Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]
Republican · TX · 17 bills sponsored
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that 501(c)(3) organizations are liable for the use of funding provided as a fiscal sponsor.
# Summary of HR 7799 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change the rules for how tax-exempt nonprofit organizations (501(c)(3) groups) operate as "fiscal sponsors." A fiscal sponsor is a nonprofit that receives and manages money on behalf of other organizations or projects that may not have their own nonprofit status. The bill would make fiscal sponsors legally responsible for how the money they receive and distribute is actually used. Currently, the legal responsibility structure for fiscal sponsorship arrangements isn't clearly defined in tax law. **Who It Affects and Key Provision** The bill primarily affects established nonprofits that act as fiscal sponsors, as well as smaller organizations, projects, and groups that rely on fiscal sponsors to handle their funds. By holding fiscal sponsors liable for how funds are used, the bill would likely increase accountability and oversight throughout the nonprofit funding chain. This could prevent misuse of charitable donations or tax-deductible funds flowing through intermediary nonprofits. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) and is currently in committee review. It has not yet been voted on by the full House or moved forward in the legislative process.
To establish the White House Council on Fathers and Sons, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7800 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7800 proposes creating a White House Council on Fathers and Sons, a new federal advisory body focused on fatherhood and father-child relationships. While the bill's full details aren't specified in the available information, the council would likely be tasked with developing policies and initiatives related to paternal involvement, family support, and related issues at the federal level. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect federal policy on family matters and could impact programs related to fathers, children, and family services. It was introduced by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. At this stage, the bill remains in the early phases of the legislative process and would require committee approval and House passage before becoming law.
Deterring Adversarial Access to Americans’ Data Act
# Deterring Adversarial Access to Americans' Data Act (HR 7509) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to protect American personal data from being accessed or controlled by foreign adversaries. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title and purpose suggest it would establish restrictions or penalties related to how foreign entities—particularly from adversarial nations—can obtain or use Americans' personal information. **Who It Affects:** The bill would potentially affect technology companies, data brokers, and any organizations that collect or handle American personal data. It may also impact foreign entities or companies with ties to countries deemed adversarial to the United States. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7509 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX). Without access to the full bill text, specific enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and detailed provisions cannot be confirmed from this summary information alone. *Note: For complete details on the bill's specific provisions, you can search the bill number on Congress.gov.*
Grave Injustice Parity Act
# Grave Injustice Parity Act (HR 7087) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Grave Injustice Parity Act is currently in congressional committee and has not yet been formally detailed in available summaries. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to address some form of inequity or unfair treatment related to graves or burial practices, though specific provisions are not publicly documented at this stage. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) in the 119th Congress. Without access to the bill's full text or committee documentation, it's unclear which communities or groups would be directly affected. The legislation remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the House of Representatives and has not been formally debated or amended by the broader chamber. **Next Steps:** For current details on this bill's specific provisions and any recent developments, readers should consult Congress.gov, which maintains up-to-date legislative information and full bill text once it becomes available.
Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act
# Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act (HR 6506) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to strengthen legal protections for taxpayers dealing with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on expanding taxpayers' rights during IRS audits, appeals, and enforcement actions—such as requiring more notice before collection actions, allowing more time to respond to IRS inquiries, or expanding access to appeals processes. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact individual taxpayers and small businesses undergoing IRS audits or disputes, as well as potentially the IRS itself through changes to how it conducts enforcement activities. **Current Status** HR 6506 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. No further action has been taken as of the latest information available. For specific details about the bill's exact provisions, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov.
Tax Court Improvement Act
# Tax Court Improvement Act Summary **What It Does:** The Tax Court Improvement Act expands the powers of the U.S. Tax Court, which is a specialized court where taxpayers can challenge IRS decisions without first paying the disputed taxes. The bill gives the court two main new abilities: (1) to issue subpoenas for documents and evidence even outside of scheduled hearings, and (2) to extend filing deadlines when it's fair to do so (called "equitable tolling"). Currently, the Tax Court can only subpoena witnesses for scheduled hearings, and has limited flexibility to extend petition deadlines. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects taxpayers involved in disputes with the IRS, their lawyers, witnesses in tax cases, and the Tax Court itself. It could make the tax dispute process somewhat easier for individuals and businesses by giving them more time to gather evidence and file petitions if they have legitimate reasons for delays (such as illness or administrative errors). **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now pending action in the Senate. It is generally viewed as a procedural modernization rather than a major policy change, as it mainly adjusts how the Tax Court operates rather than changing tax law itself.
Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act
# Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act (HR 5507) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act aims to increase transparency and accountability in the foster care system. While specific details about the bill's exact provisions are limited in available public records, bills with this title typically focus on requiring better documentation, reporting, and public access to information about foster care placements, outcomes, and system operations. The goal is generally to make it easier to track what happens to children in foster care and identify any systemic issues. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect foster children, foster families, social workers, and state child welfare agencies. It could also impact the general public's ability to understand how the foster care system operates in their states. Parents and advocates working to improve child welfare outcomes would likely pay close attention to this bill. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5507 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX). For the most current updates on this bill's progress, you can check Congress.gov, which provides real-time legislative tracking.
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
# Summary of HJRES 110: Balanced Budget Amendment **What it would do:** This proposed constitutional amendment would require the federal government to balance its budget—meaning total spending cannot exceed total revenue—though Congress would have up to 10 years after ratification to achieve this. The amendment counts all federal spending except debt payments, and doesn't count money borrowed. In emergencies, Congress could approve additional spending if two-thirds of both the House and Senate agree, but only temporarily and with the requirement to pay back any debt "as soon as practicable." **Who it affects:** This would impact every American by potentially limiting government spending on programs, services, and infrastructure, though the specific effects would depend on how Congress chooses to balance the budget (through spending cuts, revenue increases, or both). It would also constrain Congress's flexibility in responding to economic crises or national emergencies. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Congress. To become law, a balanced budget amendment must pass both chambers of Congress by a two-thirds majority, then be ratified by 38 of the 50 states—a high threshold that makes constitutional amendments rare.
Rural Weather Monitoring Systems Act
# Rural Weather Monitoring Systems Act (HR 4239) Summary **What the Bill Does** The Rural Weather Monitoring Systems Act would establish or improve weather monitoring systems specifically designed for rural areas across the United States. The bill aims to enhance atmospheric science and weather data collection in regions that currently have limited monitoring infrastructure, which could help rural communities better prepare for severe weather events and agricultural planning. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This legislation would primarily benefit rural communities, farmers, and agricultural businesses that rely on accurate weather forecasting. The bill appears to involve congressional oversight and government studies to assess current weather monitoring gaps in rural areas and develop solutions. It would likely require environmental monitoring and research to determine where new systems are needed most and how to implement them effectively. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX). The bill remains in the early legislative stage and would need committee approval and full House passage before advancing further in the legislative process.
Strong Communities Act of 2025
# Strong Communities Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Strong Communities Act of 2025 (HR 3458) addresses several areas including congressional oversight procedures, employment and training programs, higher education, and law enforcement funding and administration. Based on its subject categories, the bill would likely modify how federal agencies are monitored by Congress, adjust employment and job training initiatives, affect higher education policy, and potentially change law enforcement operations or funding levels. However, the specific provisions and exact changes are not detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** This legislation would impact multiple groups: law enforcement agencies and officers, workers and job seekers using federal employment training programs, Congress members and federal agencies involved in oversight processes, and higher education institutions and students. The scope suggests it's designed to influence how federal resources are allocated across these sectors. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was sponsored by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas). For more detailed information about specific provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.
No Dollars to Uyghur Forced Labor Act
# No Dollars to Uyghur Forced Labor Act - Summary **What it does:** This bill would prevent the U.S. State Department and the Agency for International Development (USAID) from spending taxpayer money on programs, policies, or contracts that use goods made in China's Xinjiang region or by companies involved in forced labor there. The bill targets concerns about forced labor of Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. It applies to goods made directly in the region, as well as goods made by companies that source materials from Xinjiang or work with the Chinese government to transport forced laborers. **Who it affects and key provisions:** The bill primarily affects U.S. government agencies overseeing foreign aid and diplomacy. It requires them to avoid purchasing or using products tied to Xinjiang's labor practices. However, the State Department can request a waiver if it gets written promises from partner organizations that they won't use Xinjiang-made goods and will implement tracking systems to verify compliance. The agency must notify Congress about any waivers it grants. **Current status:** The bill passed the House of Representatives and is part of the 119th Congress. It reflects broader bipartisan concern about labor practices in China and represents an attempt to align U.S. government spending with human rights standards.
PREVAIL Act
# PREVAIL Act Summary **What It Would Do** The PREVAIL Act would reform how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) handles patent challenges, particularly a process called inter partes reviews (IPRs). IPRs allow people to challenge whether an issued patent is actually valid. The bill would add new restrictions to these proceedings, including requiring that the judge who decides whether to allow a challenge to proceed cannot be the same judge who decides the final outcome, and limiting who can file these challenges by imposing "standing requirements" so that not just anyone can challenge a patent. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects inventors, patent holders, and companies involved in patent disputes. Patent holders would potentially have more protection against challenges, while competitors or others seeking to invalidate patents would face new procedural hurdles. Businesses in innovation-heavy industries like technology, pharmaceuticals, and manufacturing would see the most impact. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken on it yet during the 119th Congress.
No Tax on Overtime Act
# No Tax on Overtime Act (HR 3118) Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would allow workers to exclude overtime pay from their taxable income, meaning overtime earnings would not be subject to federal income tax. In practice, this would reduce the amount of federal income tax owed by employees who work overtime hours. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects workers who regularly earn overtime pay, which could include hourly employees in manufacturing, healthcare, retail, and other industries. It could benefit workers in any field where overtime is common, though salaried employees exempt from overtime rules would not be affected. **Current Status** HR 3118 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No companion bill has been introduced in the Senate at this time. *Note: Specific details about the bill's scope (such as how much overtime would be excluded or whether there would be income limits) were not available in the provided information.*
Orderly Liquidation of the Department of Education Act
# Orderly Liquidation of the Department of Education Act (HR 2456) **What the bill would do:** This bill would dissolve the U.S. Department of Education and distribute its functions and assets to other federal agencies or potentially to states. "Orderly liquidation" means the department would be systematically shut down over a period of time rather than closed immediately. The bill would require transferring existing education programs, federal funding mechanisms, and departmental responsibilities to alternative structures. **Who it affects:** This would impact millions of students, teachers, and schools nationwide that currently receive federal education funding and oversight. It would affect college students relying on federal student loans and grant programs, special education services, vocational training initiatives, and schools in lower-income areas that depend on federal supplements to their budgets. States would likely assume greater responsibility for education policy and administration. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. As of this summary, it remains in the early legislative stage. Bills at this stage face significant procedural hurdles and typically require substantial support to move forward.
Building Youth Workforce Skills Act
# Building Youth Workforce Skills Act (HR 2380) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Building Youth Workforce Skills Act aims to support job training and workforce development programs for young people. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically focus on creating pathways for youth to gain practical skills and work experience in high-demand fields, potentially through partnerships between schools, businesses, and training organizations. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact young people seeking job training and career preparation, as well as educational institutions and employers involved in workforce development programs. State and local governments administering training initiatives may also be affected depending on the bill's specific provisions. **Current Status:** HR 2380 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) in the 119th Congress. For details on the bill's specific provisions—such as funding amounts, eligible programs, or program requirements—you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or the sponsor's official materials.
RESTORE Patent Rights Act of 2025
# RESTORE Patent Rights Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would change how courts handle patent infringement cases by making it easier for patent owners to obtain an injunction (a court order stopping someone from using their invention). Currently, after the Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. MercExchange decision, courts have discretion to deny injunctions even when they find someone has infringed a patent. This bill would create a "rebuttable presumption," meaning courts would be expected to grant injunctions to patent owners who win their cases—though the other party could still argue against it in specific circumstances. **Who it affects:** Patent holders (individuals, small inventors, and companies with patents) would benefit, as they'd have a stronger tool to stop competitors from using their patented technology. Companies accused of patent infringement could be negatively impacted, as injunctions would become harder to avoid. The change could also affect consumers and industries that rely on patent licensing negotiations. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1574) in the House of Representatives and has not yet been voted on. It was introduced by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX).
Border Security Investment Act
# Border Security Investment Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would impose a 37% fee on electronic money transfers (remittances) sent to certain foreign countries to fund border security. The fee would apply to transfers going to the five countries with the most citizens who illegally entered the U.S. in the previous year. Half of the collected fees would go to a trust fund reimbursing border states for their security expenses, while the other half would fund border technology, physical barriers, and Border Patrol salaries. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects individuals and families who send money to relatives in countries with high rates of undocumented immigration to the U.S., as they would pay the 37% fee on those transfers. Border states (like Texas, Arizona, California, and New Mexico) would potentially benefit through reimbursements for border security costs. U.S. Customs and Border Protection would determine which countries qualify for the fee each year based on enforcement data. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) in the 119th Congress.