Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]
Republican · FL · 20 bills sponsored
Nutrition First Act of 2026
# Nutrition First Act of 2026 (HR 7580) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Nutrition First Act of 2026 is a proposed law currently being reviewed in Congress. Based on its title, the bill appears to focus on nutrition-related policies, though specific details about its exact provisions are not publicly available in the basic bill information provided. The bill was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida) in the 119th Congress. **Current Status:** The bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. This early stage suggests it is still under review and development. **Note:** To provide accurate details about who would be affected and what specific provisions the bill contains, the full text of HR 7580 would need to be consulted through Congress.gov or similar official legislative resources. This summary is limited by the basic information available, and interested readers should review the complete bill text for comprehensive details about its actual provisions and potential impact.
To prohibit users who are under age 13 from accessing social media platforms, to prohibit the use of personalized recommendation systems on individuals under age 17, and limit the use of social media in schools.
# Summary of HR 7433 **What the Bill Would Do** If passed, HR 7433 would establish age restrictions and limitations on social media use among minors. Specifically, it would prohibit children under 13 from accessing social media platforms entirely, prevent personalized recommendation algorithms from being used for users under 17, and restrict social media use within school settings. The bill aims to address concerns about screen time, addictive design features, and online safety for young people. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact children and teenagers under age 17, social media companies, and schools. Parents and guardians would gain new tools to enforce age restrictions, while social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube would need to modify their services and algorithms to comply with the new rules. **Current Status** HR 7433 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida. No further action has been taken at this time.
To prohibit users who are under age 13 from accessing social media platforms, to prohibit the use of personalized recommendation systems on individuals under age 17, and limit the use of social media in schools.
# HR 7399 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7399 aims to restrict young people's access to and use of social media in three main ways: it would ban children under 13 from using social media platforms entirely, prevent companies from using personalized recommendation algorithms (the systems that suggest content) for users under 17, and limit social media use within schools. The bill essentially creates age-based restrictions on social media access and the targeting features that platforms use to keep users engaged. **Who It Affects** This legislation would primarily impact children and teens under 17, their parents and guardians, social media companies (like Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram), and schools. Social media platforms would need to implement age verification systems to enforce the restrictions. Schools would also face new requirements regarding social media use on campus. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. Many similar bills addressing social media and youth safety have been proposed in recent years but have faced challenges related to implementation, free speech concerns, and enforcement.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3135 1st Avenue North in St. Petersburg, Florida, as the "Poul Hornsleth Post Office".
# HR 7313 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 7313 is a straightforward bill that would rename a specific U.S. Postal Service building in St. Petersburg, Florida. If passed, the post office located at 3135 1st Avenue North would officially be called the "Poul Hornsleth Post Office" instead of its current name. The bill doesn't change how the post office operates or affect its services—it's purely a naming designation to honor someone named Poul Hornsleth. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill primarily affects the St. Petersburg postal facility and residents who use that location, though the practical impact is minimal since it's only a name change. The bill was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Bills like this one are common in Congress, as lawmakers often sponsor measures to commemorate local figures or community members.
Stopping Wall Street From Competing With Main Street Homebuyers Act
# Stopping Wall Street From Competing With Main Street Homebuyers Act (HR 7221) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to restrict large investment firms and Wall Street companies from purchasing single-family homes. The legislation is designed to reduce competition between institutional investors and individual homebuyers, with the goal of making homes more affordable and accessible for ordinary Americans trying to buy their first home or relocate. **Who It Affects** The bill would directly impact large investment corporations and private equity firms that currently buy residential properties as investments. It would also affect everyday homebuyers by potentially reducing competition for available homes, which could help lower purchase prices. Renters living in homes owned by these investment firms could also be affected depending on the bill's specific restrictions. **Current Status** HR 7221 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. Since it remains in committee, it has not advanced to a vote and the specific details of what restrictions it would impose have not been finalized.
To exempt Members of the House of Representatives and Senators of the Senate from certain Federal passenger and baggage screening, and for other purposes.
# HR 6754 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would exempt members of Congress (both House Representatives and Senators) from certain security screening procedures that apply to other air travelers, such as passenger and baggage screening at airports. The exact screening procedures to be exempted are not detailed in the available information. **Who It Affects:** The bill would directly affect the 535 voting members of Congress. It could also have indirect implications for airport security procedures and other travelers, though the full scope depends on how the exemptions are defined. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. It was introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) in the 119th Congress. No additional details about committee hearings, amendments, or a timeline for potential votes are available. **Note:** This bill's practical implications and support or opposition would likely depend on how lawmakers and the public view security protocols for government officials versus general aviation safety practices.
To repeal a restriction on assistance to Azerbaijan.
# Summary of HR 6534 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 6534 would remove a federal restriction that currently limits U.S. military or financial assistance to Azerbaijan. The bill doesn't specify which restrictions it targets, but it reflects an effort to expand American support to this country in the South Caucasus region. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect Azerbaijan's access to U.S. aid and military cooperation. It could indirectly impact the region, as Azerbaijan borders Armenia and Georgia—areas where U.S. foreign policy has strategic interests. Domestically, it could affect U.S. foreign aid budgets and military cooperation programs. **Current Status** HR 6534 was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No additional details about key provisions are publicly available at this stage. The bill would require passage in both the House and Senate, plus presidential signature, to become law.
No Surrogacy for Sex Offenders Act
# No Surrogacy for Sex Offenders Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prohibit individuals convicted of certain sex offenses from entering into surrogacy arrangements. If passed, it would create legal restrictions preventing people with sex crime convictions from becoming intended parents through surrogacy (where another person carries and gives birth to a child on their behalf). The bill aims to protect children by preventing individuals with these criminal histories from using surrogacy to have biological or genetically-related children. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The legislation would primarily affect people with sex offense convictions and fertility clinics or surrogacy agencies involved in arranging these agreements. The bill would likely require background checks or conviction record reviews before approving surrogacy arrangements, though specific details on which offenses would trigger the ban aren't provided in the summary. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6208 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and has not advanced further in the legislative process.
Protect Our Farmers and Families Act of 2025
# Protect Our Farmers and Families Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** Unfortunately, the specific details of this bill are not publicly available in the information provided. The bill was introduced as HR 5196 in the 119th Congress by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), but the subjects and key provisions have not been disclosed in the legislative record accessed here. To understand what this bill specifically proposes, you would need to consult Congress.gov or other official legislative databases where the full text is posted. **Current Status:** As of the information available, the bill remains "In Committee," meaning it has been referred to the relevant House committee for review and discussion but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. **Next Steps:** If you're interested in learning more about this bill's specific provisions, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for HR 5196, where you can read the complete bill text, view any amendments, and track its progress through Congress.
Extending the emergency determined by the President on August 11, 2025 in the Executive Order titled "Declaring a crime emergency in the District of Columbia".
# Summary of HJRES 114 **What This Bill Does:** This bill would extend an emergency declaration for Washington, D.C. that was initially issued by the President on August 11, 2025, specifically focused on addressing crime in the nation's capital. Emergency declarations typically grant the federal government broader powers and resources to respond to a crisis situation. **Who It Affects:** This measure would primarily affect Washington, D.C. residents and federal agencies responsible for law enforcement and emergency response in the district. It could also impact federal funding priorities and emergency powers available to address crime-related issues. **Current Status:** The bill (HJRES 114) is currently in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida. The bill has not advanced to a floor vote at this time.
Do or Dye Act
# Do or Dye Act (HR 3722) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's text, so I cannot provide an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. The bill information you've provided shows it's sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and is currently in committee, but the subjects listed as "N/A" suggests the detailed legislative information isn't available to me. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 3722" - Reviewing the bill's full text and summary - Checking your representative's website or the sponsor's official statements This will ensure you have current, factual details about what the legislation actually proposes. If you can share the bill's text or subject matter, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
American Privacy Restoration Act
# American Privacy Restoration Act (HR 3245) - Summary **What It Would Do:** The American Privacy Restoration Act aims to strengthen privacy protections for Americans, though specific details about its provisions aren't available in this summary. Based on the title, the bill would likely establish or expand federal rules governing how companies collect, use, and share personal data. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would potentially impact virtually all Americans who use the internet, social media, online services, or digital products. It would also affect tech companies, data brokers, and other businesses that collect or handle personal information. **Current Status:** The bill is sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and remains in the committee stage. To learn more about the specific provisions—such as what data would be protected, which companies would be regulated, or what penalties would apply—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or similar legislative tracking websites.
DOGE Codification Act of 2025
# DOGE Codification Act of 2025 (HR 3072) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill, sponsored by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), aims to codify the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) into law. DOGE was established as a temporary advisory body to identify waste and inefficiencies in federal government spending and operations. The bill would make this department permanent and give it official legal standing as a formal government entity. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies and departments, which would potentially be subject to DOGE's efficiency reviews and recommendations. It could also indirectly affect federal employees and the public by influencing how government operates and spends taxpayer money. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill has not yet been enacted into law. **Note:** The full details of specific provisions are not publicly available in the limited information provided, so this summary reflects the general purpose based on the bill's title and sponsor information.
CRUSADE Act
# CRUSADE Act Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a complete summary of this bill. While I can see it's a House bill (HR 2863) sponsored by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna from Florida's 13th district in the current Congress, the information provided doesn't include the bill's actual text or detailed provisions—only its basic filing information. **What I can tell you:** This is a bill currently in committee review, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. To give you an accurate, factual summary of what it would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the full legislative text. **To learn more**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 2863" for the full text and current status - Checking the bill's summary section for an official overview - Reading Rep. Luna's office statements about the bill's purpose Would you like help finding these resources, or do you have access to the bill text you could share?
SHRED Act of 2025
# SHRED Act of 2025 Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 2136 (the SHRED Act of 2025) in my training data. To provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need additional information about its actual text or provisions. **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee stage in the House of Representatives, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full chamber. It was sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 2136" - Checking the bill's official text and summary - Reading analyses from nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service This would ensure you get factual, current details about what the bill actually proposes rather than my attempting to summarize without reliable source material.
RULES Act
# RULES Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The RULES Act (Refugees Using Legal Entry Safely Act) would change asylum laws by requiring people seeking asylum to apply only at official U.S. ports of entry. Currently, people can apply for asylum from within the U.S. even if they entered illegally. The bill would prohibit this by making anyone apprehended in the country without legal status ineligible for asylum. It would also prevent the government from allowing asylum applicants to temporarily stay in the U.S. while their cases are being reviewed—a practice called "parole." **Key Impact and Restrictions** The bill would significantly restrict who can seek asylum. Most notably, it would make asylum applications a one-time process: if someone's application is denied, they could not reapply in the future, even if their circumstances changed dramatically. Under current law, applicants can reapply if conditions improve or new circumstances emerge. This would primarily affect immigrants and asylum seekers, making legal entry and advance application essential for anyone hoping to seek asylum protection. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in February 2025 and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to arrange for the carving of the figure of President Donald J. Trump on Mount Rushmore National Memorial.
# Bill Summary: HR 792 - Mount Rushmore Trump Carving Proposal **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the Secretary of the Interior to arrange for carving a figure of President Donald Trump onto Mount Rushmore National Memorial in South Dakota. Mount Rushmore currently features four presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln. If passed, Trump's likeness would be added to the monument. **Who It Affects & Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. This bill would primarily affect the National Park Service and Mount Rushmore's operations, as well as involve significant federal funding and resources for such a large-scale project. **Key Consideration:** It's worth noting that Mount Rushmore was carved between 1927 and 1941 and is considered a completed monument. The rock face has no remaining suitable space for additional carvings, which presents a practical challenge to implementing this proposal.
Justice for Rape Survivors Act
# Justice for Rape Survivors Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 30 years for federal sexual assault crimes. Specifically, it would apply to five categories of sexual offenses: forcing someone into sexual acts through physical force or threats, engaging in sexual acts with unconscious or intoxicated individuals, threatening someone into sexual acts, assaulting incapacitated persons, and sexual assault without consent. Currently, federal law allows judges discretion in sentencing for these crimes; this bill would remove that flexibility and require all convictions in these categories to result in at least a 30-year sentence. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would directly affect individuals convicted of federal sexual assault offenses and federal judges who handle these cases. It would also impact the federal prison system, which would need to accommodate longer sentences. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL).
Holding Child Predators Accountable Act
# Holding Child Predators Accountable Act (HR 394) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to strengthen criminal penalties and procedures related to child sexual abuse crimes and child sexual abuse material (CSAM). While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, bills with this title typically focus on increasing sentences, expanding definitions of relevant crimes, and enhancing prosecution tools for federal law enforcement targeting crimes against children. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect individuals convicted of child sexual abuse offenses and related crimes. It would also impact the federal court system, law enforcement agencies, and potentially the Bureau of Prisons, which would manage any changes to sentencing requirements. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 394 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). To understand the specific provisions and their details, you would need to review the full text of the bill on Congress.gov.
No Repeat Child Sex Offenders Act
# No Repeat Child Sex Offenders Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to increase criminal penalties for individuals convicted of sex offenses against children. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, based on the bill's title and subject areas, it would likely strengthen sentencing requirements or impose mandatory minimum sentences for child sex offenders, particularly those with prior convictions. The bill addresses crimes against children, human trafficking, and repeat offenders. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily targets individuals convicted of sex crimes against minors and those involved in trafficking children. It could also impact the criminal justice system more broadly through changes to sentencing procedures and potentially affect law enforcement and court operations. **Current Status:** HR 393 is currently in committee consideration in the 119th Congress, sponsored by Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). This means the bill has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. No further action has been taken at this time. *Note: For complete details on specific penalties and provisions, the full legislative text would need to be reviewed on Congress.gov.*