Moore, Riley [R-WV-2]
Republican · WV · 10 bills sponsored
Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
# Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would prevent credit card companies and payment networks (like Visa and Mastercard) from using special merchant codes that single out gun stores separately from other retailers. Currently, these networks can assign different codes to firearms dealers versus general retail stores, which some argue allows tracking of gun purchases. The bill aims to stop this practice and requires the Department of Justice to enforce the law and report annually on any investigations. **Who it affects:** Gun store owners, credit card companies, payment networks, and consumers who purchase firearms. The bill could also impact banks and financial institutions that process these transactions, as well as law enforcement agencies involved in enforcement. **Key provisions:** The main provision prohibits merchant codes that distinguish firearms retailers from other types of retailers. The DOJ enforcement requirement means the government must actively investigate violations and publish yearly reports on cases and findings. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1181, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Riley Moore, a Republican from West Virginia.
Jumpstart Savings Act
# Jumpstart Savings Act (HR 7115) - Summary **What It Would Do:** The Jumpstart Savings Act is a proposed bill currently under review in Congress that aims to encourage Americans to save money, though specific details about its provisions aren't publicly available yet. Based on the title, the legislation is intended to make saving more accessible or attractive to everyday people. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect American workers and savers who are trying to build emergency funds or long-term savings. Depending on its final provisions, it could also impact financial institutions, employers, or specific groups like lower-income Americans or young workers. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Riley Moore (R-WV) in the 119th Congress. Without the full text available, it's difficult to detail specific provisions or predict its likelihood of passage. *Note: For detailed information about specific provisions and impacts, the full bill text would need to be reviewed on Congress.gov.*
To transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain parcels of federal land in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, and for other purposes.
# HR 6062 Summary **What the Bill Does:** HR 6062 would transfer control of certain federal lands located in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia from one federal agency to another. The bill's exact details about which parcels would be transferred and which agencies would be involved are not specified in the available information, so the specific purpose of the transfer cannot be fully determined from this summary alone. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect federal land management in the Harpers Ferry area and could impact local stakeholders, the National Park Service (which operates in the area), and other federal agencies involved in land administration. Residents and businesses in the region might also be indirectly affected depending on how the land is managed after the transfer. **Current Status:** HR 6062 was introduced by Representative Riley Moore (R-WV-2) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote by either chamber. No subject classifications are listed, and the bill has not been enacted. *Note: More detailed information about specific parcels and agencies involved would require access to the full bill text.*
Faithful Patriot Campaign Medal Act
# Faithful Patriot Campaign Medal Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I should note that the information provided about HR 4766 is limited. Based on what's available, this is a bill sponsored by Representative Riley Moore (R-WV) that is currently under review in a House committee and hasn't yet been voted on by the full chamber. Without access to the bill's actual text or detailed provisions, I cannot accurately tell you what specific medal would be created, who would be eligible to receive it, or the exact criteria for awarding it. Congressional bills with names referring to campaign medals typically establish new commendations or honors, but the details matter significantly. **To get complete, accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 4766" to read the full bill text - Checking the House Administration Committee (or whichever committee has jurisdiction) for hearings or details - Looking at the bill's summary section on Congress.gov for the official description I want to avoid summarizing inaccurately, so I'd rather direct you to these authoritative sources than guess at the bill's contents.
Protecting America’s Treasures by Raising Inflow from Overseas Tourists (PATRIOT) Parks Act
# PATRIOT Parks Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The PATRIOT Parks Act aims to boost revenue for America's national parks by increasing fees and charges for international visitors. The bill focuses on raising money from overseas tourists to fund park maintenance, conservation, and operations. **Who It Affects:** The legislation primarily impacts foreign tourists visiting U.S. national parks, recreation areas, and trails. It could also affect park management agencies and domestic visitors depending on how fees are structured and implemented. **Key Provisions:** While specific details aren't fully outlined in available summaries, the bill would likely establish or increase user fees targeting international visitors. The revenue generated would presumably be directed toward park preservation and improvements. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee review in the House of Representatives, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full vote. It was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Riley Moore (R-WV).
Easter Monday Act of 2025
# Easter Monday Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Easter Monday Act of 2025 would make Easter Monday (the day after Easter Sunday) an official federal holiday in the United States. If passed, this would mean that federal government offices would close on that day, and federal employees would receive paid time off, similar to other federal holidays like Thanksgiving or Independence Day. **Who It Affects** This bill would directly affect federal employees and federal government operations. It could also have broader effects on businesses and the private sector, as some employers typically follow federal holiday schedules. Easter Monday's date changes each year since Easter is based on a lunar calendar, so the holiday would fall on different dates annually (ranging from late March to late April). **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Riley Moore, a Republican from West Virginia's 2nd District.
Fairness for Stay-at-Home Parents Act
# Fairness for Stay-at-Home Parents Act (HR 2732) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would provide tax benefits to parents who stay home to care for children instead of working outside the home. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, similar bills typically allow stay-at-home parents to claim tax credits or deductions for childcare-related expenses, or create new tax advantages to offset lost household income. The goal is to provide financial recognition and support for unpaid caregiving work. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit stay-at-home parents and families with one primary wage earner. It could affect federal tax revenue and the Internal Revenue Service's administration of new tax provisions. The bill could also have broader implications for how the tax system treats different family structures and work arrangements. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 2732 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Riley Moore (R-WV). At this stage, the bill remains in the early legislative process and would require committee approval and further congressional action before becoming law.
Respect Parents’ Childcare Choices Act
# Respect Parents' Childcare Choices Act (HR 2282) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would expand tax credits and potentially modify regulations related to childcare options available to families. Based on its title and subject areas, it appears designed to give parents more flexibility in choosing childcare arrangements—including informal care from relatives, religious organizations, or unlicensed providers—while potentially offering tax incentives. The bill also addresses congressional oversight and liability issues related to childcare services. **Who It Affects** Primarily families with children needing childcare, childcare providers (both licensed and unlicensed), religious organizations offering childcare, and state/local governments that regulate childcare licensing. The tax credit provisions would affect households claiming childcare expenses on their taxes. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee (HR 2282, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House. No specific provisions have been publicly detailed at this stage. To learn the exact details of what it would change, you would need to review the bill text directly through Congress.gov.
Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025
# Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025 is a proposed law that would restrict visa access for individuals associated with China's Communist Party (CCP). While specific details aren't fully available in the provided information, bills with this title typically aim to prevent or limit entry to the United States for CCP members and affiliated officials, potentially as a national security measure. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact Chinese government officials and CCP members seeking to enter the United States. It could also affect their families or associated individuals depending on how the law defines eligibility restrictions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 2147 is in the committee review stage, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Riley Moore (R-WV). At this stage, the bill is under consideration and would need to pass committee review and a full House vote before advancing further in the legislative process.
United States Reciprocal Trade Act
# United States Reciprocal Trade Act Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would give the President expanded power to respond to what supporters call unfair trade practices. Specifically, it would allow the President to negotiate tariff reductions with other countries or impose additional tariffs on imported goods if those countries charge higher tariffs on U.S. goods than the U.S. charges on theirs. The President could also take action against countries using other trade barriers (like quotas or regulations) that disadvantage American products. This authority would last three years and could be renewed for another three years. **Who it affects and key provisions:** The bill impacts American businesses that export goods, domestic industries competing with imports, and consumers (who could face higher prices if tariffs increase). Key provisions include: the President must consult with and notify Congress before taking action; tariffs must be removed if the foreign country stops its unfair practices or if the tariffs no longer benefit the U.S.; and Congress maintains oversight authority. The bill essentially shifts trade negotiation power toward the executive branch. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 735, introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Riley Moore, R-WV), meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.