Kelly, Trent [R-MS-1]
Republican · MS · 8 bills sponsored
Community College Agriculture Advancement Act of 2025
# Community College Agriculture Advancement Act of 2025 (HR 5468) **What It Would Do** This bill aims to support agriculture education at community colleges across the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on increasing funding, improving curriculum, or expanding resources for agricultural training programs at two-year institutions. The legislation would help prepare students for careers in farming, agricultural technology, and related fields. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily benefit community college students interested in agriculture, community colleges offering agricultural programs, and rural communities that depend on agricultural workers. It could also indirectly support the agriculture industry by helping develop a skilled workforce. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but not yet voted on by the full House of Representatives. At this stage, it's under review by the relevant congressional committee and hasn't advanced to a floor vote.
Forest Conservation Easement Program Act of 2025
# Forest Conservation Easement Program Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would establish a new Forest Conservation Easement Program to help protect forests across the United States. While the specific details aren't available in the provided information, conservation easement programs typically work by providing financial incentives to private landowners who agree to permanently or long-term protect their forest land from development. The program would likely offer grants or tax benefits to encourage landowners to place easements on their property, restricting certain uses while allowing continued ownership. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect private forest landowners, conservation organizations, and communities interested in forest protection. It could also impact federal and state governments managing conservation budgets, as well as the general public by potentially preserving forests for environmental benefits, recreation, and wildlife habitat. **Current Status** The bill (HR 3476) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Trent Kelly (R-MS) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House. Additional details about specific provisions and program requirements would require access to the full bill text.
Pacific Ready Coast Guard Act
# Pacific Ready Coast Guard Act (HR 3397) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to enhance the U.S. Coast Guard's capabilities and readiness in the Pacific region. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on strengthening Coast Guard operations, infrastructure, personnel, or equipment in Pacific waters—an area of increasing strategic importance to the U.S. military and homeland security. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect the U.S. Coast Guard and potentially the communities and maritime industries in Pacific regions where the Coast Guard operates. It could impact military budgets, Coast Guard personnel assignments, and maritime security operations across the Pacific Ocean. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3397 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Trent Kelly (R-MS) in the 119th Congress. To get more specific details about the bill's exact provisions and intentions, you'd want to check Congress.gov or contact the sponsor's office directly.
SHIPS for America Act of 2025
# SHIPS for America Act of 2025 (HR 3151) **What the Bill Would Do** The SHIPS for America Act of 2025 appears to focus on shipping-related policies, though specific details about its provisions are limited in the available information. Based on the bill's title, it likely addresses maritime commerce, vessel operations, or domestic shipping industries. Without access to the bill's full text or summary, the exact provisions and their scope cannot be determined from this record alone. **Current Status and Impact** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Trent Kelly (R-MS). Until the bill moves forward in the legislative process or its detailed text becomes available, it's unclear who specifically would be affected—though any maritime-focused legislation typically impacts shipping companies, ports, maritime workers, and potentially consumers who rely on goods transported by ship. **Next Steps** To learn more about this bill's specific provisions and intended effects, interested parties would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov or await committee action that might reveal more details about the proposed changes to shipping policy.
Uzbekistan Normalized Trade Act
# Uzbekistan Normalized Trade Act Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would allow the President to grant permanent normal trade relations (NTR) status to Uzbekistan. Currently, Uzbekistan receives temporary trade status that must be renewed annually under an old Cold War-era law called the Jackson-Vanik amendment. That amendment was designed to pressure countries on human rights issues, particularly freedom of emigration. The bill would remove this requirement for Uzbekistan, making their favorable trade status permanent rather than temporary. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects U.S. businesses that trade with Uzbekistan and Uzbek exporters trying to sell goods to the U.S. market. Uzbekistan has had temporary access to normal trade relations since 1992, but this bill would make that permanent, likely making trade more predictable and easier for companies on both sides. The change would take effect once the President certifies that Uzbekistan has met certain conditions (the summary cuts off, but typically involves accession to trade agreements). **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase funding for the conservation stewardship program, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 622 **What It Does** This bill would increase federal funding for the Conservation Stewardship Program, a Department of Agriculture initiative that helps farmers and ranchers improve land conservation practices. The program provides money and expert guidance to agricultural producers who want to maintain or upgrade conservation efforts across their entire operations—such as soil health improvements, water conservation, or wildlife habitat protection. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily benefits farmers and ranchers who participate in conservation programs, as well as the agricultural industry more broadly. It could also indirectly affect rural communities that depend on agriculture and environmental groups interested in land conservation. **Current Status** HR 622 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. The bill was introduced by Representative Trent Kelly, a Republican from Mississippi. No specific funding amount or effective date has been provided in the available information.
Bureaucratic Labor Adjustment and Downsizing Effort Act
# Bureaucratic Labor Adjustment and Downsizing Effort Act (HR 1571) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill, introduced by Rep. Trent Kelly (R-MS), would modify how the federal government manages its workforce, specifically addressing government employee compensation, benefits, and staffing levels. Based on its title and subject areas, the legislation is designed to reduce the federal workforce or adjust how federal employees are paid and receive benefits, though the specific provisions are not detailed in this summary. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect federal government employees and the agencies that employ them. It could potentially impact millions of federal workers across different departments and agencies, as well as taxpayers who fund federal operations. **Current Status** As of this summary, HR 1571 remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. This means it is still in the early stages of the legislative process. For detailed information about specific provisions—such as which benefits might change, how many positions could be eliminated, or which agencies are targeted—you would need to review the bill's full text.
Congressional Access to Military Posts Act of 2025
# Congressional Access to Military Posts Act of 2025 (HR 1170) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would grant members of Congress and their staff easier access to military installations and posts. Currently, visiting military facilities typically requires advance security clearance, approval from military commanders, and adherence to strict protocols. The bill would streamline this process, allowing Congressional representatives and their employees to access these military properties more readily for official business. **Who It Affects** The legislation primarily affects members of Congress and their congressional staff, as well as the military and Department of Defense officials who manage access to military facilities. Constituents could indirectly benefit if increased Congressional access leads to better oversight of military installations or faster resolution of constituent issues related to those facilities. **Current Status** As of now, HR 1170 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Trent Kelly (R-MS) in the 119th Congress. No further action has been taken, so the bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee review stage.