Joyce, John [R-PA-13]
Republican · PA · 16 bills sponsored
RED Tape Act
# RED Tape Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The RED Tape Act would eliminate a requirement for the EPA to review and comment on major federal construction projects and other significant federal actions. Currently, these projects must go through two separate review processes: one under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and another involving EPA review under the Clean Air Act. This bill would remove the EPA review step, streamlining the approval process for federal projects. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies undertaking major projects (like infrastructure or development), private companies seeking federal permits or approvals, and environmental oversight. By removing the duplicate EPA review requirement, the bill aims to speed up project approvals and reduce regulatory burden. However, it would also reduce environmental scrutiny of these projects, as the EPA would no longer be required to formally review them for air quality impacts. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been voted on by the full House. As a Republican-sponsored bill focused on reducing regulations, it reflects ongoing debates in Congress about balancing environmental protection with economic efficiency and project timelines.
Community Passport Services Access Act
# Community Passport Services Access Act (HR 6997) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to expand access to passport services by allowing certain community organizations and local facilities to provide passport application and acceptance services. Currently, passport services are primarily available through post offices, libraries, and official State Department locations. If passed, the bill would enable additional venues to help Americans apply for and submit passport documents, potentially making the process more convenient for people in underserved areas. **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact Americans who need passport services, particularly those in rural or remote communities where current passport service locations may be distant. It would also affect the community organizations that would be authorized to offer these services, and could involve post offices and libraries that currently provide this service. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 6997 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative John Joyce (R-PA). *Note: Specific provisions of the bill are not detailed in the available information, so the summary reflects the general intent based on the title.*
Broadband and Telecommunications RAIL Act
# Broadband and Telecommunications RAIL Act Summary **What the bill does:** The Broadband and Telecommunications RAIL Act would create a standardized process for internet and telecommunications companies to install or upgrade equipment along railroad corridors. Currently, there's no clear framework for this. The bill would require broadband providers to submit applications to railroad companies, which must respond within 60 days. Railroad carriers could only reject applications if they pose safety risks or would damage railroad infrastructure. Once approved, work would need to start within 30 days, and providers would pay railroads for their actual costs. **Who it affects:** This bill primarily affects telecommunications and broadband companies seeking to expand internet access, railroad companies that own the corridor rights-of-way, and ultimately consumers who want better broadband coverage in areas near railroad lines. It could help expand broadband to rural or underserved areas by making it easier to use railroad corridors as pathways for fiber optic cables and other equipment. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't been voted on by the full House yet. No action has been taken.
Health Tech Investment Act
# Health Tech Investment Act Summary The Health Tech Investment Act (HR 6197) is a proposed bill that would support investment and development in health technology sectors. While specific details aren't available in the summary provided, bills with this title typically aim to encourage innovation in medical devices, digital health platforms, healthcare software, or related technologies—potentially through tax incentives, funding mechanisms, or regulatory reforms that make it easier for companies to develop and bring health tech products to market. The bill would primarily affect healthcare companies, technology firms, investors in the health sector, and potentially patients who would benefit from faster innovation and new medical solutions. It could also influence healthcare providers who adopt new technologies. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of the legislative process and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. To learn more about the specific provisions, you can search for HR 6197 on Congress.gov, which will have the full text once it's officially introduced.
Broadband Competition and Efficient Deployment Act
# Broadband Competition and Efficient Deployment Act (HR 5273) **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to streamline the process of deploying broadband infrastructure—the cables and equipment needed for high-speed internet—across the United States. It would reduce regulatory delays and environmental review requirements that broadband companies must complete before installing new networks. The legislation focuses on making it faster and less costly for companies to build and expand broadband service to underserved areas. **Key Provisions and Who It Affects** The bill would modify environmental assessment and historic preservation review procedures that currently apply to broadband infrastructure projects. This primarily affects telecommunications companies building new networks, rural communities seeking better internet access, and federal agencies responsible for environmental and heritage site reviews. By streamlining these requirements, the bill aims to speed up broadband deployment while critics might argue it could reduce environmental and historical protections. **Current Status** As of now, HR 5273 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No significant action has been taken since its introduction by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA).
SPARC Act
# SPARC Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed contents of HR 4681 (the SPARC Act) from the 119th Congress in my current information. To provide you with an accurate, factual summary covering what the bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the actual bill text. I'd recommend checking these official sources for the complete details: - **Congress.gov** (congress.gov) - Search for "HR 4681" for the full bill text, sponsor information, and latest status - **House Clerk's website** - For official legislative records - **Rep. Joyce's official website** - For the sponsor's explanation of the bill's intent If you can share the bill text or a summary from one of these sources, I'd be happy to translate it into plain language for you.
Access to Claims Data Act
# Access to Claims Data Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Access to Claims Data Act (HR 4331) would grant increased access to claims data—information about insurance claims and healthcare services. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, legislation of this type typically aims to make claims data more transparent or accessible to certain parties, such as healthcare providers, researchers, patients, or regulators. This could help stakeholders better understand healthcare trends, costs, and coverage patterns. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill would likely impact insurance companies, healthcare providers, patients, researchers, and potentially healthcare policymakers who use claims data for analysis and decision-making. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. **Note:** Without access to the bill's full text, this summary provides a general framework for this type of legislation. For complete details on specific provisions and requirements, you would need to review the actual bill text on Congress.gov.
Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
# Summary of HJRES 88 **What the bill does:** This bill reverses an EPA decision made in January 2025 that allowed California to enforce its "Advanced Clean Cars II" (ACC II) emissions standards. Under federal law, states generally cannot set their own vehicle emissions rules—the federal government does. However, California has a special exemption under the Clean Air Act allowing it to request waivers from this rule. The EPA had approved California's request, but this bill nullifies that approval, preventing California from implementing its stricter emissions standards. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts California and automakers, as it blocks California from requiring vehicles sold in the state to meet stricter pollution and emissions limits than federal standards require. Since California is the largest U.S. car market, automakers often design vehicles to meet California's standards, making this decision potentially significant for the auto industry nationwide and environmental policy. **Current status:** The bill has already been signed into law. This means California's Advanced Clean Cars II regulations cannot be enforced, and the state will need to follow federal emission standards instead.
SAFE Sunscreen Standards Act
# SAFE Sunscreen Standards Act Summary **What It Would Do:** The SAFE Sunscreen Standards Act (HR 3686) would establish new federal standards for sunscreen products sold in the United States. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it aims to create safety requirements or standardized testing procedures for sunscreen ingredients and effectiveness. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would primarily impact sunscreen manufacturers and distributors, who would need to comply with any new federal standards. It would also affect consumers, as new regulations could influence sunscreen labeling, availability, or product formulations. Healthcare providers and regulatory agencies like the FDA would be involved in implementing and overseeing compliance. **Current Status:** The bill is in the early stages of the legislative process, currently assigned to a House committee for review and discussion. This means it hasn't advanced to a floor vote and may require further amendments before moving forward. For the most current details about specific provisions, you would need to consult the full bill text on Congress.gov.
Addressing Boarding and Crowding in the Emergency Department
# HR 2936: Addressing Boarding and Crowding in the Emergency Department **What the bill would do:** This bill aims to tackle overcrowding problems in hospital emergency departments (EDs). "Boarding" refers to patients waiting in the ED for hospital beds, while "crowding" means too many patients in the ED at once. The bill would likely address these issues through federal initiatives, though specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information. **Who it affects:** This bill would primarily impact hospital emergency departments, their staff, and patients seeking emergency care. It could also affect state and local healthcare systems that receive federal guidance or funding related to emergency services. **Current status:** HR 2936 is currently in committee (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Republican Rep. John Joyce of Pennsylvania. *Note: More detailed information about specific provisions would require access to the full bill text, which wasn't provided here.*
Information and Communication Technology Strategy Act
# Information and Communication Technology Strategy Act (HR 2061) Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would require the federal government to develop a comprehensive national strategy for information and communication technology (ICT). While the specific details aren't fully available in the summary provided, the bill's purpose appears to be establishing coordinated government policies and planning around technology infrastructure, data systems, and communications networks. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect federal agencies responsible for technology and communications policy, as well as potentially technology companies and sectors that work with the government. Citizens could be indirectly affected depending on what policies result from this national strategy. **Current Status:** HR 2061 is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full House vote yet. It was introduced by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA) in the 119th Congress. To get more detailed information about specific provisions and the bill's exact objectives, you would need to review the full legislative text on Congress.gov.
Access to Pediatric Technologies Act of 2025
# Access to Pediatric Technologies Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require Medicare (the federal health insurance program for seniors and some disabled individuals) to create specific payment rates for medical devices designed for children. Currently, these pediatric devices use temporary billing codes, which can create uncertainty about reimbursement. Under this bill, device manufacturers could request that Medicare establish permanent payment methodologies for their pediatric products, based on pricing data and usage information they provide. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects manufacturers of FDA-approved medical devices used in pediatric care, as well as healthcare providers who treat children and bill Medicare for these technologies. Indirectly, it could impact children covered by Medicare and the overall Medicare budget, depending on how many devices receive new payment rates and at what cost. **Current Status** The bill (HR 1931) is sponsored by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet advanced to a full House vote. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Choices for Increased Mobility Act of 2025
# Choices for Increased Mobility Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the bill would do:** This bill directs Medicare to create specific billing codes for ultralightweight manual wheelchairs, particularly distinguishing between wheelchairs made with advanced materials (titanium or carbon fiber) versus standard materials. Currently, Medicare pays a flat rate for wheelchairs regardless of the materials used. Under this bill, suppliers could charge Medicare patients the difference between what Medicare pays and the actual cost of more expensive, advanced wheelchairs—meaning beneficiaries would pay out-of-pocket for premium options. Medicare would also be allowed to require suppliers to inform patients upfront about these potential extra costs. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily impacts Medicare beneficiaries (seniors and disabled individuals) who use manual wheelchairs and the suppliers/manufacturers who sell them. Patients seeking lighter, more durable wheelchairs made from titanium or carbon fiber would face higher out-of-pocket expenses, while those choosing standard wheelchairs would continue under current payment structures. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee (HR 1703, introduced by Rep. John Joyce, R-PA) and has not yet been voted on by Congress. It would need to pass committee review and floor votes in both the House and Senate before becoming law.
ORPHAN Cures Act
# ORPHAN Cures Act Summary **What it does:** This bill would change how the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program treats "orphan drugs"—medications developed for rare diseases that affect small patient populations. Currently, drugs must be on the market for at least 7 years (or 11 years for certain biologics) before Medicare can negotiate their prices. The bill would exclude the time a drug spent as an orphan drug from this calculation, effectively giving orphan drugs more protection from price negotiation. It would also expand the exemption to include orphan drugs approved for multiple rare diseases, not just single diseases. **Who it affects:** This primarily benefits pharmaceutical companies developing treatments for rare diseases, as it would delay or prevent Medicare from negotiating lower prices on these medications. Patients with rare diseases and Medicare beneficiaries using these drugs could be affected, as the bill could maintain higher drug prices longer. **Current status:** The bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative John Joyce (R-PA) in the 119th Congress.
Sustainable Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Services in the Home Act
# Summary: Sustainable Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Services in the Home Act (HR 783) **What it does:** This bill would allow Medicare to permanently cover cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation programs delivered through telehealth (video consultations) in patients' homes. Currently, these rehabilitation services have temporary telehealth approval that could expire. The bill would make this permanent, allowing eligible Medicare patients to receive heart and lung rehabilitation remotely rather than requiring in-person clinic visits. **Who it affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be Medicare patients recovering from heart attacks, heart surgery, or lung disease who need rehabilitation therapy. It could particularly help seniors in rural areas or those with mobility challenges who struggle to travel for in-person appointments. Healthcare providers offering these services would also be affected by the expanded coverage. **Key provisions and status:** The bill focuses solely on expanding telehealth access for these specific rehabilitation services under Medicare—it doesn't create new programs, just removes location restrictions. As of now, the bill is in committee and has not yet been voted on by Congress. The measure has bipartisan support potential since telehealth expansion is generally supported across political lines, though it would require committee approval and full congressional votes to become law.
Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act
# Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act (HR 346) - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would restrict states' ability to set their own vehicle emission standards, particularly those that limit sales of gas-powered cars. Currently, under the Clean Air Act, states can adopt stricter emission rules than federal standards if the EPA grants them a waiver. This bill would block the EPA from approving waivers for state standards that limit internal combustion engine vehicles (traditional gas cars) and would require the EPA to cancel any such waivers granted since January 2022. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects states that have adopted or want to adopt stricter vehicle emission standards (like California and others that follow its rules), automakers producing vehicles, and consumers. It would prevent these states from using emission regulations to phase out or reduce gas-powered vehicles and could limit consumer access to certain vehicle types in those states. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Rep. John Joyce (R-PA).