Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
Republican · CA · 21 bills sponsored
To require the Director of the National Science Foundation to carry out a cloud laboratory network program, and for other purposes.
# HR 7801 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7801 would require the National Science Foundation (NSF) to establish and operate a "cloud laboratory network program." In practical terms, this would create a network of computing resources accessible over the internet that researchers and scientists could use for their work. Rather than requiring individual institutions to purchase expensive equipment, this program would allow researchers across the country to access shared computing power and tools remotely—similar to how cloud storage services work, but designed specifically for scientific research and experimentation. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects academic researchers, universities, and scientific institutions that conduct NSF-funded research. It would also impact the NSF's budget and operations, as the agency would need to develop and maintain this network infrastructure. The specific details about the program's structure, funding, and exact scope are not fully detailed in the bill summary provided, so the full text would contain additional provisions about how it would function. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7801 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA).
National Commission on Robotics Act
# National Commission on Robotics Act (HR 7334) - Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would establish a new National Commission on Robotics to study how robotics and automation technology is developing and how it might affect American society, the economy, and workers. The commission would research issues related to robots and automated systems, likely examining their impact on jobs, manufacturing, and other industries. **Who It Affects:** The bill would potentially impact workers across various industries that use or could use robotic automation, businesses in manufacturing and tech sectors, policymakers developing technology regulations, and the general public as automation becomes more prevalent in everyday life. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA). *Note: Specific details about commission structure, funding, or exact provisions are not available from the information provided, so the bill may contain additional details that would emerge during the legislative process.*
Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025
# Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025 would establish new policies and oversight related to liquid cooling technology used in artificial intelligence data centers. The bill addresses the cooling systems necessary to operate large AI computing facilities, which generate significant heat. It appears designed to support technological development in this area while establishing advisory bodies and congressional oversight mechanisms to monitor how these systems are deployed and used. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact AI companies and data center operators who rely on cooling systems for their facilities. It would also create new government oversight and assessment responsibilities, affecting relevant federal agencies and Congress. Indirectly, it could influence the broader AI industry by shaping how cooling infrastructure is regulated and developed. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5332 remains in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA) in the 119th Congress. No additional action has been taken beyond the initial committee assignment.
Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Land Exchange Act
# Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Land Exchange Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would authorize a land exchange involving the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (a Native American tribe in California). The legislation would allow the tribe to exchange or acquire land, likely involving federal or private property. The specific details of which parcels would be involved and the exact terms of the exchange are typical components of such land exchange bills, which are designed to benefit tribes by consolidating their land holdings or acquiring property important to their communities. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects the San Manuel Nation tribe and potentially California landowners or federal land management agencies. Such exchanges can also have broader impacts on local communities and economies in the affected regions. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3925 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA) in the 119th Congress. Land exchange bills for Native American tribes are relatively common and often receive bipartisan support, though this one has not yet advanced beyond the committee stage.
Preventive Health Savings Act
# Preventive Health Savings Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)—the nonpartisan agency that estimates the costs of legislation—to evaluate whether proposed bills would save money in the long term through preventive healthcare measures. If the CBO finds that a bill would reduce government spending beyond the standard 10-year budget window by promoting preventive care (like screenings, vaccinations, and wellness programs that prevent disease), it must report those potential savings alongside its regular cost estimates. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects Congress and the budgeting process rather than the public directly. The main provision requires CBO to identify and document long-term savings from preventive health measures when Congress requests it. Importantly, these supplementary estimates could not be used to officially determine whether a bill complies with budget rules—they would be additional information only. **Current Status** The bill (HR 4464) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Republican Representative Jay Obernolte of California and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full House vote.
NTIA Policy and Cybersecurity Coordination Act
# NTIA Policy and Cybersecurity Coordination Act (HR 1766) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill creates a new Office of Policy Development and Cybersecurity within the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), a federal agency under the Department of Commerce. The office would be responsible for developing policies related to internet and communications technologies, with a focus on three main areas: promoting innovation and competition in tech markets, improving cybersecurity and resilience against cyberattacks while still encouraging innovation, and helping bring new communications technologies to market. An existing position within NTIA would be redesignated to lead this new office. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects how the federal government approaches technology policy and cybersecurity coordination. It could indirectly impact technology companies, internet service providers, and consumers by influencing government policies on innovation, competition, and data security in the communications sector. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need to pass the Senate and receive the President's signature to become law.
Improving Atmospheric River Forecasts Act
# Improving Atmospheric River Forecasts Act (HR 4302) Summary **What It Does** This bill aims to improve the nation's ability to forecast and prepare for atmospheric rivers—weather systems that can bring heavy rainfall and flooding. The legislation would direct funding and resources toward better research, technology, and forecasting tools to predict these weather events more accurately. It also addresses emergency communication systems and water supply management related to these storms. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily benefit communities vulnerable to atmospheric river damage, particularly in western states like California where these storms frequently occur. It would also affect federal agencies involved in weather forecasting (like NOAA), water management agencies, and emergency responders who need better warning systems. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4302 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet moved forward for a full vote in the House. The bill was introduced by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and is still in the early legislative stage. No action has been taken to advance it to the House floor for consideration.
Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
# Summary of HJRES 89 **What the Bill Does:** This bill cancels an EPA decision from January 2025 that allowed California to set its own strict pollution standards for heavy-duty trucks and engines. Under the Clean Air Act, California has special authority to request waivers that let it create stricter emission rules than federal standards. The EPA approved California's request for what's called the "Omnibus Low NOX Regulation," which targets nitrogen oxide pollution from diesel trucks and engines. This joint resolution uses Congress's power to reject federal regulations and reverses that EPA approval. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts California, which would lose the ability to enforce its stricter vehicle emission standards, and the trucking and engine manufacturing industries operating in or selling vehicles to California. Environmental advocates who supported the stricter standards are also affected, as the rule would make it harder to reduce pollution from heavy-duty vehicles. Essentially, federal emission standards would now apply in California instead of California's stricter rules. **Current Status:** The bill has already been signed into law as of the summary date, meaning it has passed both the House and Senate and been approved by the President. California's low NOX regulation has been officially nullified.
AI Whistleblower Protection Act
# AI Whistleblower Protection Act (HR 3460) Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would create legal protections for employees who report safety concerns, ethical violations, or illegal activities related to artificial intelligence (AI) development and deployment. If passed, it would establish safeguards so that workers at AI companies can raise concerns internally or to government agencies without fear of retaliation—such as being fired, demoted, or blacklisted. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects employees at companies developing or using AI systems, as well as the companies themselves. It could also impact federal agencies that oversee AI regulation, and potentially the broader public by encouraging transparency about AI safety and ethical issues before problems reach consumers. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA), and no specific provisions have been made publicly detailed beyond the title and general concept.
Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2025
# Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2025 ## What the Bill Does This bill would establish a "sandbox" program—a controlled testing environment where companies and researchers can develop and experiment with quantum computing technology with reduced regulatory barriers. The legislation aims to accelerate practical applications of quantum computing in the near term by allowing participants to test new quantum systems and applications in a regulatory safe space, rather than waiting for full compliance with existing rules. ## Who It Affects and Key Provisions The bill primarily affects quantum computing companies, technology startups, research institutions, and industries exploring quantum applications (such as finance, healthcare, and cybersecurity). By creating this sandbox environment, the legislation would enable faster innovation and real-world testing of quantum technologies. The specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, but the general concept allows participants temporary exemptions or flexibility from certain regulations while they develop and validate quantum computing solutions. ## Current Status As of now, HR 3220 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill is sponsored by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA), who represents California's 23rd congressional district.
Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act
# Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish a federal task force focused on critical minerals—materials essential for modern technology like batteries, electronics, and renewable energy systems. The task force would coordinate between different government agencies and levels of government (federal, state, and local) to develop strategies for securing, processing, and managing the supply of these minerals within the United States. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies, state and local governments, and industries that depend on critical minerals, including manufacturers of electronics, renewable energy companies, and defense contractors. Ultimately, it could impact consumers by potentially stabilizing prices and supply chains for products containing these materials. **Key Provisions & Current Status:** While specific details aren't available in this summary, the bill's focus on creating an intergovernmental task force suggests it aims to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign sources for critical minerals and improve domestic coordination on this issue. As of now, the bill remains **in committee**, meaning it hasn't advanced to a floor vote and requires further discussion among lawmakers before any potential passage.
Streamlining Aviation for Eligible Veterans Act of 2025
# SAFE Veterans Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would allow the Department of Veterans Affairs to approve flight training courses for veterans with service-connected disabilities as part of existing job training programs. Currently, the VA's Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) program helps disabled veterans prepare for employment through various training courses, but it typically requires degree-granting programs. This bill would expand that to include standalone flight training—meaning veterans could pursue aviation careers without needing a traditional college degree. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill specifically targets veterans who have disabilities related to their military service. These veterans could use their VA benefits to pay for practical flight training, potentially opening up careers as pilots or in other aviation roles. The change would make it easier for disabled veterans to access specialized job training in the aviation field while still receiving the employment support and services they already qualify for through the VR&E program. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and is currently under review in a House committee. It has not yet been voted on by the full House.
Election Results Accountability Act
# Election Results Accountability Act (HR 2694) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, currently under review in committee, aims to establish accountability measures related to election results. While the bill's specific details aren't fully outlined in the summary provided, such legislation typically focuses on election integrity, verification processes, or procedures for certifying election outcomes. The exact provisions would need to be reviewed in the full bill text to determine the precise mechanisms being proposed. **Who It Affects:** If passed, this bill would likely impact election officials at state and local levels, election workers, and potentially voters. It could also affect how election results are processed, verified, and certified across the country. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a broader vote. To understand the specific provisions and intent of this legislation, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov, as the summary provided here doesn't include those detailed proposals. *For the most current information and specific details about this bill's provisions, consult Congress.gov or your representative's office.*
CREATE AI Act of 2025
# CREATE AI Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary The CREATE AI Act would establish a national program called the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource (NAIRR) to give American researchers, educators, and students free or low-cost access to AI tools, computing power, and training resources. Managed by the National Science Foundation, the program aims to boost U.S. competitiveness in AI research and development by leveling the playing field—allowing academic institutions and nonprofits to access the same advanced AI resources that large tech companies currently dominate. The program would accept donated resources from private companies and federal agencies to keep costs down. The program would primarily benefit U.S. university researchers, students, educators, nonprofit organizations, and government employees who want to conduct AI research or education. It would help democratize access to expensive AI infrastructure that's typically only available to well-funded tech companies, potentially accelerating innovation in academia and smaller institutions. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) in the 119th Congress.
Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025
# Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025 - Summary **What it does:** This bill requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to provide regular reports on how it uses its power to reduce or eliminate cost-sharing requirements for federally-funded energy research projects. Cost-sharing typically means that organizations receiving federal research funding must contribute their own money to match or supplement federal grants. The DOE currently has the authority under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to waive or reduce these matching requirements. This bill would require DOE to explain when, why, and how often it exercises this power through reports submitted within 120 days of passage and then at least every three months. **Who it affects:** This primarily impacts energy research organizations, universities, and companies that receive federal research funding from the DOE, as well as Congress and taxpayers who fund these projects. The bill is designed to increase transparency about federal spending decisions. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is part of the 119th Congress.
American Cybersecurity Literacy Act
# American Cybersecurity Literacy Act Summary **What the bill would do:** The American Cybersecurity Literacy Act would require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (a federal agency) to launch a public education campaign teaching Americans about cybersecurity. The campaign would focus on practical steps people can take to protect themselves online, such as changing default passwords on devices and being cautious about app permissions that request unnecessary access to personal information. **Who it affects:** This bill would affect virtually all Americans who use the internet, smartphones, or connected devices. It's designed to help the general public better understand and protect against cyber threats. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's still being reviewed and debated by lawmakers and hasn't yet been brought to a full vote in the House of Representatives.
GRANTED Act of 2025
# GRANTED Act of 2025 Summary Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill because the key information—the bill's actual text and provisions—is not included in the data you've provided. The congressional record shows only that HR 1836 is sponsored by Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and is currently in committee, but doesn't specify what the bill actually proposes to do. To get accurate information about what the GRANTED Act would do, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "HR 1836" - Checking the bill's official text and summary - Reading the sponsor's official statement about the bill's purpose This will ensure you get factual, complete information about who it affects, what provisions it contains, and its current legislative status.
Medical Device Electronic Labeling Act
# Medical Device Electronic Labeling Act (HR 1539) - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would expand when manufacturers can provide medical device instructions and warning labels electronically instead of printing them on the device or its packaging. Currently, only prescription devices used in hospitals and certain lab devices can use electronic labeling. The bill would extend this to virtually all medical devices, as long as the electronic labels are easily accessible to users and patients can request printed copies for free. **Who it affects:** Patients using medical devices, healthcare facilities, medical device manufacturers, and regulators. The change could reduce packaging waste and production costs for manufacturers while requiring companies to ensure electronic labels remain available and accessible to users. **Key provisions:** Electronic labels would be allowed for all medical devices if: (1) the information is readily available to users electronically, (2) patients/users can request paper copies at no cost, and (3) the physical device packaging still contains certain required information. The bill maintains safety requirements while modernizing how labeling can be delivered. **Current status:** The bill is in committee (as of the 119th Congress) and has not yet been voted on by the full House.
9–8–8 Lifeline Cybersecurity Responsibility Act
# 9-8-8 Lifeline Cybersecurity Responsibility Act Summary **What It Does:** This bill would establish cybersecurity requirements and oversight for the 9-8-8 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, the federally-supported phone service that connects people experiencing mental health crises to trained counselors. The legislation would require the lifeline to implement security measures to protect sensitive caller information and would mandate studies and reports to Congress on the system's data protection practices. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects the 9-8-8 Lifeline program itself and the organizations that operate it, as well as anyone who calls the service. It also places reporting requirements on federal agencies that oversee the lifeline. **Key Provisions:** While specific details aren't fully outlined in available summaries, the bill focuses on cybersecurity standards, data privacy safeguards for call records and personal information shared during crisis calls, and congressional oversight through required reports and investigations into the lifeline's security practices. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Honor Our Living Donors Act
# Honor Our Living Donors Act Summary **What it does:** This bill would make changes to a federal program that reimburses living organ donors for expenses they incur when donating (such as travel, lodging, and medical costs). Currently, the program considers the organ recipient's income when deciding if a donor qualifies for reimbursement—specifically, the recipient's income cannot exceed 350% of the federal poverty level. The bill would remove this income restriction, meaning donors could receive reimbursement regardless of how much money the recipient makes. It would also allow donors to be reimbursed even if the recipient doesn't pay them back for the expenses. **Who it affects:** Living organ donors and their recipients would be the primary beneficiaries. Donors who give kidneys, parts of livers, or other organs while alive would potentially have easier access to expense reimbursement. The bill also directs the Department of Health and Human Services to study whether current reimbursements adequately cover donors' costs. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
# Summary of HJRES 17: Balanced Budget Amendment **What the bill would do:** This bill proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would require the federal government to balance its budget each year. Under the amendment, Congress could not spend more money than it receives in revenues unless two-thirds of both the House and Senate vote to approve the deficit spending. The President would also be required to submit a balanced budget proposal each year. The amendment carves out exceptions for money borrowed to pay back existing national debt. **Who it affects:** This would impact Congress, the President, and ultimately all Americans and businesses that interact with federal government programs and policies. If enacted, it could significantly constrain federal spending on everything from defense to healthcare to infrastructure, unless Congress votes to override the requirement with a supermajority. **Current status and key context:** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. Proposing a constitutional amendment is one of the most difficult legislative tasks—it requires approval from two-thirds of both chambers of Congress and then ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures. While balanced budget amendments have been proposed many times over the decades, none has successfully passed Congress and been ratified.