McCormick, David [R-PA]
Republican · PA · 24 bills sponsored
A bill to amend the Federal Power Act to establish a categorical exclusion for reconductoring within existing rights-of-way, and for other purposes.
# S 3947 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would streamline the approval process for replacing electrical transmission lines (a process called "reconductoring") along routes that already have established power lines. Currently, such projects must go through extensive environmental review and permitting procedures under the Federal Power Act. The bill would create a "categorical exclusion," meaning certain reconductoring projects within existing rights-of-way would be exempt from some of these lengthy reviews, potentially speeding up the approval timeline. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects electric utility companies, landowners with transmission lines crossing their property, and communities waiting for electrical infrastructure upgrades. By expediting approval for projects that use existing pathways rather than requiring new land, the bill aims to make it easier and faster to modernize aging power lines or upgrade their capacity. This could benefit rural areas and others seeking improved electrical infrastructure, though it may reduce public input opportunities on specific projects. **Current Status** S 3947 is currently in committee review in the Senate, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) in the 119th Congress.
A bill to promote human rights, internet freedom and accountability in Iran, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 3900: Iran Human Rights and Internet Freedom Bill **What the Bill Would Do** S. 3900 is legislation designed to advance human rights protections and internet freedom in Iran while establishing accountability measures. Though the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on supporting Iranian citizens' ability to access uncensored information online, documenting human rights violations, and imposing consequences on Iranian officials or entities responsible for repression. Such measures often include sanctions, support for anti-censorship technology, or funding for monitoring organizations. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill primarily affects Iranian government officials and entities that restrict freedoms, as well as Iranian citizens seeking greater access to information and protection of civil liberties. It may also impact U.S. foreign policy and international relations with Iran. As of now, S. 3900 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) during the 119th Congress.
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10 East Main Street in Mahaffey, Pennsylvania, as the "Robert Allen Bishop, Sr., Post Office Building".
# Summary of S 3835 **What the Bill Does** This bill would rename the post office building located at 10 East Main Street in Mahaffey, Pennsylvania, to honor Robert Allen Bishop, Sr. The change would be purely ceremonial—the post office would continue operating normally under its new official name. Naming federal buildings after individuals is a common practice in Congress to commemorate people deemed worthy of public recognition. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill directly affects the Mahaffey community and postal customers in that area, who would see the new name on their local post office. More broadly, it honors the legacy of Robert Allen Bishop, Sr., though the bill does not specify his accomplishments or connection to the community. The bill was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Expanding WKSI Eligibility Act
# Expanding WKSI Eligibility Act - Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the specific details of S 3749 in my training data, so I cannot provide accurate information about what "WKSI" refers to or what this bill would do. Without knowing the acronym's meaning or the bill's provisions, I cannot responsibly summarize its effects, who it impacts, or its key features. **To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 3749" to read the official text - Checking official summaries provided by the Congressional Research Service - Reviewing your senator's official website for their explanation of bills they sponsor I apologize I can't be more helpful here. Providing a made-up summary would be worse than admitting I don't have this information.
ACCESS Act of 2026
# Summary of the ACCESS Act of 2026 I don't have access to the specific details of this bill in my training data, as it appears to be a recently introduced measure (S 3662 from the 119th Congress). To provide you with an accurate summary of what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to see the actual bill text or a reliable legislative summary. **What I can tell you:** The bill was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. **For accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 3662" - Checking the bill's official summary and text - Looking at summaries from nonpartisan sources like Congress.gov or the Congressional Research Service If you can provide the bill text or a reliable summary, I'd be happy to break it down into plain language for you.
American Battlefield Protection Program Amendments Act of 2025
# American Battlefield Protection Program Amendments Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modify the American Battlefield Protection Program, a federal initiative that helps identify, protect, and preserve historically significant Civil War and Revolutionary War battlefields across the United States. While the specific amendments aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically propose changes to how battlefields are selected for protection, funded, or managed. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would impact historical preservation organizations, state and local governments, property owners near battlefield sites, and the general public interested in preserving American military history. It may also affect federal agencies responsible for administering the program and determining which battlefields receive protection and funding. **Current Status:** As of now, this bill (S 3524) is in committee review in the Senate, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. For detailed information about the specific amendments being proposed, you would need to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Decreasing Russian Oil Profits Act of 2025
# Decreasing Russian Oil Profits Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to reduce Russia's revenue from oil sales, likely through sanctions, trade restrictions, or other economic measures targeting Russian energy exports. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, such legislation typically seeks to limit Russia's ability to sell oil on international markets or to increase costs for countries purchasing Russian petroleum products. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact Russia's economy and energy sector. It could also affect U.S. consumers and businesses that rely on global oil markets, as well as countries that import Russian oil, though the extent depends on the bill's specific measures. **Current Status** As of now, S 3513 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator David McCormick (R-PA). To become law, it would need to pass out of committee, be debated and approved by the Senate, pass the House, and be signed by the President.
Fortifying United States Markets Against PRC Military Escalation Act of 2025
# Fortifying United States Markets Against PRC Military Escalation Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, sponsored by Senator David McCormick (R-PA), aims to protect U.S. financial markets and investments from potential disruptions related to military actions by the People's Republic of China (PRC). While specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary, bills with this title typically propose measures to restrict or regulate U.S. investments in Chinese military-related companies, strengthen market safeguards, or establish protocols to respond to Chinese military escalation that could affect American markets and investors. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact U.S. investors, investment firms, financial institutions, and potentially American companies doing business with China. It could also affect U.S.-China economic relations more broadly, depending on its specific provisions. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
PRC Financial Intermediary Review Act
# PRC Financial Intermediary Review Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The PRC Financial Intermediary Review Act (S 3405) would establish a review process for financial institutions and intermediaries that handle investments or financial transactions involving the People's Republic of China (PRC). While the bill's full details aren't specified in the available information, legislation with this title typically aims to increase oversight of financial dealings with Chinese entities to address national security and economic concerns. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect banks, investment firms, asset managers, and other financial intermediaries that engage in transactions with China or Chinese entities. It could also impact American investors and companies with Chinese business connections, as new review requirements might affect how these transactions are processed. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. It was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. The bill has not yet become law and would need to pass committee review, floor votes in both the Senate and House, and presidential approval to take effect.
Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025
# Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** The Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025 would support the development and deployment of liquid cooling systems for artificial intelligence data centers. Liquid cooling is a technology that uses liquid (rather than traditional air) to dissipate the heat generated by powerful AI computing equipment. The bill aims to encourage adoption of this technology, which can be more energy-efficient and reduce the environmental impact of AI operations. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect technology companies operating large AI data centers, as well as manufacturers of cooling equipment. It could also indirectly impact consumers and businesses that use AI services, as well as communities hosting data centers. The bill may also influence energy consumption and environmental outcomes at a broader level. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 3269) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Senator David McCormick (R-PA) sponsored the legislation. The bill would need to advance through committee review and secure sufficient support to move forward in the legislative process. *Note: Detailed provisions are not publicly available in the basic bill information provided.*
Veterans TBI Adaptive Care Opportunities Nationwide Act of 2025
# Veterans TBI Adaptive Care Opportunities Nationwide Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does:** This bill, currently in committee, aims to improve care and support services for veterans who have suffered traumatic brain injuries (TBI). While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on expanding access to rehabilitation services, treatment options, and adaptive care programs for veterans dealing with TBI—a common injury among those who served in combat zones. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would primarily benefit veterans diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries, along with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and healthcare providers who serve this population. TBI is a significant health concern for many veterans, particularly those who served in recent military operations. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3130) is in committee review in the 119th Congress and has not yet advanced to a floor vote. It was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA). For more detailed information about specific provisions—such as funding amounts, particular programs being created, or which VA facilities are affected—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Strengthening United States Leadership at the IDB Act
# Strengthening United States Leadership at the IDB Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to increase U.S. influence and oversight at the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), a multilateral organization that provides loans and financial support to countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. The legislation appears focused on strengthening U.S. leadership within the institution and addresses concerns about China's growing involvement in the region. Key subjects mentioned include trade restrictions, sanctions authority, and oversight of foreign loans and investments. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect Latin American and Caribbean nations that receive development funding from the IDB, as well as the United States' ability to shape lending policies. It could also influence how U.S. investment and trade policies operate in the region, potentially impacting U.S. businesses and diplomatic relationships in the Western Hemisphere. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S. 2626) remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA), it has not advanced to further legislative stages. Without additional information about specific provisions, the exact mechanisms for strengthening U.S. leadership cannot be detailed, though the listed subjects suggest concerns about countering Chinese influence and improving congressional oversight of development programs.
China Exchange Rate Transparency Act of 2025
# China Exchange Rate Transparency Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The China Exchange Rate Transparency Act of 2025 would require increased reporting and monitoring of China's currency exchange practices. The bill aims to improve transparency regarding how China manages its yuan currency relative to the U.S. dollar and other currencies. Proponents argue that monitoring China's exchange rate policies helps ensure fair trade practices, while critics of such measures contend that currency interventions are complex international matters requiring careful diplomacy. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect U.S. policymakers, traders, and businesses engaged in international commerce with China. It would likely establish new reporting requirements or create mechanisms to better track Chinese currency management. By improving visibility into these practices, the bill intends to help U.S. officials make more informed decisions about trade and economic policy. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 2146) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator David McCormick (R-PA). Bills at this stage often undergo review, debate, and potential amendments before proceeding further in the legislative process.
Nitazene Control Act
# Nitazene Control Act Summary **What It Would Do:** The Nitazene Control Act would regulate nitazenes, a class of powerful synthetic opioids that are becoming increasingly prevalent in illegal drug supplies. If passed, the bill would likely classify nitazenes as controlled substances under federal law, similar to heroin and fentanyl, making their manufacture, possession, and distribution illegal except for approved medical and research purposes. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact law enforcement agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and individuals struggling with substance use. It's intended to address a growing public health concern, as nitazenes have been detected in the illicit drug supply and linked to overdose deaths. The bill could also affect medical researchers and licensed manufacturers if nitazenes have any legitimate medical applications. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. This means it's still in the early legislative process. Many bills introduced in Congress never advance beyond committee stage, so passage is uncertain and would require committee approval, Senate floor debate, and approval from both chambers of Congress before reaching the President's desk.
Protecting the USMCA from Harmful Chinese Investment Act
# Protecting the USMCA from Harmful Chinese Investment Act (S 2861) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to prevent Chinese companies and investors from using loopholes in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement (USMCA) to gain market access. Specifically, it would restrict Chinese investment or ownership in industries covered by the USMCA—such as manufacturing, automobiles, and agriculture—unless the investment has been properly reviewed and approved by U.S. authorities. The bill targets a potential vulnerability where Chinese entities could bypass USMCA restrictions by routing investments through subsidiaries or shell companies based in Mexico or Canada. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact U.S. manufacturers, farmers, and workers in industries covered by the USMCA, as well as foreign investors seeking to do business in those sectors. It would likely require additional screening and approval processes for foreign investment in these industries, particularly from Chinese sources. The measure reflects concerns that without such protections, Chinese investment could undermine the intended benefits of the USMCA trade deal, which was designed to prioritize North American trade and manufacturing. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator David McCormick (R-PA).
PRC Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Moratorium Act
# PRC Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Moratorium Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would temporarily halt the approval of new broker-dealers and investment advisers from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Broker-dealers buy and sell securities, while investment advisers manage people's money and investments. The moratorium would prevent these Chinese financial entities from obtaining licenses to operate in the United States during the specified period. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects Chinese financial companies seeking to enter or expand in the U.S. market. It would also indirectly impact American investors and financial institutions, potentially limiting certain investment options while aiming to address national security and economic concerns related to Chinese financial participation in U.S. markets. The specific details of how long the moratorium would last and any exceptions aren't outlined in the available information. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Mexico Security Assistance Accountability Act
# Mexico Security Assistance Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, sponsored by Senator David McCormick (R-PA), would establish oversight requirements for U.S. security assistance provided to Mexico. If passed, it would likely require the federal government to report to Congress on how military, law enforcement, and financial aid given to Mexico is being used and what results it achieves. The bill focuses on security issues including drug trafficking, human trafficking, organized crime, and border security. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill directly affects U.S.-Mexico diplomatic and security relations, as well as federal agencies that manage foreign aid to Mexico. It would impact U.S. border security efforts and law enforcement agencies working with Mexican counterparts. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's subject areas suggest it aims to ensure accountability by requiring reports on whether Mexican officials are effectively using American security assistance and maintaining transparency in government operations. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Taiwan Non-Discrimination Act of 2025
# Taiwan Non-Discrimination Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Taiwan Non-Discrimination Act of 2025 would prevent international organizations and multilateral development programs from discriminating against Taiwan or treating it differently than other countries or territories. The bill addresses situations where Taiwan is excluded from participation in global institutions, trade agreements, or financial systems due to pressure from China, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill would impact international organizations, U.S. foreign policy, Taiwan's access to global institutions, and indirectly China's ability to influence Taiwan's international standing. It likely includes provisions requiring Congress to oversee how the U.S. government advocates for Taiwan's inclusion in international bodies and may set conditions on U.S. participation in or funding for organizations that discriminate against Taiwan. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 1900, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator David McCormick, a Pennsylvania Republican. The bill has not advanced further in the legislative process.
Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management Relocation Act of 2025
# Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management Relocation Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would relocate the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management to a new location, though the specific destination is not detailed in the available bill information. The office currently handles federal programs related to fossil fuel research, development, and carbon capture technology projects. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect the federal employees working in this office, the energy industry stakeholders who work with the office on research and development projects, and potentially communities near both the current and proposed locations. It could also impact funding and operations for fossil energy and carbon management research programs. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S. 2044) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA). Without the bill text available, specific details about the relocation rationale or location remain unclear. The bill would need to pass committee review and a full Senate vote before becoming law.
Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act
# Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act (S. 1808) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to make it easier for small businesses to raise money from investors. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically seek to expand or simplify the process for small companies to sell ownership stakes or securities to individual investors, potentially by reducing regulatory requirements or creating new pathways for fundraising. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact small business owners seeking capital to start or grow their companies, as well as individual investors looking to fund small businesses. Indirectly, it could affect the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other financial regulators who oversee these types of transactions. **Current Status:** As of now, S. 1808 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate Senate committee for review and debate but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Additional details about the specific provisions would become clearer as the bill moves through the legislative process or as committee documents are released.
International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025
# International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish new financing mechanisms to help fund nuclear energy projects outside the United States. Essentially, it would create or expand tools that allow the U.S. government to provide financial support—through loans, guarantees, or other arrangements—for nuclear power plants and related infrastructure in other countries. The goal appears to be promoting nuclear energy internationally as part of U.S. foreign policy and energy strategy. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect U.S. nuclear energy companies and exporters looking to build projects abroad, foreign countries considering nuclear power development, and potentially American taxpayers (since government financing comes from public funds). It could also influence global energy markets and international relationships, particularly with countries interested in expanding their nuclear capacity. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. This is an early stage in the legislative process, meaning it's still being reviewed and debated before any action is taken. No details about specific financing amounts or countries are provided in the available information.
HUD-USDA-VA Interagency Coordination Act
# HUD-USDA-VA Interagency Coordination Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would require three federal agencies—the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)—to work together more closely on housing-related issues. The bill aims to improve coordination and communication between these agencies, which currently handle different aspects of housing programs but don't always align their efforts effectively. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects people seeking housing assistance, particularly veterans, rural residents, and low-income families who rely on programs from these three agencies. It also affects the agencies themselves, as they would need to establish better communication channels and shared goals. **Current Status:** As of now, this bill (S 1695) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator David McCormick (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. Since it remains in the early stages, specific details about what coordination mechanisms the bill would require are not publicly available in standard legislative databases.
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress.
# Congressional Term Limits Proposal Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This proposed constitutional amendment would limit how many terms members of Congress can serve. Currently, there are no term limits for senators or representatives—they can serve indefinitely if voters keep re-electing them. If passed, this amendment would cap the number of terms any individual could serve in the House or Senate. (The specific term limits aren't detailed in the information provided, but similar proposals typically suggest limits like 6 terms for House members or 2 terms for senators.) **Who It Affects and Key Details** This would directly affect current and future members of Congress and potentially change election dynamics across the country. The amendment would require approval from two-thirds of both the House and Senate, then ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures—making it a difficult constitutional change to achieve. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full congressional vote yet. **Current Status** As of now, SJRES 48 remains in the committee review process with no indication of imminent movement toward a vote.
Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act of 2025
# Joint Task Force to Counter Illicit Synthetic Narcotics Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a new federal task force dedicated to combating the production, trafficking, and distribution of illicit synthetic narcotics—primarily fentanyl and similar drugs. The task force would coordinate efforts across multiple federal agencies to develop strategies for stopping these drugs at borders, disrupting supply chains, and prosecuting traffickers. The bill aims to create a centralized approach to addressing what has become a major public health crisis in the United States. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects federal law enforcement agencies (such as the DEA and FBI), border security officials, and communities struggling with synthetic opioid addiction and overdose deaths. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, task forces of this type typically involve information-sharing between agencies, coordinated enforcement operations, and the development of new enforcement strategies. The goal is to reduce the flow of dangerous synthetic drugs into American communities. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 938) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator David McCormick, a Republican from Pennsylvania.