McDowell, Addison P. [R-NC-6]
Republican · NC · 12 bills sponsored
MTS CYBER Act of 2026
# MTS CYBER Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The MTS CYBER Act of 2026 (HR 7625) is a cybersecurity-focused bill currently being reviewed in committee. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, based on its title and subject area, the bill would likely address cybersecurity measures related to mass transit systems (MTS). This could involve protecting public transportation infrastructure—such as buses, trains, and subway systems—from digital attacks and cyber threats. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect public transportation agencies and their passengers. It could also impact private companies that operate or maintain transit systems, as well as cybersecurity firms working in this sector. Ultimately, the general public using buses, trains, and other mass transit would be affected by any new security requirements or operational changes. **Current Status** HR 7625 was introduced by Representative Addison P. McDowell (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee review. The bill has not yet moved forward for a full House vote, meaning its specific provisions and final language have not been publicly detailed. Further information would likely become available if the bill advances through the committee process.
PRESS Act
# PRESS Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7184 (the PRESS Act) from the 119th Congress in my training data, so I cannot provide you with accurate information about what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 7184" to see the full bill text, sponsors, and committee status - **Your representative's website** - Often includes summaries of bills they sponsor - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or reputable government tracking sites If you have access to the bill text or more details about it, I'd be happy to help summarize it in plain language.
Protecting Children from Foreign Mutilation Act
# Protecting Children from Foreign Mutilation Act (HR 6876) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would make it illegal for parents or guardians to take children out of the United States for the purpose of subjecting them to female genital mutilation (FGM). It would also prohibit knowingly facilitating such travel. The legislation aims to close a potential legal gap by preventing "medical tourism" where families travel abroad to have procedures performed that would be illegal to perform on children in the U.S. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect families in communities where FGM is practiced. It creates federal criminal penalties for parents, guardians, or anyone else who knowingly transports a minor across U.S. borders for this purpose. The law would apply regardless of whether FGM is legal in the destination country. Note that federal law already prohibits performing FGM on minors within the United States (since 1996). **Current Status** As of now, HR 6876 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill is in the early stages of the legislative process.
Kidd’s Stuttering Act
# Kidd's Stuttering Act (HR 6364) — Summary I don't have access to the specific text or details of HR 6364, so I can't provide you with accurate information about what this bill would actually do. The bill summary you've provided shows only basic metadata—the bill number, sponsor, and that it's currently in committee—but not the substantive provisions. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 6364" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill's summary section for an overview of its purpose - Reading any committee reports if they've been published If you can share the bill's summary text or key provisions, I'd be happy to explain them in plain language for a general audience.
Foreign Robocall Elimination Act
# Foreign Robocall Elimination Act (HR 6152) - Summary **What It Would Do** This bill aims to reduce unwanted robocalls originating from outside the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, robocall legislation typically focuses on strengthening enforcement against international call centers making illegal calls to American phone numbers, enhancing caller ID verification systems, and giving telecommunications companies and regulators better tools to block or trace foreign-origin calls. **Who It Affects** American phone users would be the primary beneficiaries, as the bill targets a major source of spam and scam calls that plague millions of households. Telecommunications companies would likely face new requirements or tools to implement the bill's provisions, and foreign call operations engaging in illegal robocalling would face increased enforcement. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. For the most current information on specific provisions and any recent action, you can check Congress.gov using the bill number HR 6152.
ALCATRAZ Act
# ALCATRAZ Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5026 (the ALCATRAZ Act) from the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide you with accurate information about what this bill would do, its key provisions, or who it would affect. While I can see it's a Republican-sponsored bill currently in committee, the bill's actual content and purpose aren't available to me. To get accurate, detailed information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 5026" for the full text, summary, and status - **Your representative's office** - They can explain how it affects your district - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in plain language.
Ban on Inkless Directives and Executive Notarizations Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 4411: Ban on Inkless Directives and Executive Notarizations Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would ban the use of "inkless directives" and "executive notarizations"—terms that are not standard in current law. Based on the bill's title, it appears to restrict certain types of unsigned or digitally-executed executive orders or directives. However, the specific details about what these terms mean and exactly what practices would be prohibited are not provided in the available summary information. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** The bill would potentially affect how federal executives and agencies issue directives and official documents. It was introduced by Representative Addison P. McDowell (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. Without access to the bill's full text, it's unclear which agencies or executive functions would be most impacted. **Note:** The limited information available makes it difficult to provide more specific details about key provisions. To understand this bill fully, readers would need to review the complete legislative text on Congress.gov.
CURE Act
# CURE Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information available is quite limited. The congressional record shows HR 4342 is titled the "CURE Act" and is currently in committee, but the specific subjects and provisions aren't included in the data provided. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 4342" to see the full text and official summary - Checking the bill sponsor's website (Rep. Addison P. McDowell, R-NC-6) - Looking at committee reports if hearings have been held This will give you the most reliable details about what the bill would do, who it affects, and its current status in the legislative process.
To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to update the policy of the Coast Guard regarding the use of medication to treat drug overdose, and for other purposes.
# HR 2351 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill requires the U.S. Coast Guard to make naloxone—a medication that reverses opioid overdoses—available at all Coast Guard facilities and during operations. The Coast Guard would also need to track how the medication is distributed and work with the Department of Defense to monitor illegal use of fentanyl and other controlled substances. The bill essentially updates Coast Guard policy to prioritize overdose response and ensure personnel have access to life-saving medication. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Coast Guard members and facilities. It also involves the Department of Defense, since the Coast Guard would need to join DOD's existing tracking system for naloxone distribution and controlled substance monitoring. Indirectly, it affects Coast Guard operations and any civilians who interact with the Coast Guard during emergencies. **Current Status** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is sponsored by Rep. Addison McDowell (R-NC). The bill is now awaiting action in the Senate. The underlying motivation appears to be improving emergency response capabilities and addressing substance abuse within military/government organizations, consistent with broader federal efforts to combat the opioid crisis.
Preventing the Abuse of Immigration Parole Act
# Preventing the Abuse of Immigration Parole Act (HR 3725) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill seeks to restrict how the federal government uses "parole" authority in immigration cases. Parole is a legal tool that allows officials to allow certain individuals to enter or remain in the U.S. temporarily without going through standard immigration processes. The bill would limit when and how this authority can be used, with the stated goal of preventing what sponsors view as misuse of these powers. **Who It Affects & Key Details:** The bill would primarily affect immigration policy enforcement and individuals seeking entry to the U.S. or challenging deportation. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to restrict programs that allow temporary stays for humanitarian reasons or other grounds. The measure was introduced by Representative Addison McDowell (R-NC) and relates to broader debates over immigration enforcement. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3725 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full House vote. Without additional details on specific provisions, interested parties should monitor committee proceedings or official congressional sources for more information about what restrictions the bill proposes.
Unmasking Hamas Act of 2025
# Unmasking Hamas Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Unmasking Hamas Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently under review in Congress. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to increase transparency or impose restrictions related to Hamas, the Palestinian political and militant organization. However, the bill's specific provisions are not publicly detailed in the available information, making it difficult to describe its exact mechanisms or requirements without access to the full legislative text. **Who It Would Affect** Depending on its specific provisions, this bill could potentially affect organizations involved with Hamas, government agencies responsible for enforcing sanctions or foreign policy, and possibly nonprofits or advocacy groups. The precise impact on individuals and organizations cannot be determined without reviewing the bill's actual language. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Addison McDowell (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill may be amended, discussed further, or may not advance to a floor vote. *Note: For detailed information about this bill's specific provisions, consult Congress.gov or the bill's official text.*
To designate the Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia as the "Donald J. Trump International Airport".
# Summary of HR 691 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would officially rename Washington Dulles International Airport (located near Washington, D.C., in Virginia) to "Donald J. Trump International Airport." If passed, all official government documents, signage, and references to the airport would use the new name. The bill makes no changes to the airport's operations, services, or management—it is purely a naming change. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The change would affect airport signage, official communications, and branding, though it would have minimal direct impact on daily travelers or airport operations. The bill was introduced by Representative Addison McDowell (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. For a bill to become law, it must pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President.