Larson, John B. [D-CT-1]
Democrat · CT · 6 bills sponsored
Stop ICE Election Militarization Act
# Stop ICE Election Militarization Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would restrict Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting immigration enforcement operations near polling places during elections. The legislation aims to prevent ICE arrests and enforcement activities in areas where people vote, with the stated goal of ensuring citizens can cast ballots without fear of immigration enforcement interference. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect ICE operations and policies during election periods. It could impact undocumented immigrants who might otherwise face enforcement near voting locations, as well as election administrators and voters who might be concerned about enforcement activity affecting polling places. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a result, it has not been passed into law. The bill's progression through Congress would depend on committee review and any subsequent votes by House members. --- *Note: Limited details are available about specific provisions since the bill remains in committee stage.*
MAGA Act
# MAGA Act (HR 5802) Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5802 to provide an accurate summary of what this bill would do. While I can see it's sponsored by Rep. John Larson (D-CT) and is currently in committee, I cannot find reliable information about its actual provisions, goals, or who it would affect. To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend: - **Congress.gov**: Search for "HR 5802" to see the official bill text and summary - **Rep. Larson's website**: Often includes sponsor statements explaining legislative intent - **Nonpartisan sources**: Sites like Ballotpedia or legislative tracking services provide objective bill summaries If you can share more details about what the bill addresses, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
HOPE Act
# HOPE Act (HR 5379) Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a complete summary because the bill information provided is quite limited. You've shared the bill's basic details (sponsorship, status, and chamber), but the key details—such as the bill's actual title description, specific provisions, and affected populations—aren't included in what you've provided. **What I can tell you:** This is a House bill sponsored by Rep. John Larson (D-CT) that is currently in committee review, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The acronym "HOPE" typically suggests the bill addresses a positive outcome or opportunity, but without the actual bill text or summary, I can't specify what that is. **To get accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 5379" to read the full bill text and official summary - Checking the bill's sponsor's website for a description of their legislative intent - Looking at any press releases from the sponsoring office If you can provide more details about the bill's provisions, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language.
Protecting Americans’ Social Security Data Act
# Protecting Americans' Social Security Data Act – Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would restrict access to Social Security Administration databases containing personal information about Social Security beneficiaries. Specifically, it would prevent political appointees and special government employees from accessing systems that contain Social Security numbers, eligibility information, benefit payment records, or other personally identifiable information. The bill aims to protect sensitive data by limiting access to these systems to permanent civil service employees rather than political hires. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill primarily affects Social Security beneficiaries by adding a layer of protection for their personal data. It also impacts political appointees and special employees hired for temporary positions within the federal government. A major provision creates a legal right for individuals whose information is negligently accessed or disclosed in violation of these rules—meaning they could sue either the U.S. government (if the violator was a federal employee) or the violator directly (if they were not a federal employee). **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Representative John B. Larson, a Democrat from Connecticut, in the 119th Congress.
Keeping Our Field Offices Open Act
# Keeping Our Field Offices Open Act - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would prevent the Social Security Administration (SSA) from closing, consolidating, or reducing access to its local field offices, hearing offices, and service locations through at least January 2029. After that date, the SSA would need to submit a detailed report to Congress explaining why it wants to close or consolidate offices. The agency could only proceed 180 days after Congress receives this report. Going forward, the SSA would be required to give the public at least 120 days' notice before making any changes to office locations or services. **Who It Affects:** This primarily affects Social Security beneficiaries and people applying for Social Security benefits, particularly those who rely on in-person services at local offices. It also affects SSA employees and operations. The bill is sponsored by a Connecticut Democrat and is currently in committee. **Current Status:** The bill has been introduced but has not yet been voted on. It remains in committee, meaning it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and would need to advance through committee review and floor votes in both the House and Senate before becoming law.
Ending DOGE Conflicts Act
# Ending DOGE Conflicts Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 1321, called the "Ending DOGE Conflicts Act," addresses potential conflicts of interest related to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Based on its subject matter, the bill would likely establish ethics rules and oversight requirements for government employees and contractors involved in DOGE operations. The bill appears designed to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts of interest in government procurement and personnel decisions, particularly as DOGE evaluates federal spending and efficiency. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill primarily affects government employees working within or advising DOGE, federal contractors bidding on government work, and the federal agencies subject to DOGE's efficiency reviews. The bill's focus on government ethics, public contracts, and personnel management suggests it would create rules requiring disclosure of financial interests, recusal from decisions where conflicts exist, and possibly restrictions on federal employees working with entities they have financial ties to. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative John B. Larson (D-CT) and remains in committee as of now, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. It has not advanced to become law.