Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]
Republican · CA · 36 bills sponsored
To take certain land in the State of California into trust for the benefit of the Pechanga Band of Indians, and for other purposes.
# Bill Summary: HR 5682 - Pechanga Band Land Trust **What the Bill Would Do** HR 5682 would transfer specific land in California into federal trust status for the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians. When land is placed "in trust," the federal government holds legal ownership on behalf of a tribe, giving the tribe certain rights to use and manage the property. This is a common mechanism for establishing or expanding tribal lands. **Who It Affects** The bill directly affects the Pechanga Band of Indians, a federally recognized tribe in Southern California. It may also impact local property owners and California state and local governments, depending on which specific lands are involved and what activities might occur there. **Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill's full text would need to be reviewed to determine exact acreage, location, and other specific provisions.
Lebanon Election Integrity and Diaspora Voting Protection Act of 2026
# Lebanon Election Integrity and Diaspora Voting Protection Act of 2026 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would establish U.S. government support for election integrity measures in Lebanon and create protections for Lebanese diaspora citizens (people of Lebanese descent living abroad) who wish to participate in Lebanese elections. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, the title suggests it would address concerns about fair elections in Lebanon and ensure that Lebanese nationals living outside the country can vote without facing obstacles. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect Lebanese citizens living abroad who want to vote in their home country's elections, as well as Lebanese government institutions responsible for conducting elections. It may also involve U.S. agencies tasked with monitoring or supporting election processes internationally. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but hasn't advanced to a full House vote. The proposal was sponsored by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA). Further details about specific provisions and next steps would require additional legislative documentation.
To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress a notification of certain construction projects using nonstandard designs.
# Summary of HR 7054 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 7054 would require the Secretary of State to notify Congress about certain State Department construction projects that use nonstandard designs. Essentially, if the State Department plans to build or significantly renovate a facility using designs that don't follow standard architectural or construction practices, they would have to inform Congress about it first. The bill doesn't prevent these projects from happening—it just adds a notification requirement so Congress is aware before construction begins. **Who It Affects and Current Status** This bill primarily affects the State Department and Congress. It would give lawmakers oversight of how the department spends construction funds and what types of buildings or facilities are being built. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA), but no additional details about specific provisions or the reasoning behind the notification requirement are included in the summary.
Protecting TPLF From Abuse Act
I appreciate your request, but I need to be transparent: the bill information you've provided is incomplete. While I can see this is HR 7015 from the 119th Congress sponsored by Rep. Darrell Issa, the "Subjects: N/A" field means the key details about what the bill actually does aren't available in what you've shared. To give you an accurate summary, I would need: - The bill's full text or official summary - Explanation of what "TPLF" refers to in this context - The specific provisions and policy changes proposed Without these details, any summary I provide would be speculation rather than factual information. I'd recommend checking **Congress.gov** (the official government source) for this bill's full details, or let me know if you have access to more complete information that I can help summarize.
Direct Hire To Fight Fires
# Direct Hire To Fight Fires (HR 435) – Summary **What the Bill Does:** This bill would make it easier for the federal government to hire wildland firefighters quickly. Currently, federal hiring follows lengthy bureaucratic processes. The bill gives the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service and the Department of the Interior permanent "direct-hire" authority, meaning they could bypass some normal hiring procedures to fill firefighting positions faster. It also requires these agencies to create better policies for recruiting and keeping firefighters, such as simplifying the hiring process and making it easier for firefighters to move between federal agencies. **Who It Affects & Key Provisions:** The bill primarily affects wildland firefighters and support staff working for the federal government, as well as the Forest Service and Interior agencies that employ them. To increase transparency, the bill requires these agencies to submit annual reports to Congress detailing how many firefighters they need, where vacancies exist by state, and what obstacles prevent them from hiring enough people. This information would also be published on a public website so the public can track progress. **Current Status:** HR 435 is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA).
HERO Act
# HERO Act Summary I don't have access to the detailed text or specific provisions of HR 6730 (HERO Act) from the 119th Congress. To provide you with an accurate, factual summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need to review the bill's actual language. **I'd recommend:** - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 6730" to read the full bill text - Checking the bill's summary section for the official overview - Reviewing the "Actions" tab to track its current committee status If you can share the bill's text or a link to it, I'd be happy to provide a clear, plain-language summary for you.
To ensure that certain members of the Armed Forces who served in female cultural support teams receive proper credit for such service.
# Summary of HR 6036 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would ensure that members of the Armed Forces who served in female cultural support teams receive proper official recognition and credit for their service. Female cultural support teams were informal groups of women who worked alongside U.S. military units in Afghanistan and other locations to conduct cultural outreach and gather intelligence in communities where male soldiers couldn't interact with women due to local customs. The bill aims to formalize recognition of this service in military records and benefits. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects current and former military members—predominantly women—who served in these cultural support teams, as well as their families. These individuals may be seeking formal acknowledgment of their service for purposes like veteran benefits, employment, or military credit records. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA). No specific provisions or details about how credit would be formally granted are listed in the available information.
Litigation Transparency Act of 2025
# Litigation Transparency Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Would Do** The Litigation Transparency Act of 2025 would require greater disclosure of information related to civil lawsuits, legal fees, and court costs. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the summary provided, legislation with this title typically aims to make legal proceedings and associated expenses more publicly visible and accessible. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact parties involved in civil litigation (plaintiffs and defendants), attorneys, courts, and potentially the general public by changing what lawsuit information becomes public record. It could affect both individual lawsuits and larger settlement agreements. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it's under review and hasn't yet advanced to a full floor vote. At this stage, it could be revised, combined with other bills, or remain in committee without further action. *Note: For complete details on specific provisions (such as which documents must be disclosed or any exceptions), you would need to review the full text of HR 1109 on Congress.gov.*
PEACE Act
I don't have access to the specific details of HR 5632 (the PEACE Act) from the 119th Congress needed to provide you with an accurate summary. To give you a factual, non-partisan overview, I would need information about: - What the bill's actual provisions are - Who specifically would be affected - The stated purpose and intended outcomes **I'd recommend checking:** - **Congress.gov** - Search "HR 5632" for the full text, summary, and status - **The bill sponsor's website** - Rep. Darrell Issa's official site may have details - **Nonpartisan analysis sources** - Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports offer objective summaries If you can share the bill's text or a summary section, I'd be happy to help explain it in plain language!
FIREARM Act
# FIREARM Act Summary **What the Bill Does:** The FIREARM Act would protect gun dealers and firearms retailers from losing their federal licenses if they voluntarily report certain violations to the ATF (the federal agency that regulates firearms) before the agency discovers them during an inspection. The bill specifically exempts violations that are "correctable"—meaning they can be fixed—as long as the violation didn't involve illegally selling a gun to someone prohibited from owning one (like a felon). The protections would apply retroactively, meaning they could cover violations already reported in the past. **Who It Affects:** This bill primarily affects federal firearms licensees (gun dealers, retailers, and distributors) by giving them an incentive to self-report compliance mistakes without fear of losing their operating license. It could indirectly affect gun buyers and the ATF's enforcement capacity, though violations involving illegal sales to prohibited persons would still face enforcement action. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives.
To define "showerhead" for the purpose of determining the acceptable water pressure for a showerhead, and for other purposes.
# Summary of HR 5042 **What the Bill Would Do** HR 5042 would establish a specific federal definition of what counts as a "showerhead" for purposes of water pressure regulations. Currently, federal law limits showerheads to 2.5 gallons of water per minute to conserve water. This bill appears designed to clarify which products fall under that regulation, potentially allowing certain showerhead designs to exceed current water flow limits or be exempt from the restrictions. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would affect manufacturers and consumers of showerheads, as well as households' water usage and utility costs. It's currently in committee, meaning it hasn't advanced to a full House vote yet. Limited public information is available about the specific definitions being proposed or the bill's exact provisions beyond its title. **Key Point** This bill touches on the ongoing debate between water conservation regulations and consumer preferences for water pressure—a topic that has generated interest from both environmental advocates and those who favor less restrictive appliance standards.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1444 Main Street in Ramona, California, as the "Archie Moore Post Office Building".
# HR 4982 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would rename the post office located at 1444 Main Street in Ramona, California to the "Archie Moore Post Office Building." If passed, the building would officially bear this new name, though the postal facility would continue operating normally with no changes to its services or operations. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill primarily affects the local Ramona community and honors Archie Moore, who has significance to the area. The bill is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. It was sponsored by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA-48).
SIPS Act
# SIPS Act Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of HR 4887 (the SIPS Act) in the current database available to me. To provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would do, who it affects, and its key provisions, I would need access to the full bill text or legislative summary. **What I can tell you:** - It's currently in committee (early stage of the legislative process) - It was introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California) - The abbreviation "SIPS" likely indicates the subject matter, but the full name isn't shown in your provided information **To get accurate information, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 4887" - Checking the bill's full text and official summary - Looking at the bill's status and any committee reports If you can share the bill's full title or more details about what SIPS stands for, I'd be happy to help summarize it more thoroughly.
Modern Firearm Safety Act
# Modern Firearm Safety Act (HR 4676) Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Modern Firearm Safety Act is currently in committee and details about its specific provisions are not publicly available in standard legislative databases. Without access to the bill's full text, I cannot provide accurate information about what it would actually do if passed. **What We Know** - It was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) in the 119th Congress - It is currently in the committee review stage, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House - The bill's title suggests it relates to firearm safety measures, but the specific provisions remain unclear from available information **How to Learn More** To get accurate details about this bill's actual provisions, who it affects, and its key features, I'd recommend checking Congress.gov (the official legislative tracking website), which provides full bill text, summaries, and updates on its progress through the legislative process.
SOIL Act of 2025
# SOIL Act of 2025 Summary I don't have access to the specific text or detailed provisions of HR 4454 (the SOIL Act of 2025), so I can't provide you with an accurate summary of what this bill would actually do. While I can see it's a House bill sponsored by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) that's currently in committee, the actual content—which would tell us the bill's purpose, who it affects, and what changes it proposes—isn't available in the information provided. To get a reliable summary, I'd recommend checking: - **Congress.gov** - the official source for all federal legislation, with bill text and summaries - **Your representative's website** - often includes their sponsored bills' descriptions - **Reputable news sources** - major outlets often cover significant legislation If you can provide the bill text or more details about its subject matter, I'd be happy to help summarize it in plain language.
Hookah Clarification Act of 2025
# Hookah Clarification Act of 2025 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Hookah Clarification Act of 2025 (HR 4404) aims to clarify how federal tobacco regulations apply to hookah products and hookah lounges. While the bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, hookah clarification bills typically address how existing FDA tobacco rules—originally written for cigarettes and modern e-cigarettes—should be interpreted when applied to traditional water pipe smoking devices and the businesses that operate them. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact hookah lounge owners and operators, as well as manufacturers and retailers of hookah products. It could also affect consumers who use hookahs, and federal agencies like the FDA that enforce tobacco regulations. The clarification could influence how states and local governments regulate hookah businesses. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Without more detailed information about the bill's specific language, it's unclear whether it seeks to increase, decrease, or simply clarify existing regulatory requirements.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1157 West Mission Avenue in Escondido, California, as the "Captain E. Royce Williams Post Office Building".
# HR 4283 Summary **What the bill does:** This is a naming bill that would officially designate the U.S. Postal Service building located at 1157 West Mission Avenue in Escondido, California, as the "Captain E. Royce Williams Post Office Building." The change would be ceremonial—it doesn't affect how the post office operates or any of its services. **Who it affects:** The primary impact would be on residents and businesses in Escondido, California, who use this postal facility. The bill appears intended to honor Captain E. Royce Williams, though the bill itself doesn't provide details about who he is or why he's being commemorated. **Current status:** The bill is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on by the full House. It was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA).
WILTR Act of 2025
# WILTR Act of 2025 Summary I appreciate your request, but I'm unable to provide a meaningful summary of this bill. The bill information you've provided contains only basic metadata (bill number, sponsor, and status), but lacks the actual text or a description of what the bill would do. Without access to the bill's substantive provisions—such as what programs it would create, modify, or eliminate, or what rules it would change—I cannot accurately explain its contents or impacts to you. **To get the information you're looking for**, I'd recommend: - Visiting **Congress.gov** and searching "HR 4181" to read the full bill text and summary - Checking the bill's official summary section, which typically explains its purpose in plain language - Reviewing any analysis from nonpartisan sources like the Congressional Research Service If you can share the bill's summary or key provisions, I'd be happy to help explain them in accessible language.
Pro Codes Act
# Pro Codes Act Summary I don't have access to the specific details of HR 4072 (Pro Codes Act) to provide you with an accurate summary of what it would do, who it affects, or its key provisions. While I can confirm it's a House bill in the 119th Congress sponsored by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), I cannot reliably describe its contents without risking providing incorrect information. **To get accurate information about this bill, I'd recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching for "HR 4072" - Reviewing the bill text directly - Checking summaries from nonpartisan sources like Congress.gov or the Congressional Research Service I apologize I can't provide the summary you requested. If you have access to the bill text or additional details about its purpose, I'd be happy to help summarize that information for you.
Pro Codes Act
# Pro Codes Act (HR 4009) Summary I don't have detailed information about the specific provisions of HR 4009 (the Pro Codes Act) in my training data. To give you an accurate, factual summary, I would need access to the full bill text, which I cannot reliably reconstruct from the limited details provided. **What I can tell you:** This is a House bill sponsored by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) that is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. **To get accurate information, I recommend:** - Visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 4009" for the official bill text and summary - Checking your representative's website for their position on the bill - Reviewing nonpartisan sources like CRS (Congressional Research Service) reports if available This approach will ensure you have correct details about what the bill would actually do and who it affects.
Valor Has No Expiration Act
# Valor Has No Expiration Act Summary **What It Does:** The Valor Has No Expiration Act would allow military service members and veterans to wear military medals and decorations they've earned at any time, without time restrictions. Currently, regulations may limit when certain service members can wear their awards in official or public settings. This bill would remove those limitations, enabling veterans and active-duty personnel to display their earned honors whenever they choose. **Who It Affects:** Military service members, both active duty and retired veterans, would be the primary beneficiaries. The change would affect military regulations and potentially federal employee policies regarding uniform standards and dress codes. **Current Status:** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) but remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. No significant action has been taken on the measure at this time.
To redesignate Gravelly Point Park, located along the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Arlington County, Virginia, as the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park, and for other purposes.
# HR 3396 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would rename Gravelly Point Park in Arlington County, Virginia to the Nancy Reagan Memorial Park. Gravelly Point Park is a public park located along the George Washington Memorial Parkway, a scenic route that connects several important monuments and parks in the Washington, D.C. area. The renaming would honor former First Lady Nancy Reagan. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The change would primarily affect local residents and visitors to the Arlington area who use or visit the park. The bill was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill's specific purposes beyond the park redesignation are not detailed in the available information.
NORRA of 2025
# NORRA of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Does** The No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA) would restrict the power of federal district courts to issue injunctions—court orders that require someone to do or stop doing something. Currently, courts can sometimes issue "nationwide injunctions" that apply to entire states or the whole country. This bill would limit injunctions to only the parties directly involved in a specific case, preventing them from having broader effects. **Who It Affects** This bill would impact anyone involved in federal lawsuits, including individuals, businesses, nonprofits, and government agencies. It could affect the effectiveness of legal challenges to federal policies—for example, if someone sues to block a federal regulation, the court could only stop that regulation for the person who sued, not for everyone. This could lead to conflicting rulings across different courts and create inconsistent application of federal law. **Current Status** HR 1526 has passed the House of Representatives. The bill now moves to the Senate for consideration. The sponsor is Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA).
Freedom from Unfair Gun Taxes Act of 2025
# Freedom from Unfair Gun Taxes Act of 2025 – Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would limit federal excise taxes on firearms and ammunition. Currently, the federal government collects an 11% excise tax on guns and an 11% excise tax on ammunition, with revenues typically funding wildlife conservation and shooting sports programs. The bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, but based on its title, it would likely reduce or eliminate these taxes, characterizing them as "unfair." **Who It Affects:** The bill would impact gun manufacturers, ammunition producers, and retailers (who may pass tax savings to consumers), as well as hunters and gun owners who might see lower prices. It would also affect the federal programs that currently receive funding from these excise taxes, primarily the Wildlife Restoration Program, which funds state fish and wildlife agencies and outdoor recreation projects. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 2442 remains in committee and has not advanced for a full House vote. The bill was introduced by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) in the 119th Congress. Further legislative details about specific tax reductions or exemptions are not yet available in the public record.