Min, Dave [D-CA-47]
Democrat · CA · 16 bills sponsored
BRUSH Fires Act
# BRUSH Fires Act Summary The BRUSH Fires Act (HR 3553) is a proposed federal bill currently under review in Congress. While specific legislative text details aren't provided here, based on its title and listed subjects, the bill appears focused on addressing wildfire management and forest health issues. It would likely involve congressional oversight of federal forest management practices, research into fire prevention and ecology, and investigations into hazardous conditions that contribute to dangerous wildfires. The bill would potentially affect federal agencies responsible for forest management (like the Forest Service), state and local fire management authorities, and communities in wildfire-prone areas. Key areas of focus appear to include forest management strategies, hazardous materials that increase fire risk, and government studies aimed at preventing or better managing forest fires. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To find the most current and detailed information about specific provisions, you can visit Congress.gov and search for HR 3553.
To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to promulgate a consumer product safety standard for the uniform classification and labeling of certain electric bicycles and other off-road electric devices, and for other purposes.
# HR 7839: Electric Bicycle Safety Standards Bill **What It Would Do** This bill would require the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)—the federal agency responsible for product safety—to create standardized rules for classifying and labeling electric bicycles and similar off-road electric devices. Currently, different states and manufacturers use different standards, which can confuse consumers about safety features and performance. The bill aims to establish uniform national standards so that all e-bikes and related devices are labeled consistently and meet minimum safety requirements. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects manufacturers and sellers of e-bikes and off-road electric devices, as they would need to comply with the new federal standards. Consumers would also be impacted, as clearer labeling and safety standards could make these products safer and easier to compare when shopping. States that currently have their own e-bike regulations might see changes to align with federal standards. **Current Status** HR 7839 was introduced by Representative Dave Min (D-CA) in the 119th Congress. As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is a relatively early stage in the legislative process.
Financial Disclosure Modernization Act
# Financial Disclosure Modernization Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Financial Disclosure Modernization Act would update how members of Congress and other federal officials report their financial information. Rather than filing paper-based disclosures, this bill would modernize the process to use digital systems. The exact changes aren't detailed in the available information, but the goal appears to be making financial disclosures more efficient and potentially more accessible to the public. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect members of Congress and federal employees required to file financial disclosure forms. Indirectly, it could affect the general public by potentially improving transparency into officials' finances and potential conflicts of interest. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dave Min (D-California) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. No substantial details about specific provisions are currently available in the legislative record.
Reproductive Coercion Prevention and Protection Act of 2025
# Reproductive Coercion Prevention and Protection Act of 2025 (HR 6883) ## What the Bill Would Do This bill would establish federal protections against "reproductive coercion"—actions that prevent someone from making free choices about pregnancy, contraception, or fertility. If passed, it would make reproductive coercion a violation of federal law and create legal remedies for people harmed by such actions. The bill appears designed to address situations where individuals are pressured, deceived, or physically prevented from using contraception, becoming pregnant, or ending a pregnancy. ## Who It Affects and Key Provisions The legislation would primarily affect individuals experiencing reproductive coercion in relationships or other contexts. It would likely establish definitions of prohibited conduct, penalties for violations, and mechanisms for victims to seek legal remedies. The bill could impact healthcare providers, law enforcement, and anyone involved in situations involving reproductive decisions. ## Current Status As of now, HR 6883 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dave Min (D-CA-47). At this stage, the bill is in the early phases of the legislative process and would need committee approval and broader support before becoming law.
BASIC Act
# Summary of the BASIC Act (HR 6658) I don't have access to the specific details of this particular bill (HR 6658 from the 119th Congress). To provide you with an accurate summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need more information about its contents. **What I can tell you:** - The bill is currently in committee (meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House) - It was introduced by Representative Dave Min, a Democrat from California's 47th district - The bill title is simply "BASIC Act," but the subjects aren't listed in the information provided **To get accurate details, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for HR 6658 - Checking Rep. Min's official website - Looking at recent news coverage of the bill If you can share the bill's summary or main provisions, I'd be happy to explain them in plain language!
FREEDOM Act
# FREEDOM Act (HR 6469) Summary I'm unable to provide a detailed summary because the bill information provided doesn't include the actual text, provisions, or legislative description—only basic metadata showing it's sponsored by Rep. Dave Min (D-CA) and currently in committee. To give you an accurate, plain-language summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and key provisions, I would need access to: - The bill's official summary or description - Its specific provisions and language - What problem it aims to address **Current Status:** The bill is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (congress.gov) by searching "HR 6469" to find the official bill text and summary, which will have all the details needed for a proper explanation.
Regional Leadership in Wildland Fire Research Act of 2025
# Regional Leadership in Wildland Fire Research Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Regional Leadership in Wildland Fire Research Act of 2025 would establish or enhance regional centers focused on researching wildland fires and fire management strategies. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to improve scientific understanding of wildfires and develop better prevention, suppression, and recovery methods across different regions of the country. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect communities in fire-prone areas, federal and state land management agencies, firefighting organizations, and researchers studying wildfire behavior and mitigation. It could also impact rural communities, property owners, and public health officials concerned with air quality and disaster preparedness. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 6154) is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House of Representatives but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. For more detailed information about specific provisions—such as funding amounts, which regions would be included, or exact research priorities—you would need to review the full bill text through Congress.gov.
Digital Coast Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Digital Coast Reauthorization Act of 2025 – Plain Language Summary **What It Does:** The Digital Coast Reauthorization Act of 2025 would renew and update a federal program that provides digital mapping, data tools, and technology resources to help coastal communities manage their resources and plan for environmental challenges. The bill aims to give states, local governments, and coastal communities better access to online mapping systems and databases about ocean and coastal conditions, helping them make informed decisions about fisheries, environmental protection, and coastal development. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects coastal states and communities, local government agencies, and organizations that work in fisheries management and marine conservation. It could also benefit coastal residents who depend on fishing industries or live in areas vulnerable to coastal hazards. Federal agencies involved in ocean and environmental monitoring would also play a role in implementing the program. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 4256) is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Sponsor Rep. Dave Min (D-CA) introduced the bill, and it remains under review before any floor action can occur.
SAFE Act of 2025
# SAFE Act of 2025 Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5028 (the SAFE Act of 2025) in my training data, so I cannot provide you with accurate information about what this bill would do, its key provisions, or who it affects. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - The official government source with full bill text, summaries, and status updates - **House Clerk's website** - Official legislative tracking - **Sponsor's official website** - Rep. Dave Min's (D-CA) congressional office page Since the bill is currently in committee, the official sources should have the bill text and any summaries available. I'd be happy to help summarize it if you can share the bill's text or a reliable source describing its provisions.
DEAL Act of 2025
# DEAL Act of 2025 (HR 4859) - Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's content. The information provided shows it's a House bill (HR 4859) currently in committee, sponsored by Representative Dave Min (D-CA), but the summary you've shared doesn't include what the bill actually proposes to do. To give you an accurate, plain-language summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need additional information such as: - The bill's full text or official summary - A description of its main provisions - The legislative subjects it addresses **If you can provide the bill's summary or text**, I'd be happy to break it down into clear, accessible language for a general audience. Alternatively, you can find complete bill details on Congress.gov by searching "HR 4859" or looking up Representative Min's official website.
Stopping Executive Clearance Unfair Revocation Efforts Act
# Summary of HR 4237: Stopping Executive Clearance Unfair Revocation Efforts Act **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish legal protections for federal employees and contractors who hold security clearances. Specifically, it would require the government to follow certain procedural safeguards before revoking someone's security clearance, including notice of the reasons for potential revocation and an opportunity for the person to respond or appeal the decision. The bill aims to prevent what sponsors view as arbitrary or unfair clearance removals. **Who It Affects:** The legislation primarily impacts federal employees, military personnel, and private contractors who hold security clearances—people who need government authorization to access classified information as part of their jobs. These individuals work across various agencies and defense contractors. **Current Status:** HR 4237 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dave Min (D-CA), and it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. No significant action has been reported as of this summary.
Autism Family Caregivers Act of 2025
# Autism Family Caregivers Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Autism Family Caregivers Act of 2025 is designed to provide support and resources for families caring for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to improve access to services, provide financial assistance, expand respite care options (temporary relief for caregivers), or enhance training and support programs for family members serving as primary caregivers for autistic children and adults. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect families and caregivers of people with autism, as well as individuals with ASD themselves. It could also impact service providers, healthcare systems, and state programs that support autism care and services. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 4086) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dave Min (D-CA). At this stage, it remains under review and would need to pass committee before moving forward in the legislative process.
STOCK Act 2.0
# STOCK Act 2.0 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** STOCK Act 2.0 would impose stricter rules on stock trading by members of Congress and their staff. While a previous STOCK Act (passed in 2012) already banned Congress members from trading on non-public information they learn through their jobs, this updated version would likely expand those restrictions and close loopholes that have allowed some trading activity to continue. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily targets U.S. senators, House representatives, and congressional staff members. It could also potentially affect their spouses and immediate family members, depending on the specific provisions included. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 3779) has been introduced in the House but remains in committee and has not yet been voted on. Without seeing the detailed text of the specific provisions, it's difficult to specify exactly what new restrictions or requirements it would add beyond the existing 2012 STOCK Act framework. *Note: For a complete understanding of the specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text, which may be available through Congress.gov.*
Special Government Employees Transparency Act of 2025
# Special Government Employees Transparency Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Special Government Employees Transparency Act of 2025 would increase public disclosure and transparency requirements for special government employees (SGEs)—individuals hired by federal agencies on a temporary or part-time basis to provide specialized expertise. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, transparency bills of this type typically require agencies to publicly disclose more information about who these employees are, their roles, compensation, and potential conflicts of interest. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies that employ SGEs and the public's ability to monitor government operations. SGEs span various fields and include consultants, advisors, and subject-matter experts. The transparency requirements could also impact the SGEs themselves by increasing disclosure obligations. **Current Status:** HR 2455 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Dave Min (D-CA). To find more detailed information about specific provisions, you can visit Congress.gov or contact the sponsoring office directly.
BAD DOGE Act
# BAD DOGE Act Summary **What the bill would do:** The BAD DOGE Act would eliminate Executive Order 14158, which created the President's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). If passed, this executive order would be struck down and have no legal effect. The bill essentially reverses the creation of this department through congressional action rather than leaving it to presidential discretion alone. **Who it affects and key provisions:** This bill would impact the operations and structure of the executive branch, particularly any department or initiatives created under the government efficiency order. It also involves questions about presidential power and congressional oversight—specifically, Congress's ability to override or eliminate executive orders through legislation. The bill's subjects include congressional oversight, executive agency funding, and the scope of presidential authority. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1535, sponsored by Rep. Dave Min, D-CA-47, in the 119th Congress), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. For the bill to become law, it would need to pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President, or Congress would need a two-thirds majority to override a presidential veto.
Aquatic Biodiversity Preservation Act of 2025
# Aquatic Biodiversity Preservation Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Aquatic Biodiversity Preservation Act of 2025 is designed to protect and preserve aquatic ecosystems and the species that live in them. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically focus on protecting fish, plants, and other organisms in rivers, lakes, wetlands, and coastal areas from threats like pollution, habitat loss, and invasive species. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would likely impact environmental agencies, fishing communities, water utilities, agricultural operations, and any industries that use water resources. Conservation groups and recreational users (fishermen, boaters) would also be affected, as would states with significant aquatic ecosystems. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 1332) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Dave Min (D-CA) and is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and hasn't yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. To learn what specific protections or regulations the bill proposes, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov.