Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]
Democrat · AZ · 26 bills sponsored
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a gasoline tax holiday.
# Gasoline Tax Holiday Bill Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would temporarily suspend the federal excise tax on gasoline, which is currently 18.4 cents per gallon. If passed, it would create a "tax holiday" that would lower gas prices at the pump for consumers by reducing the federal tax portion of the total price. The bill aims to provide short-term relief from higher fuel costs. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This legislation would directly benefit anyone who buys gasoline, potentially lowering their fuel expenses during the holiday period. It could also affect state budgets, since the federal gasoline tax typically funds road and infrastructure maintenance programs. The bill would need to address how those programs would be funded during the tax holiday period, though specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic summary available. **Current Status** The bill (S 4032) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) but remains in committee as of now. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Many similar tax holiday proposals have been introduced over the years but face challenges related to infrastructure funding concerns and debates about their effectiveness at lowering prices.
A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
# S 700 Summary: Pleasant Valley Ranger District Transfer to Gila County **What the Bill Does:** This bill would transfer approximately 233 acres of federal forest land in Arizona's Tonto National Forest to Gila County at no cost. The land, currently managed by the U.S. Forest Service, would be conveyed through a simple deed transfer without any payment required from the county. However, the county must cover all costs associated with the transfer process itself. **Key Conditions and Who It Affects:** The main requirement is that Gila County must use the land exclusively to serve and support veterans. If the county ever stops using the property for this purpose, ownership automatically reverts back to the federal government. The Forest Service would have no obligation to guarantee the condition of the land or make any repairs—the county accepts it "as-is." This primarily affects Gila County, Arizona, and veterans in that region who could potentially benefit from facilities or services built on the property. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Delivering for Rural Seniors Act of 2026
# Delivering for Rural Seniors Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Delivering for Rural Seniors Act of 2026 is designed to address healthcare and services challenges facing senior citizens in rural America. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on improving Medicare coverage, prescription drug access, healthcare provider availability, and support services in areas where seniors have fewer medical resources and longer travel distances to care. **Who It Affects:** This legislation primarily targets elderly Americans (typically age 65+) living in rural communities, as well as rural healthcare providers and local service organizations that serve these populations. The bill may also have implications for Medicare program costs and operations. **Current Status:** As of now, S 3718 is in committee, meaning it has been referred to the relevant Senate committee for review and discussion but has not yet been brought to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in the 119th Congress. No further action has been taken at this stage. *Note: Complete details on specific provisions are not available in the current information. For detailed provisions, you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov.*
Chiricahua National Park Act
# Chiricahua National Park Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would designate the Chiricahua area in southeastern Arizona as a national park. Currently, the region is managed as a national monument, which is a less formal designation. Converting it to national park status would provide stronger federal protection, potentially increase funding, and give the area greater visibility and resources for conservation and public access. The bill was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in the 119th Congress. **Who It Affects** The change would primarily affect visitors to the Chiricahua area, local Arizona communities near the site, conservation efforts in the region, and the National Park Service's management responsibilities. Local economies could benefit from increased tourism that typically follows national park designation, while environmental protections for the landscape and wildlife would be enhanced. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It has not advanced beyond the initial committee review stage.
Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2026
# Stop Excessive Force in Immigration Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This proposed legislation aims to establish limits on how much force federal immigration enforcement officers can use when detaining or apprehending people. The bill would create rules and oversight mechanisms to prevent what supporters view as excessive or unnecessary force during immigration enforcement operations. While the full details aren't available from this listing, such bills typically include provisions requiring de-escalation training, documenting use-of-force incidents, and creating accountability measures for violations. **Who It Affects:** The bill would directly impact Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers who conduct immigration enforcement operations. It would also affect immigrants and migrants who encounter these officers during arrests or deportation proceedings. The legislation could influence how immigration detention facilities operate and train their staff. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. It was sponsored by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ). Without the complete text available, specific provisions regarding training requirements, oversight bodies, or penalties cannot be detailed here, but interested parties can find the full bill text through Congress.gov for complete information.
Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2026
# Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would settle long-standing water rights disputes involving the Yavapai-Apache Nation, a Native American tribe in Arizona. While specific details aren't provided in the bill information available, water rights settlements for tribal nations typically involve securing a guaranteed water supply for the tribe's use, resolving legal conflicts with state and federal governments, and establishing how water will be allocated among different users in a region. **Who It Affects:** The primary beneficiary would be the Yavapai-Apache Nation and its members. The settlement would likely also affect Arizona water users, local communities, and state water management agencies, as these agreements often involve negotiating how water resources are divided among tribes, cities, farms, and other stakeholders in the Southwest. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 3617) is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the Senate but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) sponsored the legislation. Water rights settlements for tribal nations are often complex and can take years to negotiate, requiring agreement from multiple parties before being finalized into law.
A bill to require coordination of depot-level maintenance in multinational exercises conducted by the Air Force.
# Summary of S 3381 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the U.S. Air Force to coordinate depot-level maintenance activities during multinational military exercises. Depot-level maintenance refers to major repair and overhaul work on aircraft and equipment performed at specialized facilities. The bill essentially asks the Air Force to plan and synchronize this maintenance work when conducting joint training exercises with allied nations, rather than handling it independently. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily impacts the Air Force and its allied military partners who participate in joint exercises. It could also indirectly affect defense contractors and maintenance facilities that perform depot-level work. The coordination requirement may influence training schedules and maintenance timelines for participating nations. **Current Status** S 3381 was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No significant action has been taken on the bill at this time.
Chip EQUIP Act
# Chip EQUIP Act Summary Unfortunately, I don't have access to the detailed text or specifics of S 3301 (the Chip EQUIP Act) to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would actually do. While I can see it's a bill sponsored by Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and is currently in committee, I cannot reliably tell you: - What specific provisions it contains - Who it would directly affect - What problem it aims to solve - The exact policy changes it proposes **To get accurate information**, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "S 3301" to read the full bill text and summary - Checking the bill's status page for any committee reports or amendments - Looking at the sponsor's official website for their explanation of the bill's purpose This ensures you get factual, complete information rather than my incomplete summary.
Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2025
# Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does** The Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2025 would establish a federal program to clean up abandoned and inactive mines across the United States. The bill focuses on addressing environmental hazards left behind by older mining operations, particularly those on or near tribal lands. It would provide funding and authority for the EPA and other federal agencies to identify, assess, and remediate contaminated sites where mining companies are no longer responsible for cleanup. **Who It Affects** This legislation primarily affects communities living near abandoned mines, Native American tribes whose lands have been impacted by legacy mining, and mining companies. Taxpayers would fund the cleanup efforts through federal appropriations. The bill also involves multiple government agencies, including the EPA, the Department of Interior, and tribal governments. **Key Provisions** The bill authorizes federal funding for mine remediation work, establishes congressional oversight mechanisms, and emphasizes protecting tribal lands and water resources. It likely includes provisions for innovative cleanup technologies and coordination between federal and tribal authorities to determine priorities for cleanup projects. **Current Status** The bill has passed the Senate as of the latest update but has not yet been voted on by the House of Representatives, meaning it remains in the early-to-middle stages of the legislative process.
A bill to designate the Federal building located at 300 West Congress Street in Tucson, Arizona, as the "Raul M. Grijalva Federal Building".
# Summary of S 2319 **What the bill would do:** This bill would officially rename a federal building in Tucson, Arizona, located at 300 West Congress Street, to the "Raul M. Grijalva Federal Building." The change would be largely ceremonial, honoring Raul M. Grijalva through the naming of the existing government building. **Who it affects and key provisions:** The bill would primarily affect the Tucson community and federal employees who work in that building. There are no major policy changes or financial impacts associated with this designation—it is a tribute bill intended to recognize Grijalva's service to the area. (Grijalva is a longtime Democratic U.S. Representative from Arizona who has served in Congress for many years.) **Current status:** As of now, the bill (S 2319) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona.
ACES Act of 2025
# ACES Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary The ACES Act, signed into law in 2025, directs the Department of Veterans Affairs to partner with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study cancer rates among military veterans who worked as aircrew members on fixed-wing aircraft. The research will examine how common cancer is among this group of veterans and how many have died from cancer-related illnesses. This study aims to determine whether veterans' exposure to certain hazardous materials or conditions during their service—such as radiation, fuel, or other toxic substances—may have contributed to higher cancer rates. The bill primarily affects military veterans who served as aircrew members, along with the VA and the research institutions involved. By requiring this formal investigation, the legislation seeks to better understand potential health risks associated with specific military service roles and could eventually lead to expanded healthcare benefits or new support programs if a link between service and cancer is established. The study represents a congressional effort to ensure that veterans who may have been exposed to harmful substances receive appropriate medical attention and recognition of service-related health conditions.
MEDIC Careers Act of 2025
# MEDIC Careers Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The MEDIC Careers Act of 2025 is a proposed law currently being reviewed in the Senate. While specific details about its provisions aren't available in the summary provided, based on its title, the bill likely aims to support career development in medical fields. The bill is sponsored by Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. **Current Status:** This bill is still in the committee review stage, meaning it hasn't been debated or voted on by the full Senate yet. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and many bills at this stage don't advance further. **Note:** To provide more specific information about who would be affected and what exact provisions the bill contains, the full text of S 2673 would need to be reviewed. If you're interested in learning more details, the bill text is available on Congress.gov.
Ban Corporate PACs Act
# Ban Corporate PACs Act Summary **What It Would Do** This bill would prohibit corporations from creating and funding Political Action Committees (PACs). PACs are organizations that collect money from employees, shareholders, or members and use it to support political candidates and causes. If passed, companies would no longer be allowed to establish or maintain these political fundraising entities. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact corporations and their ability to participate in campaign financing. It would also affect employees and shareholders who currently have the option to contribute to corporate PACs, as well as political candidates who receive funding from these organizations. Notably, the bill does not address other types of PACs, such as those created by labor unions, trade associations, or individual advocacy groups. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced for a full vote in the Senate. As of now, it remains in the early stages of the legislative process with no clear timeline for when—or if—it might receive further consideration.
Health Care Fairness for Military Families Act of 2025
# Health Care Fairness for Military Families Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to improve health care benefits for military families. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, based on its title, the legislation would likely address fairness issues in how military dependents and families access or receive health care coverage, potentially including changes to TRICARE (the military health care system) or other military health benefits. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily impact active-duty military members, veterans, retirees, and their families who rely on military health care benefits. It could also affect the Department of Defense and the agencies that administer military health programs. **Current Status** As of now, S 2448 remains in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was sponsored by Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona. At this stage, the bill has not passed and its specific provisions have not been publicly detailed in the available sources. *Note: For complete details about what this bill would specifically change, you may want to check Congress.gov or the bill's full text once available.*
EdCOPS Act of 2025
# EdCOPS Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The EdCOPS Act of 2025 (S 1752) is a proposed federal law currently being reviewed in the Senate. While specific details about its provisions aren't available in the basic information provided, the bill's title suggests it relates to educational and law enforcement coordination—likely addressing how schools work with police or law enforcement agencies. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect schools, students, and law enforcement agencies, though the exact scope depends on its specific provisions. It could impact school safety policies, student discipline procedures, and how schools interact with police departments. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains "in committee," meaning it's still in the early stages of review and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) introduced the bill. For detailed information about what the bill specifically proposes to do—such as funding allocations, specific policy changes, or requirements it would impose—you can view the full text on Congress.gov.
Extreme Heat Economic Study Act of 2025
# Extreme Heat Economic Study Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would authorize a comprehensive study on the economic impacts of extreme heat in the United States. If passed, it would require researchers or a designated agency to examine how extreme heat affects the economy—including impacts on workers, businesses, public health systems, and infrastructure. The study would help policymakers understand the financial costs of heat-related issues like reduced worker productivity, increased energy demands, healthcare expenses, and potential damage to roads and other infrastructure. **Who It Affects and Key Details:** The bill primarily affects policymakers, economists, and communities dealing with extreme heat, particularly in hot-climate states. Sponsor Senator Mark Kelly represents Arizona, a state frequently experiencing extreme temperatures. The study's findings could inform future policies on climate adaptation, workplace safety standards, energy management, and emergency preparedness. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's still in the early legislative stage and has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
LIHEAP Parity Act
# LIHEAP Parity Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The LIHEAP Parity Act (S 1700) would modify the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), a federal program that helps low-income households pay for heating and cooling costs. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it aims to address disparities or inequities in how LIHEAP funds are distributed across states or regions. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect low-income families and individuals who struggle to afford energy bills for heating and cooling their homes. It could also impact state governments that administer LIHEAP programs, as changes to the program structure or funding allocation could affect how they distribute assistance. **Current Status:** As of now, S 1700 remains in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full Senate vote. The bill was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in the 119th Congress. Further details about the specific provisions and potential impacts would become clearer if the bill moves forward in the legislative process.
Youth Substance Use Prevention and Awareness Act
# Youth Substance Use Prevention and Awareness Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Youth Substance Use Prevention and Awareness Act aims to address substance abuse among young people through prevention and education initiatives. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on funding prevention programs, increasing public awareness campaigns about the dangers of drugs and alcohol, and improving education resources in schools about substance use risks. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily affect young people and families, along with schools and public health organizations that implement prevention programs. It could also impact healthcare providers and substance abuse treatment facilities that work with youth. **Current Status** The bill (S. 1611) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and has not yet advanced to a full Senate vote. At this stage, the bill has not been enacted and its final provisions may change during the legislative process.
SHIPS for America Act of 2025
# SHIPS for America Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does:** The SHIPS for America Act of 2025 is a bill introduced in the U.S. Senate that aims to strengthen America's domestic shipbuilding and maritime industries. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on supporting the construction and maintenance of ships built in the United States, protecting American shipyards, and ensuring the country's maritime capabilities remain competitive. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact shipyard workers, shipping companies, and defense contractors involved in naval and commercial shipbuilding. It could also affect consumers and businesses that rely on maritime transportation, as well as American military readiness that depends on domestic ship production. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S 1541) remains in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-Arizona) in the 119th Congress. The bill would need to pass through committee review, Senate debate, and a full Senate vote before moving to the House for consideration.
Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025
# Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Does** This bill would settle long-standing water rights disputes involving Native American tribes in northeastern Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah. The legislation addresses claims over water from rivers and water storage facilities in the region, establishing legal agreements about how much water tribes are entitled to use. The bill also creates funding mechanisms and establishes advisory bodies to manage the settlement's implementation and handle any ongoing disputes between tribes and other water users. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Native American tribes in the northeastern Arizona region, who have historically had unresolved claims to water resources. It also impacts other Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah water users—including municipalities, agricultural operations, and dam operators—since settling tribal water rights will clarify how water is distributed across the region. The federal government would be involved in overseeing the settlement and managing trust funds related to the agreement. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Water rights settlements of this kind typically involve extensive negotiations among multiple stakeholders before moving forward.
Protect our Parks Act of 2025
# Protect our Parks Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Protect our Parks Act of 2025 would make changes to how the National Park Service hires, compensates, and manages its workforce. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the bill focuses on employee hiring practices, pay structures, and benefits for government workers in the park system. The legislation also appears to address the management of parks, recreation areas, and trails across the country. **Who It Affects:** This bill would directly impact National Park Service employees and potentially affect park visitors and recreation enthusiasts who use public parks and trails. It may also influence how federal agencies operate their human resources and personnel management systems. **Current Status:** The bill (S 949) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. For detailed provisions, the full legislative text would need to be reviewed, as the summary information available is limited.
Save Our Forests Act of 2025
# Save Our Forests Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Save Our Forests Act of 2025 aims to protect and preserve forest lands, though specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. Based on the bill's title and typical forest conservation legislation, it likely addresses forest management, conservation efforts, or protection measures, but the exact details of what policies it would implement are not yet publicly available. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would potentially impact environmental agencies responsible for managing federal forests, timber companies, conservation organizations, and communities that depend on forest resources. States with significant forest lands—particularly Arizona, where the sponsor is based—may be particularly affected. **Current Status:** The bill (S 950) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and is currently in committee review. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. For detailed information about specific provisions and current developments, you can check Congress.gov or the bill's official page.
HIDTA Enhancement Act
# HIDTA Enhancement Act Summary The HIDTA Enhancement Act (S 767) is a bill currently being reviewed in the Senate that would strengthen the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) program. HIDTA is a federal initiative that provides funding and resources to regions experiencing significant drug trafficking problems. If passed, this bill would enhance the program's effectiveness, though specific details about the proposed enhancements aren't specified in the basic bill information available. The bill would primarily affect communities designated as HIDTAs—typically areas where drug trafficking is concentrated—as well as federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies working to combat drug crimes in these regions. It could also impact residents of these high-trafficking areas by potentially improving coordinated drug enforcement efforts. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) sponsored the bill, which is currently in committee review, meaning it hasn't yet been voted on by the full Senate. **Note:** To understand the specific changes this bill proposes (such as increased funding levels, expanded geographic coverage, or new program requirements), you would need to review the full text of S 767, as those details aren't included in the basic summary information provided.
Water Infrastructure Subcontractor and Taxpayer Protection Act of 2025
# Water Infrastructure Subcontractor and Taxpayer Protection Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** This bill aims to protect subcontractors and taxpayers involved in water infrastructure projects. While specific details aren't provided in the summary, bills with this title typically establish requirements for how federal water projects are funded, managed, and contracted out—particularly focusing on ensuring that smaller companies hired to do portions of the work get paid fairly and on time, and that taxpayer money is spent responsibly. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect water companies, construction subcontractors, construction workers, and taxpayers funding water infrastructure improvements. It could also impact federal and state agencies that manage water projects and the larger contractors who hire subcontractors to complete work. **Current Status** As of now, the bill (S 570) remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. This means it's still in the early stages of consideration and hasn't been debated or voted on by the full Senate.