Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]
Republican · TX · 49 bills sponsored
To provide for the decentralization of operation of the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7773 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7773 proposes to decentralize operations of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis. Rather than having intelligence analysis centralized in one location, the bill would distribute these operations across multiple locations. The exact details of how this decentralization would work are not specified in the available information, as the bill is still in the early committee stage. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect the DHS and its intelligence operations, which could indirectly impact federal security agencies that rely on DHS intelligence analysis. It was introduced by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. At this stage, the bill has not advanced further in the legislative process.
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for time limits for action by the Federal Communications Commission on applications for the transfer of control or assignment of any license or other authorization subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7742 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to establish deadlines for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to make decisions on applications when companies want to transfer ownership or reassign licenses (such as broadcast licenses, wireless spectrum licenses, etc.). Currently, the FCC can take extended periods to review these applications. The bill aims to speed up this process by imposing time limits on how long the FCC can take to approve or deny such requests. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts broadcasting companies, telecommunications firms, and other entities that hold FCC licenses or authorizations. It could also indirectly affect consumers by potentially accelerating changes in media ownership or service providers. The FCC and its decision-making process would also be directly affected. **Current Status:** HR 7742 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX).
I&A Mission Reorientation Act of 2026
# I&A Mission Reorientation Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would reorient the mission of the Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) division, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security. The specific details of what changes would be made are not publicly available in the bill summary, as the subjects and provisions are not listed in the congressional record provided. To understand the exact nature of the proposed changes, you would need to review the full text of HR 7443. **Who It Affects:** The bill would directly impact DHS's I&A division and its operations. Depending on its provisions, it could affect intelligence gathering and analysis related to homeland security issues, as well as the agency's personnel and resources. **Current Status:** As of the information available, HR 7443 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To learn more about this bill's specific proposals and track its progress, you can visit Congress.gov.
Federal Broadband Deployment Tracking Act
# Federal Broadband Deployment Tracking Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), a federal agency, to create and submit a plan to Congress for tracking broadband infrastructure applications. Specifically, it would track how applications are received, processed, and decided upon when companies request permission to build or modify communications facilities—such as cell towers, fiber optic cables, or other equipment—on federal public lands or National Forest System land. **Who It Affects and Why It Matters** The bill primarily affects telecommunications companies seeking to expand broadband and wireless service, federal land managers who handle these requests, and Congress, which would oversee the process. By establishing a tracking system, the bill aims to improve transparency and efficiency in how the government handles broadband infrastructure applications on public lands. This could potentially speed up deployment of broadband services to underserved areas. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 1343) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative August Pfluger, a Republican from Texas.
FENCES Act
# FENCES Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The FENCES Act (HR 6409) is a proposed law that addresses air quality, climate policy, and trade issues, though the specific details of its provisions are not fully specified in the information available. Based on its subject classifications, the bill appears to involve regulations or fees related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, potentially including sanctions or trade restrictions, and may affect how state and local governments operate in these areas. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would likely impact businesses involved in emissions, state and local environmental agencies, and potentially international trade partners depending on its specific provisions. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Representative August Pfluger (R-TX) sponsored the legislation. **Note**: Without access to the bill's full text, this summary is limited. For complete details on the specific provisions, penalties, and implementation mechanisms, readers should consult the official bill text on Congress.gov.
Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2026
# Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2026 (HR 7084) **What the Bill Would Do:** Based on its title, this bill appears designed to protect American-owned property and assets located in foreign countries, though specific details about its provisions are not publicly available yet. The bill would likely establish legal protections or remedies for U.S. citizens and companies whose property has been seized, confiscated, or damaged by foreign governments. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact American property owners, investors, and businesses operating internationally. It could also affect U.S. foreign policy and relationships with other nations, depending on how it addresses seized assets. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No additional details about specific provisions are available at this stage. *Note: Full bill text would provide specific details about enforcement mechanisms, which countries or situations it addresses, and what remedies it proposes.*
Mystic Alerts Act
# Mystic Alerts Act (HR 7022) Summary **What the Bill Does** The Mystic Alerts Act would establish a system to use satellite and spacecraft technology to improve emergency communications across the United States. The bill aims to create partnerships between government agencies and private companies to develop better ways of alerting the public during emergencies. This would supplement existing emergency alert systems, potentially reaching people in areas where traditional communication networks may be damaged or unavailable. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact emergency management agencies, telecommunications companies, and satellite operators. It focuses on creating frameworks for public-private cooperation—meaning government and private businesses would work together to build and maintain these satellite-based alert systems. This could particularly benefit remote or rural areas where emergency warnings are harder to transmit during disasters like hurricanes, wildfires, or other major events. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7022 is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. It has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill would require additional debate, potential amendments, and approval by both chambers of Congress before becoming law.
Trade Transparency Unit Strategy Act
# Trade Transparency Unit Strategy Act (HR 6988) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish a "Trade Transparency Unit" within the federal government to improve visibility and reporting on international trade activities. While specific details aren't available in the basic bill information, the title suggests the legislation would create a coordinated strategy for making trade data and negotiations more transparent to Congress, businesses, and the public. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect government agencies involved in trade policy (likely the U.S. Trade Representative's office and Commerce Department), Congress, American businesses engaged in international trade, and potentially consumers who would benefit from clearer information about trade policies and their impacts. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6988 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet debated or voted on by the full House. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process. To learn more about specific provisions, you can search for the bill on Congress.gov, which will have the full text once it's available.
More Affordable Care Act
# More Affordable Care Act (HR 6538) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The More Affordable Care Act is a proposed bill that aims to modify aspects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly known as Obamacare. However, specific details about the bill's provisions are not publicly available in the provided information, making it impossible to describe exactly what changes it would make or how it would affect healthcare coverage and costs. **Who It Affects & Current Status:** This bill would potentially affect millions of Americans who rely on the ACA for health insurance, as well as healthcare providers, insurers, and employers. The bill was introduced by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Until the bill advances or more details become public, its specific impact remains unclear. **Note:** To understand this bill's actual provisions and implications, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or similar legislative tracking websites.
Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025
# Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would remove the U.S. Department of Energy's authority to approve natural gas exports and imports, and instead give that power solely to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Currently, both agencies have approval roles—the DOE reviews whether exports/imports serve the national interest, while FERC handles the technical facility approvals. The bill eliminates the DOE's review process and streamlines everything under FERC, which would only need to determine that the natural gas trade is in the public interest. **Who It Affects:** This primarily affects natural gas companies looking to build liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals for exporting American gas abroad or importing it from other countries. The change could speed up project approvals by removing one layer of government review. It also potentially affects international trade relationships since the bill removes certain trade agreement restrictions on natural gas. Energy consumers and domestic natural gas markets could be indirectly affected depending on how exports impact prices and supply. **Current Status:** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is now moving through the legislative process. As a bill sponsored by a Texas Republican (where the energy industry is significant), it reflects efforts to increase domestic energy production and reduce regulatory barriers in the oil and gas sector.
ANCHOR Act of 2025
# ANCHOR Act of 2025 Summary The ANCHOR Act of 2025 (HR 6408) is a bill currently under consideration in the House of Representatives. However, detailed information about its specific provisions is not available in the summary provided. Without access to the bill's text or official description, I cannot accurately explain what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. **Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives and remains in the early stages of the legislative process. **What you should know:** To get accurate information about this bill's contents and potential impact, I'd recommend checking official sources like Congress.gov, where you can read the full bill text, view sponsor statements, and track any amendments or hearings scheduled on the legislation.
Cyber Deterrence and Response Act of 2025
# Cyber Deterrence and Response Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Cyber Deterrence and Response Act of 2025 is designed to strengthen the U.S. government's ability to prevent, detect, and respond to cyberattacks from foreign adversaries. While the bill's specific details aren't yet publicly detailed, its title suggests it would establish policies and potentially new authorities to deter hostile cyber activities and coordinate federal responses when cyberattacks occur. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect federal government agencies responsible for cybersecurity and national defense, including the Department of Defense, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and intelligence agencies. It could also indirectly impact private businesses and critical infrastructure operators, as government cybersecurity policies often influence private sector security standards. **Current Status:** HR 6309 is currently in committee review (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative August Pfluger, a Republican from Texas.
Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act
# Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act - Summary **What it does:** This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to regularly assess and report to Congress on potential terrorism threats involving generative AI—the technology that creates realistic images, videos, audio, and text. The law also mandates that DHS collect relevant threat information from fusion centers (collaborative intelligence agencies across federal, state, local, and tribal levels) and requires other federal agencies to share related information with DHS. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects government agencies responsible for national security and intelligence gathering. Indirectly, it may influence how AI companies operate, as increased government oversight of AI risks could lead to future regulations. The general public has an indirect interest as the bill addresses potential security threats. **Current status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) and covers topics including advanced technology oversight and congressional monitoring of government information related to terrorism threats.
CLEAR Path Act
# CLEAR Path Act (HR 6106) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The CLEAR Path Act is a proposed law currently under review in the House of Representatives. However, the available information does not include the bill's specific provisions or detailed purpose. To understand what this bill would actually do if passed, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or other legislative tracking websites. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6106 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is an early stage in the legislative process. **Next Steps:** If you're interested in learning more about this bill, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 6106" to find the complete bill text, sponsor information, and any recent updates on its progress.
REVOKE Act
# REVOKE Act (HR 6105) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's content, as the information provided only shows basic metadata (sponsor, committee status, etc.) without describing its actual provisions. To give you an accurate, factual summary of what the REVOKE Act would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the bill's text. **What I can tell you:** HR 6105 is currently in committee consideration in the House of Representatives, sponsored by Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX). It has not yet passed. **To get accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 6105" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill's summary section for an official overview of its purpose - Looking at the sponsor's official website for their explanation of the bill's intent This ensures you get factual details about what the legislation actually proposes rather than my speculation based on limited information.
PAID OFF Act of 2025
# PAID OFF Act of 2025 Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed text or provisions of HR 6107 (the PAID OFF Act of 2025) to provide you with an accurate summary. While I can see it's a House bill sponsored by Representative August Pfluger from Texas that's currently in committee, I cannot reliably explain what the bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions without access to the actual legislative language. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Visit congress.gov and search for "HR 6107" for the full text and summaries - **Representative Pfluger's website**: His office may have a bill description - **Bill tracking resources**: Sites like LegiScan or Ballotpedia often provide plain-language summaries This approach ensures you get factual, verified information rather than my speculation about the bill's contents.
UNtaxed Act
# UNtaxed Act (HR 5888) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The UNtaxed Act is a proposed tax-related bill currently under consideration in Congress. However, the available information is extremely limited—the bill's specific provisions, detailed purpose, and exact tax changes are not included in the documentation provided. To understand what this bill would actually do, you would need to review the full legislative text. **Who It Affects and Current Status** Without access to the bill's details, it's unclear which taxpayers or industries would be impacted. The bill was introduced by Representative August Pfluger (R-Texas) in the current congressional session and is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. **What You Should Know** To learn the specifics of this proposal, you can search for "HR 5888" on Congress.gov, which provides the complete bill text, sponsor statements, and any official summaries.
LAUNCH Act
# LAUNCH Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a substantive summary of this bill. While the basic metadata shows it's HR 5602 from the 119th Congress sponsored by Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX), the information provided doesn't include the bill's actual text, specific provisions, or legislative details needed to explain what it would do. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 5602" for the full text and summary - Checking the bill's official summary and sponsor's description - Looking at committee reports if they're available This will give you reliable details about the bill's purpose, affected parties, and specific provisions without relying on incomplete information.
Second Chance at Life Act of 2025
# Second Chance at Life Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 5485, the Second Chance at Life Act of 2025, is a bill currently under consideration in the House of Representatives. However, detailed information about the specific provisions of this bill is not publicly available in standard legislative databases at this time. To understand exactly what the bill proposes, you would need to access the full text through Congress.gov or the House Clerk's office. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX) and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. This is an early stage in the legislative process. Bills can remain in committee indefinitely, be amended, or advance to a floor vote depending on committee action and priorities. **Next Steps** For accurate, detailed information about this bill's specific provisions and who it would affect, I recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 5485" to read the official bill text and any available summaries from the Congressional Research Service.
COUNT Act
# COUNT Act (HR 5156) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill beyond what's listed in your header. To provide you with an accurate summary of what the COUNT Act would actually do, I would need additional information such as: - The bill's official description or summary - Its key provisions or proposed changes to law - The problem it's intended to address **What I can tell you:** - **Status**: The bill is currently in committee (hasn't advanced to a full House vote yet) - **Sponsor**: Representative August Pfluger, a Republican from Texas - **Type**: It's a House bill (HR 5156) in the 119th Congress **To get accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 5156" for the official text - Reading the bill's summary section for plain-language explanation - Checking recent news coverage if the bill has received media attention If you can share the bill's full title expansion (what "COUNT" stands for) or its stated purpose, I'd be happy to provide a proper summary.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the "Mary Granados Memorial Post Office Building".
# HR 5071 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 5071 is a straightforward naming bill that would officially designate the post office building located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas as the "Mary Granados Memorial Post Office Building." The bill doesn't create new programs, change postal operations, or allocate funding—it simply honors someone named Mary Granados by naming the facility after her. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill primarily affects the Odessa, Texas community and the specific postal facility there, which would display the new official name. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but hasn't yet been scheduled for a full vote. It was sponsored by U.S. Representative August Pfluger (R-TX-11). Bills like this are common in Congress and typically pass with minimal controversy when they move forward, though many naming bills never advance beyond the committee stage.
Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2025
# Defending American Property Abroad Act of 2025 (HR 4577) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX), aims to protect American-owned property and assets located outside the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it would establish legal protections or mechanisms to defend U.S. citizens' and businesses' property rights in foreign countries, potentially including responses to seizure, expropriation, or other threats to American assets abroad. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact American citizens, companies, and investors who own property or conduct business internationally. It could also affect U.S. foreign policy and diplomatic relations, depending on what enforcement mechanisms it includes. Foreign governments and entities that hold American property could potentially be affected by any legal remedies the bill establishes. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Further details about specific provisions would be available once the bill text is released or if it advances through the committee process.
To prohibit individuals who are not citizens of the United States from voting in elections in the District of Columbia and to repeal the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022.
# HR 884 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in District of Columbia local elections and repeal a 2022 DC law that allowed noncitizens to vote in those elections. The DC law, which took effect in February 2023, permitted noncitizens who met residency requirements to participate in local elections. This bill would undo that permission, returning DC to a noncitizen voting ban. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects noncitizens living in Washington, DC who currently have voting rights in local elections. It also affects DC's local government and election administration. While federal law already prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections (like presidential races), this bill addresses only DC's local elections for city council, mayor, and similar positions. **Current Status** HR 884 has passed the House of Representatives. It now requires Senate approval to become law. The bill was sponsored by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX). The outcome depends on Senate action and whether the bill receives sufficient support to advance further in the legislative process.
Terrorist Inadmissibility Codification Act
# Terrorist Inadmissibility Codification Act (HR 3926) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would codify into law existing executive branch rules that prevent individuals designated as terrorists or with terrorist connections from entering the United States. Rather than relying on executive orders or administrative policies that can change with different administrations, the bill would make these restrictions permanent federal law. The legislation essentially converts existing terrorism-related exclusion practices into statute form. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect foreign nationals seeking to enter the U.S., particularly those with alleged ties to terrorist organizations or individuals designated as terrorists. Immigration officials would use these codified standards when reviewing visa applications, asylum claims, and entry requests. It could also affect humanitarian efforts, family reunification cases, and refugee admissions if applicants have any connections to designated terrorist entities. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3926 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill was introduced by Representative August Pfluger (R-TX) in the 119th Congress. No major actions have been taken on the legislation since its introduction.