remains in the early stages of the legislative process and would require committee approval, floor debate, passage in the House, Senate approval, and presidential signature before becoming law. **Note:** Without the full bill text available, this summary reflects the general intent suggested by the bill's title. For specific provisions and impacts, you can view the complete text on Congress.gov once it becomes available.
Restoring Vehicle Market Freedom Act of 2025
# Restoring Vehicle Market Freedom Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would eliminate federal tax credits that currently help Americans buy electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and fuel cell vehicles. It would also remove tax credits for installing charging stations and alternative fuel refueling equipment. If passed, buyers would no longer receive up to $7,500 off the purchase price of a new clean vehicle, up to $4,000 off a used one, or tax breaks for installing charging equipment at home or businesses. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact consumers considering electric or alternative-fuel vehicles, businesses that operate commercial fleets, and those investing in charging infrastructure. Removing these incentives would likely make clean vehicles more expensive for buyers and could slow adoption of electric vehicles. The bill would also affect industries supporting EV manufacturing and charging networks. **Current Status** The bill (HR 312) was introduced by Republican Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken on it at this time.
Restoring Energy Market Freedom Act
# Restoring Energy Market Freedom Act (HR 310) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Restoring Energy Market Freedom Act is currently in committee and hasn't advanced for a vote. Based on its title and sponsor information, the bill appears intended to address energy market regulations, though specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information. To understand exactly what changes it would make, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov. **Who It Affects:** Depending on its specific provisions, this bill could impact energy companies (fossil fuels, renewables, or both), consumers' electricity prices, and potentially state or federal environmental regulations. Without seeing the bill's details, it's difficult to determine the precise scope of affected parties. **Current Status:** As of the latest available information, HR 310 remains in committee and has not moved forward for a full House vote. To learn more about this bill's specific provisions and current progress, visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 310" to access the full text and latest status updates.
.Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution requiring that each agency and department's funding is justified.
# Summary of HJ RES 11: Balanced Budget Amendment **What It Would Do** This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would require the federal government to balance its budget each year—meaning the government cannot spend more money than it takes in—with limited exceptions. The President would need to submit a budget where spending doesn't exceed revenue, and Congress could only approve deficit spending (spending more than it takes in) if three-fifths of both the House and Senate vote to allow it. The amendment would also require a three-fifths congressional vote to raise taxes or increase the national debt limit. Departments and agencies would need to justify their funding requests in detail. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This amendment would affect all Americans by potentially constraining federal spending on programs like Social Security, Medicare, defense, infrastructure, and other government services. It includes exceptions for war or military emergencies declared by Congress. The bill also excludes debt repayment from deficit calculations. Because constitutional amendments require approval from Congress and ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures, this is a significant undertaking. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. Balanced budget amendments are recurring proposals in Congress with supporters arguing they would prevent unsustainable debt and critics contending they would force harmful cuts to vital programs during economic downturns.