Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16]
Republican · PA · 23 bills sponsored
To modify the procedures for investigating claims of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders.
# HR 6446 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 6446 would change how the U.S. government investigates cases where foreign companies are accused of evading antidumping and countervailing duty orders. These duties are tariffs imposed on imported goods to prevent unfair trade practices—specifically, when foreign companies sell products at artificially low prices (dumping) or receive government subsidies. The bill modifies the procedures and rules for investigating whether companies are trying to circumvent these existing tariffs through various methods. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill would primarily affect U.S. importers, domestic manufacturers competing with foreign imports, and the Commerce Department (which handles these investigations). By changing investigation procedures, the bill could make it easier or harder to prove evasion attempts, depending on the specific modifications. The exact provisions aren't detailed in the available summary, but such bills typically address factors like evidence standards, investigation timelines, or what counts as evasion. **Current Status** As of now, HR 6446 remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. This means it's still in the early legislative stage and may not advance further.
Diagnostic Accuracy in Sepsis Act of 2025
# Diagnostic Accuracy in Sepsis Act of 2025 (HR 5275) - Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill aims to improve how sepsis—a life-threatening condition where the body's response to infection causes tissue damage—is diagnosed and treated. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in available records, the title suggests it would focus on enhancing diagnostic accuracy and potentially establishing standards or funding for better sepsis detection methods. Sepsis kills thousands of Americans annually, and faster, more accurate diagnosis can significantly improve patient outcomes. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact patients with sepsis, hospitals and healthcare providers responsible for diagnosis and treatment, and potentially the broader healthcare system's approach to managing serious infections. Healthcare workers, emergency departments, and intensive care units would be directly involved in implementing any new diagnostic standards or procedures. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without the detailed legislative text, the specific provisions and implementation mechanisms remain unclear.
Washington’s Trail—1753 National Historic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025
# Washington's Trail—1753 National Historic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** HR 4566 would authorize the federal government to conduct a feasibility study examining whether a new National Historic Trail should be established to commemorate George Washington's 1753 expedition. During this journey, the young surveyor traveled through what is now Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio to deliver a diplomatic message to French forces. If passed, the bill would fund research to determine the historical route, assess the condition of the trail, and evaluate whether it meets criteria for official National Historic Trail designation. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The study would primarily affect states along the proposed trail route (Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio) and local communities interested in heritage tourism and historical preservation. It would also involve the National Park Service, which manages National Historic Trails. The bill doesn't establish the trail itself—it simply authorizes an investigation into whether doing so is feasible and worthwhile. No specific funding amount is mentioned in the available information. **Current Status** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. It was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress.
To advance Thomas B. Hagen on the retired list of the Navy.
# HR 4547 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would advance Thomas B. Hagen on the Navy's retired list. "Advancing" means moving him to a higher rank on the retirement rolls than he currently holds. This is a special legislative action typically used to correct perceived injustices or recognize service that Congress believes was not properly acknowledged. **Who It Affects:** The bill directly affects only Thomas B. Hagen, a retired Navy officer. It would increase his retirement pay and benefits to reflect the higher rank. No other individuals or groups would be impacted. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill contains no detailed subject information in the record, so the specific circumstances behind Hagen's case are not publicly documented in this summary.
Treat and Reduce Obesity Act of 2025
# Summary of the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act of 2025 **What the Bill Does** This bill would expand Medicare coverage for obesity treatment in two main ways. First, it would allow Medicare to pay for weight loss counseling and behavioral therapy provided by a wider range of healthcare professionals—including physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and approved counseling programs—rather than limiting coverage to primary care doctors only. Second, it would extend Medicare's prescription drug coverage to include weight loss and obesity medications for people who are overweight, which is currently not covered. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Medicare beneficiaries (people 65 and older, plus some younger disabled individuals) who struggle with obesity or weight management. It could also impact healthcare providers like specialists, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners who treat obesity, as well as pharmaceutical companies that manufacture weight loss medications. The changes would potentially make these treatments more accessible and affordable for seniors. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income certain compensation to clinical trial participants, and for other purposes.
# Clinical Trial Participant Tax Bill Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 4184 would change federal tax law to allow people who participate in medical clinical trials to exclude certain payments they receive from their taxable income. Currently, compensation for participating in clinical trials is treated as regular income and subject to federal taxes. This bill would create an exception so that at least some of this compensation would not count toward a person's taxable income, potentially reducing their tax burden. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects individuals who volunteer for clinical trials—research studies testing new medications, treatments, or medical procedures. It could also indirectly affect pharmaceutical companies and research institutions that conduct these trials, as it might make trial participation more attractive to volunteers. Broader tax policy could be affected depending on how much compensation is ultimately excluded. **Current Status** As of now, HR 4184 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA).
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to renew and enhance opportunity zones, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 3687: Opportunity Zones Renewal and Enhancement Act **What the Bill Does:** This bill would modify federal tax laws related to "opportunity zones"—economically distressed areas where investors receive tax breaks when they invest capital gains into designated communities. The bill aims to renew and expand these tax incentives beyond their current expiration dates and potentially enhance the program's benefits. **Who It Affects:** The legislation would primarily benefit investors with capital gains (profitable investments), businesses and developers operating in designated low-income areas, and residents of economically struggling communities. Opportunity zones currently exist in all 50 states and U.S. territories, so the effects could be geographically widespread. **Current Status:** HR 3687 is currently in committee, meaning it has been referred to the appropriate House committee for review and debate but has not yet been brought to a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA). The specific provisions for renewal and enhancement are not detailed in the available information, so the exact scope of changes is unclear at this stage.
Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025
# Improving Seniors' Timely Access to Care Act of 2025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to improve how quickly seniors can access medical care, though specific details about its provisions aren't publicly available yet since it remains in early stages. Based on its title, the legislation is intended to address wait times and scheduling delays that Medicare beneficiaries (people age 65 and older) may experience when trying to see doctors and specialists. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily impact seniors enrolled in Medicare. It may also affect healthcare providers, hospitals, and insurance companies that serve this population, depending on what requirements or incentives the final legislation includes. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 3514 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't advanced to a full House vote. The bill was sponsored by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA). To learn more about the specific provisions being proposed, you can check Congress.gov or wait for the bill text to be officially released, as detailed information about its exact requirements isn't yet publicly summarized.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for special rules allowing taxpayers to deduct qualified passenger vehicle loan interest paid or accrued during the taxable year on certain indebtedness, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: HR 3450 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3450 proposes to change federal tax law to allow taxpayers to deduct interest paid on certain car loans. Currently, interest on personal vehicle loans is generally not tax-deductible (unlike mortgage or student loan interest). This bill would create an exception, letting people subtract qualifying vehicle loan interest from their taxable income, potentially lowering their tax bills. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily benefit individuals who take out loans to purchase passenger vehicles. The exact scope depends on specific requirements in the full bill text—such as income limits, loan amount caps, or vehicle type restrictions—which aren't detailed in this summary. It could potentially affect millions of American car buyers and current vehicle owners with existing loans. **Current Status** HR 3450 was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently under committee review. This means it hasn't advanced to a full House vote yet. The bill's provisions and any limitations on who could claim this deduction remain under evaluation. No timeline for further action has been publicly announced.
Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2025
# Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to encourage more private companies to offer employee ownership plans, where workers can buy shares or have a stake in the companies where they work. The legislation would likely provide tax incentives or other benefits to make it easier and more attractive for businesses to set up these ownership programs and for employees to participate in them. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily affect private sector employees and business owners. Employees would potentially gain opportunities to build wealth through company ownership, while business owners would receive incentives to implement these programs. The broader economy could be impacted if employee ownership becomes more widespread. **Current Status** As of now, HR 3105 is in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. The bill must pass through committee review before advancing further in the legislative process. *Note: Specific provisions of the bill were not available in the provided information, so the summary reflects the general intent based on the title and subject matter.*
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit the coinsurance amount for certain services furnished in an ambulatory surgical center.
# HR 3006 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** HR 3006 would change how much patients have to pay out-of-pocket when they receive surgery or medical procedures at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs)—facilities that provide same-day surgeries without requiring an overnight hospital stay. Specifically, the bill would limit the coinsurance amounts (the percentage of costs patients share with insurance) for certain services performed at these centers under Medicare, the federal health insurance program for seniors and some disabled individuals. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This bill primarily affects Medicare beneficiaries (people 65 and older, plus some younger disabled individuals) who receive procedures at ambulatory surgical centers. It could also impact the centers themselves and insurance costs. The exact services covered and specific coinsurance limits aren't detailed in the available information, which means the bill's full scope depends on the specific language within the legislation. **Current Status** HR 3006 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Mike Kelly, a Republican from Pennsylvania. At this stage, the bill would need to advance through committee review before it could move forward for a House vote.
Neighborhood Homes Investment Act
# Neighborhood Homes Investment Act (HR 2854) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Neighborhood Homes Investment Act aims to encourage investment in residential properties in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. While specific details aren't provided in the available information, bills with this title typically propose tax incentives or other federal programs to attract private investment in housing in lower-income communities. The goal is usually to stimulate neighborhood revitalization and increase homeownership opportunities in areas that have experienced disinvestment. **Who It Affects** This bill would potentially affect homeowners and investors interested in purchasing or rehabilitating properties in struggling neighborhoods, residents of economically disadvantaged communities seeking improved housing options, and local governments working on neighborhood development. It may also impact federal tax revenue depending on what incentives are included. **Current Status** As of now, HR 2854 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. For more detailed information about specific provisions, you would need to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov, as those details are not included in this summary.
PHIT Act of 2025
# PHIT Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does** The PHIT Act of 2025 (HR 2369) would allow individuals to use pre-tax dollars from Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) to pay for certain fitness and wellness expenses. Currently, these accounts can only be used for medical care and certain medical equipment. If passed, the bill would expand eligible uses to include gym memberships, fitness classes, sports equipment, and other physical activity-related costs, similar to how these funds can already be used for other health expenses. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily benefit workers who have access to HSAs or FSAs through their employers—mainly people with health insurance plans that allow these savings accounts. By using pre-tax dollars for fitness expenses, eligible individuals could reduce their taxable income and potentially save money on taxes while funding their health and wellness activities. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The sponsor is Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA).
Restore Protections for Dialysis Patients Act
# Restore Protections for Dialysis Patients Act (HR 2199) ## What the Bill Does This bill aims to restore certain protections for patients who depend on dialysis treatment, a medical procedure that filters waste from the blood for people with kidney failure. While specific details about which protections would be restored aren't fully specified in the available information, the bill's title suggests it would reverse or prevent the removal of existing safeguards for this vulnerable patient population. ## Who It Affects The bill directly affects dialysis patients—primarily people with end-stage renal disease (kidney failure) who require regular treatment to survive. It may also impact dialysis clinics and healthcare providers who treat these patients, as well as insurance companies and Medicare, which covers dialysis for many Americans. ## Current Status As of now, HR 2199 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA). **Note:** For complete details about the specific protections involved, you would need to review the full bill text, as the summary provided here lacks those specifics.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the taxable REIT subsidiary asset test.
# HR 2198 Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would change tax rules for REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts), which are companies that own and manage real estate properties. Specifically, it would restore an "asset test" that limits how much of a REIT's assets can be held through a taxable REIT subsidiary—a special type of subsidiary company. The bill would effectively tighten restrictions on how REITs structure their operations and investments. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects REIT companies and their investors, as well as real estate businesses that use the REIT structure. It could also indirectly impact real estate projects and commercial property development, since REITs finance and operate many of these ventures. Investors in REIT stocks and mutual funds might see changes to how these investments operate. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No significant action has been taken on the measure to date.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat membership in a health care sharing ministry as a medical expense, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 2062 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would allow people to deduct payments to health care sharing ministries as medical expenses on their taxes. Health care sharing ministries are faith-based organizations where members contribute money to a shared pool that covers other members' medical costs. Currently, these payments are not tax-deductible. If passed, the bill would treat membership fees and contributions to these organizations the same way the tax code treats other qualified medical expenses. **Who It Affects** The bill would primarily benefit members of health care sharing ministries—faith-based communities that operate as alternatives to traditional health insurance. It could make these organizations more financially attractive to members since their contributions would reduce taxable income. The bill could also affect federal tax revenue, though the amount would depend on how many people use these ministries. **Current Status** HR 2062 was introduced by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House. The bill has not advanced beyond the initial committee review stage.
MATCH IT Act of 2025
# MATCH IT Act of 2025 Summary **What the bill would do:** The MATCH IT Act would require the federal government to establish clear standards and definitions for "patient matching"—the process of correctly linking patients with their medical records when information is shared between healthcare providers. Currently, there's no uniform system for this, which can lead to mix-ups and errors. The bill would have the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) create these standards, develop technology requirements to improve matching accuracy, and set up financial incentives through Medicare to encourage healthcare providers to adopt better matching practices. **Who it affects:** This primarily affects healthcare providers, hospitals, and health IT companies that share patient information. Patients would benefit indirectly through more accurate medical records and safer care coordination. Medicare patients could be particularly impacted since the bill specifically includes Medicare incentives. **Current status:** The bill (HR 2002) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. This is an early stage in the legislative process, and the bill would need committee approval before advancing further.
Broadband Grant Tax Treatment Act
# Broadband Grant Tax Treatment Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would change how broadband companies are taxed when they receive government grants for expanding internet infrastructure. Currently, these grants are treated as taxable income, meaning companies owe federal income taxes on the money they receive. The bill would exclude these grants from taxable income, allowing companies to keep more of the grant money without paying taxes on it. **Who It Affects:** The bill specifically targets broadband companies and internet service providers that receive grants from federal programs managed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). These include grants for broadband deployment, expanding broadband access in rural or underserved areas, and building middle-mile broadband infrastructure. **Background and Current Status:** A 2017 tax law change classified government grants as taxable income for companies. This bill would reverse that treatment for broadband-related grants, returning to how the IRS handled these grants before 2017. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. The reasoning behind it is that by reducing the tax burden on grant recipients, more of the federal funding can be directly used for broadband infrastructure rather than being paid in taxes.
Supporting Innovation in Agriculture Act of 2025
# Supporting Innovation in Agriculture Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Supporting Innovation in Agriculture Act of 2025 aims to promote new farming technologies and practices in the U.S. agricultural sector. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in available sources, bills with this title typically focus on encouraging farmers to adopt innovations like precision agriculture, new crop varieties, sustainable farming methods, or digital farming tools. **Who It Affects** This bill would primarily impact farmers and agricultural producers across the country, as well as agricultural technology companies and research institutions. It could also affect consumers through changes in food production methods and potentially farm profitability. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) and is currently in committee. This means it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House. For more detailed information about specific provisions, you can check Congress.gov, where the full bill text and any amendments would be available once introduced.
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand practitioners eligible to furnish telehealth services under the Medicare program.
# HR 1614 Summary **What the Bill Does** HR 1614 would make permanent a temporary allowance for certain healthcare providers to offer telehealth services (remote video appointments) through Medicare. Specifically, it would let audiologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists provide care to Medicare patients via telehealth on an ongoing basis, rather than having this option expire. **Who It Affects** This bill impacts Medicare beneficiaries (primarily seniors age 65+) who could access hearing, rehabilitation, and speech therapy services remotely instead of traveling to in-person appointments. It also affects the four types of healthcare providers listed above, who would gain permanent authorization to offer telehealth services under the Medicare program. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Key provisions would remove the expiration date on telehealth services for these practitioners, making remote care a permanent Medicare option rather than a temporary one.
Access Technology Affordability Act of 2025
# Access Technology Affordability Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Access Technology Affordability Act of 2025 aims to make assistive technology more affordable and accessible for people with disabilities. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, bills with this title typically focus on reducing costs for devices and software that help people with visual, hearing, mobility, or cognitive disabilities to use computers, phones, and other technology independently. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily benefit people with disabilities who rely on assistive technology such as screen readers, speech recognition software, hearing aids, or adaptive input devices. It could also affect manufacturers and vendors of these technologies, as well as taxpayers if the bill includes government funding or tax incentives. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without additional legislative text available, the specific mechanisms for reducing costs—whether through tax credits, direct subsidies, insurance coverage requirements, or other means—cannot be determined.
Heartbeat Protection Act of 2025
# Heartbeat Protection Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Heartbeat Protection Act of 2025 would make it a federal crime for doctors to perform abortions without first checking for a fetal heartbeat and informing the pregnant person of the results. Doctors who perform abortions after detecting a heartbeat could face fines and up to five years in prison. The bill includes narrow exceptions: abortions necessary to save a mother's life due to a physical medical condition, and abortions in cases of rape or incest (with specific requirements). **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily affect physicians and pregnant women seeking abortions. Under the legislation, women themselves cannot be prosecuted—only doctors face criminal penalties. The bill would apply nationwide if passed, potentially overriding varying state abortion laws currently in effect. **Current Status:** The bill (HR 682) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) and is currently in committee. This means it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. Like most bills in committee, it may be debated, amended, or may not advance further in the legislative process.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the railroad track maintenance credit.
# Summary of HR 516: Railroad Track Maintenance Credit **What the bill does:** HR 516 would increase a tax credit that helps railroad companies pay for track maintenance. Currently, companies can claim up to $3,500 per year for each mile of track they own or lease. This bill would nearly double that limit to $6,100 per mile, and would automatically adjust this amount for inflation starting in 2026. The bill would also expand which railroad tracks qualify for the credit. **Who it affects:** This tax credit primarily benefits short-line and regional railroad companies—smaller operators that maintain their own track infrastructure. These companies would receive larger tax breaks to offset maintenance costs, potentially allowing them to invest more in repairs and upgrades. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced in the House but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. It was sponsored by Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA).