McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]
Republican · GA · 11 bills sponsored
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand the definition of a historically Black college or university to include schools established prior to November 8, 1965, so long as such schools meet all other required criteria, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7660 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change the federal definition of a "Historically Black College or University" (HBCU) by adjusting the establishment date requirement. Currently, to be officially recognized as an HBCU, a school must have been established before November 8, 1965, and have a primary mission of educating African Americans. This bill appears designed to clarify or expand eligibility by emphasizing that schools established before that date can qualify as long as they meet all other required criteria for HBCU status. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects educational institutions and their students. Some colleges or universities that weren't previously recognized as HBCUs could potentially gain that designation, which comes with federal funding advantages, grants, and other support programs. Students at newly designated HBCUs could access HBCU-specific scholarships and resources. **Current Status** HR 7660 is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. It was introduced by Representative Richard McCormick (R-GA) in the 119th Congress. The bill would require committee approval and votes in both the House and Senate before it could become law.
Humanitarian Theft Enforcement Act
# Humanitarian Theft Enforcement Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7649 to provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would actually do. While I can see it's a House bill from the current Congress sponsored by Rep. Richard McCormick (R-GA), the subject information isn't included in what you've provided, and I can't reliably tell you about its provisions without access to the full bill text. **To get an accurate summary, I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 7649" for the official bill text and details - Checking the bill's summary section, which Congress.gov provides - Looking at the sponsor's official website for their description of the bill's intent This will ensure you get factual, authoritative information rather than my speculation about what a bill titled "Humanitarian Theft Enforcement Act" might contain.
Incentivize Savings Act
# Incentivize Savings Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5438 from the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would actually do. While I can see it's a Republican-sponsored bill focused on savings incentives currently in committee, the detailed provisions aren't available to me. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 5438" for the full bill text - Checking your representative's official website for their statement on the bill - Looking at nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service (CRS) summary This ensures you get the actual provisions rather than my speculation about what a bill with this title might contain. Would you like guidance on how to find this information, or do you have the bill text you'd like me to help summarize?
Medical Professional Access Act
# Medical Professional Access Act (HR 6211) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Medical Professional Access Act is currently in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been publicly detailed with specific provisions. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to address access to medical professionals, though the exact mechanisms and scope are not specified in available information. To understand what specific changes it would make to healthcare access or medical licensing, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov. **Current Status:** This bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Richard McCormick (R-GA) and is currently in committee review. This is an early stage where the bill is being examined before any floor vote. No additional action or amendments have been reported at this time. **Next Steps:** For detailed information about this bill's specific provisions and its potential impact, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov directly, where you can read the full text, view any committee reports, or track updates as the bill progresses through the legislative process.
Litigation Reimbursement Act
# Litigation Reimbursement Act Summary Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill because the specific provisions and text are not included in the information you provided. The database entry shows only the bill's basic details (number, sponsor, status) but not what it would actually do. **What I can tell you:** HR 5477, sponsored by Representative Richard McCormick (R-GA), is currently in committee review. To understand the bill's specific provisions—who would be reimbursed for litigation costs, under what circumstances, and how much—you would need to: - Visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 5477" to read the full bill text - Check the bill's summary section for an official description - Review committee documents if available If you can share the bill's text or detailed summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for a general audience.
ROTOR Act
# ROTOR Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed text of HR 4704 (the ROTOR Act) from the 119th Congress, so I cannot provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill specifically would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 4704" to see the full text, sponsor information, and any summaries - **Your representative's website** - Often includes explanations of bills they sponsor - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or legitimate bill tracking websites If you can share the bill's text or a link to it, I'd be happy to help summarize it for you in plain language.
STATES Act
# STATES Act Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed text or substantive provisions of HR 4042 (the STATES Act) from the 119th Congress to provide you with an accurate summary. While I can see it's a Republican-sponsored bill currently in committee, I cannot reliably tell you what it would actually do, who it affects, or its key provisions without reviewing the bill's language. To get accurate information, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search "HR 4042" for the full text, summary, and sponsor details - **Bill summary services**: Sites like Congress.gov provide official summaries written by the Legislative Counsel - **Sponsor's website**: Rep. McCormick's official page may have a description of the bill's purpose This approach ensures you get factual, complete information rather than my potentially incomplete or inaccurate summary.
Economic Espionage Prevention Act
# Economic Espionage Prevention Act (HR 1486) Summary **What It Does:** This bill would give the President power to impose sanctions—including visa bans and property freezes—against foreign individuals and companies caught stealing U.S. trade secrets, providing support to hostile countries' military or intelligence agencies, or violating U.S. export controls. The bill specifically identifies China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela's Maduro government as potential targets. It also narrows certain exemptions in existing presidential emergency powers, making it easier for the President to enforce economic restrictions during national emergencies. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily targets foreign entities engaged in espionage or illegal trade activities, but it could indirectly affect U.S. companies doing business with sanctioned foreign entities. American intellectual property owners (businesses, inventors, and researchers) would potentially benefit from stronger legal tools against theft of their secrets. The bill also expands presidential authority, giving the executive branch more tools to respond to economic and security threats without congressional approval in emergency situations. **Current Status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need Senate approval and presidential signature to become law.
To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the rate of pay for care or services provided under the Community Care Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs based on the location at which such care or services were provided, and for other purposes.
# HR 874 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 874 would change how the Department of Veterans Affairs pays for healthcare services provided to veterans through its Community Care Program. Rather than using a single payment rate nationwide, the bill would allow the VA to adjust payment rates based on geographic location. This means healthcare providers in different regions could receive different amounts for providing the same services to veterans, likely reflecting regional differences in healthcare costs. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect veterans who receive care through the Community Care Program (which allows eligible veterans to receive care from private healthcare providers rather than VA facilities) and the private healthcare providers who treat these veterans. It could also impact the VA's budget and healthcare costs. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Richard McCormick (R-GA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill addresses healthcare costs and veterans' medical care.
To amend title 10, United States Code, to modify the rate of pay for care or services provided under the TRICARE program based on the location at which such care or services were provided.
# HR 873 Summary **What It Would Do** HR 873 would change how much the military's TRICARE health insurance program pays for medical care and services depending on where the care is provided. Currently, TRICARE uses a standardized payment rate. This bill would adjust those rates based on location, meaning providers in some areas would receive different payments than those in others for the same service. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact military service members, military retirees, and their families who use TRICARE coverage. It would also affect healthcare providers and facilities that serve TRICARE patients, as they would receive varying reimbursement rates based on geographic location. **Current Status** HR 873 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Richard McCormick (R-GA) in the 119th Congress and is being reviewed in the relevant legislative committees before any further action can be taken.
PROTECTS Act of 2025
# PROTECTS Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The PROTECTS Act would prohibit the use of federal money to pay for gender transition procedures for minors under age 18. This includes surgeries, medications, and certain implants designed to change a person's body to match a different gender identity than their biological sex. The bill would apply to federal funding sources like Medicare, Medicaid, and military health programs. However, it includes exceptions for procedures treating genetic conditions or preventing serious harm to health, as long as a parent or guardian consents. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects transgender youth under 18 who might otherwise receive gender transition treatments paid for by federal health insurance programs. It would also impact healthcare providers, hospitals, and clinics that currently offer these services using federal funds. The bill does not prevent these procedures from occurring with private insurance or out-of-pocket payment. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Richard McCormick (R-GA).