Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]
Republican · NY · 33 bills sponsored
Seneca Nation Law Enforcement Efficiency Act
# Seneca Nation Law Enforcement Efficiency Act (HR 7065) - Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill aims to improve law enforcement operations for the Seneca Nation, a Native American tribe based primarily in western New York. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on streamlining police operations, increasing funding, improving coordination between tribal and state/federal law enforcement, or clarifying legal authorities for tribal police departments. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly impacts the Seneca Nation and its law enforcement agencies. It could also affect residents living on or near Seneca Nation territories in New York, as well as state and federal law enforcement agencies that work alongside tribal police. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7065 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY), whose district includes Seneca Nation territory. Without more detailed legislative text available, the specific provisions and potential impacts cannot be fully outlined. Anyone interested in the bill's details should consult Congress.gov for the full text once it becomes available.
To prohibit a person from making a misleading recycled content claim in advertising, marketing, selling, or offering for sale a product to a consumer, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: HR 7502 - Recycled Content Claims Bill **What the Bill Does** HR 7502 would prohibit companies from making false or misleading claims about recycled content when advertising or selling products to consumers. In plain terms, if a product is labeled as "recycled" or contains "recycled materials," the bill would require those claims to be accurate. This is designed to prevent "greenwashing"—when companies exaggerate their environmental practices to attract environmentally conscious shoppers. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would primarily affect manufacturers, retailers, and advertisers who market products to consumers. It applies broadly to any product claims about recycled content made in advertising, marketing, or sales. The legislation would give regulators tools to enforce standards against misleading environmental claims, though the specific penalties and enforcement mechanisms aren't detailed in the available summary. Consumers would benefit by having more reliable information when making purchasing decisions based on environmental considerations. **Current Status** HR 7502 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) in the 119th Congress. As a bill still in early legislative stages, its passage is uncertain and may depend on further committee discussion and amendments.
Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act
# Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act (HR 7366) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to create more uniform federal rules for dietary supplements across the country. Currently, dietary supplements are regulated by the FDA but individual states can impose their own additional requirements, creating a patchwork of different rules. This bill would establish a single set of national standards, preventing states from setting their own stricter regulations on how supplements are labeled, manufactured, or sold. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact dietary supplement manufacturers and distributors who currently must comply with varying state regulations. Consumers could see more standardized product labeling and potentially easier access to supplements across state lines. Health professionals and state governments would also be affected, as states would lose authority to enforce their own supplement regulations. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken since its introduction in the 119th Congress.
Energy Choice Act
# Energy Choice Act Summary **What It Would Do:** The Energy Choice Act (HR 3699) would give states greater authority to decide their own energy policies rather than having the federal government impose uniform energy requirements nationwide. The bill targets federal regulations affecting how electricity is generated and distributed, as well as policies governing oil and gas development. In practical terms, it would allow states more flexibility to choose their own mix of energy sources—whether that's renewable energy like solar and wind, fossil fuels like coal and natural gas, or nuclear power. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact utility companies, energy producers, state governments, and ultimately consumers who pay electricity bills. States with different energy resources and preferences (such as coal-heavy states versus those pursuing renewable energy goals) would be affected differently. Environmental advocates and fossil fuel industries may have competing interests in how this plays out. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Nicholas Langworthy, a Republican from New York.
Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act
# Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act (HR 4690) Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would require federal government buildings to meet specific energy efficiency and performance standards. The legislation focuses on improving how the federal government maintains, operates, and upgrades its own facilities—such as office buildings, courthouses, and other government properties. It establishes measurement and accountability systems to track whether these buildings are meeting energy conservation goals. **Who It Affects** The bill directly impacts federal agencies responsible for managing government buildings and facilities. Indirectly, it affects taxpayers (through potential changes in federal building operating costs) and could influence construction and energy efficiency standards in the private sector if federal requirements set new benchmarks. **Current Status & Key Points** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not been passed. While specific provisions aren't detailed in this summary, the bill emphasizes performance measurement and energy efficiency—suggesting it aims to reduce federal building energy consumption and associated costs. No partisan opposition is evident from the bill's basic information, as energy efficiency in government operations is generally a bipartisan concern, though details about implementation costs and specific requirements could become points of debate.
Federal Workforce Early Separation Incentives Act
# Federal Workforce Early Separation Incentives Act (HR 7256) – Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would create financial incentives for federal government employees to voluntarily leave their jobs early. Rather than laying off workers or waiting for them to retire at normal ages, the government would offer buyout packages to encourage employees to resign. This is a tool sometimes used to reduce government workforce size without forced terminations. **Who It Affects** The bill would impact federal employees across government agencies. It could also indirectly affect government operations and the public, depending on which agencies lose staff and how services are maintained with fewer workers. **Current Status** HR 7256 is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been voted on by the full House. No details about specific incentive amounts or eligibility requirements are publicly available at this stage. The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) in the 119th Congress.
To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project.
# HR 6037: West Valley Demonstration Project Reauthorization **What the Bill Does** This bill would extend the authorization for the West Valley Demonstration Project, a long-standing federal initiative. The West Valley site in New York has been involved in nuclear fuel reprocessing and radioactive waste management. By reauthorizing the project, Congress would continue federal funding and oversight for ongoing cleanup and management activities at this location. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the Department of Energy, which oversees the project, and residents of western New York near the West Valley site. It may also impact workers employed in project operations and the surrounding communities that depend on or are influenced by the facility's activities. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6037 remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY), whose district includes the West Valley area. --- *Note: Specific funding amounts, timeline details, and exact scope of activities aren't provided in the bill summary available. For more detailed information, you can review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
CTE Student Mental Health and Wellness Act
# CTE Student Mental Health and Wellness Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The CTE Student Mental Health and Wellness Act (HR 5553) would establish or enhance mental health and wellness support programs for students enrolled in Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs. CTE programs prepare high school and post-secondary students for specific trades and careers like electrician work, nursing, automotive repair, or welding. The bill aims to address mental health challenges that this student population may face. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This legislation would primarily affect CTE students, educators, and the schools and institutions offering these programs. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills of this type typically include funding mechanisms, program requirements, counseling resources, or partnerships with mental health providers. The focus on CTE students recognizes that this population may have distinct mental health needs compared to traditional academic-track students. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5553 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. For a bill to become law, it must pass both the House and Senate and receive the President's signature.
Northern Border Security Enhancement and Review Act
# Northern Border Security Enhancement and Review Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 5517 is a proposed law focused on improving security measures at the U.S.-Canada border. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, its title indicates it would involve enhancing security operations and conducting a review of current practices along the northern border. This would likely address topics such as border patrol resources, technology, personnel, or enforcement procedures. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect border communities in northern states, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agencies, and potentially Canadian relations regarding cross-border security cooperation. It could also impact businesses and travelers who cross the Canada-U.S. border. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5517 remains in committee review and has not been brought to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY-23) from New York, a state with significant Canadian border territory. To become law, it would need to pass through committee review, secure House approval, pass the Senate, and receive the President's signature.
Integrated Cross-Border Law Enforcement Operations Expansion Act
# Integrated Cross-Border Law Enforcement Operations Expansion Act (HR 5518) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would expand law enforcement operations that cross U.S. borders, likely giving federal agencies greater authority and resources to coordinate with international partners on criminal investigations and enforcement activities. While the full details aren't publicly specified in available summaries, such legislation typically aims to streamline how U.S. agencies work with their counterparts in Canada, Mexico, and other countries to address crimes like drug trafficking, human smuggling, and organized crime. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect federal law enforcement agencies (such as the FBI, DEA, and Customs and Border Protection), state and local police departments that participate in cross-border operations, and potentially international law enforcement agencies. It could also indirectly impact border communities and individuals involved in cases with international dimensions. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5518 remains in committee review and has not yet advanced for a full congressional vote. The bill was introduced by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) in the 119th Congress. Without the detailed legislative text being widely available, the specific provisions and scope of expanded authority remain unclear.
State Energy Accountability Act
# State Energy Accountability Act Summary The State Energy Accountability Act would require states that have adopted certain renewable energy policies—such as requirements to use solar or wind power—to study and publicly report on how these policies affect electricity rates and grid reliability. The bill specifically asks states to evaluate whether their energy policies help or hinder the grid's ability to meet demand during emergencies, peak usage times, and extreme weather events. The bill affects states with renewable energy mandates and would impact utility companies, consumers, and policymakers in those states. Key provisions include mandatory evaluations of energy policy impacts and public disclosure of findings, which supporters argue would provide transparency about renewable energy costs and benefits, while critics might view it as questioning the viability of clean energy transitions. Currently, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House.
Safeguarding Americans From Extremist Risk (SAFER) at the Border Act
# SAFER at the Border Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safeguarding Americans From Extremist Risk (SAFER) at the Border Act (HR 4234) is designed to address concerns about potential security threats at U.S. borders. While the bill's specific provisions are not detailed in the available information, the title suggests it would implement measures to screen or identify individuals with potential extremist affiliations or intentions who attempt to enter the United States. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect people seeking to enter the United States at the border, as well as U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents and other officials responsible for border security and screening procedures. It could also impact immigration and national security policy more broadly. **Current Status:** HR 4234 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) in the 119th Congress. Without access to the bill's full text or detailed provisions, the specific enforcement mechanisms, definitions, or resource allocations cannot be described. *Note: For complete details on this bill's specific provisions, the full legislative text would need to be reviewed on Congress.gov.*
Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act
# Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act (HR 3881) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY), aims to restrict what are commonly called "sanctuary city" policies—local laws that limit cooperation between city and state law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities. The bill would penalize jurisdictions that don't comply with federal immigration enforcement requests, though specific penalty mechanisms aren't detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact local governments and police departments in cities and states that have adopted sanctuary policies, as well as immigrants and residents in those jurisdictions. Supporters argue it strengthens federal immigration enforcement; critics contend it could strain local law enforcement resources and community trust with immigrant populations. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3881 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill reflects ongoing debate between the federal government and local jurisdictions over immigration enforcement priorities and the role of local police in federal immigration matters.
Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2025
# Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently being considered in the House of Representatives. While specific details about its provisions aren't available in the information provided, the bill's title suggests it would focus on expanding infrastructure—likely addressing roads, bridges, public transit, utilities, or similar public works projects across the United States. **Current Status and Who It Affects** The bill is still in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy, a Republican from New York's 23rd district. If passed, the bill would affect American taxpayers (who would fund infrastructure projects), construction companies, workers in the infrastructure sector, and communities that receive new or improved public facilities. **Next Steps** To understand the bill's specific proposals, funding amounts, and which infrastructure projects it prioritizes, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or similar official sources.
Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act
# Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 2783, called the Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act, is designed to speed up the process for approving and building infrastructure projects. While the bill's specific details aren't publicly detailed in available sources, bills with this title typically aim to reduce bureaucratic delays and streamline permitting processes for projects like roads, bridges, airports, and utilities. The goal would be to get these projects approved and constructed faster than under current procedures. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect infrastructure developers, construction companies, and federal agencies responsible for environmental reviews and project approvals. State and local governments that depend on federal infrastructure funding could also be impacted. Ultimately, the general public would be affected through potential changes in how quickly infrastructure improvements reach their communities. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a bill sponsored by a Republican member, its passage would depend on securing support from both parties in the House.
Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025
# Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025 (HR 2560) **What It Does:** This bill would reauthorize and extend the Lifespan Respite Care program, a federal initiative that provides temporary relief care for family caregivers. "Respite care" means short-term assistance that allows primary caregivers to take a break while a trained substitute cares for their loved one. The program helps families caring for individuals with disabilities, chronic illnesses, or age-related conditions. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily benefits family caregivers—people who care for aging parents, disabled children, or relatives with serious health conditions—by giving them access to temporary care services. It also affects states and organizations that receive federal funding to operate respite care programs. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 2560 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY). Without additional information about specific funding amounts or program changes, this appears to be a straightforward reauthorization to continue existing federal support for respite care services.
Safer Skies Act of 2025
# Safer Skies Act of 2025 Summary The Safer Skies Act of 2025 (HR 2353) is a bill currently being reviewed in congressional committee. Unfortunately, the bill summary information available is limited—the specific details about what the bill would do, which provisions it contains, and who it would affect are not provided in the legislative record. To understand the bill's actual contents, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or similar legislative tracking websites. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Many bills in committee never advance further in the legislative process. If you're interested in learning what this bill specifically proposes, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (congress.gov) directly, where you can read the full text, view any amendments, and track its progress through the legislative process.
Innovative FEED Act of 2025
# Innovative FEED Act of 2025 – Plain Language Summary The Innovative FEED Act would create new federal rules for how certain animal feed additives are classified and labeled. Specifically, it focuses on "zootechnical" substances—additives put into animal food or water that affect only the animal's digestive system. These substances are intended to improve digestion byproducts, reduce harmful bacteria in food, or change the animal's gut bacteria. The bill would require these products to be clearly labeled with a warning that they cannot be used to treat or prevent diseases in animals. This bill primarily affects the animal agriculture industry, feed manufacturers, and farmers who use these products. It does **not** apply to veterinary medicines, hormones, or treatments for animal diseases—those remain in a separate regulatory category. The legislation aims to streamline how the FDA regulates these digestive-health feed additives, distinguishing them from therapeutic drugs while ensuring clear labeling so farmers know what they can and cannot use these products for. **Current Status:** The bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To require an institution of higher education that becomes aware that a student having nonimmigrant status under subparagraph (F)(i) or (J) of section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)) has endorsed or supported a foreign terrorist organization to notify the SEVIS, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 2204 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require U.S. colleges and universities to report to federal authorities (specifically SEVIS, the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System) if they learn that a foreign student has endorsed or supported a foreign terrorist organization. The bill targets students on F-1 visas (international students) and J-1 visas (exchange visitors). **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects international students attending U.S. colleges and universities, as well as the institutions themselves, which would bear the responsibility of monitoring and reporting. It could also impact campus free speech and student privacy considerations. **Current Status:** HR 2204 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill has not yet advanced further in the legislative process.
Lakes Before Turbines Act
# Lakes Before Turbines Act (HR 2133) – Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Lakes Before Turbines Act would restrict wind energy development in the Great Lakes region. While the full legislative text isn't available from the summary provided, the bill's title indicates it prioritizes protecting the Great Lakes over allowing turbine (wind turbine) construction in or around these water bodies. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy, a Republican from New York. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact: - Wind energy companies planning Great Lakes projects - Great Lakes states and communities considering renewable energy development - Residents living near the Great Lakes - The broader renewable energy and climate initiatives that rely on wind power **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No further action has been taken at this time. *Note: Specific provisions and the exact scope of restrictions are not detailed in this summary. For complete information about what the bill would prohibit or allow, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov.*
Medicaid Provider Screening Accountability Act
# Medicaid Provider Screening Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require state Medicaid programs to screen healthcare providers more thoroughly when they apply to join or renew their participation in Medicaid. Specifically, states would need to check federal databases to see if providers were previously kicked out of Medicare, other state Medicaid programs, or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). After providers are approved, states would have to continue checking these databases at least once a month to catch any new terminations. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects healthcare providers (doctors, hospitals, clinics, etc.) who want to participate in Medicaid, as well as state Medicaid programs that administer these benefits. Indirectly, it could affect Medicaid patients by potentially reducing fraud and preventing problematic providers from treating them. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Wireless Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act of 2025
# Wireless Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does:** This bill would streamline the process for updating wireless communication towers and base stations. Currently, states and local governments can take as long as they want to approve requests to modify existing towers—such as adding new equipment or replacing old antennas. This bill would require them to make a decision within 60 days. If they don't respond within that timeframe, the request would automatically be approved. The bill applies to "eligible" modifications, which are changes that don't significantly alter the tower's physical size or appearance. **Who It Affects:** Wireless companies and telecommunications providers seeking to upgrade their infrastructure would benefit from faster approval timelines. States and local governments would have new deadlines to meet when reviewing these requests. Citizens and communities where these towers exist may see faster network upgrades, though the bill requires local governments to explain any denials in writing. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Make American Flags in America Act of 2025
# Make American Flags in America Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require that all American flags displayed in federal government buildings and facilities be manufactured in the United States. Currently, federal buildings can purchase flags from foreign manufacturers. The legislation aims to ensure that flags used by the government are made domestically. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would directly impact federal agencies and their flag procurement practices. It would likely require the government to conduct a study on flag manufacturing capacity within the U.S. and establish oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance with American-made requirements. The legislation falls under "Buy American" policies, which prioritize domestic products for government purchases. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (HR 1421) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY) in the 119th Congress.
Rural Telehealth and Education Enhancement Act of 2025
# Rural Telehealth and Education Enhancement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would extend federal funding for a Department of Agriculture program that helps rural areas access telemedicine (remote medical care) and distance learning through 2030. The program provides grants to rural communities to purchase technology, equipment, and training needed for residents to receive medical care and education remotely. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily benefits rural communities, patients, students, and healthcare providers in areas with limited access to hospitals, specialists, and schools. It also affects the Department of Agriculture, which administers the grant program. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee review (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy, a Republican from New York.