Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]
Republican · FL · 24 bills sponsored
To limit liability for certain entities storing child sexual abuse material for law enforcement agencies, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 7834 **What the Bill Would Do:** HR 7834 would protect companies and organizations from legal liability when they store child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on behalf of law enforcement agencies. Currently, these entities could potentially face lawsuits even when they're assisting law enforcement in investigating crimes. The bill aims to remove this legal risk so that storage providers are willing to help police without fear of being sued. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects technology companies, data storage providers, and other businesses that might work with law enforcement to preserve evidence of child exploitation. It would also indirectly affect victims of child abuse, as the goal is to make it easier for law enforcement to store and investigate CSAM evidence. The bill does not change the rights of crime victims to sue perpetrators. **Current Status:** HR 7834 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. It was sponsored by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL). The bill remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
James T. Woods Act
# James T. Woods Act (HR 6719) - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill creates new federal crimes targeting "sextortion"—a form of online extortion where predators threaten to share sexually explicit images of minors (or people they believe are minors) to force victims into creating or sending explicit material. The bill makes it illegal to engage in sextortion, as well as to attempt or plan such crimes. Currently, federal law doesn't specifically address this tactic, so this bill fills that gap by establishing dedicated criminal offenses. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily aims to protect minors from online sexual exploitation. It also affects law enforcement, who would gain clearer legal tools to investigate and prosecute sextortion cases. Anyone who engages in this form of extortion would face federal criminal penalties if the bill becomes law. **Current Status** The bill has passed the U.S. House of Representatives and is named after James T. Woods, likely a victim or related to a case involving this crime. It now awaits consideration in the Senate.
Energy Emergency Leadership Act
# Energy Emergency Leadership Act (HR 7258) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Energy Emergency Leadership Act would establish new leadership and coordination structures within the Department of Energy to handle energy-related emergencies. Based on its subject matter, the bill appears to aim at improving how the federal government responds to energy crises—whether caused by natural disasters, infrastructure failures, cyberattacks, or other disruptions—by clarifying roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority during emergencies. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill would primarily affect the Department of Energy and federal officials responsible for energy security, as well as state and local governments that depend on federal coordination during energy emergencies. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in available information, the bill's subjects indicate it addresses cybersecurity protections for energy infrastructure, energy storage and supply management, emergency planning procedures, and coordination between federal, state, and tribal governments during crises. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 7258 remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. Like most bills, it would need to pass out of committee, receive House approval, pass the Senate, and be signed by the President before becoming law.
CLEAR Act
# CLEAR Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 7140 (the CLEAR Act) from the 119th Congress in my training data, so I cannot provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 7140" to see the full text, summary, and current status - **Representative Lee's official website** - Often includes sponsor statements explaining their legislation - **Relevant committee websites** - Since it's in committee, the committee's website may have hearing information or summaries If you have access to the bill text or want to share those details, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language for a general audience.
Renewed Hope Act
# Renewed Hope Act (HR 6998) Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed legislative text or provisions of the Renewed Hope Act (HR 6998) in my current information. While I can confirm it's a House bill sponsored by Rep. Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, I cannot accurately describe what it would do, who it affects, or its specific provisions without access to the bill's full text. To get accurate, plain-language information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - The official government source with full bill text and summaries - **Ballotpedia** - Often provides neutral bill summaries - **Your representative's official website** - May include their position and explanation I want to avoid speculating about the bill's content, as that wouldn't be factual. Would you like to share the bill's text or key provisions, or would you like help finding it on one of these official sources?
Promoting a Safe Internet for Minors Act
# Promoting a Safe Internet for Minors Act – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to improve online safety for children and teenagers by establishing new requirements for social media platforms and internet companies. The legislation would likely require these companies to implement stronger protections against harmful content, better age verification systems, and enhanced parental controls. It would also create oversight mechanisms, possibly involving Congress and federal agencies, to ensure companies are actually protecting minors from dangers like cyberbullying, predatory behavior, and inappropriate content. **Who It Affects & Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect social media companies and web platforms that minors use, such as TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube, which would need to comply with new safety standards. It also impacts parents and guardians by potentially giving them stronger tools to monitor their children's online activity. The legislation emphasizes public-private cooperation, meaning both government agencies and tech companies would work together on child protection efforts. Educational components suggest the bill may also include guidance or resources for schools and families about internet safety. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is where bills typically undergo detailed review and potential amendments before advancing further.
Safer Supervision Act of 2025
# Safer Supervision Act of 2025 - Summary Unfortunately, I cannot provide a detailed summary of this bill because the specific provisions are not included in the information you've provided. The data shows only that HR 5883 is a bill sponsored by Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL) called the "Safer Supervision Act of 2025," but the actual text and details about what it would do are not available. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 5883" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill's summary section, which typically explains its main provisions - Looking at the sponsor's official website for their explanation of the bill's purpose If you can share the bill's text or summary details, I'd be happy to break it down into plain language for you.
FLIGHT Act
# Summary of the FLIGHT Act (HR 5087) I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary because the bill information available shows only basic metadata—the bill number, sponsor, and committee status—without access to the actual text or legislative summary. To give you accurate information about what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the full bill text. **What I can tell you:** The FLIGHT Act is a House bill (HR 5087) sponsored by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the current 119th Congress. It is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. **For accurate details,** I'd recommend checking Congress.gov or the House Clerk's website, where you can read the full bill text and any summaries provided by the Congressional Research Service. If you can share the bill's actual text or a legislative summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language.
Enduring Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act
# Enduring Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Enduring Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act would strengthen criminal penalties and procedures related to human trafficking offenses. While the full legislative text would need to be reviewed for specific provisions, bills with this title typically focus on increasing sentences for trafficking crimes, expanding victim protections, and improving law enforcement tools to prosecute traffickers. The bill appears designed to create stricter consequences for those involved in trafficking people, particularly crimes involving children and sexual exploitation. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily affect human trafficking victims (who would receive enhanced protections and support), traffickers and smugglers (who would face harsher penalties), law enforcement agencies, and the courts. It could also impact federal prison systems through longer sentences and court resources through new procedural requirements. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4929 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. To learn the specific provisions being proposed, you would need to review the bill's text directly on Congress.gov, as the summary provided focuses on the bill's general subject areas rather than detailed policy changes.
Cutting LNG Bunkering Red Tape Act
# Cutting LNG Bunkering Red Tape Act - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to streamline the regulatory process for liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering—the practice of using LNG as fuel for ships. Currently, the bill would reduce bureaucratic requirements and speed up approvals for companies that want to supply LNG fuel to vessels. The legislation focuses on cutting regulatory "red tape" to make it easier and faster for the maritime industry to adopt LNG as an alternative fuel source. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects shipping companies, LNG fuel suppliers, and ports that handle maritime operations. It could also impact environmental and safety regulators who currently oversee these activities. Indirectly, it may influence fuel costs and emissions from commercial shipping. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4760 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. Limited details about specific provisions are publicly available at this stage.
Supporting Military Voters Act
# Supporting Military Voters Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Supporting Military Voters Act (HR 4567) is a proposal aimed at improving voting access for active-duty military members and their families. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on simplifying voter registration processes, improving mail-in voting procedures, or extending deadlines for military personnel serving overseas who may have difficulty voting in standard timeframes. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact active-duty service members, military families stationed abroad, and military-connected voters. It could also affect election officials and states responsible for processing military voter registrations and ballots. **Current Status:** As of the latest information available, HR 4567 is in Committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL). Without additional details on the bill's specific provisions, it's difficult to assess its likelihood of passage or any potential opposition. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions, you may want to check Congress.gov or your representative's office.*
CBP SPACE Act
# CBP SPACE Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a detailed summary of this bill because the information available is limited. The legislative database shows only that HR 4336 (the "CBP SPACE Act") is currently in committee in the 119th Congress and sponsored by Representative Laurel Lee (R-FL), but specific details about what the bill actually does aren't included in the data provided. To get accurate information about this bill's provisions, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 4336" for the full text - Checking the bill's summary section, which explains its purpose - Reading the sponsor's official statement for their intended goals This will give you the most current and complete picture of what the bill proposes, who it affects, and its chances of passage.
To clarify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016, to appropriately limit the application of defenses based on the passage of time and other non-merits defenses to claims under that Act.
# HR 4235 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016 to make it easier for people to recover artwork stolen by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. Specifically, it would prevent museums and current art owners from using certain legal defenses—particularly arguments based on how much time has passed since the theft—to block claims from rightful owners or their heirs seeking to recover stolen artwork. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects Holocaust victims and their descendants seeking to reclaim family artwork taken during WWII, as well as museums and art collectors currently holding these pieces. It could require institutions to return valuable artwork even if they've possessed it for decades, potentially without compensation. **Current Status:** HR 4235 was introduced by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced to a floor vote as of this summary.
SALONS Stories Act
# SALONS Stories Act Summary I'm unable to provide a complete summary of this bill because the detailed information available is limited. The bill (HR 4040) is currently in committee and hasn't advanced to a stage where full legislative details are publicly documented. The acronym "SALONS" and specific provisions aren't specified in the standard congressional records provided. To get accurate information about what this bill would do, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - the official legislative tracking website, where you can search "HR 4040" for the full text, sponsor statements, and any committee reports - **Rep. Laurel Lee's official website** - which may include a summary of the bill's purpose and goals If you can share the bill's full title or its stated purpose, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
RIPPLE Act of 2025
# RIPPLE Act of 2025 Summary I don't have access to the detailed text or provisions of HR 3882 (the RIPPLE Act of 2025), so I cannot provide you with a complete and accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov** - Search for "HR 3882" to view the full bill text, summary, and status - **Representative Lee's official website** - Often includes explanations of sponsored legislation - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or reputable news outlets covering the bill If you can share the bill text or a summary from Congress.gov, I'd be happy to help translate it into plain language for you.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade Commission relating to ''Negative Option Rule''.
# Plain Language Summary: HJRES 100 **What This Bill Does:** This bill would reject a new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rule about "negative option" services—subscriptions and automatic renewal programs where customers are automatically charged unless they cancel. If passed, the rule would be disapproved and prevented from going into effect. This uses a congressional process called the Congressional Review Act that allows Congress to overturn recent federal regulations. **Who It Affects and Key Details:** The rule being targeted would make it easier for consumers to cancel subscriptions and would require companies to get clear consent before charging customers. Rejecting it would keep these stricter protections from taking effect, meaning subscription services (streaming, fitness apps, memberships, etc.) would continue operating under less stringent rules. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't been voted on yet. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. While the Republican-controlled House could potentially pass it, the bill's ultimate fate would depend on Senate action and whether enough votes exist to override any presidential veto.
Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act
# Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act (HR 3353) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to strengthen federal efforts to prevent contraband—unauthorized items like drugs, weapons, and phones—from entering prisons and jails. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, it's named after Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati, suggesting it may be motivated by an incident involving prison security or contraband smuggling. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact the federal prison system, including correctional officers, inmates, and facilities operated by the Bureau of Prisons. It could also affect other stakeholders involved in prison security and law enforcement. **Current Status** HR 3353 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL). As with all bills in committee, it would need to advance through the legislative process before it could become law. *For more detailed information about the bill's specific provisions, you can search for it on Congress.gov.*
Fresh Start Act of 2025
# Fresh Start Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Fresh Start Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently being reviewed in Congress. Based on its title, the bill appears designed to provide individuals with a "fresh start," though the specific details of what provisions it contains are not publicly available in the information provided. Without access to the bill's full text, it's difficult to describe its exact impacts and mechanisms. **Current Status and Next Steps** HR 3111 was introduced by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. Before it can become law, it would need to pass through committee review, receive a full House vote, pass the Senate, and be signed by the President. **What You Should Know** To get a complete picture of this bill's provisions, effects, and who it would impact, you would need to review the full bill text, typically available through Congress.gov. This would show you specific details about eligibility, implementation, and which groups or industries are affected.
Canadian Snowbird Act
# Canadian Snowbird Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would create a new visa category allowing Canadian citizens aged 50 and older to stay in the United States for extended periods—up to 240 days per year. The program is designed specifically for "snowbirds," Canadians who spend winters in the U.S. To qualify, applicants must own or rent a U.S. residence, maintain a home in Canada, pass security checks, and meet income/benefit requirements. Their spouses could join them under the same rules (though spouses wouldn't need their own U.S. property). **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily targets Canadian retirees and older adults who want to spend extended time in warm U.S. locations during winter months. It would also benefit U.S. communities in warm-weather states (particularly Florida, where the sponsor is from) that rely on seasonal Canadian visitors for tourism and economic activity. U.S. employers are largely unaffected, as Canadians under this program couldn't work in the U.S. except for Canadian-based employers. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on or passed. It remains in the early legislative stage.
Stopping the Theft and Destruction of Broadband Act of 2025
# Stopping the Theft and Destruction of Broadband Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to address the theft and vandalism of broadband infrastructure. While specific details aren't publicly available yet (the bill summary shows minimal information), the title suggests it would create legal protections or penalties related to stealing broadband equipment or intentionally damaging broadband networks and infrastructure. **Who It Affects:** The bill would likely impact broadband service providers, telecommunications companies, and potentially individuals who steal or damage broadband equipment. It may also affect communities that rely on broadband internet access, as reducing infrastructure theft and destruction could help maintain service reliability. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 2784, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote. The sponsor is Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL). At this early stage, the bill's specific provisions and any detailed legislative language are not yet available for public review. *Note: For complete details on the bill's specific provisions, you can search for HR 2784 on Congress.gov.*
DHS Intelligence and Analysis Oversight and Transparency Act
# DHS Intelligence and Analysis Oversight and Transparency Act (HR 1711) **What the Bill Does** This bill would increase oversight and transparency of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) intelligence and analysis operations. The legislation focuses on how DHS collects, uses, and manages intelligence information, with particular attention to accounting practices and information technology systems. It aims to ensure Congress has better visibility into DHS intelligence activities and spending. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects the DHS and its intelligence divisions, along with congressional committees responsible for overseeing homeland security operations. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, the focus areas suggest it would require better documentation of DHS intelligence spending, improved auditing procedures, and likely new reporting requirements to Congress about intelligence activities and technology systems used for data collection and analysis. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It was sponsored by Representative Laurel M. Lee, a Republican from Florida.
OPIOIDS Act
# OPIOIDS Act Summary The OPIOIDS Act (HR 1257) is a bill currently under review in the House of Representatives that aims to address the opioid crisis through various federal initiatives. While the full legislative text would provide specific details, based on its subject categories, the bill appears to combine technology solutions, law enforcement coordination, and employment/training programs to combat opioid abuse and trafficking. It likely involves cooperation between federal, state, and local governments to implement these strategies. The bill would affect multiple groups, including law enforcement agencies, state and local governments, individuals struggling with opioid addiction, and potentially technology companies involved in implementation. Key areas of focus appear to include developing better data-sharing systems between jurisdictions, funding for enforcement efforts, and creating job training or employment programs—possibly for people in recovery or in communities heavily impacted by the opioid epidemic. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Further legislative action would be needed for it to advance toward passage.
Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act
# Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act would require the Department of Justice to create national standards aimed at preventing, reducing, and punishing sexual harassment and sexual assault committed by incarcerated people against prison staff and Bureau of Prisons employees. The bill focuses on protecting correctional officers and other prison workers from sexual misconduct by inmates. **Who It Affects** This bill directly affects Bureau of Prisons employees and correctional officers working in federal prisons. Indirectly, it could impact incarcerated individuals subject to any new rules or disciplinary measures that result from the standards, as well as the Department of Justice, which would be responsible for developing and implementing these standards. **Current Status** The bill (HR 868) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. No action has been taken beyond the initial introduction stage.
READY Accounts Act
# READY Accounts Act Summary **What It Does:** The READY Accounts Act would create a new type of savings account specifically for homeowners to save money for disaster preparation and recovery. People could contribute up to $4,500 per year (adjusted for inflation) to these accounts and deduct these contributions from their taxes. The money could then be withdrawn tax-free to pay for home improvements that reduce damage from natural disasters—such as installing impact-resistant windows and doors, reinforcing roofs, or elevating homes—or to recover from disaster damage to their primary residence. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects homeowners, particularly those living in areas prone to natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, or severe storms. It could help middle-class families afford protective upgrades that might otherwise be expensive and financially out of reach. Insurance companies and disaster mitigation professionals who certify eligible improvements would also be involved in the process. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Representative Laurel M. Lee (R-FL), a Republican from Florida, where hurricanes and natural disasters are common concerns.