Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4]
Republican · KY · 18 bills sponsored
No Immunity for Glyphosate Act
# No Immunity for Glyphosate Act (HR 7601) - Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would prevent the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from granting immunity or legal protection to glyphosate—a widely used herbicide found in products like Roundup. Essentially, it would bar the EPA from shielding manufacturers or users of glyphosate from lawsuits, meaning they could be sued in court regardless of EPA approval or safety determinations. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact agricultural companies that produce or sell glyphosate-based products, farmers and other users of these herbicides, and individuals who claim to have been harmed by glyphosate exposure. It could also affect the EPA's regulatory authority over pesticides. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) in the 119th Congress. No significant action has been taken on it yet. **Note:** The bill's title and structure suggest it relates to ongoing debates about glyphosate's safety and litigation, but the full legislative text would contain specific details about what immunity provisions would be restricted.
NATO Act
# NATO Act (HR 6508) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The NATO Act is a proposed bill that would require Congressional approval before the United States can fulfill its NATO treaty obligations or increase military commitments to NATO member countries. Currently, the President has significant authority to direct U.S. military support and involvement in NATO without explicit Congressional votes each time. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect NATO member countries that rely on U.S. military support and defense commitments, as well as the executive branch's ability to quickly respond to NATO requests. It could also impact U.S. military planning and operations in Europe. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant Congressional committee for review and discussion but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken to advance it to a floor vote. *Note: Detailed provisions were not publicly available in the source material provided. For specific details about what activities would require Congressional approval, you may want to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2025
# Restoring America's Leadership in Innovation Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The bill's specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. Based on its title, it appears designed to strengthen American innovation and competitiveness, though the exact mechanisms and policies are unclear without access to the full legislative text. The bill has not advanced beyond the committee stage, meaning Congress has not yet debated or voted on it. **Current Status:** HR 5811 is currently in committee review during the 119th Congress. It was introduced by Representative Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky). At this stage, the bill remains in the early legislative process and has not been scheduled for a full House vote. **What You Should Know:** To understand the specific provisions, who would be directly affected, and what changes it would actually implement, you would need to review the complete bill text on Congress.gov or similar legislative databases. The title suggests it addresses innovation policy, but without those details, a meaningful summary of its actual impact cannot be provided.
Repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013
# Summary of HR 5704: Repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would reverse a 2013 law that allowed U.S. government-funded media organizations (like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe) to distribute their content to American audiences. If passed, it would restore the original restriction that prevented these taxpayer-funded international broadcasting services from being shown or heard inside the United States. The underlying intent would be to limit domestic distribution of federally-produced international news and information content. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects U.S. government broadcasting agencies and American citizens who currently access their content. By repealing the 2013 modernization law, it would effectively prohibit these government media organizations from distributing programs domestically, though they could continue operating abroad. This could impact people who rely on these sources for news and information, as well as the agencies themselves. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. With limited co-sponsorship and no scheduled votes, the measure faces an uncertain path forward in Congress.
NICS Data Reporting Act of 2025
# NICS Data Reporting Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish annual reports showing demographic information about people who fail federal firearm background checks. Currently, when someone tries to buy a gun, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) screens them against criminal records and other disqualifying factors. If they're rejected, that information isn't systematically reported to the public. This bill would make that data transparent by requiring yearly reports that break down who is being denied firearm purchases. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the DOJ (which would do the reporting), lawmakers and the public (who would receive the data), and indirectly anyone involved in the background check process. It doesn't change who can or cannot buy guns—it just makes existing rejection data public. **Current Status** The bill is in committee as of now, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The sponsor is Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky. The bill focuses on government transparency and record-keeping rather than changing gun laws themselves.
No Funds for Foreign Abortions Act
# No Funds for Foreign Abortions Act (HR 5302) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would prohibit the use of U.S. federal funds for abortion services or related activities in foreign countries. Specifically, it would prevent taxpayer money from being allocated to international organizations or foreign aid programs that provide, promote, or support abortion services overseas. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily impacts international aid organizations, foreign governments receiving U.S. assistance, and global health agencies that currently receive American funding. It would also affect women and healthcare providers in developing countries who rely on U.S.-funded programs for family planning and reproductive health services. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet advanced for a full vote in the House of Representatives. No action has been taken since its introduction. Similar provisions have been a recurring feature of U.S. foreign aid policy under various administrations and have been debated in previous congressional sessions.
Safe Students Act
# Safe Students Act (HR 5066) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safe Students Act is a proposed federal bill currently under review in the House of Representatives. However, the available information about this specific bill is limited—the congressional record shows it was introduced but does not provide details about its actual provisions or intended purpose. The bill's title suggests it relates to student safety, but without access to the full text, it's unclear what specific problems it aims to address or what solutions it proposes. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) in the 119th Congress. For accurate details about what this bill would actually do, who it affects, and its specific provisions, you would need to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov or reach out to the sponsoring office directly. **Note:** To get complete information about this legislation, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 5066" to view the full bill text and any amendments or committee reports.
PRIME Act
# PRIME Act Summary **What the bill would do:** The PRIME Act would allow meat from animals slaughtered at custom facilities to be sold within a state without federal inspection, expanding current exemptions. Right now, meat from custom slaughter facilities can only be used for personal consumption. This bill would permit intrastate sales to restaurants, grocery stores, hotels, and other food businesses—as long as both the slaughter facility and the sales occur within the same state. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts small-scale meat producers, custom slaughter facilities, local farmers, and state-level food businesses. It could also affect consumers who purchase locally-raised meat products. Federal meat inspectors and food safety agencies would have reduced oversight of these operations. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) in the 119th Congress. No companion bill in the Senate has been identified yet.
PREP Repeal Act
# PREP Repeal Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The PREP Repeal Act (HR 4388) proposes to repeal the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, a federal law that provides legal protections to manufacturers, distributors, and healthcare providers who develop and distribute medical countermeasures (like vaccines, treatments, and diagnostic tests) during public health emergencies. If passed, this bill would eliminate those liability protections, meaning companies and healthcare workers could potentially face lawsuits for harm allegedly caused by emergency medical products. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect pharmaceutical manufacturers, healthcare providers, and the federal government's ability to quickly mobilize medical resources during health crises. The PREP Act protections have been used extensively during emergencies like pandemics and bioterror threats. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. Without additional action, it remains unlikely to pass.
Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025
# Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025 would require the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive audit of America's gold reserves. Currently, the U.S. Treasury Department holds approximately 8,133 metric tons of gold (about 261 million ounces), making it one of the world's largest gold reserves. This bill would mandate an independent verification and detailed accounting of these reserves to confirm they actually exist and match official records. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve, which manage the nation's gold holdings. If passed, it would also provide transparency to Congress, policymakers, and the American public about the status of this significant national asset. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process. It was sponsored by Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and requires committee approval before it can advance further in Congress.
Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act
# Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act would require federal political candidates (those running for Congress, President, or other federal offices) who hold citizenship in countries other than the United States to publicly disclose this information. Candidates would need to list their non-U.S. citizenship when filing their official statement of candidacy—the standard form where candidates provide basic information and register their campaign committee. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would primarily affect any candidate for federal office who is a U.S. citizen but also holds citizenship in another country. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced the bill in the 119th Congress. The stated intent appears to be increasing transparency about candidates' citizenship ties, though the bill does not appear to prevent dual citizens from running for office—only require them to disclose it.
Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act
# Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** If passed, this bill would eliminate the Federal Reserve Board, the central banking system of the United States. The Federal Reserve currently manages monetary policy, regulates banks, and influences interest rates and inflation. Passing this legislation would fundamentally dismantle these institutions and their operations. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact virtually every American and the broader economy. The Federal Reserve influences borrowing costs for mortgages, car loans, and credit cards; manages the money supply; and oversees the banking system. Its elimination would affect financial stability, savings, investments, and economic policy nationwide. **Current Status and Key Context** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. As introduced, it does not specify what would replace the Federal Reserve's functions, such as banking regulation or monetary policy management. Similar proposals have been introduced in previous congressional sessions but have not gained significant traction in either chamber.
SAFER Voter Act
# SAFER Voter Act Summary **What It Would Do:** The SAFER Voter Act would allow licensed firearms dealers to conduct background checks on gun buyers without requiring federal approval for each individual transaction. Under current law, dealers must contact the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) for every gun sale. This bill would shift that authority to licensed dealers themselves. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact firearms retailers, gun purchasers, and federal law enforcement agencies that currently oversee background checks. It could also affect background check accuracy and speed, potentially influencing how quickly people can purchase firearms. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. As a Republican-sponsored proposal, it reflects a perspective focused on streamlining the purchasing process, though it remains in the early legislative stage with no indication of when or whether it will advance for a vote. --- *Note: For the most current information on this bill's status, visit Congress.gov.*
To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of Federal funds for disinformation research grants, and for other purposes.
# HR 1233 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 1233 would prohibit the federal government from spending money on certain research grants related to disinformation and cybersecurity. Specifically, it would eliminate funding for: (1) general disinformation research grants, (2) the National Science Foundation's "Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace" grant program, and (3) a specific track of the NSF's "Convergence Accelerator" program focused on preventing misinformation and manipulation of communications systems. These programs currently support academic and research institutions studying topics like cybersecurity, privacy protection, cryptography, and ways to identify and counter false information online. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect universities, research institutions, and scientists who receive federal funding to study cybersecurity, misinformation, and information integrity. It would also impact the National Science Foundation, which administers these grant programs. Indirectly, it could affect the general public by reducing research into tools and techniques designed to protect communications systems and combat disinformation. **Current Status** HR 1233 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky).
Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act
# Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill proposes to eliminate federal income taxes for senior citizens (though the specific age threshold isn't detailed in the available information). If passed, eligible seniors would no longer owe federal income tax, potentially reducing their tax burden in retirement. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be senior citizens who currently pay federal income taxes. The bill could also affect federal tax revenue and potentially impact government programs funded through income taxes. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 1040) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Committee review is typically where bills are analyzed for feasibility, costs, and potential impacts before moving forward. *Note: Limited details about specific provisions are available from the information provided. For a complete understanding of age eligibility requirements, implementation details, or estimated costs, you would need to review the full bill text through Congress.gov.*
To terminate the Department of Education.
# HR 899: Department of Education Termination Bill **What the Bill Would Do** HR 899 would shut down the federal Department of Education by December 31, 2026. If passed, this would eliminate the federal agency responsible for administering student aid programs, special education services, civil rights enforcement in schools, and various education policies and grants that currently support schools nationwide. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would impact students, teachers, school districts, and families across the country. Key areas affected would include federal student loan programs (like Pell Grants and federal loans), special education requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Title I funding for low-income schools, and civil rights protections in education. The bill provides a two-year timeline for the agency's closure, though it doesn't detail how education functions would be handled afterward—whether they'd be transferred to other agencies, eliminated entirely, or managed differently. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. The bill reflects a longstanding debate about the federal government's role in education, with supporters arguing for more local control and reduced federal spending, while opponents contend that the Department ensures equitable access to education and protects student rights nationwide.
National Constitutional Carry Act
# National Constitutional Carry Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The National Constitutional Carry Act would allow Americans to carry concealed firearms in public without obtaining a permit from their state or local government. Currently, most states require people to apply for and receive a concealed carry permit before carrying a hidden gun in public. If passed, this bill would make concealed carry legal nationwide without such permits, though it would still allow states to issue optional permits if they choose. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This legislation would impact gun owners, law enforcement agencies, and state governments. The bill removes the federal requirement for permits while preserving states' ability to maintain their own permit systems if they wish. It would affect how firearms regulations work across all 50 states, since concealed carry laws currently vary significantly by state—some already allow permit-free carry, while others have stricter requirements. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2025
# Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Government Accountability Office (GAO)—an independent agency that audits federal spending—to conduct a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve and its regional banks within 12 months. Currently, the GAO has limited ability to examine certain Federal Reserve activities. This bill would expand those auditing powers to include the Fed's international financial dealings, decisions about monetary policy (like interest rate changes), transactions made by the Federal Open Market Committee, and internal communications among Fed officials about these matters. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects the Federal Reserve System and would increase Congressional oversight of its operations. It would allow more detailed scrutiny of how the Fed makes decisions and conducts its business. Supporters argue this would increase transparency and accountability in how the nation's central bank operates. Critics might contend that such audits could interfere with the Fed's independence in managing monetary policy. The bill's scope includes all Federal Reserve banks across the country. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 24) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and is in the 119th Congress.