Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]
Republican · OK · 17 bills sponsored
A bill to amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to authorize Tribal meat inspection under that Act by Tribal personnel, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3994: Tribal Meat Inspection Bill **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change federal meat inspection rules to allow Native American tribes to inspect meat processing facilities on tribal lands using their own trained personnel, rather than requiring federal inspectors. Currently, the Federal Meat Inspection Act requires USDA inspectors to oversee all meat processing. The bill would essentially authorize tribes to run their own inspection programs that meet federal safety standards. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects Native American tribes that operate or want to operate meat processing businesses, as well as consumers of meat from tribal facilities. It would allow tribes to develop inspection programs parallel to the federal system, potentially giving tribal communities more control over food production and economic development on tribal lands. The bill doesn't specify details about how tribes would be certified or what standards they'd need to meet, though the intent is to maintain food safety while increasing tribal sovereignty. **Current Status** S 3994 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK). For the bill to become law, it would need to be approved by the committee, pass both the Senate and House, and be signed by the President.
A bill to allow members of federally recognized Tribes to use their Tribal government identification documents in obtaining a firearm from a federally licensed firearms dealer.
# Plain Language Summary of S 3946 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow Native Americans who are members of federally recognized Tribes to use their Tribal government ID cards when buying firearms from licensed gun dealers. Currently, federal law requires certain forms of government-issued identification (like state driver's licenses or passports) for firearm purchases. This bill would add Tribal IDs to the list of acceptable documents for that purpose. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill specifically targets members of federally recognized Indian Tribes—roughly 574 federally recognized Tribes in the United States. It would make it easier for these individuals to purchase firearms by accepting their Tribal government identification as valid proof of identity and residency, similar to how state IDs are currently accepted. The bill does not change gun ownership restrictions or background check requirements; it only addresses which identification documents qualify. **Current Status** As of now, S 3946 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma). For the bill to become law, it would need to move out of committee and receive approval from both the Senate and House, then be signed by the President.
A bill to ensure that Federal laws that enable Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies to access firearms apply equally to Tribal law enforcement agencies.
# Bill Summary: S 3945 - Tribal Law Enforcement Firearms Access **What the Bill Does** S 3945 would modify federal firearms laws to give Tribal law enforcement agencies the same access to firearms that federal, state, and local police departments currently have. Essentially, it aims to close what supporters view as a gap where Tribal police officers may face different or more restrictive rules than other law enforcement agencies when obtaining firearms for official use. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Tribal law enforcement agencies and their officers across the United States. It could also impact federal firearms regulations and how they apply to Native American tribes. By extending equal access to firearms programs, the bill would ensure Tribal police have the same tools and resources as other law enforcement agencies. **Current Status** S 3945 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma).
A bill to provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes.
# S. 550 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill allows the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to bring a legal claim to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims regarding land in Illinois that the tribe says belongs to them under an 1809 treaty called the Treaty of Grouseland. The tribe would have one year to file this claim, and the court would decide the case without being restricted by normal time limits that typically prevent old legal cases from moving forward. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill directly affects the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma and any parties with interests in the disputed Illinois land. However, there's an important tradeoff: if the tribe uses this opportunity to pursue their land claim, they give up the right to make any other claims—current or future—to land in Illinois. This essentially settles the dispute one way or another, either through the court's decision on this specific claim or by the tribe's forfeiture of other potential claims. **Current Status** The bill has passed the Senate and is moving through the legislative process. It would need House approval and the President's signature to become law.
Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025
# Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, officially named S 3302, is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Based on its title, the legislation appears to be designed to provide opportunities or assistance to children, though specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. Without access to the full text, the exact scope of what programs or protections it would create cannot be determined from the metadata provided. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma) during the 119th Congress. Since it remains "In Committee," it has not advanced to the floor for a full Senate vote. This means it is still in the early stages of the legislative process and may undergo revisions or face obstacles before moving forward. **Note:** To provide more specific details about the bill's key provisions and its actual impact, the full text of S 3302 would need to be reviewed, as the summary information available is limited. Interested parties can find complete details on Congress.gov or the Senate website.
Small Businesses before Bureaucrats Act
# Small Businesses before Bureaucrats Act (S 3111) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Small Businesses before Bureaucrats Act, introduced by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), aims to prioritize small business interests in federal regulatory processes. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically seek to reduce regulatory burdens on small businesses, streamline approval processes, or give small business owners a greater voice in how government agencies develop new rules and regulations. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact small business owners and entrepreneurs, as well as the federal agencies that regulate business activities. It could also indirectly affect consumers, depending on which regulations are modified or removed. **Current Status** As of now, S 3111 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill has not progressed to become law. To understand the specific regulatory changes being proposed, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or the sponsor's office.
Dennis John Benigno Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Dennis John Benigno Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2025 **What the bill would do:** This bill would reauthorize and continue federal funding for programs that help people with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). It appears to renew existing government initiatives focused on research, treatment, prevention, and support services for TBI patients. The bill is named after Dennis John Benigno, suggesting it may honor someone affected by traumatic brain injury. **Who it affects:** The bill would directly benefit people living with traumatic brain injuries, including military veterans, accident survivors, and athletes. It would also affect state and local health agencies that administer TBI programs, as well as medical researchers and healthcare providers involved in treatment and prevention efforts. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No further action has been taken at this time.
A joint resolution honoring the sacrifice of Marine Corps Lance Corporal David L. Espinoza, Marine Corps Sergeant Nicole L. Gee, Marine Corps Staff Sergeant Darin Taylor Hoover, Army Staff Sergeant Ryan Christian Knauss, Marine Corps Corporal Hunter Lopez, Marine Corps Lance Corporal Rylee J. McCollum, Marine Corps Lance Corporal Dylan R. Merola, Marine Corps Lance Corporal Kareem M. Nikoui, Marine Corps Corporal Daegan W. Page, Marine Corps Sergeant Johanny Rosario, Marine Corps Corporal Humberto A. Sanchez, Marine Corps Lance Corporal Jared M. Schmitz, and Navy Petty Officer Third Class Maxton W. Soviak.
# Summary of SJRES 79 **What the Bill Does:** This is a joint resolution that honors 13 U.S. service members who died in a 2021 bombing in Kabul, Afghanistan during the military withdrawal. The resolution formally recognizes and pays tribute to these Marines, one Army soldier, and one Navy sailor by name. Joint resolutions like this don't create laws or direct government action—instead, they serve as formal expressions of Congress's respect and remembrance. **Who It Affects:** The resolution directly honors the 13 service members named in the bill and acknowledges their sacrifice and service. It affects their families and the broader military community by providing official congressional recognition of their loss. All Americans are affected in the sense that Congress is expressing national values through this formal tribute. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full House or Senate.
Prescription Information Modernization Act of 2025
# Prescription Information Modernization Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Prescription Information Modernization Act of 2025 would modernize how prescription drug information is shared and managed in the United States. While the bill's specific details aren't publicly available yet, the title suggests it aims to update systems for handling prescription data to reflect current technology and practices. This could include changes to electronic health records, pharmacy databases, or how prescribers and pharmacies communicate about medications. **Who It Affects** If passed, this bill would likely impact patients, doctors, pharmacies, insurance companies, and healthcare providers across the country. It could affect how quickly patients receive medications, how easily their medical history is shared between providers, and potentially impact prescription costs or access. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 2027 in the Senate), meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Further details about the bill's specific provisions would become clearer as it moves through the committee process.
Black Vulture Relief Act of 2025
# Black Vulture Relief Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would allow farmers and ranchers to kill, capture, or scare away black vultures that threaten their livestock without needing a special permit from the federal government. Currently, black vultures are protected by federal law, and producers must obtain permits to take action against them. The bill would make this process simpler by allowing direct action, though it would prohibit using poison. Producers would need to report annually to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service about which vultures they've taken. **Who it affects:** Livestock producers (farmers and ranchers) and their employees would be the primary beneficiaries. The bill responds to concerns that black vulture populations have grown and increasingly attack cattle, sheep, and other farm animals. Bird protection advocates would likely be concerned about the change to federal protections for this species. **Current status:** The bill was introduced in the Senate in 2025 by Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma. It is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Lowering Broadband Costs for Consumers Act of 2025
# Lowering Broadband Costs for Consumers Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Lowering Broadband Costs for Consumers Act of 2025 aims to reduce what Americans pay for internet service. While the bill's specific provisions aren't fully detailed in available summaries, it addresses broadband pricing and accessibility issues by focusing on internet, cable, and wireless communication services across the country. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact everyday internet users, particularly rural Americans who often face higher costs and limited service options. It also affects broadband service providers and telecommunications companies that offer internet services to consumers. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Before becoming law, it would need to pass committee review, Senate approval, House approval, and presidential signature. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions and mechanisms the bill would use to lower costs, you may want to review the full text on Congress.gov.*
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOx Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
# Summary of SJRES 47 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would overturn an EPA decision from January 2025 that allowed California to enforce stricter pollution standards for heavy-duty vehicles and engines. Under federal law, California can request waivers to set its own emission rules that are stricter than national standards. The EPA approved California's request for its "Low NOx Regulation," which targets nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks and engines. This resolution would cancel that approval, preventing California from implementing these stricter standards. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects California, the trucking and automotive industries, and air quality in states that follow California's emission standards. California's stricter rules typically influence other states that adopt similar standards, so the impact could extend beyond California's borders. Environmental groups and public health advocates would likely oppose the measure, while industries citing compliance costs would support it. **Current Status and Key Details:** The bill is currently in committee and has not passed. It was introduced by Representative Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) and uses Congress's power to disapprove federal regulations. The measure reflects ongoing debates about balancing environmental regulation with industry concerns about compliance costs, and about whether California should have authority to set pollution standards different from federal requirements.
EASE Act
# EASE Act (S 1248) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's text, so I can't provide accurate information about what it would actually do. To give you a reliable summary, I would need to see the bill's official language and provisions. **To find accurate information, I recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "S 1248" (the bill number) - Looking at the bill's full text and summary sections - Checking the sponsor's official website for their description - Reading summaries from nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service If you can share the bill's text or a link to it, I'd be happy to summarize it in plain language for you. I want to make sure any information I provide is accurate rather than guessing at what "EASE Act" might stand for or do.
9–8–8 Lifeline Cybersecurity Responsibility Act
# 9-8-8 Lifeline Cybersecurity Responsibility Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish cybersecurity requirements for the 9-8-8 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, a federal mental health crisis service that launched in 2022. If passed, it would require the lifeline to implement security measures to protect personal information collected from callers, and would mandate government oversight to ensure these protections are adequate. The bill would also likely require studies or reports on the system's current security practices. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects the 9-8-8 Lifeline service, the mental health organizations that operate it, and the millions of Americans who call seeking crisis support. By establishing cybersecurity standards, the bill aims to protect sensitive personal and health information shared during calls. The legislation reflects growing Congressional concern about data security across government services, particularly those handling sensitive mental health information. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. As a newly introduced bill in the 119th Congress, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025
# Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would restrict states' ability to set their own vehicle emission standards, particularly those that limit sales of gas-powered cars. Currently, states can adopt stricter emission rules than federal standards if the EPA grants them a waiver. This bill would prevent the EPA from approving waivers for state standards that discourage or ban internal combustion engine vehicles (traditional gas cars). It would also require the EPA to cancel any waivers it granted for such standards between January 2022 and when the bill becomes law. **Who it affects:** States like California that have adopted stricter vehicle emission standards would be directly impacted, as would manufacturers, consumers, and environmental advocates. States would lose regulatory flexibility to set their own pollution standards, while the auto industry would face fewer state-level restrictions on gas vehicle sales. **Current status:** The bill (S 996) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate.
Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025
# Give Kids a Chance Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill would make it easier for researchers to conduct clinical trials testing new drug combinations to treat pediatric (children's) cancers. Currently, FDA rules restrict testing new drugs alongside already-approved cancer medications. This bill would relax those restrictions, allowing researchers to combine new drugs with existing approved treatments—either those already standard practice for childhood cancers or drugs approved for adult cancers that target similar biological pathways. The bill also renews the FDA's ability to award "priority review vouchers" to companies developing treatments for rare childhood diseases, which speeds up the approval process. **Who It Affects:** Children with cancer and pharmaceutical companies developing new pediatric cancer treatments would be the primary beneficiaries. The bill aims to accelerate drug development by removing research barriers while maintaining FDA oversight through required guidance and reporting. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (S 932, 119th Congress), sponsored by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK). It has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill requires the FDA to issue implementation guidance and the Government Accountability Office to report on whether these changes actually improve drug development for childhood cancers.
Quapaw Tribal Settlement Act of 2025
# Quapaw Tribal Settlement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would settle a long-standing financial dispute between the federal government and the Quapaw Nation, a Native American tribe based in Oklahoma. It would create a special trust account (called the Quapaw Bear Settlement Trust Account) to hold settlement money and direct the Department of the Interior to distribute those funds to the tribe and its members according to a court recommendation from January 2020. The bill essentially implements a settlement agreement that a federal court panel previously recommended. **Who It Affects** The primary beneficiaries would be the Quapaw Nation and its members. The bill also involves the federal government, which would fund the account, and the Department of the Interior, which would manage the distribution of settlement payments. **Current Status** The bill (S 630) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The specific details of how much money would be allocated and the exact payment distribution timeline would be determined by the settlement terms outlined in the January 2020 court recommendation.