Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]
Republican · AL · 21 bills sponsored
To amend title 38, United States Code, to require call centers of the Department of Veterans Affairs to use multi-factor identification to verify the identity of callers in connection with high-impact veteran or beneficiary actions, and for other purposes.
# HR 7704 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to use multi-factor identification when veterans or their beneficiaries call VA call centers to conduct sensitive transactions. Multi-factor identification means verifying identity through multiple methods (such as a password plus a code sent to a phone) rather than relying on a single verification method. The bill aims to prevent unauthorized people from accessing veteran accounts and making changes to benefits or personal information. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects veterans and their families who use VA call centers to manage benefits, claims, or medical services. It would also impact VA call center operations, as they would need to implement the new verification procedures. **Current Status** HR 7704 was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced to the Senate.
To amend the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 to impose sanctions on foreign countries in response to acts concerning chemical or biological programs that cause injury to other foreign countries, and for other purposes.
# HR 7552 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would modify existing U.S. law to expand when the government can impose economic sanctions on foreign countries. Specifically, it would allow the U.S. to sanction nations that develop or use chemical or biological weapons programs in ways that harm other countries. The bill amends a 1991 law that already addressed chemical and biological weapons control. **Who It Affects:** The bill could affect U.S. relations with foreign nations suspected of developing or using chemical or biological weapons. It could also impact American businesses and individuals who trade with sanctioned countries, and would give the U.S. government additional tools to respond to weapons violations internationally. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7552 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL). Without additional information on the bill's specific provisions or Congressional activity, it remains unclear when or if it will advance for a vote.
Freedom to Fuel Act
# Freedom to Fuel Act Summary I appreciate you asking for a summary, but I need to be transparent: the bill information you've provided is limited to basic metadata without access to the actual text or legislative details. The subjects field is marked "N/A," which means I don't have the specific information needed to accurately describe what this bill would actually do. **What I can tell you:** - Bill number: HR 7000 - Current stage: Committee (early in the legislative process) - Sponsor: Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) - Based on the title, it likely concerns fuel-related policies, but the exact provisions aren't visible in the data provided **To give you an accurate summary**, I would need access to the bill's actual text, which would typically be available on Congress.gov. If you can provide the bill's summary or link, I'd be happy to break down what it would do, who it affects, and its key provisions in plain language.
Safeguarding US Rulemaking Act
# Safeguarding US Rulemaking Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Safeguarding US Rulemaking Act (HR 6581) is a proposal currently under review in Congress that addresses how federal agencies create and implement new rules and regulations. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically aim to modify the regulatory process—often by requiring additional review steps, increasing transparency, or changing how agencies can enforce new rules. **Who It Affects:** If passed, this bill would impact federal agencies that issue regulations, as well as businesses and individuals subject to those regulations. The changes could affect how quickly new rules take effect, what information must be disclosed about pending regulations, or how agencies justify their decisions. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in an early stage of the legislative process. It has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL). *Note: To understand the specific provisions and detailed implications, you would need to review the full text of HR 6581 on Congress.gov, as the summary information provided doesn't include those specifics.*
Federal Carjacking Enforcement Act
# Federal Carjacking Enforcement Act (HR 6155) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Federal Carjacking Enforcement Act would strengthen federal enforcement against carjacking—the crime of stealing a vehicle from someone by force or threat. While carjacking is already a federal crime, this bill appears designed to enhance penalties, improve enforcement mechanisms, or expand federal jurisdiction over these crimes, though specific details aren't provided in the available information. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect individuals convicted of carjacking and could impact federal law enforcement agencies responsible for prosecuting these crimes. It may also indirectly affect public safety in communities experiencing carjacking incidents, as well as vehicle owners and insurance companies dealing with these thefts. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6155 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL). Without access to the full text, specific provisions—such as sentencing enhancements or enforcement details—cannot be detailed here. *Note: For complete details on this bill's specific provisions, consult Congress.gov or the bill's full text.*
LABEL Act
# LABEL Act Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of HR 5969 (the LABEL Act) from the 119th Congress to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 5969" for the full text, sponsor details, and status - **The bill's official summary** - Available on Congress.gov once you locate it - **Your representative's office** - They can explain how it might affect your district If you can share the bill's full title or main subject area, I'd be happy to help explain legislative concepts or provide context about similar bills.
Advocates for Families Act of 2025
# Advocates for Families Act of 2025 Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed text or provisions of HR 5647 (Advocates for Families Act of 2025). While I can confirm it's a bill sponsored by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) currently in committee, I cannot provide accurate information about what it would specifically do, which groups it affects, or its key provisions without reviewing the actual bill text. **To get accurate information about this bill, I recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 5647" for the full text and details - Checking the bill's summary section, which outlines its stated purpose - Reviewing any committee documents if hearings have been held If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to break it down into plain language for you.
Auto Bailout Accident Victims Recovery Act of 2025
# Auto Bailout Accident Victims Recovery Act of 2025 (HR 5331) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL), aims to address compensation for victims of accidents involving vehicles from automakers that received federal bailout funds. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it would create a mechanism or fund to help accident victims recover damages or receive compensation related to vehicles manufactured by companies that benefited from government financial assistance during economic crises (likely referencing the 2008-2009 auto industry bailout). **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect individuals injured in accidents involving vehicles from bailout-recipient automakers. It may also impact the automakers themselves and potentially federal budgets if it establishes new compensation programs or liabilities. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5331 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The lack of subject details suggests the bill may still be in early drafting stages. Without access to the bill's full text, specific provisions cannot be detailed, so interested parties should review the complete legislation for comprehensive information.
BOP Release Card ID Act of 2025
# BOP Release Card ID Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The BOP Release Card ID Act of 2025 would establish new identification card requirements for individuals being released from federal prisons managed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it would create or modify a standardized ID card system for people leaving federal custody. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect individuals being released from federal prisons, as well as Bureau of Prisons administrators who would implement the new system. It could also indirectly affect law enforcement agencies and communities that interact with formerly incarcerated individuals. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5152 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL). *Note: Additional details about specific provisions would require access to the full bill text, which was not provided in the summary information available.*
Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act of 2025
# Summary: Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act of 2025 **What the bill does:** This legislation would make driving under the influence (DUI) a reason to prevent non-U.S. citizens from entering the country or to deport those already here. Currently, DUI convictions are not automatic grounds for deportation or entry denial under federal immigration law. The bill would change that by treating DUI offenses similarly to other serious crimes in immigration proceedings. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts non-U.S. citizens—both those seeking to enter the United States and those already living here on various visa statuses. It would also affect immigration courts and enforcement agencies that handle deportation cases. The bill is named after individuals killed by drivers with DUI convictions, highlighting its focus on public safety. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives. It would need to be approved by the Senate and signed by the President to become law. As of now, it remains pending in the Senate.
Define to Defeat Act of 2025
# Define to Defeat Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Define to Defeat Act of 2025 (HR 4087) is a bill currently under review in Congress, but detailed information about its specific provisions is not publicly available yet. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to establish or clarify definitions related to defeating something—though the exact subject matter requires access to the full bill text to explain accurately. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. At this stage, the bill is under preliminary review and has not advanced further in the legislative process. **Next Steps:** To provide you with accurate details about who this bill affects, its key provisions, and its implications, the full bill text would need to be reviewed. I'd recommend checking Congress.gov for the complete text and any committee reports once they become available.
STOP CSAM Act of 2025
# STOP CSAM Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 (HR 3921) is designed to combat child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on strengthening law enforcement's ability to detect, investigate, and prosecute CSAM-related crimes. These measures usually involve technology requirements for online platforms, reporting mechanisms, and penalties for violations. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect internet platforms and service providers, which would likely face new compliance requirements. It would also impact law enforcement agencies working on child exploitation cases, as well as child safety advocates. The general public could see changes to how online platforms operate and monitor content. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3921 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet moved forward for a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL). Without access to the specific legislative language, readers interested in the exact provisions should consult Congress.gov or contact their representatives for detailed information about what requirements or changes the bill proposes.
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 with respect to the feral swine eradication and control program, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 3457: Feral Swine Eradication and Control Program **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3457 proposes to modify the federal government's approach to managing feral swine populations by amending the Food Security Act of 1985. Feral swine are wild pigs that cause significant damage to agricultural land, natural ecosystems, and property. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills of this type typically aim to expand, modify, or fund programs that help states and landowners control or eliminate feral swine populations through various methods. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily affect farmers and ranchers who suffer crop and pasture damage from feral swine, state wildlife agencies responsible for managing wild animals, and private landowners dealing with swine on their property. It could also impact rural communities where feral swine populations cause environmental damage. The bill may have funding implications for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees the existing feral swine program. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without access to the specific text, the exact details of proposed changes cannot be confirmed.
Readiness Over Wokeness Act
# Readiness Over Wokeness Act (HR 3406) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would restrict the Department of Defense from funding, promoting, or requiring diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and initiatives. If passed, it would prohibit the military from using appropriated funds for DEI training, recruitment programs targeting specific demographic groups, or related activities. The bill aims to redirect military resources and focus toward what sponsors describe as core military readiness and training. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect the Department of Defense, military personnel, and individuals involved in military recruitment and training programs. It would also impact current or planned DEI-related initiatives within the armed forces. **Current Status:** HR 3406 is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL). No additional details about specific provisions or amendments are available from the limited information provided. --- *Note: This summary is based on limited publicly available information about the bill's introduction. For more detailed analysis, consult Congress.gov or official legislative resources.*
To amend the Small Business Act to include surviving children in the definition of small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, and for other purposes.
# HR 3195 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change federal law to allow the surviving children of disabled veterans to qualify for special small business programs currently reserved for service-disabled veterans themselves. Under current rules, only veterans with service-connected disabilities can access these benefits. The bill would expand eligibility to include their surviving children, giving them the same access to government contracts, loans, and other support programs designed to help veteran-owned businesses get started and grow. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects surviving children of deceased service-disabled veterans and the federal small business programs that serve them. It could also indirectly affect federal contracting, as government agencies set aside certain contract opportunities for veteran-owned businesses. Small business programs and the Small Business Administration would need to implement the new eligibility rules. **Current Status** HR 3195 was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and is currently pending in committee. The bill has not yet been voted on by either the full House or Senate. The specific provisions beyond the main eligibility change were not detailed in the available information.
To establish the Commission on National Agricultural Statistics Service Modernization to modernize the data collection and reporting processes of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, and for other purposes.
# HR 2307 Summary **What the Bill Does:** HR 2307 would create a special commission to study how the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) collects and reports farm data. NASS currently conducts the Census of Agriculture and provides official statistics on crop production, livestock, and other farm-related information that farmers, policymakers, and businesses rely on. The commission would examine whether NASS's data collection methods are outdated and recommend ways to modernize and streamline them. **Who It Affects and Key Details:** The 11-member commission would include officials from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, plus representatives appointed by House and Senate Agriculture Committees. Federal agencies would be required to share relevant information with the commission upon request. Within two years, the commission must deliver a report to the President and Congress that lists all NASS surveys, how often they're conducted, and suggests specific changes—whether administrative adjustments, new regulations, or new laws—to improve the system. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL).
Farmers’ Market Expansion Act of 2025
# Summary of the Farmers' Market Expansion Act of 2025 **What the bill would do:** This bill would expand the Senior Farmers' Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP) to include tree nuts—such as almonds, walnuts, and pecans—as eligible foods that seniors can purchase. Currently, the program allows low-income seniors to use government-provided coupons at farmers' markets and local farms to buy fresh fruits, vegetables, honey, and herbs. Adding tree nuts would give seniors access to additional nutritious foods through these same vouchers. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects low-income seniors who participate in the SFMNP, as well as state agricultural departments that administer the program and local farmers and vendors who sell at farmers' markets and community farms. It could also benefit tree nut farmers and producers. **Current status:** As of now, the bill (HR 2379) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama.
Why Does the IRS Need Guns Act
# Why Does the IRS Need Guns Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would prohibit the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from purchasing, carrying, or using firearms and ammunition. If passed, it would effectively disarm the IRS's Criminal Investigation division, which currently employs special agents authorized to carry weapons while investigating financial crimes like tax fraud and money laundering. **Who It Affects:** The bill would directly impact IRS Criminal Investigation agents who use firearms in their work. It could also affect taxpayers and the government's ability to investigate serious financial crimes, since armed agents sometimes encounter dangerous suspects during investigations. The measure reflects ongoing debate about which federal agencies should have armed personnel. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No companion legislation has been introduced in the Senate at this time.
To abolish the Department of Education and to provide funding directly to States for elementary and secondary education, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 2691 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 2691 proposes to eliminate the federal Department of Education and redirect federal education funding directly to individual states rather than distributing it through the federal department. Instead of the current system where the federal government administers education programs and funding, states would receive the money and make their own decisions about how to spend it on elementary and secondary schools. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would primarily affect states, school districts, educators, and students nationwide. It would significantly change how federal education dollars flow to schools—moving from a centralized federal agency to a decentralized state-based system. The bill would remove federal oversight of education programs, standards, and requirements that currently come with federal funding. States would gain more control over education policy and spending decisions within their borders. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Barry Moore, a Republican from Alabama.
Stop Secret Spending Act of 2025
# Stop Secret Spending Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would require federal agencies to publicly disclose spending information about "other transaction agreements" (OTAs) on USAspending.gov, a government website where federal spending is tracked. Currently, most federal spending on contracts and grants must be reported there, but OTAs—special types of agreements that bypass many standard federal procurement rules—are not included. The bill would expand reporting requirements to include these agreements and ensure the Treasury Department automatically uploads this data to the website. **Who it affects and why it matters:** This bill would primarily affect federal agencies that use OTAs and the public seeking transparency in government spending. OTAs are often used by the Department of Defense and research agencies because they're faster and more flexible than traditional contracts, but their spending has remained largely hidden from public view. The bill aims to bring these expenditures into the open so Congress and citizens can see how taxpayer money is being spent. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 2069, sponsored by Representative Barry Moore of Alabama). It has not yet been voted on by the full House.
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 with respect to the issuance of quality control guidance issued by the Secretary of Agriculture.
# HR 734 Summary **What the bill does:** HR 734 would require the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to give the public at least 60 days to review and comment before making significant changes to how it oversees the SNAP program (food stamps). Currently, the SNAP quality control system checks whether state agencies correctly determine who qualifies for benefits and how much they should receive. This bill would add a formal public input period before the USDA can issue new or updated instructions that would require states to change their systems, procedures, staff, or verification methods related to these quality control reviews. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects state SNAP agencies that conduct eligibility reviews, the USDA which oversees the program, and potentially SNAP recipients if procedural changes occur. Public stakeholders—including advocacy groups, state officials, and businesses involved in SNAP administration—would also have the opportunity to weigh in during the comment period. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House. No action has been taken to advance it further.