Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3]
Republican · UT · 29 bills sponsored
Geothermal Royalty Reform Act
# Geothermal Royalty Reform Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Geothermal Royalty Reform Act would change how the federal government collects payments (called "royalties") from companies that develop geothermal energy on public lands. Geothermal energy harnesses heat from within the Earth to generate electricity. Currently, the royalty rates and terms are set by existing law, and this bill would reform those terms—likely to make them more favorable to geothermal development, though the specific changes aren't detailed in the basic bill information available. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects geothermal energy companies operating on federal lands, the states where these projects operate (particularly Utah and western states), and the federal government's energy revenues. Indirectly, it could impact consumers who use geothermal-generated electricity and taxpayers, since changes to royalties affect public land revenues. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken to advance it further at this time.
Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025
# Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025 would establish new regulations related to forests, forestry, and tree management, with specific provisions connected to national symbols and licensing requirements. Based on its subjects, the bill appears to address how forests and timber operations are regulated, particularly in Utah, though specific details about the exact provisions aren't publicly available from the subject listing alone. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact Utah residents and businesses involved in forestry, timber management, and tree harvesting. It could also affect federal land management policies in the state and potentially anyone involved in outdoor recreation or conservation in affected areas. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a recently introduced bill in the 119th Congress, it is still in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: For more detailed information about specific provisions, you may want to visit Congress.gov, where the full text of HR 4684 would provide complete legislative language.*
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to extend the period of time during which the Secretary of the Interior is required to collect a fee for each new application for a permit to drill, and for other purposes.
# HR 7831 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7831 proposes to modify the Mineral Leasing Act by extending the timeframe during which the Secretary of the Interior must collect fees from companies applying for new drilling permits. In simpler terms, it would change the rules about when and how the federal government collects application fees from oil, gas, and mineral companies seeking to drill on public lands. The bill's full details about what "other purposes" it serves are not specified in the available information. **Who It Affects** This bill primarily affects oil, gas, and mineral extraction companies that apply for federal drilling permits, as well as the Department of the Interior, which manages public lands and collects these fees. Indirectly, it could affect taxpayers, since fees collected help fund federal operations, and potentially environmental and conservation programs that depend on these revenues. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to provide transparency and accountability in the administration of Federal child care funds expended by the States.
# Summary of HR 7794 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7794 proposes changes to how states handle federal money they receive for child care programs. Specifically, it aims to increase transparency and accountability in how states spend Child Care and Development Block Grant funds—federal dollars distributed to states to help fund child care services. The bill would amend the existing 1990 law that governs this program, though specific details about what new requirements or oversight measures it would impose are not provided in the available information. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect state governments that receive and distribute federal child care funding, as well as child care providers and families who rely on these subsidized services. States would likely face new reporting or compliance requirements, while families using subsidized child care could potentially benefit from improved oversight of how their programs are run and funded. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To improve the ability of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to carry out forest management activities that reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires, and for other purposes.
# HR 7578 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to give the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior greater authority and flexibility to manage forests with the goal of reducing catastrophic wildfires. The specific details of what management activities would be permitted or required are not provided in the available information, but the general intent is to streamline the agencies' ability to take action on federal forestlands. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect federal land management agencies and their operations on public forests. It could indirectly impact communities near federal forestlands that face wildfire risks, as well as various interests in forest use—including timber operations, conservation groups, and residents in wildfire-prone areas. **Current Status:** HR 7578 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a floor vote in the House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Mike Kennedy, a Republican from Utah. Without the full bill text, the specific provisions and any restrictions or requirements on forest management activities cannot be detailed further.
Streamline Transit Projects Act
# Streamline Transit Projects Act (HR 6491) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Streamline Transit Projects Act aims to speed up the process for approving and building public transportation projects across the United States. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on reducing bureaucratic delays and simplifying the environmental review and permitting requirements that transit projects must go through before construction can begin. **Who It Affects:** This bill would potentially affect cities and states planning bus, rail, or other public transit systems; federal agencies that oversee transportation approvals; construction companies; and commuters who use public transportation. By reducing approval timelines, the goal would be to get projects built faster and potentially at lower costs. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6491 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT). For more specific information about the bill's exact provisions, you can check Congress.gov or the bill's official text.
Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025
# Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025 - Summary **What the bill does:** The bill would establish a new Southwest Ecological Restoration Institute in Utah focused on wildfire prevention and forest health. Similar institutes already operate in Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado. The new institute would conduct research and promote "adaptive ecosystem management"—methods designed to reduce wildfire risk and restore forests and woodlands to healthier conditions. **Who it affects:** The bill would primarily benefit Utah residents and communities at risk from wildfires, as well as researchers and educators. It would likely involve universities or research institutions in Utah and could affect federal land management practices in the region. **Current status:** The bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now awaiting consideration in the Senate. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy, a Republican from Utah.
CCP IP Act
# CCP IP Act (HR 6447) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The CCP IP Act aims to protect American intellectual property (IP) from China's Communist Party (CCP). While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically seek to prevent theft or unauthorized use of U.S. patents, trademarks, and trade secrets by Chinese entities, and may strengthen enforcement mechanisms or create new penalties for IP violations connected to the Chinese government. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact American technology companies, manufacturers, and innovators concerned about protecting their inventions and business secrets from being copied or stolen. It could also affect U.S.-China trade relations and Chinese companies doing business in America. **Current Status:** HR 6447 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Further details about specific provisions would become available as the bill moves through the legislative process. *Note: Limited details are publicly available about this bill's specific provisions. For comprehensive information, consult Congress.gov.*
To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Highland City, Utah.
# Summary of HR 6399 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would require the U.S. Postal Service to assign Highland City, Utah its own unique ZIP Code. Currently, Highland City appears to share a ZIP Code with other nearby communities, and this legislation aims to give the city its own dedicated postal code for mail delivery and identification purposes. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects residents and businesses in Highland City, Utah, as well as the Postal Service. A separate ZIP Code could make it easier for mail delivery, local business operations, and municipal identification. It's a localized measure with minimal impact on the broader population. **Current Status:** HR 6399 was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No further action has been taken at this time.
GENESIS Act
# GENESIS Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed legislative text for HR 6360 (the GENESIS Act) in my current information, so I cannot provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill specifically proposes, who it would affect, or its key provisions. To get reliable information about this bill, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - The official legislative tracking website where you can read the full bill text, view amendments, and see committee actions - **Your representative's website** - They often provide summaries of bills they sponsor - **Nonpartisan sources** like the Congressional Research Service or Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in plain language.
Algorithm Accountability Act
# Algorithm Accountability Act (HR 6266) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Algorithm Accountability Act would require companies to be more transparent about and responsible for the algorithms they use in decision-making systems. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically aim to ensure that automated systems used by companies—such as those that determine hiring decisions, loan approvals, content recommendations, or content moderation—are tested for bias, properly documented, and explained to consumers and regulators. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact large technology companies and businesses that rely on automated decision-making systems. It would also affect consumers and employees who are subject to algorithmic decisions in areas like hiring, lending, insurance, and social media. Regulators would gain new oversight responsibilities. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6266 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. This is the early stage of the legislative process, and the bill may be modified, combined with other proposals, or may not advance further. *Note: Limited details are publicly available about this specific bill's exact provisions. For the most current and detailed information, visit Congress.gov.*
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 50 East 100 North in Moab, Utah, as the "2nd Lieutenant Mitchell Williams Post Office".
# HR 6059 Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would rename the Moab, Utah post office located at 50 East 100 North to the "2nd Lieutenant Mitchell Williams Post Office." The change is purely ceremonial and would not affect the post office's operations or services. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects residents and businesses in Moab, Utah, who use that post office facility. It honors 2nd Lieutenant Mitchell Williams, though the bill text does not provide details about who he was or why he is being commemorated. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT-3) in the 119th Congress. Naming post offices and other federal facilities after individuals is a common type of legislation that Congress regularly considers.
Upper Price River Watershed Project Act of 2025
# Upper Price River Watershed Project Act of 2025 (HR 5752) **What the Bill Does** This bill authorizes a watershed management project in Utah's Upper Price River area. The legislation focuses on land transfers and water storage infrastructure in the region. Based on its subject categories, the bill likely involves transferring public lands, updating water management systems, and preserving geographical and government records related to the watershed. The specific project details would be outlined in the full bill text. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects residents and water users in Utah, particularly in the Price River region. It may impact local agriculture, municipalities that rely on water resources, and landowners whose properties could be involved in land transfers. Federal agencies managing public lands and water resources would also be involved in implementing the project. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5752 is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT), whose district includes parts of Utah. For the most current status and to review specific provisions, you can visit Congress.gov.
Protect Consumers from Reallocation Costs Act of 2025
# Summary of HR 5636: Protect Consumers from Reallocation Costs Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to protect consumers from being charged fees or costs related to "reallocation"—though the bill summary doesn't specify the exact type of reallocation or industry involved. Based on the title, it would likely prevent businesses from passing certain costs onto consumers for reallocating resources, assets, or services. Without more detailed legislative text available, the precise mechanisms and restrictions aren't clear from the information provided. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact consumers who purchase goods or services from businesses that currently charge reallocation fees. It may also affect the businesses themselves if they're restricted from recovering certain costs from customers. **Current Status:** HR 5636 is currently in committee review, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT). *Note: This summary is limited by the availability of detailed bill text. For complete information about specific provisions and the bill's scope, you may want to review the full text on Congress.gov.*
Co-Location Energy Act
# Co-Location Energy Act (HR 5639) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Co-Location Energy Act aims to streamline regulations for facilities that combine multiple types of energy production at the same location—such as solar panels paired with battery storage, or wind turbines alongside natural gas plants. By reducing bureaucratic requirements for these "co-located" energy projects, the bill intends to make it easier and faster for companies to build and operate mixed-energy facilities on a single site. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit energy companies and developers looking to build these combined facilities, as well as potentially consumers who might see faster deployment of new energy infrastructure. It could also affect federal land managers and environmental agencies that currently oversee permitting for such projects. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5639 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT). *Note: Limited details are publicly available about specific provisions since the bill remains in early stages of the legislative process.*
No Work, No Pay Act of 2025
# No Work, No Pay Act of 2025 Summary **What the bill would do:** This legislation would stop paying members of Congress whenever a government shutdown occurs. A shutdown happens when Congress fails to pass the required funding bills to keep federal agencies operating, causing a lapse in government spending. The bill would apply this pay suspension starting with the next Congress (the 120th Congress, beginning in 2027). **Who it affects:** The primary impact would be on U.S. senators and representatives. Indirectly, it could affect federal employees and the public, since the bill's intent is to incentivize Congress to quickly resolve budget disputes and prevent shutdowns—which currently leave hundreds of thousands of federal workers without pay and disrupt government services. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Mike Kennedy, a Republican from Utah.
Equal Detention Standards Act of 2025
# Equal Detention Standards Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Equal Detention Standards Act of 2025 aims to establish uniform standards for how people are detained in the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, legislation with this title typically addresses conditions, procedures, and requirements across different types of detention facilities to ensure consistency in how detainees are treated. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact detention facilities (such as jails, immigration detention centers, and other holding facilities) and the people held in them. It could also affect federal, state, and local agencies responsible for operating these facilities, as they would need to comply with any new national standards established by the law. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5585 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT), a Republican from Utah's 3rd district. To become law, it would need to advance through committee review, pass both the House and Senate, and receive the President's signature. *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would require access to the full bill text.*
Personnel Oversight and Shift Tracking Act of 2025
# Personnel Oversight and Shift Tracking Act of 2025 (HR 3425) Summary **What the Bill Does:** The POST Act directs the Federal Protective Service (FPS)—the agency responsible for security at federal buildings—to establish stronger oversight systems for contract security personnel. Within one year, FPS must create performance testing protocols that include covert (secret) testing of security staff, quarterly reviews of test results to spot problems and improvements, mandatory retraining for anyone who fails a covert test, and updated training guidance reflecting lessons learned and new threats. The agency must then report to Congress on how well these improvements are working. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects contract security personnel who protect federal buildings and facilities, as well as the FPS agency overseeing them. Ultimately, it aims to improve security for federal employees and visitors to federal buildings. **Current Status:** The bill has already passed the House of Representatives and is sponsored by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT). It now awaits consideration in the Senate.
Ensuring Coast Guard Readiness Act
# Ensuring Coast Guard Readiness Act (HR 4952) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Ensuring Coast Guard Readiness Act aims to strengthen the operational capabilities and preparedness of the U.S. Coast Guard. While specific details about the bill's provisions are not available in the information provided, bills with this title typically focus on improving the Coast Guard's ability to respond to maritime emergencies, national security threats, and other coastal operations. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact the Coast Guard and its personnel, as well as Americans who depend on Coast Guard services for search and rescue operations, maritime security, and coastal protection. The bill could also affect defense budgets and taxpayers who fund these operations. **Current Status:** As of the last update, HR 4952 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT). For current details on specific provisions and the latest status, you can check Congress.gov, which maintains up-to-date information on all federal legislation.
Ensuring Naval Readiness Act
# Ensuring Naval Readiness Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Ensuring Naval Readiness Act (HR 4951) is a proposed law focused on strengthening the operational capability and preparedness of the U.S. Navy. While specific legislative details aren't available in the information provided, bills with this title typically address matters such as naval fleet maintenance, ship construction timelines, military personnel readiness, or funding for naval operations. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact the U.S. Navy and Department of Defense, along with defense contractors involved in ship building and naval equipment. It could also affect military service members and their families, as well as communities with naval bases and shipyards. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 4951 is in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT). To learn more about the specific provisions and exact details of what this bill proposes, you could check Congress.gov, which provides the full legislative text and any amendments that have been proposed.
Safe Prescribing Through Reporting Act of 2025
# Safe Prescribing Through Reporting Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Safe Prescribing Through Reporting Act of 2025 aims to improve prescription drug safety by enhancing reporting requirements for prescribers and healthcare providers. While specific details about the bill's exact provisions aren't available in the basic information provided, the title suggests it would establish or strengthen systems for reporting prescribing patterns, adverse drug events, or potential misuse of medications to relevant authorities. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact doctors, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals who prescribe or dispense medications. It could also affect patients by potentially leading to closer monitoring of prescription practices and the medications they receive. Pharmaceutical companies and healthcare systems might face new compliance requirements. **Current Status:** As of the information provided, HR 3595 is in the committee stage, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT). For the most current information on this bill's progress, status, or specific provisions, you can visit Congress.gov.
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Bonneville Shoreline Trail.
# Summary of HR 3451 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3451 would direct the U.S. Secretary of the Interior to study whether the Bonneville Shoreline Trail in Utah could be officially designated as part of the National Trails System—a network of scenic and historic trails managed by the federal government. The bill doesn't immediately establish the trail as part of the system; rather, it requires a feasibility study to determine whether designation is appropriate. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects Utah residents and outdoor enthusiasts who use or would use the Bonneville Shoreline Trail. If the study determines the trail is suitable for designation, it could lead to increased federal funding, maintenance, and protection for the trail. The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT) and addresses topics related to government studies, parks, recreation areas, and trails. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3451 remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This means it's still in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet advanced to a floor vote.
Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025
# Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would allow the Department of Energy to transfer ownership of the Moab uranium mill site to Grand County, Utah for free once cleanup of radioactive waste (uranium tailings) is complete. The site, located about three miles northwest of Moab, currently contains contaminated material from past uranium milling operations. The DOE would keep certain water rights needed to manage ongoing groundwater cleanup and maintain access to monitoring wells. Importantly, the bill requires that Grand County cannot sell or transfer the land to private companies or nonprofits—it must remain publicly owned. **Who It Affects:** This primarily affects residents and officials in Grand County, Utah, and the local Moab area. It also impacts the Department of Energy, which has been responsible for the expensive, long-term cleanup of this contaminated site. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Republican Representative Mike Kennedy of Utah's 3rd Congressional District.
Healthy Lunch for Healthy Kids Act
# Healthy Lunch for Healthy Kids Act Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill would change nutrition rules for school lunches served across the country's National School Lunch Program. If passed, it would ban ultraprocessed foods and several specific food additives from school meals, including certain food dyes (like yellow dyes 5 and 6) and chemical additives such as potassium bromate, propylparaben, titanium dioxide, and brominated vegetable oil. Schools participating in the federal lunch program would be required to meet these stricter standards. **Who it affects:** This legislation would impact millions of students who eat school lunches daily, as well as schools that serve meals through the National School Lunch Program. Schools would need to adjust their meal planning and food sourcing to comply with the new restrictions. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R-UT) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.