Johnson, Ron [R-WI]
Republican · WI · 17 bills sponsored
SOAR Permanent Authorization Act
# SOAR Permanent Authorization Act Summary **What It Would Do:** This bill would make permanent the SOAR program (Substance Abuse and Treatment for Opioid Addiction and Recovery), which currently operates under a temporary authorization set to expire. By making it permanent, the program would continue indefinitely without requiring Congress to reauthorize it periodically. The SOAR program provides support for substance abuse treatment and recovery services, particularly focused on addressing opioid addiction. **Who It Affects:** This legislation would impact individuals struggling with opioid addiction and substance abuse disorders, as well as healthcare providers and treatment facilities that receive funding through the SOAR program. It would also affect states and local communities that rely on this federal program for treatment resources. **Current Status:** The bill (S 3710) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. At this stage, it remains under consideration and has not advanced further in the legislative process.
Shutdown Fairness Act
# Shutdown Fairness Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Shutdown Fairness Act would ensure that federal employees who are required to work during a government shutdown receive regular paychecks while the shutdown is ongoing. Currently, these "excepted employees"—those deemed essential and required to keep working—don't get paid until the shutdown ends and normal funding resumes. This bill would provide the money to pay them during the shutdown period. It also extends this pay protection to certain contractors supporting federal workers and active-duty military members. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects federal employees who must continue working when Congress hasn't approved a budget, including those in agencies like the FBI, TSA, and others providing essential services. It also covers military personnel on active duty and related contractors. Essentially, it addresses the hardship faced by workers who perform their jobs but face delayed paychecks during budget disputes. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) but has not yet passed. It remains in the early stage of the legislative process.
A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to release a reversionary interest in certain land in the Black River State Forest in Millston, Wisconsin, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: Black River State Forest Land Transfer This bill would require the U.S. Department of Agriculture to release its legal claim to a specific parcel of land in the Black River State Forest near Millston, Wisconsin. When the government originally acquired this land, it retained what's called a "reversionary interest"—meaning the land would revert back to the government if certain conditions weren't met. This bill would eliminate that government claim, allowing the land to be fully transferred to the state of Wisconsin or its designated owner without any federal strings attached. The bill primarily affects Wisconsin landowners or the state government who currently control or wish to control the affected property. By removing the government's reversionary interest, the bill would give the state or property owners more complete ownership and control over how the land is managed and used. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin).
Interstate Commerce Simplification Act of 2025
# Interstate Commerce Simplification Act of 2025 - Summary I don't have access to the specific details of this bill's provisions, so I can't provide a complete summary of what it would do. The information you've provided shows that S 3027 is currently under review in a Senate committee and was introduced by Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, but the bill's actual contents—what changes it would make to interstate commerce regulations—aren't included in your source material. To give you an accurate summary, I would need access to the bill's text or official summary from Congress.gov. I'd recommend visiting **Congress.gov** and searching for "S 3027" to find: - The full bill text - The official summary - Details on which committee is reviewing it - Any recent updates on its progress If you can share the bill's key provisions or official summary, I'd be happy to explain them in plain language for a general audience.
Shutdown Fairness Act
# Shutdown Fairness Act Summary **What it would do:** This bill would require the federal government to pay certain employees during government shutdowns, rather than making them wait until the shutdown ends. Currently, some federal workers deemed "excepted employees"—those whose jobs are considered essential and must continue during a shutdown—are required to keep working but don't receive paychecks until the government resumes normal operations. This bill would provide immediate funding to pay these workers during the shutdown period. The bill also expands the definition of who qualifies for this pay to include some contractors who support federal employees. **Who it affects:** The primary beneficiaries would be federal employees classified as "excepted" workers, such as those in national security, law enforcement, air traffic control, and other critical functions. These employees currently face financial hardship when shutdowns occur, as they work without pay for days or weeks. The bill also covers certain contractors who support these essential operations. **Current status:** The bill (S. 3001) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.
Eliminate Shutdowns Act
# Eliminate Shutdowns Act - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Eliminate Shutdowns Act would automatically continue government funding if Congress fails to pass new budget bills by the start of a fiscal year. Instead of allowing a shutdown, the bill would keep federal agencies and programs running at the funding levels from the previous year. This would apply to all programs, projects, and activities that received money in the prior fiscal year. **Who It Affects and Why It Matters** This bill would affect federal employees, federal contractors, and Americans who rely on government services. Currently, when Congress cannot agree on a budget before the fiscal year begins, the government can "shut down," forcing many agencies to stop operations and furloughing workers without pay. This bill aims to prevent that disruption by providing a safety net of automatic, temporary funding. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) but has not yet been passed. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process. The bill addresses a recurring budget problem—government shutdowns have occurred multiple times in recent years—though it represents just one of several proposed approaches to solving this issue.
Health Care Freedom and Choice Act
# Health Care Freedom and Choice Act (S 2641) Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Health Care Freedom and Choice Act is a proposed bill currently under review in the Senate that aims to expand healthcare choices and flexibility for Americans. Based on its title and sponsor, the bill appears focused on increasing consumer options in the healthcare system and reducing restrictions on how people can access or pay for medical services. However, specific details about its exact provisions are not publicly available in the information provided. **Who It Affects and Current Status:** This bill would potentially impact all Americans who purchase or receive healthcare, as well as healthcare providers and insurers. The bill is currently in committee review, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Sponsored by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin), it remains in the early stages of the legislative process. **Note:** To understand the specific provisions and detailed impacts of this bill, you would need to review the full text on Congress.gov or other legislative tracking websites, as comprehensive policy details are not included in the available summary information.
No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act
# Summary of S. 1983: No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require that any pandemic preparedness treaty negotiated by the World Health Organization (WHO) must be approved by the U.S. Senate before it can take effect in the United States. Currently, the bill is still in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. **Who It Affects and Key Details** The bill primarily affects the federal government's ability to enter into international health agreements on pandemic response. It would impact any future WHO pandemic treaties by adding a congressional approval requirement, giving the Senate formal say over U.S. participation in such agreements. The measure reflects concerns some lawmakers have about international health organizations' authority over U.S. policy. **Current Status** As of now, S. 1983 remains in committee, meaning it has not advanced to a floor vote in the Senate. No further action has been taken at this stage.
Right to Treat Act
# Right to Treat Act Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of S. 1830 (Right to Treat Act) in my current knowledge base. To provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the actual legislative text. **What I can tell you:** The bill is currently in committee (meaning it's under review and hasn't advanced to a full floor vote yet) and was introduced by Senator Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, in the 119th Congress. **To get accurate details, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "S 1830" for the full text and summary - Checking Senator Johnson's official website for his statement on the bill - Looking at news coverage from reputable outlets that have covered this legislation If you can share the bill's text or summary, I'd be happy to explain it in plain language for you.
A bill to require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
# S 1306 - Gray Wolf Delisting Bill Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would require the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remove gray wolves from the federal list of endangered and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. If passed, this would eliminate federal protections for gray wolves nationwide, allowing states to manage the species independently and potentially permit hunting and other removal practices. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects conservation groups, wildlife advocates, ranchers, hunters, Native American tribes, and state wildlife agencies. Ranchers and some hunting communities view wolf delisting as beneficial for livestock protection, while environmental and conservation organizations generally oppose it, arguing wolves still need federal protection in certain regions. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee as of the 119th Congress and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) sponsors the legislation. Gray wolves have been a controversial subject for decades—they were removed from the endangered species list in 2020 but protections were partially restored by courts in 2022, so this bill would reinstate that previous delisting decision.
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for payments to certain individuals who dye fuel, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 1111 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would modify federal tax law to allow certain individuals who dye fuel to receive payments under the Internal Revenue Code. "Dyed fuel" typically refers to diesel fuel used for off-road purposes (like farming, heating, or construction) that is marked with a dye to distinguish it from regular taxable fuel. The bill appears designed to provide some form of financial assistance or tax relief to people involved in dyeing this fuel, though the specific details of the payments are not outlined in the available information. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect individuals and businesses involved in the fuel dyeing industry, which includes agricultural operations, heating oil distributors, and other off-road fuel users. It may also impact federal tax revenue and fuel-related regulatory compliance. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S. 1111) has been introduced in the Senate and referred to committee for review. It has not yet advanced beyond this stage and remains in the early legislative process. The bill was sponsored by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI). *Note: Limited details are available about specific provisions of this bill, so some aspects remain unclear without access to the full legislative text.*
Safe Routes Act of 2025
# Safe Routes Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Does:** The Safe Routes Act of 2025 would allow the federal Department of Transportation to waive the standard weight limits for certain logging trucks on interstate highways. Currently, federal law limits how much weight vehicles can carry on interstates. This bill would create an exception for logging vehicles transporting raw forest products like logs, wood chips, and biomass, allowing them to carry heavier loads than normally permitted. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions:** The bill specifically targets logging trucks that meet three conditions: they must be carrying unfinished forest products, traveling no more than 150 air miles from their starting point to a storage or processing facility, and comply with weight and vehicle size rules already established by the state where they're operating. This means the exemption would apply to relatively short-distance hauls within logging regions. The change would primarily benefit the logging industry and related wood processing businesses, though it could also affect highway safety standards and wear on interstate roads. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill (S. 1063) is in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate. It was introduced by Senator Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin.
Reducing the Federal Workforce Through Attrition Act
# Reducing the Federal Workforce Through Attrition Act (S 295) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill aims to reduce the size of the federal government workforce without conducting mass layoffs. Instead, it would accomplish this through "attrition"—meaning when federal employees retire, resign, or leave their jobs, their positions would not be filled. The bill would restrict federal agencies' ability to hire new workers to replace those who depart, gradually shrinking the total number of government employees over time. **Who It Affects & Key Provisions** The legislation would primarily affect federal agencies and their employees. While it doesn't directly cut existing workers' salaries or benefits, it would prevent agencies from maintaining current staffing levels. This could impact service delivery across various government functions, depending on which positions remain unfilled. The bill is sponsored by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) and focuses on executive branch agencies rather than Congress itself. **Current Status** As of now, S 295 remains in committee and has not advanced to a full Senate vote. This means it's still in the early legislative stage and would need committee approval and broader congressional support before becoming law.
GOOD Act
# GOOD Act Summary **What It Does:** The Guidance Out Of Darkness (GOOD) Act would require federal agencies to make their guidance documents more accessible to the public. Specifically, it would mandate that agencies publish guidance documents online when they're issued, maintain a centralized location where all current guidance documents can be found, clearly label which documents are guidance versus other types of rules, and track which guidance documents have been rescinded (cancelled). The bill aims to make it easier for the public to find and understand what federal agencies actually require or recommend. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects federal agencies and the public they serve. Businesses, nonprofits, and individuals who must comply with or understand federal regulations would benefit from having guidance documents more easily accessible in one organized place. Federal agencies would need to invest time and resources into organizing and maintaining these centralized databases of guidance documents. **Current Status:** The bill (S. 252) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill addresses administrative transparency, a topic that generally receives bipartisan interest, though its specific provisions may be subject to debate.
CURD Act
# CURD Act Summary The **CURD Act** (Codifying Useful Regulatory Definitions Act) would establish a federal legal definition for "natural cheese" to clarify food labeling standards. Under the bill, natural cheese would be defined as cheese made from animal milk or certain dairy ingredients following established cheese-making practices, while excluding processed varieties like pasteurized process cheese, cheese foods, and cheese spreads. Any cheese product that doesn't meet this definition but is labeled as "natural cheese" would be considered misbranded and prohibited from sale. This bill primarily affects cheese manufacturers, food producers, and consumers. Manufacturers would need to ensure their products comply with the statutory definition if they use the "natural cheese" label, while consumers would theoretically have clearer information about what they're purchasing. The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full Senate.
Midnight Rules Relief Act of 2025
# Midnight Rules Relief Act of 2025 - Plain Language Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would change how Congress reviews and rejects regulations issued near the end of a presidential term. Currently, if Congress wants to disapprove of multiple regulations that were issued in a president's final year, it must vote on each one separately through individual resolutions. This bill would allow Congress to disapprove of several of these regulations using a single vote instead, streamlining the process. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects Congress and the executive branch's regulatory process. It builds on existing law called the Congressional Review Act, which already gives Congress a period to review and potentially reject regulations issued in the final weeks of a president's term. The main change is procedural efficiency—allowing lawmakers to bundle multiple regulations into one disapproval vote rather than holding separate votes for each regulation. This could make it easier and faster for Congress to overturn regulations they oppose. **Current Status** The bill (S 164) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet advanced to a full Senate vote.
Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues Act
# Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues Act - Summary **What the bill does:** This bill would make permanent the federal government's classification of fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I controlled drugs. Currently, these substances are only temporarily classified as Schedule I under an order from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that expires on March 31, 2025. Schedule I is the most restrictive classification, meaning these drugs are considered to have high abuse potential and no accepted medical use. The bill would ensure this classification continues indefinitely rather than expiring. **Who it affects:** The bill primarily affects people involved in drug manufacturing and trafficking, law enforcement agencies, and individuals who may use fentanyl-related substances. It would also impact medical and research communities working with these substances. The bill responds to the ongoing fentanyl overdose crisis, as fentanyl and its chemical variations are major contributors to overdose deaths in the United States. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.