Lankford, James [R-OK]
Republican · OK · 48 bills sponsored
A bill to amend title III of the Social Security Act and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act to require identity verification procedures and data matching, to prevent unemployment fraud, and to strengthen work search requirements, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: S 4016 - Unemployment Fraud Prevention Bill **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to reduce fraud in the unemployment insurance system by requiring stricter identity verification procedures and data matching between agencies. It would also strengthen work search requirements, meaning unemployed workers would need to demonstrate more active job-seeking efforts to receive benefits. The bill modifies federal unemployment tax law and Social Security regulations to implement these changes. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects unemployed workers applying for or receiving unemployment benefits, as they would face new verification requirements and stricter work search obligations. It also impacts state unemployment agencies, which would need to implement the new identity verification and data-matching systems, and potentially employers who would interact with these updated systems. **Current Status** S 4016 is currently in committee consideration (as of the 119th Congress) and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma. No similar House companion bill information is provided, meaning it has not advanced to the floor for a vote and remains in the early legislative stage.
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, Oklahoma, as the "Oscar J. Upham Post Office".
# Summary of S 2283 **What the Bill Does** This bill renames the post office building located at 201 West Oklahoma Avenue in Guthrie, Oklahoma to the "Oscar J. Upham Post Office." The change is purely ceremonial and honors Oscar J. Upham by giving his name to the facility. It does not affect the postal service's operations or funding. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects the Guthrie, Oklahoma community and postal facility. It was sponsored by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) and has already been signed into law, meaning it is now in effect. The post office building will officially bear Oscar J. Upham's name going forward.
Conscience Protections for Medical Residents Act
# Conscience Protections for Medical Residents Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would protect medical residents (doctors in training) from being forced to perform or assist with medical procedures that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs. It would establish federal protections allowing residents to opt out of certain procedures without facing penalties like job loss, reduced training opportunities, or other professional consequences from their employers or training programs. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects medical residents in training programs, as well as the hospitals and medical institutions that oversee their education. It could also impact patients seeking certain medical services, depending on how broadly the protections are applied. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It has not advanced to become law. The bill was sponsored by Senator James Lankford (R-OK). *Note: This bill relates to ongoing debates about balancing healthcare worker rights with patient access to care, though the specific procedures it would cover are not detailed in the basic bill information available.*
A bill to direct the United States Postal Service to designate single, unique ZIP Codes for certain Oklahoma communities, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 3176 **What the Bill Does** This bill would require the U.S. Postal Service to assign unique ZIP codes to specific communities in Oklahoma. Currently, some of these communities likely share ZIP codes with other areas, which can complicate mail delivery, emergency services, and local identification. By giving each community its own distinct ZIP code, the bill aims to improve postal efficiency and community distinction. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects residents and businesses in certain Oklahoma communities that would receive new or separate ZIP codes. It also impacts the U.S. Postal Service, which would need to implement these changes. Indirectly, it may affect emergency services and government agencies that rely on accurate ZIP code designations. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Bills at this stage may be amended, passed, or remain inactive depending on committee priorities.
CIPZIP Act of 2025
# CIPZIP Act of 2025 - Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of the CIPZIP Act of 2025 (S. 3175) available in my knowledge base. While I can see it's a Senate bill sponsored by Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma that is currently in committee review, I cannot provide accurate details about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions without access to the full bill text or reliable summaries. **What I can tell you:** The bill is in its early stages (in committee) and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate, meaning it hasn't advanced to a floor vote. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 3175" for the official bill text - Checking Senator Lankford's official website for his statement on the bill's purpose - Looking at summaries from nonpartisan sources like Congress.gov or the Congressional Research Service I apologize I cannot provide more specific details. Would you like help finding where to locate this information?
Preserving Patient Access to Long-Term Care Pharmacies Act
# Preserving Patient Access to Long-Term Care Pharmacies Act (S 3159) ## What the Bill Would Do This bill aims to protect long-term care pharmacies—specialized pharmacies that serve nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and homebound patients requiring ongoing medication management. While the full details of specific provisions aren't publicly available yet, the bill's title suggests it would establish protections or requirements to ensure patients in long-term care settings maintain reliable access to pharmacy services. ## Who It Affects The legislation would primarily impact: - Patients in nursing homes and assisted living facilities - Homebound elderly and disabled individuals - Long-term care pharmacy businesses - Potentially insurance companies and Medicare/Medicaid programs that reimburse these services ## Current Status S 3159 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. As a recent introduction, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. For the most current details about specific provisions, you would need to check Congress.gov, as the summary above reflects limited publicly available information about this bill's exact requirements.
Guidance Clarity Act of 2025
# Guidance Clarity Act of 2025 — Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would require federal agencies to include a clear disclaimer on the first page of all guidance documents stating that the guidance is not legally binding and only explains existing laws or agency policies. Essentially, it would make agencies explicitly tell the public when they're offering guidance versus issuing actual rules or requirements. **Who it affects:** This applies to all federal agencies (like the EPA, IRS, or FDA) and the public they serve. Citizens and businesses would see these disclaimers whenever they read government guidance on regulations or procedures. The bill is intended to prevent confusion about what is a hard legal requirement versus what is just clarification. **Current status:** The bill (S. 81) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Republican Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Competitive Bidding Relief Act
# Competitive Bidding Relief Act (S 2951) - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would temporarily extend a higher Medicare payment rate for durable medical equipment—items like wheelchairs, oxygen machines, and hospital beds—in certain areas through the end of 2025. Specifically, it would keep a "blended rate" payment system in place that combines two different payment calculation methods, resulting in higher reimbursement for medical equipment suppliers in nonrural and noncontiguous areas (mainly urban regions and Alaska/Hawaii). **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects medical equipment suppliers, Medicare beneficiaries in urban areas, and healthcare providers who supply durable medical equipment to Medicare patients. The higher payment rates could influence equipment availability and costs for seniors and disabled individuals who rely on these items, as well as the companies that manufacture and distribute them. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator James Lankford (R-OK).
Equal Campus Access Act of 2025
# Equal Campus Access Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Equal Campus Access Act of 2025 would establish requirements to ensure equal access to college and university campuses. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically address issues related to campus facilities, programs, or services being equally available to all students regardless of certain characteristics or backgrounds. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact college and university students, institutions of higher education, and potentially campus organizations or student groups. The exact scope of who benefits depends on what specific access issues the bill addresses. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The detailed provisions and specific goals of the bill are not yet publicly available in standard legislative databases. *Note: For complete information about this bill's specific provisions and intent, you may want to check Congress.gov or the sponsor's official website, as this summary is limited by the basic information available.*
Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025
# Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025 – Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill aims to prevent government shutdowns by automatically keeping federal agencies funded at previous-year spending levels if Congress hasn't passed new budget bills by the start of a fiscal year. Instead of allowing agencies to close down when budgets aren't finalized, the bill would maintain current operations continuously until Congress completes the appropriations process. **Key provisions and who it affects:** The bill includes restrictions that would take effect when appropriations are delayed: it limits official travel for government employees, prevents Congress from taking recesses or breaks, and restricts lawmakers from considering non-budget legislation. These measures would apply across all federal agencies and programs that received funding in the prior year, affecting federal employees and the services the government provides to the public. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (S 2721 in the Senate), meaning it hasn't been debated or voted on by the full Congress yet. It was introduced by Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma.
Small Nonprofit Retirement Security Act of 2025
# Small Nonprofit Retirement Security Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Would Do** This bill aims to make it easier for small nonprofit organizations to offer retirement plans to their employees. Currently, many small nonprofits struggle to provide retirement benefits because the process is complicated and expensive. The legislation would likely streamline rules and reduce costs associated with establishing and maintaining retirement savings plans for nonprofit staff. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily targets small nonprofit organizations and their employees. This includes charities, educational institutions, religious organizations, and other tax-exempt groups that typically have limited budgets for employee benefits. Workers at these organizations would potentially gain better access to retirement savings options. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The specific provisions of the bill have not been publicly detailed in available summaries, so the exact mechanisms for reducing barriers to retirement plan adoption remain unclear.
Border Patrol Supervisors Retention Act
# Border Patrol Supervisors Retention Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Border Patrol Supervisors Retention Act is designed to help the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency keep experienced supervisory staff employed. While specific details aren't available in the summary provided, bills with this title typically aim to improve job conditions, benefits, or compensation for Border Patrol supervisors to reduce employee turnover and retain experienced personnel who manage frontline border security operations. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect U.S. Border Patrol supervisors—managers who oversee agents and operations at the southern and northern borders. It could indirectly impact the broader Border Patrol workforce and border communities by influencing the effectiveness of border management operations. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 2249) remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the Senate. It requires committee review and approval before it can be debated by the full chamber. The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) in the 119th Congress. *Note: The full legislative text would provide specific details about proposed policy changes and implementation mechanisms.*
Historic Greenwood District—Black Wall Street National Monument Establishment Act
# Historic Greenwood District—Black Wall Street National Monument Establishment Act **What the Bill Does** This bill would establish a national monument in Tulsa, Oklahoma, to honor the Historic Greenwood District, historically known as "Black Wall Street." The legislation would create a formal federal designation for this historically significant African American neighborhood that was destroyed during the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. If passed, the monument would recognize and preserve the area's historical importance and promote public education about this tragic event and the thriving Black-owned businesses and community that existed there before the violence. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects residents and property owners in the Greenwood District area of Tulsa, as well as visitors and educational institutions. The legislation includes provisions for land transfers, federal oversight through advisory bodies, and intergovernmental coordination between federal, state, and local authorities. It addresses how the monument will be managed and how the land will be used going forward while balancing historic preservation with property rights concerns. **Current Status** As of now, the bill has passed the Senate (S 1051) and awaits consideration in the House of Representatives. It has bipartisan sponsorship, with Republican Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma as the primary sponsor, indicating broad agreement on honoring this important but often overlooked chapter of American history.
A bill to require the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security to complete a threat assessment regarding unmanned aircraft systems at or near the international borders of the United States, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 1908 - Unmanned Aircraft Systems Threat Assessment **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require a senior Defense Department official—the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security—to conduct and complete a formal threat assessment of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) operating at or near the U.S. international borders. The assessment would evaluate the risks these systems pose to national security and border areas. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects the Department of Defense and national security operations at U.S. borders. While specific deadlines or detailed requirements aren't outlined in the available information, the bill's purpose suggests it aims to provide policymakers with better intelligence about drone activity along the Canadian and Mexican borders. This could influence future border security policies and defense priorities. **Current Status** As of now, S 1908 is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-Oklahoma) and remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Conscience Protection Act of 2025
# Conscience Protection Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Conscience Protection Act of 2025 would provide legal protections for individuals and organizations who object to certain actions based on their religious or moral beliefs. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, conscience protection bills typically aim to shield people from legal penalties, job loss, or forced participation in activities they find morally or religiously objectionable. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** This bill would potentially affect healthcare workers, employers, employees, and religious organizations. It was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced to a hearing or vote stage, so its exact provisions and potential impact remain to be seen. **Note:** Without access to the bill's full text, this summary reflects only general information about the bill's title and sponsorship. For specific details about what actions would be protected and how broad these protections would be, you would need to review the complete legislative language on Congress.gov or similar official sources.
Regulatory Accountability Act
# Regulatory Accountability Act (S 1708) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Regulatory Accountability Act would make it harder for federal agencies to create new regulations without extensive review and public input. It requires agencies to conduct detailed cost-benefit analyses, consider alternative approaches, and provide more opportunities for the public and Congress to review proposed rules before they take effect. The bill aims to ensure that regulations are necessary and that their benefits outweigh their costs. **Who It Affects:** This bill would impact businesses (particularly small companies that find compliance costly), workers, consumers, and government agencies. It could affect virtually every regulated industry—from environmental protection and workplace safety to financial services and healthcare—by changing how quickly and easily new regulations can be implemented. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) in the 119th Congress.
Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act
# Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish new accountability measures for federal disaster assistance programs administered online. While the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill's title suggests it aims to improve transparency, oversight, and potentially fraud prevention in how federal agencies distribute disaster aid through digital platforms. This would likely apply to programs like FEMA assistance, small business disaster loans, and other federal relief funding. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact federal agencies distributing disaster assistance, individuals and businesses applying for disaster aid, and taxpayers funding these programs. State and local governments coordinating disaster relief could also be affected depending on the specific requirements. **Current Status:** As of now, S. 1619 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't advanced to a full floor vote in the Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator James Lankford (R-OK). Without the detailed legislative text, the exact provisions—such as what accountability measures would be required or how they would be implemented—aren't yet clear. *Note: For more specific information about the bill's provisions, you can review the full text on Congress.gov.*
Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulations Act of 2025
# Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulations Act of 2025 (S 1584) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to increase transparency and accountability in how federal agencies develop and implement energy regulations. While specific details aren't available in the provided information, bills with this title typically require agencies to disclose more information about their regulatory decision-making processes, potentially including cost-benefit analyses, scientific data, and stakeholder input used to justify new energy rules. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact federal agencies that oversee energy policy (such as the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency), energy companies operating under federal regulations, and potentially consumers who rely on energy services. **Current Status:** S 1584 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) in the 119th Congress. *Note: The summary above is based on limited information. To understand the specific provisions and implications of this bill, you would need to review the full legislative text, available on Congress.gov.*
Safeguarding Charity Act
# Safeguarding Charity Act (S 1428) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Safeguarding Charity Act would establish new requirements and oversight measures for charitable organizations operating in the United States. While specific provisions are not detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to strengthen accountability, transparency, and security measures within the charitable sector to prevent fraud, misuse of funds, or other problems. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact charitable organizations and nonprofits, as well as donors who contribute to these organizations. It could also affect the agencies responsible for regulating charities. **Current Status:** As of now, S 1428 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. To understand the specific provisions being proposed, you would need to review the bill's full text on Congress.gov, as the summary provided does not include those details.
POWER Act of 2025
# POWER Act of 2025 Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of S. 1429 (the POWER Act of 2025) in my current knowledge base. While I can confirm it's a bill sponsored by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) that's currently in committee during the 119th Congress, I cannot provide accurate details about what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions without access to the full bill text. **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 1429" to read the full bill text - Checking Senator Lankford's official website for a summary - Looking at news coverage from reliable sources covering congressional legislation I want to be honest rather than speculate about the bill's contents. If you have access to the full bill text or a summary you'd like me to explain further, I'm happy to help break it down into plain language.
Physician Led and Rural Access to Quality Care Act
# Physician Led and Rural Access to Quality Care Act (S 1390) **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to improve healthcare access in rural areas by giving physicians more control over healthcare decisions and practice standards. The legislation emphasizes physician-led care models rather than having insurance companies, government agencies, or non-physician administrators make clinical decisions. It appears designed to reduce regulatory burdens on doctors practicing in underserved rural communities. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily targets rural Americans who struggle to access healthcare services, rural physicians and healthcare providers, and potentially impacts insurance companies and healthcare administrators whose authority over medical decisions could be limited under the bill. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (S 1390, 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet advanced to a full Senate vote. Without more detailed legislative text available, the specific provisions and mechanisms for achieving its goals aren't fully clear. Like most bills at the committee stage, its chances of passage remain uncertain. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions, you may want to check Congress.gov or contact Senator Lankford's office.*
Free Speech Fairness Act
# Free Speech Fairness Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Free Speech Fairness Act (S 1205) aims to address how federal agencies handle free speech issues, though the specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information. Based on its title and sponsorship, the bill likely focuses on protecting or clarifying free speech rights in some context involving federal government operations or regulations. **Who It Affects** This bill would potentially impact federal agencies, individuals who interact with government, and possibly entities regulated by the federal government. The exact scope of affected parties depends on the bill's specific provisions. **Current Status** As of now, S 1205 remains "In Committee," meaning it has been referred to a Senate committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK). **Note:** The summary provided is limited because the full text and detailed provisions of the bill are not included in the source material. For a complete understanding of what this bill specifically proposes, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov or similar legislative databases.
No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2025
# No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would eliminate federal tax breaks currently available for the construction and renovation of sports stadiums. Specifically, it would end tax-exempt financing for stadium projects, meaning developers and sports teams could no longer use certain tax-advantaged bonds to fund these facilities. The legislation aims to prevent taxpayers from subsidizing private sports venues through the federal tax code. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact professional sports teams, stadium developers, and construction companies involved in sports venue projects. Indirectly, it affects taxpayers by potentially reducing federal revenue losses from these tax breaks, and sports fans in communities planning new stadiums. State and local governments that have used similar financing mechanisms would also be affected. **Current Status** As of now, the bill is in committee (S 1192 in the Senate), meaning it has been referred to the relevant congressional committee for review and debate but has not yet been brought to a full vote. The bill was introduced by Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma.
CAMPUS Act
# CAMPUS Act (S 1010) - Summary **What the bill does:** The CAMPUS Act is currently pending in the Senate and has not yet been fully detailed in public records. Based on the bill designation, it likely addresses campus-related policy issues, though the specific provisions are not available in the information provided. To understand exactly what this bill would do, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office. **Current status:** The bill is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant Senate committee for review and discussion but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. Bills at this stage may be debated, amended, or shelved depending on committee priorities. **Next steps:** If you want detailed information about this bill's specific provisions and who it affects, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching for "S 1010" to access the official text and any sponsor statements explaining its purpose.