Moore, Tim [R-NC-14]
Republican · NC · 21 bills sponsored
Unlocking Homeownership Act
# Unlocking Homeownership Act (HR 7402) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Unlocking Homeownership Act aims to make it easier for Americans to buy homes by removing certain barriers to homeownership. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't available in the information provided, bills with this title typically focus on reducing regulatory requirements, streamlining lending processes, or adjusting down payment and credit requirements to help more people qualify for mortgages. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect prospective homebuyers—particularly those who currently struggle to qualify for traditional mortgages due to credit scores, limited savings for down payments, or other financial factors. It could also impact mortgage lenders, real estate companies, and government agencies that oversee housing programs. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7402 is in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To understand exactly what provisions this bill contains, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or similar legislative tracking websites.
SALAMANDER Act
# SALAMANDER Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a meaningful summary of this bill. The information available shows only basic details: it's HR 6693 from the current Congress, sponsored by Rep. Tim Moore (R-NC), and it's currently in committee. However, the bill's actual content, purpose, and provisions aren't included in the data provided—the "Subjects" field is blank, which would normally describe what the legislation addresses. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 6693" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill summary and status updates there - Looking at the sponsor's official website for their statement on the bill's purpose This will ensure you get complete, factual details about what the bill would actually do, who it affects, and its current legislative status.
Protecting Child Sex Trafficking Victim Witnesses Act
# Protecting Child Sex Trafficking Victim Witnesses Act (HR 7225) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to improve the legal protections and support available to child victims who serve as witnesses in sex trafficking cases. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this focus typically address measures such as enhanced confidentiality protections, trauma-informed witness procedures, improved access to support services, and safeguards to prevent re-traumatization during legal proceedings. The goal is to help children who have experienced trafficking feel safer participating in the criminal justice system. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects children who are victims of sex trafficking and must testify or participate in court proceedings against their traffickers. It also impacts law enforcement, prosecutors, federal courts, and child protection agencies involved in trafficking cases. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7225 remains in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC).
No Bounties on Badges Act
# No Bounties on Badges Act (HR 7114) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The No Bounties on Badges Act would make it a federal crime to offer rewards or "bounties" for harming, killing, or kidnapping law enforcement officers. The bill aims to create a specific federal offense with criminal penalties for anyone who solicits, offers, or provides payment to encourage violence against police, sheriffs, or other law enforcement personnel. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect individuals who might incite violence against police officers, as well as law enforcement agencies and their officers. It would establish federal jurisdiction over these offenses, allowing federal prosecutors to bring charges in addition to any state-level charges. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC) in the 119th Congress. No further action has been taken at this time.
Next Generation Nuclear Deployment Act
# Next Generation Nuclear Deployment Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The Next Generation Nuclear Deployment Act (HR 6805) would support the development and deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies in the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to streamline regulatory processes, provide financial incentives, or remove barriers for newer nuclear reactor designs—such as small modular reactors (SMRs) and other innovations—to be built and operated more quickly. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect energy companies developing nuclear technology, the nuclear power industry, communities where new reactors might be built, and electricity consumers. It could also impact federal agencies responsible for nuclear regulation and oversight. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6805 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC) in the 119th Congress. For more detailed information about specific provisions, you can check Congress.gov for the full bill text and any amendments or hearings.
Critical Minerals Trade Security Act
# Critical Minerals Trade Security Act (HR 6659) - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill aims to strengthen U.S. access to critical minerals—rare materials essential for batteries, electronics, defense systems, and renewable energy technologies. The legislation would likely focus on reducing American dependence on foreign sources (particularly China) for these minerals and potentially supporting domestic mining, processing, and supply chain development. The exact provisions aren't detailed in the available information, but such bills typically address trade policies, domestic production incentives, or supply chain security measures. **Who it affects:** The bill would impact manufacturers relying on critical minerals, the domestic mining and processing industry, consumers of electronics and renewable energy products, and potentially workers in these sectors. It could also affect U.S. trade relationships and international supply chains. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet advanced to a floor vote. This is an early stage in the legislative process, meaning it remains under review and discussion before any further action would occur. *Note: Limited details are publicly available about specific provisions of this bill. For complete information, you can review the full text on Congress.gov.*
Flight Risk Reduction Act
# Flight Risk Reduction Act Summary **What It Would Do:** The Flight Risk Reduction Act (HR 6582) is a proposed federal law currently under review in Congress. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to address issues related to individuals failing to appear for court proceedings or legal obligations (known as "flight risk"). However, specific details about the bill's exact provisions are not publicly available in the summary provided, so the precise mechanisms and requirements cannot be detailed here. **Who It Affects:** This bill would likely impact the criminal justice system, potentially affecting courts, law enforcement agencies, bail/bond procedures, and individuals involved in legal proceedings. Depending on its specific provisions, it could influence how judges assess whether someone might flee before trial and what conditions might be placed on their release. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. For more detailed information about the bill's specific provisions, you would need to consult Congress.gov or request the full text of the legislation.
No Budget, No Pay Act
# No Budget, No Pay Act (HR 5738) - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would withhold congressional salaries until Congress completes its core budgeting duties. Specifically, members of the House and Senate would stop receiving paychecks for any fiscal year in which they fail to approve a budget resolution and pass all 12 regular appropriations bills (spending bills for different government departments). Members would also be prohibited from receiving back pay for periods when they weren't paid under these conditions. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill directly affects all members of Congress—representatives and senators from both parties. It would take effect on September 29, 2027. The intent is to incentivize Congress to complete its budgeting process on time, since delaying these votes could cost lawmakers their salaries. Currently, Congress often misses budget deadlines and relies on temporary spending measures, so this bill is designed to create financial pressure to pass budgets punctually. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House or Senate. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Judicial Accountability for Public Safety Act of 2025
# Judicial Accountability for Public Safety Act of 2025 (HR 5649) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to create accountability measures for federal judges regarding their decisions on criminal cases and public safety matters. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it would establish mechanisms to review or hold judges responsible for rulings related to criminal sentencing, bail decisions, or other public safety determinations. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact federal judges and potentially defendants in federal criminal cases. It could also affect the federal court system's independence and operations, as well as public safety outcomes depending on what accountability measures are included. **Current Status:** HR 5649 is currently in committee (as of the latest available information), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Representative Tim Moore, a Republican from North Carolina's 14th district. **Note:** The specific provisions of this bill are not publicly detailed in the available summary. For complete details on what measures the bill proposes, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov.
Disaster Relief Continuity Act of 2025
# Disaster Relief Continuity Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would ensure that disaster relief programs continue operating even if the federal government shuts down in 2026. It specifically provides emergency funding to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to keep critical disaster assistance programs running during any gap when regular government funding lapses. This includes continuing financial aid to disaster victims, paying FEMA staff working on emergency response and recovery, processing disaster grants, and maintaining ongoing disaster recovery projects. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects people recovering from federally-declared disasters and emergencies. It also impacts FEMA employees working in disaster response and recovery efforts. More broadly, any community relying on federal disaster assistance—such as those dealing with hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, or other major disasters—would be protected from losing aid if a shutdown occurs. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 5648) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No specific timeline for further action has been announced.
TRUST Act of 2025
# TRUST Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The TRUST Act of 2025 would modify regulations governing bank accounts, deposits, and how the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) oversees financial institutions. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in this summary information, it addresses how banks manage capital and deposits, and how federal regulators measure bank performance. The bill appears focused on adjusting the rules that banks must follow regarding deposits and financial management. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact banks and financial institutions, as well as their customers. The FDIC—the federal agency that insures deposits—would need to implement any new regulatory requirements. Individual account holders could potentially be affected depending on how the bill changes deposit insurance or bank operations. **Current Status** The TRUST Act is currently in committee (HR 4478, introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Tim Moore, R-NC), meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill would need to pass committee, be approved by the House, then the Senate, before becoming law. *Note: Specific legislative details beyond the bill's general subject areas are not provided in the information available.*
Securing our Border Act
# Securing our Border Act (HR 4765) - Summary I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: the bill information provided doesn't include the actual text or detailed provisions of HR 4765. Without access to the specific language and requirements in the bill, I cannot accurately summarize what it would actually do, who it affects, or its key provisions. **What I can tell you:** This is a Republican-sponsored bill currently in committee review. The title suggests it addresses border security matters, but the title alone doesn't reveal the specific policies proposed. **To get accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 4765" for the full text - Reading the bill summary and sponsor's statement - Checking nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service I want to avoid speculating about the bill's contents, as that would risk giving you misleading information. If you can provide the actual bill text or more detailed provisions, I'd be happy to summarize it clearly for a general audience.
Enhanced Penalties for Criminal Flag Burners Act
# Enhanced Penalties for Criminal Flag Burners Act (HR 4287) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would increase criminal penalties for people who burn the American flag as a form of protest or expression. Currently, flag burning exists in a legal gray area—the Supreme Court has ruled it's protected as free speech in some contexts, but Congress has passed laws allowing states to penalize it. This bill would strengthen those penalties, making flag burning a more serious criminal offense with harsher consequences. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would primarily affect individuals who burn flags as a form of political protest or expression. It would apply across the country if passed into law. The exact penalties aren't detailed in this summary, but "enhanced" penalties typically mean longer prison sentences, higher fines, or both compared to current law. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process. It has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tim Moore, a Republican from North Carolina. *Note: Any Supreme Court protections for flag burning as protected speech would likely create legal challenges if this bill were enacted.*
DLARA
# HR 4238 (DLARA) - Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information available is quite limited. The congressional record shows this is HR 4238 from the 119th Congress, sponsored by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC), and it's currently in committee. However, the bill's full title appears to be abbreviated as "DLARA," and no subject matter details are listed in the provided data. To give you an accurate, factual summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the bill's actual text or more detailed legislative information. I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 4238" to view the full text and bill summary - **Your representative's official website** - For their statement on the bill - **Legislative tracking websites** - Like GovTrack or LegiScan for detailed analyses This approach ensures you get accurate information rather than my attempting to interpret an acronym without full context.
National Airport Supersonic Readiness Act of 2025
# National Airport Supersonic Readiness Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to prepare U.S. airports for the potential arrival of supersonic passenger aircraft. It would require airports and federal aviation authorities to assess their current infrastructure and develop plans to accommodate faster-than-sound commercial flights, which don't yet exist but are in development by private companies. The legislation focuses on getting airports ready before these aircraft are actually available for passenger service. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts airport operators, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and potentially future passengers. It would require coordination between these entities to evaluate runway capabilities, noise management systems, and other infrastructure needs. Supersonic aircraft manufacturers developing these jets would also have an indirect stake in the bill's outcomes. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. Limited details are publicly available about specific provisions, as the bill appears to be in its early legislative stages. The 119th Congress is still considering whether to move forward with this measure.
Border Operations Service Medal Act
# Border Operations Service Medal Act (HR 3780) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would create a new military service medal to recognize and honor personnel who have served in border operations. If passed, it would authorize the Department of Defense to award this medal to service members who meet specific criteria for their work related to border security and operations. **Who It Affects** The medal would primarily benefit military service members and veterans who have participated in border-related duties. It provides official recognition and a tangible award for their service in these operations. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3780 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Tim Moore (R-NC) and requires further legislative action to move forward.
Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act
# Summary of HR 2240: Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act **What the Bill Does** This legislation requires the Department of Justice to study and report on three things: attacks specifically targeting law enforcement officers, whether these attacks can be added to existing national crime reporting systems, and what mental health resources are currently available to police officers. Essentially, it asks the federal government to gather better data on threats to officers' safety and their access to mental health support. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects law enforcement agencies and officers across the country, as well as the Department of Justice, which must conduct and submit the reports. It could indirectly benefit officers by identifying gaps in mental health services and helping track trends in violence against police. **Current Status** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now under consideration in the Senate. If approved there and signed by the President, the Department of Justice would be required to complete these studies and provide Congress with findings, though the bill itself doesn't create new programs—it's focused on data collection and reporting.
Disaster Relief Transparency Act
# Disaster Relief Transparency Act (HR 2950) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Disaster Relief Transparency Act aims to improve oversight and accountability in how federal disaster relief funds are distributed and spent. While specific details about the bill's provisions aren't available in the information provided, bills with this title typically focus on requiring agencies to provide better public reporting on disaster aid—such as tracking where money goes, how quickly it's distributed, and whether it reaches intended recipients. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies that administer disaster relief (like FEMA), state and local governments that receive these funds, and the public who have an interest in how taxpayer money is used during emergencies. Disaster victims and affected communities could also be indirectly impacted depending on the bill's specific requirements. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Tim Moore (R-North Carolina) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. At this stage, it remains in the early phases of the legislative process. *Note: To understand the specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Mobile Mammography Promotion Act of 2025
# Mobile Mammography Promotion Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Mobile Mammography Promotion Act of 2025 aims to expand access to mammography services by supporting mobile mammography units—specially equipped vehicles that bring breast cancer screening directly to communities. If passed, the bill would encourage the use of these mobile units to reach underserved populations, including rural areas and communities with limited access to traditional medical facilities where mammography equipment is normally located. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily benefit women in rural, remote, or medically underserved areas who currently face barriers to accessing breast cancer screening. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills of this type typically include measures such as funding incentives, regulatory support, or tax benefits to help mobile mammography programs operate. Healthcare providers, particularly those serving rural communities, would also be affected. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC) in the 119th Congress. Further action would require committee approval before it could proceed to a full House vote.
Radar Gap Elimination Act
# Radar Gap Elimination Act (HR 2646) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Radar Gap Elimination Act aims to address gaps in radar coverage over the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on improving or modernizing radar systems used for weather monitoring, air traffic control, and national defense. The bill would likely allocate funding or authorize actions to identify areas with insufficient radar coverage and implement solutions to close those gaps. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would potentially impact the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), National Weather Service, Department of Defense, and aviation industry stakeholders. Improved radar coverage could benefit commercial and private aircraft operations, weather forecasting accuracy, and national security monitoring. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC). For the most current information on its progress, you can check Congress.gov.
To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to designate a portion of United States Route 74 in North Carolina as a future interstate, and for other purposes.
# HR 1333 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would officially designate a specific stretch of U.S. Route 74 in North Carolina—running from Columbus to Kings Mountain—as a "future interstate" and a high-priority corridor on the National Highway System. In practical terms, this designation would prioritize this road segment for federal funding and support as it works toward eventually meeting interstate standards (such as improved safety features, capacity, and design specifications). **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects North Carolina, particularly communities along the U.S. 74 corridor between Columbus and Kings Mountain. The designation could lead to infrastructure improvements and economic development in the region, while also potentially benefiting travelers and freight movement through that area. The bill was introduced by Representative Tim Moore (R-NC-14). **Current Status:** HR 1333 is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process and would require committee approval, House passage, and Senate approval before becoming law.